FANDOM

YamiWheeler

  • I am Male
Welcome to YamiWheeler's Talk Page
Please remember to use a header and to sign your posts. To leave a message, click here.

Ninja'd

He actually mad that you went Ninja Master on him. I can see a way to get rid of that ninja; "Book of Moon" and "Nobleman of Crossout" - a common way to kill a stalling monster(s). --iFredCat 20:45, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for that, now I can archive this talk page.--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 20:52, May 14, 2013 (UTC)
You're welcome, friend - glad to help you with this. --iFredCat 21:02, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

Hohohoho

I am sure he can't stand bouncing on your lap when you're wearing the red dress with white beard, which could reach the bottom of your ribcage. So that mean that user is getting a bag of coal on the Christmas this year. Haha. --iFredCat 20:59, May 18, 2013 (UTC)

I'm not gonna lie, I have no idea what you just said.--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 21:24, May 18, 2013 (UTC)
I repeat myself, that user who just quitted on you while you "bounced" his monster on the third turn would not be a big fan of Santa Clause. I just physical joked by using the "Bounce" word referring to you bounced him on your lap while you're being "Santa". So yea, pathetic player he is. --iFredCat 21:28, May 18, 2013 (UTC)
Oh, right, yeah. It's annoying. Just a waste of time when people do that.--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 21:45, May 18, 2013 (UTC)
Tell them to beheading themselves if they tried to leaving the game. That will shut them up. --iFredCat 22:22, May 18, 2013 (UTC)

Look at other Artwork Article

When "Elemental HERO Burstinatrix" was released her artwork was made more detailed compared to her anime artwork. The English version of "Elemental HERO Burstinatrix" has her outfit altered to be less revealing and her bust is reduced.

In the international version, less of Ehren's left leg is visible under her skirt.

Like the other Fortune Ladies, the International version of "Fortune Lady Dark" has >>her<< skin recolored, to make it look she's wearing more clothing and to make the card less revealing.

Yeah, all other Artworks do have that the same way, eh? Those three were actually disagreed. --iFredCat 18:50, May 29, 2013 (UTC)

And if you want Elfobia to be writing like that - you gotta have to wiping all of those articles that we didn't manage to cover and fixed them into the way you liked them to be. If you can't, then it's better to let Elfobia's article alone. Thank you for helping. =^_^= --iFredCat 18:55, May 29, 2013 (UTC)
Don't you worry, I plan to. And thanks for being a freak who wants to treat cards like people.--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 18:56, May 29, 2013 (UTC)
Yup, him too. --iFredCat 18:57, May 29, 2013 (UTC)
Difference is that, he isn't real.--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 18:58, May 29, 2013 (UTC)

Dragon Ball Reference

Is that ok for Tyler to have a reference of Trunks included? I am only check to make sure if that's okay or not. --iFredCat 14:45, June 2, 2013 (UTC)

Glassjaw in Hall of Shame

Actually I have to disagree with the wording under that. Normally Glassjaw's effect cannot be activated if its detached as Xyz Material because it's normally as a cost. However, only in the displayed case was its usage correct because that is part of an effect. I'd still make that clear though; you said "for an Xyz Monster effect"; Glassjaw's effect says that it must be sent to the graveyard "by" an effect. 67.242.169.33 (talk) 22:16, June 2, 2013 (UTC)

That's all semantics, my Hall of Fame isn't a scientific dictionary and I'm not going to stiffen up the descriptions just because a few people might interpret it incorrectly. "Battlin' Boxer Lead Yoke" doesn't detach as a cost, period, so I don't see the confusion, anyway. Regardless, I specifically mentioned "for an Xyz Monster effect," not an "Xyz Monster cost" because I'm well aware of the difference, so there's no issue with the wording.--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 22:47, June 2, 2013 (UTC)

I am with this IP-Addressed User - I had some discussion with this issue before and it was settling of Detach Glassjaw as Xyz Material is as of Cost, not by Effect therefore Glassjaw can and will missing his chance to activating. --iFredCat 22:39, June 2, 2013 (UTC)

You're obviously misunderstanding what he's trying to say. "Battlin' Boxer Glassjaw" will not "miss the timing" when detached by "Battlin Boxer Lead Yoke". That isn't what he's saying.--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 22:47, June 2, 2013 (UTC)
Other than Yoke, that is. --iFredCat 22:52, June 2, 2013 (UTC)
Added a new unofficial ruling in, just to prevent the further "stupidity" argument. --iFredCat 12:41, June 3, 2013 (UTC)

FHD Remastered

hey! I was just wondering where you found the remastered picture of the Five-Headed Dragon. I have the four Duel Box DVDs which remastered the latter half of the series. But I was wondering if you knew anything about the first half of the second anime series and remastered DVDs. Rob52xbhs (talkcontribs) 22:28, June 6, 2013 (UTC)Rob

JOTL (TCG) names

If you need to know the TCG names, it can be found in this forum under JOTL (TCG) section. WinterNightmare (talkcontribs) 21:41, July 21, 2013 (UTC)

Oh, cool. Thanks. A bit busy ATM, I'll work on it soon.--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 21:43, July 21, 2013 (UTC)

RE:Wonder Wings

Ark explained that nobody in Japan uploaded it yet 'cuz it seems the copyright laws are really tough currently, so we'll only be getting those when someone on NAC or Pojo or anywhere else orders the single from Japan and uploads it. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talkcontribs) 15:02, November 20, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, Cheesedude showed me that link shortly after I PMed you. That sucks, but hopefully we'll get it soon. I'd just buy the CD, if it wasn't so expensive for only 1 track that I want. :/--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 15:06, November 20, 2013 (UTC)

Argent Force and Number 99

You know, honestly, I agree with you, but I got into a big argument with one of the admins about it for about two days, and gave up because he wouldn't budge and it's ultimately his say. If he shows up again, you can try and convince him. The logic he tried to use on me was it was the same as why TG Hyper Librarian doesn't activate upon its own summon, even though that's a single card and we're dealing with two separate ones, so come up with your arguments now. I hope you get it, 'cause I made a really good OTK using Hope Dragun, Argent Chaos Force, and Otomatopia. A Wikia contirutor (talkcontribs) 20:28, June 20, 2014 (UTC)

Mm, I'm chatting with that admin on Skype and everyone seems to be on the same page now regarding this.--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 20:40, June 20, 2014 (UTC)
Good to hear. If all goes well, I'd like to be able to post that OTK again. I was pretty upset when I had to pull it down, especially because whoever I was dealing with didn't seem to want to budge on the issue. A Wikia contirutor (talkcontribs) 20:46, June 20, 2014 (UTC)

Raid Raptors in The Secret of Evolution

(This was originally on the talk page of PhotonLegion95, who removed it, ironically calling my argument irrational, despite him not even having a cohesive argument or reason for edit warring, period. I'm chronicling it here to show evidence of the edit war and his "stances" on the argument.)

Can I see your proof that other "Raid Raptor" monsters are in it?--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 12:38, October 5, 2014 (UTC)

Evidently, you are mentally impaired and can't understand the argument I'm making, nor can you form an argument of your own. I'll be taking it to a moderator instead.--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 12:45, October 5, 2014 (UTC)

1. I have made no insult to you what so ever. The fact that you decide to resort to that actually, says more about your mentality, and IMO your maturity, than it does about me. 2. Raid Raptors ARE an archetype. Raid Raptors - Rise Falcon, is apart of that archetype. Therefore the archetype is featured in Secrets of Eternity - PhotonLegion95 (talkcontribs) 12:47, October 5, 2014 (UTC)
No, I'm calling it like I see it. You can't understand the basic argument of myself or Elvin Kara, who are more experienced on this Wiki than you are and KNOW how the Wiki defines an archetype. 1 card is NOT an archetype. Until more "Raid Raptor" monsters are confirmed, the archetype of "Raid Raptors" is not introduced in this Set. Moreover, rather than trying to even make an argument, you undo with comments like "it is an archetype except it and move on." We don't work like that on the Wiki. This is not the PhotonLegion95 Wiki. We don't do things just because you want us to, even if they're wrong. Now 2 people have disagreed with you, so yes, either you are mentally impaired or just really, really stupid. I'm putting my money on the latter.--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 12:52, October 5, 2014 (UTC)
Firstly, don't assume that I don't know how an archetype is defined. And, unless I'm mistaken there are cards supporting the Raid Raptors. Weather they are released or not DOES NOT negated the fact that they are an archetype. An archetype that is having tis cards represented in a set. PhotonLegion95 (talkcontribs) 12:57, October 5, 2014 (UTC)
This is the problem with anime fanboys like you. "Raid Raptors" will likely BE confirmed as an archetype in this Set later on when more members are added, but you can't wait that long and choose to infect the Wiki with your speculation, which is akin to spreading misinformation and lies. People will look at that sentence "introduces the "Raid Raptors" archetype" and scroll down expecting to find several cards, and find only one. "Where is the archetype?" How do you even know there will be more added? Are you a Konami insider? No, you're just an ADHD fanboy with nothing better to do.--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 12:57, October 5, 2014 (UTC)
You don't know how an archetype is defined if you're making this argument. "Raid Raptors" is not an archetype in the TCG/OCG yet. There is only one member confirmed. In the context of the page, which is "The Secret of Evolution," whether or not it is an archetype in the anime is completely irrelevant. Once again, you are spreading lies and misinformation.--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 12:59, October 5, 2014 (UTC)
I'm not but Ok. PhotonLegion95 (talkcontribs) 13:00, October 5, 2014 (UTC)

Talk Page Policy

(Continued from here.)

So how does not relevant anymore mean it wasn't relevant at the time? And why does not relevant anymore mean that it should just be removed at your whim? Are you going to go through ALL the talk pages that have no longer relevant information and blank every page that contains purely that? Also, can you please explain what it is that I was meant to understand about your initial blank? You offered no explanation with it, making you somewhat hypocritical raging your comment about offering no good explanation for my revert, when you yourself offered no explanation for the edit to begin with. So please do explain how I'm expected to understand something that was not offered to begin with. PhotonLegion95 (talkcontribs) 23:45, February 1, 2015 (UTC)

"not relevant" is not the same thing as "not in use." A talk page can be in use, but not have relevant content, and nobody said it was removed because it wasn't in use.
Ignoring the fact that you went ahead and reverted it with no explanation whatsoever and thus are arguing a hypocritical point, I didn't think I needed to explain something so basic and obvious, as anyone who actually bothered reading the page would deduce that it went against the talk header policy. Admittedly my mistake for expecting people to have some common sense.
Also, yes, removing ALL the misused talk pages would be the point, that's what many admins endeavor to do from what I've seen, as that's the entire point of the talk header - to remove misused talk pages and minimize the increase of further misused pages, two things that you actually did the opposite of by reverting my edit and then commenting.
Now, since you're just arguing over me not leaving an explanation, and have no real leg to stand on in terms of the actual content of the page, which is the real crux of your complaint, how about we wait for Cheesedude to respond so he can tell you himself, since you're so against discussing things with other users.--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 23:54, February 1, 2015 (UTC)
Regarding the talk page; There is a comment on there regarding the attributes/types of the cards. Now, as looking at the edit history there have been times where such things have been added without confirmation, would you be kind enough to explain how that contradicts the talk header? Because, this may just be my opinion, using the talk page(s) to question the validity of information and making adjustments if necessary, falls under the category of 'improving the article' which is a valid use of said talk pages. Care to explain how such a use is not relevant, or did you not read the whole of the page like your suggesting I didn't, or just ignoring it completely?
Regarding you recent comment on Cheesedudes TP; I felt that the more appropriate place to address you would be your talk page. This is why I referred to it as "spam" on his, unless you'd like to argue that this wouldn't be the case. PhotonLegion95 (talkcontribs) 00:30, February 2, 2015 (UTC)
Once again, if you actually looked at the page, the Types/Attributes are already "???" and thus that comment is not relevant. Also, you could have added that one comment back if you felt it was relevant at the time, but you chose to be a lazy editor and reverted the entire page instead.
Now you've decided to jump the gun before a decision is made by Cheesedude, risking a potential edit war.
This all just goes to show that you have no argument and are arguing for the sake of arguing, and thus are the confrontational one in this situation. Rather than come and talk to me, you chose to blindly revert and then make a complaint to an admin before even trying to understand the reasoning behind the edit. Now you've decided this is the right place to address me, when it should have been the right place from the start.--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 00:43, February 2, 2015 (UTC)
And if you look at the edit history of the actual page, not the talk page, you will see that around the time that that particular comment was made, the types and attributes did have an actual listing on them. So again, how is that not relevant to improving the article? Considering the accusations you've made against me in the past, I'd assume you'd appreciate a fellow user trying to ensure that only confirmed information is shown on pages, and would like to acknowledge them reaching out to the rest of the community to ensure that the information was accurate. Or are you using a different context of 'relevant' in your argument to mean both, 'not relating to improving the article' & 'no longer important' (as that comment, arguably had some significance in terms of confirmed information). PhotonLegion95 (talkcontribs) 09:45, February 2, 2015 (UTC)
Once again, if you felt that way at the time, why did you revert the entire page and not just the "relevant" section? Why didn't you list that in the editing description? Could it be that you had no leg to stand on for this argument and are now desperately attempting to pull some feeble defense out of your ass that completely contradicts your actions? I think so. This is not about "accurate information," talk pages are not informative articles. Anyway, I'm bored of dealing with you cherry picking which one of my points to respond to and ignoring the others. I also foresee repeating myself a lot in the future if this continues, so I'm going to end this now. Any further comments of yours on this subject here will be reverted. Next time, try to apply a bit of common sense.--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 13:06, February 2, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Formula Synchron

1st Edition STBL-EN041

50091196 (Copyright sign) 1996 KAZUKI TAKAHASHI

And why would I get banned when I'm right?--LeoUchiha289 (talkcontribs) 01:13, March 21, 2015 (UTC)

You're not right, that's why, now listen. That print was released in Starstrike Blast, as you can see here. There have been numerous erratas since then. The image you see on the main page is the most recent one, from the Legendary Collection 5D's Mega-Pack, released in 2014. Your card is from 2010. Newer cards have PSCT which your card does not have. Now, please stop reverting the edits.--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 01:16, March 21, 2015 (UTC)
No I am right. The card we see on the main page is an edit. It's not the real card. You have no real proof that it has been changed.--LeoUchiha289 (talkcontribs) 01:21, March 21, 2015 (UTC)
You're making a claim that it's been edited - where's your evidence?--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 01:23, March 21, 2015 (UTC)
Other than the fact that there are untold amounts of copies of the card with that text in the world? Odds are, there's at least one near you. The errata is real. You've already been warned. Revert again and you will be blocked. As YamiWheeler said, if you provide actual evidence, that would be one thing. Cheesedude (talkcontribs) 01:24, March 21, 2015 (UTC)
You want a screen shot of my card for proof? Well then here.
File:Formula Synchron.jpg
that's the real copy. --LeoUchiha289 (talkcontribs) 01:35, March 21, 2015 (UTC)
No one is denying that you have the card. I'm asking for evidence that the one we have on the page has been edited, but you've gone and reverted again, so there's nothing that can be done.--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 01:38, March 21, 2015 (UTC)
I just showed you evidence. I posted the actual card and it's real effect.--LeoUchiha289 (talkcontribs) 01:40, March 21, 2015 (UTC)
I honestly don't believe anyone could be so dense, so I've concluded that you're trolling us. To what gain, I have no idea, but I have to fix the formatting every time you leave a message, so do me a favour and don't leave one. Thanks.--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 01:45, March 21, 2015 (UTC)
I have no reason to troll and I'm not dense. --LeoUchiha289 (talkcontribs) 01:49, March 21, 2015 (UTC)
No one is denying the card you have is real. That does not make the card the wiki has fake. There are things called Erratas. Cheesedude (talkcontribs) 02:03, March 21, 2015 (UTC)

Number List

[Background: FAYAL decided to add some bad fanslations here, on a list he supposedly created to 'help the Wiki.' When people obviously objected, since fanslations only spread confusion (amongst other reasons), he responded to PhotonLegion95 with this. After that, he reverted back to his fanslations, which were promptly removed again. Then, there was a discussion on his talk page (documented below), explaining why his edits were not going to be accepted. He cried and didn't like being told the truth, so he deleted some points. This topic chronicles the entire exchange.]

(in response to FAYAL's edits)

You aware that listing the Numbers with your own name, on a page that isn't your user page, is in no way convenient to anyone reading it if your not going to list the actual, official, names we have for them. It'll just confuse anyone reading into why they have different names for no apparent reason, other than you want to change them with no authority. Or, if you are going to ignore the official names, not following standard naming convention, such as you've done with 37/38, isn't going to help either. PhotonLegion95 (talkcontribs) 10:15, March 24, 2015 (UTC)

I'm not some dumb fanboy who pretends to help just because I THINK I can make my contribution to the card game. I changed those names because the other ones are redundant, lame and inconsequential. They're going to get changed when/if they get translated into the game because of that, and I just happen to name them differently with that in mind.
Plus, who the hell said that I was okay with you editing my own thoughts, however brief or unsettling as they were? I don't edit people's word because I consider it to be some form of foul play. It's like if I were to edit your profile and replace every subject with the words "I'm a loser," or tripled every letter to make it unreadable. You weren't the first one to make that list, and even if you were, you didn't do a damn thing. If you wanted it fixed, make a second one, and one-up me in a way that I can get behind: I would consider that to be the civilized way to screw me over, and I wouldn't feel the need to get in your way to defend how I think.
I don't have the patience to abide by the rules made up by idiots or my equals. If there's one thing that this game has taught me that will actually stick, it's that not every name matters. Plus, it's a talk page, the only reason YOU'RE the one correcting me is because the rules don't apply. If they did, everything would be deleted for being in the things being formed as questions or opinions.
So, if you'd kindly, ROLL IT UP SIDEWAYS AND QUIT SCREWING WITH ME. —This unsigned comment was made by FAYAL (talkcontribs) 15:28, March 24, 2015‎ (UTC)
You've got no right to snap at Photon. You're the one acting like a internet troll. Leave the names go until we know for sure what they are called in English. If you want to give them your own names, join a fanon wiki like ycm.wikia.com --Rocket.knight.777 (talkcontribs) 16:00, March 24, 2015 (UTC)
I'm going to wait for other admins to chime in on this, but since your list was made "For the sake of the people who are new to Yu-Gi-Oh", then I don't think giving some of the Numbers fan-made unofficial names is the best thing to do, especially since Viz Media has given them somewhat official English names. If you want to keep the fan-made names, then you can make your own list on a subuser page of yours, like User:FAYAL/Numbers. --UltimateKuriboh (talkcontribs) 16:32, March 24, 2015 (UTC)
Just a few points I'd like to make about your response on my tp.
1. What ever words you use to describe those names, thats your opinion. Which is fine. But, if your going to provide a list for people, and mean for it to be convenient, then it should use the exact name that is provided for it, or, if you really must use a fan-name, follow how they would be named in the TCG, e.g. name like those held by No. 37, are usually shortened to remove a lot of the waffle, in this case the "Hope Woven Dragon" would be lost and simply called "Spider Shark".
2. The names provided are not inconsequential. At this time, they are the only official acknowledgment of the names we have for those cards. The only time they will stop being so is if Konami change them. Until then, they are the names that should be used to reference them in any, non-peronsal (i.e. user space) capacity.
3. Calling them lame is completely subjective and I'm not even going to bother commenting further.
4. As the names given by an official source, they are not redundant. If a source higher in the hierarchy, in this case, the actual cards, comes along naming them something else, then, and only then will the cards become redundant.
5. If the list is meant for the purpose you say its meant for, a convenient way for people to know what "Number" monsters have appeared in what media form, that is not your opinion, that is a service you are providing, via the wiki, to interested parties. In that, you must be factual, objective and not pour your opinion on how they will be handled in to the mix. By using your "fan-names" on that page you are not doing any of this. Nor are you being convenient, as you claim, by presenting unconfirmed names, and linking them to the actual name, that is confusing if you want to label it as anything.
6. This is nothing like you editing my profile. What is in my user space, is in my interest. A talk page on the wiki is in the interest of the article in relates to or the convenience of the reader. What your comparing is making something less confusing, and more convenient to a reader, and what the wiki would consider vandalism.
7. No, not every name will matter. But, until we get Koanmi's names for these monsters, then the names provided by the english source material are the only ones that matter because they are the only official ones that we have to go by. PhotonLegion95 (talkcontribs) 18:41, March 24, 2015 (UTC)
I saw your dubious message on PhotonLegion95's page, and I thought I'd throw in my two cents. Your list is on a public talk page and if you intend to market it as a list meant to help other players on this Wiki, you have to play by the Wiki's rules. Otherwise, like he said, put it on your own talk page where you can have anything you want in any form you want, because it doesn't affect or matter to anyone else.
While I'm here, I thought I'd take the time to tell you why your fanboy names are unsuitable:
Number 37: Spinner Shark - Loses the "Utopia" meaning entirely, and that's pretty major considering that card's history is so invested in those three monsters. Even disregarding that, what's wrong with just Spider Shark, anyway? A bit try-hard, if you ask me.
Number 38: Hope Dragon Titan - The fact that you criticize these names and then come out with this makes me laugh, because it shows you have no idea what you're talking about. "Number 38: Hope Harbinger Dragon Titanic Galaxy" is part of the "Galaxy" archetype; your fanboy name doesn't take that into consideration, meaning that it has a 0% chance of ever being made real. Also, you leave in the allusion to Hope here but ignore it in Number 37. Inconsistent.
Number 70: Enemy of Man and Number 77: Deadly Enemies of Man - These are just ugly. The word Deadly is used in Number 70's original name, yet you omit it in your fanslation and add it to Number 77 instead. This disregarding the fact that one could argue that sins are a part of mankind, so your name makes little sense as a reference to the original.
Anyway, that's four different people (including an admin) who have told you to stop now, so let me ask you - are we done here, or do you want to dig yourself into a deeper hole?--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 00:43, March 25, 2015 (UTC)

Legion the Fiend Jester

First, I think you need to calm down. This isn't a case of vandalism, please stop treating it as such. Saying "Even if you are right about why that is (and I don't think you are), the fact remains the same - it is that way" offers nothing but your own opinion. You say that video game artwork contributed nothing to the OCG/TCG/anime artworks, when in reality most manga artworks were black and white before the video games decided the color (and pose, in some cases).

"You going in and reordering everything doesn't offer any bit of extra context." In your opinion, of course. I previously stated the benefits to explaining it in chronological order.

Finally, please search around for specific regulations before assuming things should be a certain way. The question was officially answered by an administrator here. It was in explicit terms stated that, it should be chronological. I don't want to have an edit war here, but I feel like I've adequately explained myself already. -SlashMan (talkcontribs) 01:23, May 11, 2015 (UTC)

But with all that being said, you fail to address when I brought up where an administrator confirmed that chronological order is preferred. Once again, that's Forum:Artworks_and_Tips_Section. I see no point in continuing to dispute your preferences. -SlashMan (talkcontribs) 03:01, May 11, 2015 (UTC)
Very well, but I've backed up the reasoning for my edits with a judgment that should still be considered relevant. Please consider this before automatically reverting. -SlashMan (talkcontribs) 03:12, May 11, 2015 (UTC)

I'm Sorry

Hi YamiWheeler,

I am so sorry, my computer was acting up on me and it kept reverting the edits on that discussion page. I didn't mean to cause any trouble, =) --ToonPegasus (talkcontribs) 01:18, June 1, 2015 (UTC)

It's no problem. I'm sorry for jumping the gun, I'm used to dealing with less considerate users.--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 06:14, June 1, 2015 (UTC)
Thank you; I completely understand. But you were right though - thank you for fixing the name and for your kindness. =) --ToonPegasus (talkcontribs) 14:28, June 1, 2015 (UTC)

Card Artworks

Alright, that works for including the manga vs TCG artworks. I just wasn't sure how to include the information since the manga references were usually on the trivia pages, while the artwork pages usually only had card depictions. -SlashMan (talkcontribs) 01:28, July 6, 2015 (UTC)

Yep, it's good for now. It may need tweaking in future though.--YamiWheeler (talkcontribs) 19:21, July 8, 2015 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.