Hi and welcome to the Yu-Gi-Oh! wiki! Thank you for your edit to the Burn! page.

If you need help, you can consult these pages:

If you would like to make a suggestion or ask for assistance, feel free start a topic at the forums or contact an administrator.

Japanese names

Don't make up Japanese names for articles which have no official name. Unlike Zuzu's bracelet, none of the other bracelets received a name in the anime or a magazine. -- The Talk Goblin 20:35, November 26, 2015 (UTC)


The reason why I reverted a large amount of your edits before this is because Cheesedude specified who exactly the opponents were. You took those specifications out. This is because the characters Dueled only a small amount of members of each faction, not the faction as a whole. ChaosGallade (talkcontribs) 09:19, January 18, 2016 (UTC)

"Unofficial members"

There's no such thing as an "unofficial Lancer." Neither Zuzu nor Sora have any of the benefits of being a Lancer without actually being named a Lancer. Lancers' benefits: modified Duel Disks with the ability to produce "Solid Vision with Mass" without the help of an ARC system, with the custom Action Field "Crossover"; the card "Dimension Mover"; and custom Pendulum Monsters made for their use. At best, they're just allies to the Lancers' cause. --UltimateKuriboh (talkcontribs) 21:36, January 26, 2016 (UTC)

While the section probably still shouldn't be re-added, it came about because the Executive Council decided to count Zuzu's win in the first round as one for the Lancers and Declan himself called her equal in skill to the Lancers. Does that warrant Trivia, maybe? Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 22:04, January 26, 2016 (UTC)
I think UK's rationale is fine here. As for the Council, that's a fair point, but who becomes a Lancer has nothing to do with the Council. Reiji is the one making these decisions, what the Council thinks is entirely irrelevant If you can find a way to integrate that point as trivia without simply adding it in a trivia section of its own, I have no objections. Cheesedude (talkcontribs) 03:47, January 27, 2016 (UTC)

Summoning Methods: Lancers

Reinforcing what UK and Cheesedude have said; get on the talk page and start discussing reasonably. Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 00:06, May 6, 2016 (UTC)

Talk page. Now. You didn't even give him a reason this time. Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 03:25, September 17, 2016 (UTC)


The infobox image is right-aligned. Images go right-left-right-left-etc except in very, very specific circumstances. Do not revert again. You need to stop reverting people (regardless of who they are) without providing an explanation as to why. If you have a specific argument as to WHY we should do something a certain way, you need to make that clear in edit summaries. Thanks, Cheesedude (talkcontribs) 09:08, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

Character biographies

When you're writing character biographies, please keep the tenses consistent. Past tense is highly preferred. ChaosGallade (talkcontribs) 15:24, May 30, 2016 (UTC)

Manual of Style

Follow the Yu-Gi-Oh!:Manual of style more carefully, please. More specifically, follow the quotation marks section of the link. ChaosGallade (talkcontribs) 05:27, May 31, 2016 (UTC)

My bad ChaosGallade, sometimes I can't word the summaries so I be trying the best I could to get it right. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 06:20, May 31, 2016 (UTC)

Talk Before Undo

If you have an issue with my edits on the Lancers article, take it up on the talk page first before you go undoing them. Otherwise, it'll end up blocked again. --Jackpo21 (talkcontribs) 03:23, July 5, 2016 (UTC)

The same can be said about a lot of things on this wikia, like the trivia or the dimension each Lancer came from. The summoning methods are a plot point to Arc-V and I don't appreciate you deleting them every chance you get. On another note, you never really argued your case about it until the page got blocked. --Jackpo21 (talkcontribs) 03:56, July 5, 2016 (UTC)
Which no one bothered to follow up on, leading to Cheesedude forgetting about the block until I reminded him. --Jackpo21 (talkcontribs) 23:45, July 5, 2016 (UTC)
  • Then maybe you can stop undoing my edits and talk it over in the talk page for once. --Jackpo21 (talkcontribs) 01:45, July 6, 2016 (UTC)
  • Well I hope your happy. The Lancers article was blocked again. --Jackpo21 (talkcontribs) 05:13, July 6, 2016 (UTC)

Manual of style

If you've been the one editing the ARC-V character articles, I suggest you follow the Yu-Gi-Oh!:Manual of style more carefully. For instance, it's not right to do this: "monster name's" effect. It's better to do this: The effect of "monster name". ChaosGallade (talkcontribs) 07:12, July 18, 2016 (UTC)

Seconding what Chaos said. English isn't an easy language, and I do appreciate that you add the information, but it is getting a little tiresome to clean up the grammar afterwards. Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 03:08, August 3, 2016 (UTC)
Just another request for you to fix your grammar. Also, we're putting Episode 125 in the Heartland City arc; we don't split arcs in the middle of Duels and Episode 126 is where the story begins to change. Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 05:43, October 10, 2016 (UTC)
I'd like to specify the thing you haven't been following the Manual of style. It's the card names and possessives part. You have to do this: the effect of "[card name]". You don't do this: "[card name]'s] effect.
More specifically, this rule: "It is best to avoid adding a possessive apostrophe s ('s) that is not part of the source to a name in quotation marks." ChaosGallade (talkcontribs) 01:21, March 27, 2017 (UTC)

Template capitalization

Please don't change the capitalization of template names when editing, as you did in this edit with {{anime}}. It makes literally no difference for the wiki software, and only clutters up the diff. Thanks! ディノ千?!? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 05:05, September 28, 2016 (UTC)

Questions about the Awakened Page

Couple of things about the awakened page, 1. Sorry about the edit, did not know about the that they have made the 6th arc. 2. Would Yuto changing body count as awakened? 3. Reference 19 should be with episode 125 right, not 126?

Bdun4 (talkcontribs) 05:13, October 3, 2016 (UTC)


Hey why did you undo all the changes i madeYugosynchropaladin (talkcontribs) 19:51, October 6, 2016 (UTC)yugosynchropaladin

Let's just wait for the episodes to air, the spoilers are making a mess on the pages. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 23:48, October 6, 2016 (UTC)

Duplicate files

DragonEmeperor, you uploaded two files exactly similar to two already existing files, but with a different (and better) name. If you want files to have another name, you just have to tag them with {{Rename}}, if they are in the same format of the ones you would upload (PNG, in this particular case). Do not re-upload them under a different name. Further more, if they are re-uploaded by you with a different format (JPG that you upload as PNG), at least tag the stray ones with {{Delete}}, please. Becasita Pendulum (talkcontribs) 22:01, October 10, 2016 (UTC)

My bad. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 00:47, October 11, 2016 (UTC)

Again, if you re-upload a JPG image as PNG, please tag the JPG one with {{Delete}}. And since anime images don't follow any naming policy, if you could pass the new path, it would be great. E.g., {{Delete|reason=File:Yuya & Yuto in control.png}}.
We really don't want to have copyrighted content floating around meaninglessly. Becasita Pendulum (talkcontribs) 11:27, October 31, 2016 (UTC)

Celina and Lulu

That image that you put on their pages with them cornering Yuya doesn't really feature them. May I suggest the shot with them both in it while the "Parasite Fusioners" cower in fear? It's fine to leave it on the Duel Academy page though. Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 05:25, October 13, 2016 (UTC)


I noticed you undoing edits without giving an explanation of said undoing. Please give your reasoning for undoing things in the future; edits summaries are there for a reason. ChaosGallade (talkcontribs) 20:05, October 16, 2016 (UTC)

Second warning on the above. In addition, you also removed the summary of the latest ARC-V episode when there was clearly nothing wrong with it. Please explain yourself. ChaosGallade (talkcontribs) 07:53, October 17, 2016 (UTC)
The summary was already put back and I decided to just fix it a little instead.DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 09:52, October 17, 2016 (UTC)

You did it again for Yusho's page and started a mini edit war with User:Lol-ionel!. Do NOT do that, please. Do not remove material before you replace it; do it at the same time, after all it's what I do when I clean up your mess. And if you had a problem with Loli's grammar, you are the LAST person to gripe about that. Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 06:06, October 24, 2016 (UTC)

It's important that we give reasons when we undo edits. We need to be considerate that:
  • It's disheartening for someone to have their work rejected without explanation.
  • If your reverts are indeed correct, the other person needs to know what was wrong, so they don't just redo their edit.
  • If people are in disagreement over the content of a page, they need to give their reasons, in order for some resolution to be made.
I think that you have good intentions behind your undos and you're genuinely working to improve the pages, so I'd rather it not come to this. But you've made at least 15 unexplained reverts since your third prompt above. If you continue to undo without making an effort to add an explanation, you will be temporarily blocked from editing. -- Deltaneos (talk) 19:59, October 29, 2016 (UTC)
Just to voice that I also support this, because, DragonEmeperor, I've been keeping an eye on you for several months now; before the messages above, you only reverted with an explanation twice (as far as my records go, at least (not 100% accurate)). I always tried to avoid saying something regarding it, because, just like Deltaneos, I also think you don't have bad intentions. However, everytime you click on "undo", a notification saying "If you are undoing an edit that is not vandalism, explain the reason in the edit summary rather than using only the default message." appears and you never (bar a couple of times) respected it. So I'd also like to leave the note here that I want you to start making use of the edit summary, at least when you revert other people's edits. Thank you. Becasita Pendulum (talkcontribs) 20:08, October 29, 2016 (UTC)
And again, on the Duel Academy (ARC-V) page. Get to the talk page there and discuss with User:Superlogan7437 instead of undoing his edits without telling him why. Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 03:36, October 31, 2016 (UTC)
Good. Thank you. Make sure that you keep it up please. Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 04:12, October 31, 2016 (UTC)
You've made at least thirteen unexplained reverts in the past two weeks. You have been temporarily blocked from editing. -- Deltaneos (talk) 12:19, January 1, 2017 (UTC)

Ya did it again, and it's annoying people. Least you seem to have noticed, but the point shouldn't have had to be made in the first place. Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 02:58, April 26, 2017 (UTC)

What are you talking about. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 04:50, April 26, 2017 (UTC)

You're undoing edits without leaving explanations. It took two instances of this - and a complaint from the other user - to get you to comply, which shouldn't have been necessary in the first place. Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 06:52, April 26, 2017 (UTC)

I did explain this time. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 19:23, April 26, 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, but only on the third undo; you should have done so the first time that you reverted it. Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 22:31, April 26, 2017 (UTC)

Oh for goodness sake; you'd think that you'd folow instruction over something that you've been blocked for. And for that matter, you were wrong this time, so that looks even worse. Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 21:38, April 28, 2017 (UTC)

I thought we go by order. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 21:45, April 28, 2017 (UTC)

Mental State breaks

someone did not read episode 127 summary (Declan interrupts and relays his view of the story, that Leo was so immersed in his incomprehensible research that Henrietta's mental state started to break) (Clayton Carmine 23:55, October 16, 2016 (UTC))

Pages with no links

I suppose you went through all of those pages adding just one link to remove them from pages with no links, correct? You see, the point is not to remove them from there; the point is to clean them. And they still need that clean-up as much as they needed when they didn't have a link. The difference now is that they can't be easily (if at all) tracked. Becasita Pendulum (talkcontribs) 09:37, October 19, 2016 (UTC)

I honestly did try to do all of them, but it got tiring so yeah I did it the lazy way.DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 00:08, October 20, 2016 (UTC)

I'm looking forward to see more from the deck of leo and the awakening of zarc Yamamoto genryusei (talkcontribs) 22:30, October 30, 2016 (UTC)

please stop

BASTA!!! (means stop in Italy) (Lionel Head (talkcontribs) 17:39, November 7, 2016 (UTC))

Lol-ionel, your edits didn't have any source to back them up. No, we don't assume stuff. If an official source says Zarc will be voiced by A and Ray by B, then we add it here. Else, we don't. Becasita Pendulum (talkcontribs) 17:41, November 7, 2016 (UTC) —Last edited at 17:42, November 27, 2016 (UTC). Reason: Fix typo.

More undoing

Could you explain why you reverted this, please? Sure, I can see it doesn't have the best grammar, but some tweaks could put this into place. Why did you revert? And again, no explanation given. DragonEmeperor, this is not to be repeated. Becasita Pendulum (talkcontribs) 17:42, November 27, 2016 (UTC)

Some of the info was in the wrong section and was half done. 0123456789 The Great wasn't even trying to finish the relationships, that's why I reverted it so somebody could try to clean it up. DragonEmeperor 20:01, November 27, 2016 (UTC)
If it was in the wrong section, it means it would have to be moved to the correct section (or the section name being adapted (depending on the case)). If it was half-done, now it's zero-done. At least before, it had something that wasn't erroneous (if it was erroneous, that erroneous part should have been removed; the erroneous part only). Please don't do this again. People try to help; they may not have the time to build the prettiest of the texts, but they try to add some info. If it's not complete, you or anyone else can complete it; don't remove it entirely. Becasita Pendulum (talkcontribs) 20:12, November 27, 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I was wondering why you took down the pictures I added for Zuzu's page. That goes for every other picture I've posted as well. If you are going to take down something someone else posted you should at least give the person a heads up on why and tell him how he can fix whatever mistake he made. And what is this about edit summaries? Are they really necessary? Because I don't understand exactly what I should be typing?

Sign, ----AJ1989---- Denofa 08:55, December 31, 2016 (UTC)

There are a few problems with how you add pictures, but DragonEmeperor here hasn't mentioned this in his edit summaries like we've asked him to in the past. When placing images, they are generally arranged with one on the left, then one on the right, rinse and repeat; they generally aren't placed in the middle of paragraphs but at the top; blank sections aren't added for space (use clear sections if you have to; you should find some examples on certain ARC-V character pages), and sometimes there's too many images for the space. All of which are easily fixed with more than just undoing it. Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 20:33, December 31, 2016 (UTC)

WHAT THE HECK PAL!? Why did you erase all the info I added for Leo Akaba and undo the separation I put down for the death list page? It makes it easier for others to see the difference between the manga & anime! As I said before, give someone a heads up before you undo their hard work! I hate to repeat what my mom says, but that's just common courtesy. Who do you think you are, do you even work for wiki or are you just a user like me? Denofa 06:28, January 1, 2017 (UTC)

Calm down mate. Goodness only knows why he did that; he's always been a bit too friendly with that undo button. He's been asked to give edit summaries before, and if you go to his user page you'll see that he's just an ordinary user.Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 06:38, January 1, 2017 (UTC)
Leo's info was a mess and jumbled all up with different events so I'll fix it later. And the deaths aren't hard to tell the difference. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 07:38, January 1, 2017 (UTC)

What on earth did you do to Jack's page and why? Now I've got to go and fix this mess... Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 06:50, January 16, 2017 (UTC)

Loli's getting irritated with your lack of leaving edit summaries when you undo (and yes, that includes your "stealthy" undoing). Best to make sure that you tell people why you do stuff, lest the admins step in again. Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 22:28, March 10, 2017 (UTC)

Loli need to stay out of my business because you and me put the needed info for the bios, his looked copy & pasted. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 01:48, March 11, 2017 (UTC)
I know, you just need to let him know each time, okay? Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 01:56, March 11, 2017 (UTC)
I'll think about it. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 01:59, March 11, 2017 (UTC)

Drags, you did it again, and this time your edit was wrong. I suggest adjusting your preferences (wiki settings) to remind you to add an edit summary. Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 05:12, March 20, 2017 (UTC)

What edit are you talking about? DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 05:17, March 20, 2017 (UTC)

One on Yuya's page (and thanks for doing the Rollerboots page itself, that one completely slipped my mind). This edit; [[1]].Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 05:22, March 20, 2017 (UTC)

I did that one on purpose in order to revert the deck back into the Duel Academy list (and no problem I been editing every character that appeared in the episode again). DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 05:26, March 20, 2017 (UTC)


It's been agreed to be removed in favour of hardlinks. Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 23:27, January 8, 2017 (UTC)

Bot edits

Stop your edits. When the edits have been made by a bot, that usually means they shouldn't be reverted. At least ask the account why they made those edits? And wait for their response, please. --UltimateKuriboh (talkcontribs) 23:28, January 8, 2017 (UTC)

Sanokal just told me, but I want to know when did the discussion happened for the template. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 23:30, January 8, 2017 (UTC)

Forum:Template:Anime_and_Template:Manga_usage. A month and half with no objections. Regardless, read the discussion. Using a template to replace a basic wiki function like a pipe link is pointless. Cheesedude (talkcontribs) 23:38, January 8, 2017 (UTC)

Edit War

You get to them before I do. That is a legitimate thing; I wait for the subs to come out; you don't and you thus get there before me (not grumping at you for THAT). Thus, by the time I get to them, you've usually added your poorly worded stuff, and it honestly demoralizes me every time I go through and correct it.

You say you like to go into detail, but you go into too MUCH detail that doesn't really describe the character, and is often just reactions that aren't very relevant.

As I've said before, I do appreciate that you add the info in the first place; if nothing else, it's a good base for me to fix. But when you replace what I've written with content that has...problems, it just presses my buttons and seems to be needless.

That's how I feel about it. Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 07:43, January 16, 2017 (UTC)

I wait for the subs to come out as well, its just that I was working on Jack's bio when Denversapple put that weak crap up. I go into detail for the important parts of the Duels and discussions. Besides, most of todays episode only had Jack talking mostly at the beginning and near end of the Duel. He did more action than talking. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 07:55, January 16, 2017 (UTC)
Wait, did you mix my stuff up with his? (Not feeling insulted, just genuinely curious). Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 07:59, January 16, 2017 (UTC)
I just pasted my work over everything because I had finished and had seen stuff that was not needed like two pics. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 08:23, January 16, 2017 (UTC)
Ah, now I see the reasoning behind the initial confusion. I must have cleaned up Denversapple's stuff while you were writing your stuff (and I will admit that I didn't look at the images too closely, I'm at fault there). Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 08:29, January 16, 2017 (UTC)
It's weird how this always happen to us, I don't even know if I could this coincidences anymore. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 08:35, January 16, 2017 (UTC)
Well, we're usually the only people editing the pages so it is bound to happen sometimes. When I was doing a mass-edit on Yuya's page I had to keep track of other edits and merge them in. Anyway, we'll continue this tomorrow; I need to sleep. Blasted work... Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 08:48, January 16, 2017 (UTC)
Alright. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 08:52, January 16, 2017 (UTC)

ARC-V DVD covers

Can you explain why you tagged for deletion a JPG file with a resolution of 1,016 × 1,436 pixels, saying there is a PNG available, uploaded by yourself, but only with 85 × 120 pixels of resolution? Becasita Pendulum (talkcontribs) 12:06, January 18, 2017 (UTC)

Also, you should upload them with the correct {{Fair use}} tag. Some of the JPG ones already had one, so please just copy and paste it. We try to change the images to one extension only (PNG); but if you're doing that by cutting the resolution to 1/12 times and by removing the fair use tag; I prefer you to not do it. Becasita Pendulum (talkcontribs) 12:09, January 18, 2017 (UTC)

Anime images

Since you re-upload several of ARC-V anime images, it would be great if you could add the following to them, when you upload them:

== Licensing ==
{{Fair use|tv-screenshot}}

[[Category:Yu-Gi-Oh! ARC-V Anime Images]]

Thanks. Becasita Pendulum (talkcontribs) 14:10, March 11, 2017 (UTC)

I did every image I uploaded and just finished. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 20:30, March 11, 2017 (UTC)
Alright, nice. Keep in mind this is just for ARC-V images. If you upload for other series, just use the respective category (you can check them on Category:Anime card images). If you upload images for other stuff, like video games and such, just use the correct parameter on {{Fair use}}. Thanks. Becasita Pendulum (talkcontribs) 21:26, March 11, 2017 (UTC)

Undoing without explanation

Special:Diff/3778102, Special:Diff/3777184, Special:Diff/3781419 (even though you then reverted again with explanation), Special:Diff/3784577, Special:Diff/3777183. None of the edits you reverted were with bad intentions. Once again, explain. You have been blocked twice; sure, a matter of days. But if I see you reverting without explanation, even if it's vandalism and you don't write "(vandalism)", I will block you for a bigger while. So please try to show more respect for other users. It's not good for the other users to have their work reverted without explanation, especially since they are trying to help. Becasita Pendulum (talkcontribs) 21:46, April 28, 2017 (UTC)

I didn't know the card's name took "Servant" out of it, that's why. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 21:48, April 28, 2017 (UTC)


You're doing it again, without explanation. I don't care how obvious they are, you are going to state on every edit summary why you are reverting. Else, you're out of here. Enough is enough. Becasita Pendulum (talkcontribs) 11:23, July 1, 2017 (UTC)


I've noticed how you have been checking those walls of texts I add. I should be thanking you for that. Truth be told, I also do this sort of stuff on an another Wiki, although I don't have many proofreaders there. Perhaps you can share some advice on that? Energy X 09:47, August 7, 2017 (UTC)

I usually check for mistakes and try to slim down the summaries to make simpler. You could also ask Sanokal K-T for tips as well since he always do the samething but better. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 20:00, August 7, 2017 (UTC)

No explanation or heads up again

Hey! You deleted my pictures again! What's wrong with you? That was a good picture.

When is the eighteenth episode of Yugioh vrains gonna come out?

Aren't you an administrator?


I've noticed a lot that GY is expanded to Graveyard. I thought we should use modern terminology, even anime cards use GY rather than Graveyard. Besides, Life Points is abbreviated to LP, is it not? Energy X 20:58, September 30, 2017 (UTC)

You could try it, I just read that it was abbreviated in card texts now starting from Starter Deck: Link Strike now. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 21:12, September 30, 2017 (UTC)

More unexplained reverts

You've undone over a hundred edits by one user with no explanation. I can understand that at least one other user gave them some explanation beforehand. Although they're not the only reverts you've been making without comment. And you're not replying when other users ask why you've reverted their edit. I'm sorry, I have to block again. -- Deltaneos (talk) 21:51, December 19, 2017 (UTC)

I couldn't explain on all of them because it was too many to do. My reason for doing it was because those duels still count even if they were only in a dream or flashback. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 23:41, December 19, 2017 (UTC)
I wasn't blocking you for just that incident. I acknowledge that an explanation was given by another user for those edits. Not all of Finaldraw's edits that you undid fell into that scope and you've been making numerous other reverts against other people, since you were last warned (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). -- Deltaneos (talk) 23:54, December 19, 2017 (UTC)
On Ray's page, there's no room for anymore pictures and on Ai's page, we always have links to other pages for each new arc of the series. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 00:20, December 20, 2017 (UTC)
I understand that are reasons for each revert. But you need to communicate that to the person whose work is being undone. You can do that in the edit summary. Even in the scenario I mentioned earlier, where someone directly asked you why their edit was undone, you could have replied. -- Deltaneos (talk) 00:27, December 20, 2017 (UTC)
There don't any room for all those pictures and it overcrowds the page. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 00:36, December 20, 2017 (UTC)
I got that from your last comment. You haven't been blocked because I disagree with the reverts. You're being blocked because you're not explaining it to the other person.
For example, a user makes an edit. You undo the edit. There is no way of him knowing why his work has been rejected. You're being unfair to the other person and doing it repeatedly. I've went into more detail before on why explaining reverts is important. -- Deltaneos (talk) 00:53, December 20, 2017 (UTC)
Deltaneos, would you be able to explain your reason on a 100 reverts straight cause I couldn't. I wouldn't have done all of that if FinalDraw waited for someone to tell him their have a vote on it if those duels should count. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 01:04, December 20, 2017 (UTC)
If I may Drags, it's actually not too difficult, surprisingly. Your computer might be different, but Google Chrome on mine actually saves edit summaries. It might get funky when it comes to reverts, but you can just Copy/Paste them in even if that is the case. I'd (as I have before, and as I do myself) suggest changing your preferences to remind you to always leave an edit summary. Sanokal K-T (talkcontribs) 01:17, December 20, 2017 (UTC)
If it's 100 reverts, but just the same few reasons for each one, then yes, you can just explain it on the user's talk page. Even if you revert all the edits without giving a summary, you've still given them an explanation. Like Sanokal, I'd probably copy-paste the summary or use the browser autocomplete. Although, if that makes for a massive difference in time, just the talk page message would suffice. -- Deltaneos (talk) 20:34, December 20, 2017 (UTC)
Okay, but what about Finaldraw. He's still causing problems and the other users who revert his edits are stuck in a edit war with him. 20:42, December 20, 2017 (UTC)

Cut it out

We need a talk. Please stop the annoying edit war, or you'll be blocked again, for a much longer period of time. --UltimateKuriboh (talkcontribs) 01:07, December 30, 2017 (UTC)

https://discordapp.com/ use this url, click "Open Discord in your browser" in the center of the screen (or possibly top-right corner), enter any username of your choice, then click the arrow. Press "Skip", then click outside the box that asks you to register. Finally, click on the "+" sign in the upper-left corner and select "Join a server", inputting the following invite url: (https://discord.gg/jRRcQ). Unfortunately, I have to be out for an hour or two, but please stay online until I can come back. --UltimateKuriboh (talkcontribs) 01:10, December 30, 2017 (UTC)

I gave an explanation this time just like Deltaneos wanted me to. When the discussion about the duels on the Forum:Duel Records Edits come to a better conclusion, things will be different then. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 01:13, December 30, 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for using the summary. Although having a summary is much better than leaving no explanation, it's not always justification to make a revert.
  • I would encourage you to use something more specific than "The former listing was fine". When someone revert, it's a given that they think the previous version is fine. You should really say why your version is preferred to the one you're undoing.
  • If there is an ongoing discussion, you should take part in the discussion, not try to force your version. 50+ reverts to non-spam/vandalism is considered edit warring. Please don't do that.
-- Deltaneos (talk) 15:18, December 30, 2017 (UTC)
Given this entire fiasco, I'm going to be drafting up a policy page for duel records, attempting to make clear what should be done under all circumstances a duel has occurred, including taking over by other characters, etc. I will take the forum thread thus far into account as I construct it. You obviously then should not be editing duel records without further discussion. Cheesedude (talkcontribs) 02:03, January 11, 2018 (UTC)

Arc titles

Curious, from where do you get the arc titles, like Lost Memories or Ignis Warfare, if it is said that the names are unofficial? Energy X 20:13, September 19, 2018 (UTC)

I made them up. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 20:18, September 19, 2018 (UTC)
I don't think that's a wise idea to make up names for arcs. That doesn't seem very sincere, even with that notice atop the page. Energy X 23:15, September 20, 2018 (UTC)
It's the only way to separate each story arc, I did the same thing for ARC-V and nobody complained about it. They can be renamed when the official titles are released. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 01:57, September 21, 2018 (UTC)

Lost Memories & Ignis Warfare

Well, I think each arc should be separated with new OP/ED. And EP71 marks the firts use of Glory, as well as a clear clarification of Ignis Warfare's beginning; They are still discussing and searching for Jin's conscussioness even after Windy's world is deleted. 0123456789 The Great (talkcontribs) 02:07, October 4, 2018 (UTC)

That's not how start new arcs. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 02:11, October 4, 2018 (UTC)
From EP60 to 70, it is still unknown who is behind all the scheme. It is only made clear in EP68(?) (Not a serious fan of the series since ARC-V 140) that the Ignis is planning something "evil". And that is "war to make humanity submit".
Also, the previous series separate arcs in that fashion.0123456789 The Great (talkcontribs) 03:20, October 4, 2018 (UTC)
Not by the ending themes though. Even in Arc-V, when four of its episodes was using the previous opening, it didn't directly start on the new one. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 03:25, October 4, 2018 (UTC)
  1. Can you point me what episodes?
  2. To be precise, it's the OP that is the clearer split
  3. Each arc asts for around six months in average. The Lost Memories only lasts 3, and I think that's breaking the pattern. That's why I made the edit.
  4. Anyway thanks for helping.

0123456789 The Great (talkcontribs) 03:39, October 4, 2018 (UTC)

Episodes 27-30 of Arc-V. The pattern was already broken ARC-V, so there's nothing we can do about it anymore. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 03:47, October 4, 2018 (UTC)
  1. That's an irregular case.
  2. Still, I think the Ignis Warfare started too early. As I've pointed out. I think we should take a careful look at the focus of EP [ 60 , 69 ].
  3. We still can do something. Since this is not official, and thus, not set in stone.0123456789 The Great (talkcontribs) 04:20, October 4, 2018 (UTC)

Arcs always have episodes that build up to the main problem of it. There's nothing wrong with those episodes being part of it until official sources say otherwise. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 04:51, October 4, 2018 (UTC)

Still, the main point of Episode [ 59 , 70 ] isn't "The Ignis is going to make humanity submit", but "Where can we find whoever stole Jin's conscussioness".
  • EP59 marks the return of Knights of Hanoi
  • EP60 - Naoki sucks.
  • [ 61 , 63 ] The Shepherd, again.
  • [ 64 , 65 ] The flashback to the day of "Unknown" and "Unnamed".
  • [ 66 , 67 ] EARTH Ignis! Force the info out of him.
  • 68 - Something went wrong... The Ignis want to make human submit?
  • [ 69 , 70 ] - OK the Ignises are very likely to do it after what they said in 68.

So basically, it is clear that the "Ignis Warfare" has begun at Episode 71. And Even if it's very likely, as said in [ 69 , 70 ], it's still not clear. If anyhow, I want a clear reason from your side of view. 0123456789 The Great (talkcontribs) 10:40, October 4, 2018 (UTC)

Still waiting for your response. 0123456789 The Great (talkcontribs) 14:00, October 7, 2018 (UTC).

I am trying to engage you in a constructive way of resolution, yet you ignored me. I edited the page after showing my point of view, but you edited without showing your point of view, so I think you are not doing it fairly. If your reason is appropriate enough (It proves me that the arc's episodes should be listed as such with me unable to make counterargument). Then I shall let your version be. Else, we will have to discuss further. Please do not make this an edit war,lest we risk punishment.0123456789 The Great (talkcontribs) 07:34, October 8, 2018 (UTC)

ARC-V's Duel Academy arc had episodes that wasn't part of it in the way your thinking but was still listed. Each arc has to have episodes that build up to main conflict. Plus these arc titles are not official so there's no reason to change the episode listing until official stuff is released like Duel Monsters!. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 08:14, October 8, 2018 (UTC)

I still question why are there fan-made-up names for articles that we pass around. If anything, we may as well merge them to seasons. Otherwise you have these edit conflicts, and there's no consensus from which episode an arc really starts off. Energy X 09:16, October 8, 2018 (UTC)
The ARC-V is really inconsistent starting from the 2nd season: They took too long in Synchro Dimension and took away 2 arcs. Friendship Cup and the Finals unoffical but namely. Then, we have 3 months of Xyz Dimension, then it finally became "Duel Academy" for another 6 months, before crashing into Z-ARC for a month then messed up so badly at the final 2 months. So the arc inconsistency just can't be helped. This result in the first half of the true "Duel Academy" falling into Heartland City, despite the city is not mentioned again until the last 2 months.
VRAINS, however, is quite consistent so far, even though the first arc is nothing but Yusaku kicking up Hanoi's ass and nothing in particular, so naming the arc "Hanoi" is quite appropriate. The only inconsistency so far is the first half of second arc having the Hanoi taking up a virus called The Deleted. It cleared at the end of the 3-month season. Then Hanoi build a tower, and the dower is broken in another 3 months.
Then here are our problem: I will repeat it for the fourth time that EP [ 59 , 70 ] is still Yusaku and co searching for the culprit, and not yet fighting against Ignis.0123456789 The Great (talkcontribs) 11:54, October 8, 2018 (UTC)

Lost Memories ends with Bohman being defeated due to him trying to regain his memories. Iginis Warfare can't start at episode 71 because the episodes before it are building up to the war like Duel Academy's did. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 16:59, October 8, 2018 (UTC)

  1. You are trying to say that the "Lost Memories" is named for the sake of Bohman, and not Yusaku? That's quite strnge, as every arc should be named for the sake of storyline, or at least the protagonist.
  2. Why cant "Ignis Warfare" start at 71? What's the point of episode [ 59 , 70 ] then? Are they nothing but a limbo Episode?
Your reason is getting more valid, but still, your idea is trying to defy the true purpose of Episode [ 59 , 70 ]. I will say it the fifth time that the "Ignis Warfare" is still not clear until Episode 71. Everything between that closed episode interval is not a limbo.
DO not take ARC-V as the heart of getting an arc. Because the anime is very inconsistent regarding arc.

Also, you pressed UNDO, without knowing that the ED is incorrect. 0123456789 The Great (talkcontribs) 07:48, October 9, 2018 (UTC)

Since the last date, I havent made modification, but still, I haven't got my response. If you cannot give me a reason that invalidate my reason, I will bring this issue to admin to hear his final say. 0123456789 The Great (talkcontribs) 09:59, October 13, 2018 (UTC)

New Leadership

Hello there. I suggest you visit Forum:New Leadership to discuss what's next for the wikia. 0123456789 The Great (talkcontribs) 03:39, November 9, 2018 (UTC)

Edit War: Arc Placing

It seems like you don't listen, and stick to your version. I have stated all my reasons, yet you have not. So I will say this again: Either engage in discussion, or I will have to call in an admin for the final say, given I am not in the position to decide this issue, and I am tired of this entire counterproductivity. 0123456789 The Great 02:00, March 9, 2019 (UTC)

I told you already. Until official titles are given, those episodes will be placed in the right arcs. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 02:12, March 9, 2019 (UTC)
And what determine right or wrong? The official never state everything regarding arc separating. 0123456789 The Great 07:16, March 9, 2019 (UTC)
Because I'm following how the arcs in the previous series ended theirs. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 23:42, March 9, 2019 (UTC)
After seven months (a bit too late, I know), the pages have been deleted. As it has been said, these are new times where there shouldn't be any arcs - placing episodes in an arc looks like an opinion rather than a fact, including the article name. Moreover, I don't see the need for all this hustle, considering you have the episodes diverged by seasons (1/2/3). Energy X 12:26, October 20, 2019 (UTC)

Edit war

Since you two are in a constant argument, I'll give you a week to clear things out. If the conflict is not resolved, the only thing I could also do is to delete the pages. After all, if the names aren't even confirmed, why should we even have the pages?? Considering that the duration of the arc is interpreted subjectively. Another thing is, why aren't you arguing with ARC-V arcs like this one? Energy X 14:14, March 9, 2019 (UTC)

Its not easy coming up with names for these arcs since they won't get official ones for some reason. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 23:40, March 9, 2019 (UTC)


I'm losing my patience with edits like these; they are directly copied from the other site, which means they are PLAGIARIZED. This is the final warning, the next time such thing occurs, there will be *severe* consequences, as in a very long block. What I also find insulting is it is not even formatted to fit the other pages, like this. Energy X 18:37, August 10, 2020 (UTC)

Or we could do this from other perspective: do you really want this place to be titled as the one where people copy and plagiarize, so every newcomer can look down on everyone? Energy X 18:40, August 10, 2020 (UTC)


Let me guess, you made the name up. If so, you know well that we shouldn't make fan terms, and instead resort to official terms, like season 1. Energy X 08:12, August 25, 2020 (UTC)

I forgot to list it under unknown name. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 22:40, August 26, 2020 (UTC)
It still doesn't excuse it for having a fan-made name. Perhaps you haven't noticed that all of the terms to describe VRAINS arcs are gone and are replaced by seasons, like the name on this section. These are the old ways that don't function well, and we do have to readapt our strategy so that people may not have to call out on us for making fake names. Energy X 22:42, August 26, 2020 (UTC)
Even so, the seasons are broken down into arcs with the only issue of not having an official name for them. So that's why unofficial names are used instead but not just any name, only ones that's the main focus of each arc like ZEXAL and ARC-V for example. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 22:50, August 26, 2020 (UTC)
But again, you can't determine what's the length of an arc. You can just "feel" it, not measure it. And I'm definitively sure of my point because you did argue with another user as to how long one of the VRAINS arc was. As said, these are old ways and they can't be applied if we don't have a source. It is the reason why we name our pages for Structure Decks, which have names on the back. Energy X 23:12, August 26, 2020 (UTC)
The last time an official name for the arcs that came out was for either 5D'S or ZEXAL. Nobody in the main industry focus on them anymore but you can't just say its season isn't broken down into smaller arcs since the main objective for them is different even if its still following the main storyline written out. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 23:23, August 26, 2020 (UTC)


I've actually noticed that you are creating those pages - which are fan named - from this account, for that user is making posts and naming those arcs for his followers. I cannot approve of that, and the pages have been deleted. And before you say how "there has to be arcs" - even if we have perfectly acceptable season pages - then I will remind you that not everything has to remain the same in the industry. Especially if you compare the VRAINS DVD-s that are coming in bundles of 12 episodes.

If - and only if - you have at least some confirmation that arcs exist in SEVENS series (even if they are not even named), I can undelete the pages. It's bad enough to see that some people around here are plagiarizing pages, and I don't wish to see that we are making fake terms to refer to something that may not even exist. As said, find proof to back up your pages, or focus on something else to do. Energy X 14:58, September 13, 2020 (UTC)

You could thank this user for finally shedding the truth to light. The mentioned pages will be undeleted, but the ARC-V arcs will have to be deleted unless you provide some proof, instead of saying "there were arcs before, and there should be now, even if we don't actually know their names or how long they last". Energy X 16:22, September 13, 2020 (UTC)

First of all I don't use Twitter, so I have no idea who j_byyx is. Second, I'm done arguing about this and just don't care anymore. Everyone knows each series is broken into arcs but its hard finding the names of them if they have any at so that's have temp fan names were used. But, your the only one against them so that's it. I no longer care especially since the people who agree with me no longer edit here. DragonEmeperor (talkcontribs) 04:22, September 16, 2020 (UTC)

This j_byyx is the guy that posted arc names, which turns out they are official. Anyway, as said, find proof or don't do that at all. How else do we name articles, anyway? Even for Structure Decks the names were changed because of their real name on the back of the product. More importantly, you also need the official fact when the arc starts and ends, to prevent the edit war you had with the other user. Energy X 08:14, September 16, 2020 (UTC)
And finally, if you are saying how this wasn't before a problem, then consider this: why is there an increase of plagiarism on this site, which has never been done before? Energy X 08:25, September 16, 2020 (UTC)


Typical, I am a slave to my own work, having to put through many doubts and many frustrations of other users, such as yourself. And when you copy an article like the Relic from Yugipedia, nobody appears to have any sort of questions. For this type of behavior, you are blocked for one month. I already applied this block for this unethical behavior before, and there can be no exceptions to this. Energy X 09:13, September 16, 2020 (UTC)


I used a script to rename the page from Four Dimension Bracelets to Natural Energy Bracelets. As such, the script also changed the name of the file on the articles, but did not rename that file. It's fixed now. Energy X 07:18, November 10, 2020 (UTC)

*Disclosure: Some of the links above are affiliate links, meaning, at no additional cost to you, Fandom will earn a commission if you click through and make a purchase. Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.