FANDOM


Victory Dragon suggestive

Can you please look at the corner of that dragon's card again? I don't think I see any word like "This card cannot be used in Duel." anywhere on that dragon. If it is, then it should be on Illegal list instead of "Forbidden" List. --FredCat Ta.P.F.P.J.R.W.S.Th.P.S.C. 19:12, November 3, 2010 (UTC)

You're right. I was working from memory, and confused it with the other Match Winners, which do have that text in the lower left corner (which is particularly egregious, since I *own* a copy of VD). Thanks for the catch. =) ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 19:17, November 3, 2010 (UTC)
No problem, I just try to keep you in good position. That's only legal "Match Winner" out of those many. --FredCat Ta.P.F.P.J.R.W.S.Th.P.S.C. 19:25, November 3, 2010 (UTC)
Yep, thanks again. =) ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 19:35, November 3, 2010 (UTC)
Please refer to this. http://www.yugioh-card.com/oc/limited/ (Fabled Destiny (talkcontribs) 04:58, December 24, 2010 (UTC))
I'm not sure what you're trying to demonstrate here. Victory Dragon does not have the text "This card cannot be used in a duel." in its lower left-hand corner, where the card number normally is (and indeed, VD *has* a card number), meaning it is not illegal in duels. The fact that it is forbidden in the Advanced Format is immaterial. ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 06:10, December 25, 2010 (UTC)

Archive Locked up?

I am about to moving the comments from my main Talk Page to Archive 7, but cannot find the "Edit" button on my Archive #. How can it happened? Should I have to renew the whole page? --FredCat Ta.P.F.P.J.R.W.S.Th.P.S.C. 20:15, December 21, 2010 (UTC)

It looks from Delt's talk page that you got it all sorted out; feel free to ask if you need more help though. =) ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 23:44, December 21, 2010 (UTC)
Yea... I just don't like the change too much. --FredCat Ta.P.F.P.J.R.W.S.Th.P.S.C. 23:47, December 21, 2010 (UTC)

Lowlife User

I honest like to ban this user; Matynayu because he just shove up yugiohcardmaker in some article that I just revived twice. --FredCat Ta.P.F.P.J.R.W.S.Th.P.S.C. 01:14, December 23, 2010 (UTC)

I don't think they need blocked; they haven't continued their edits, and no one's talked to them at all yet. In addition, Deltaneos deleted the page, so if he thought it warranted a block, he would have done so. ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 07:18, December 23, 2010 (UTC)

Archive failed

That user just rejected it out and revive it back to his version... Just felt unhappy that I just helped him went waste. --FredCat Ta.P.F.P.J.R.W.S.Th.P.S.C. 01:33, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Well, it is his page... Ultimately, all you can do is offer advice; it's up to them whether to actually use it or not (and if so, how they use it). ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 02:12, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
He only make it worst... the shortcut sound easier to place in each archives if he is going to create... --FredCat Ta.P.F.P.J.R.W.S.Th.P.S.C. 04:20, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry to but in. If referring to me, I don't like creating "Templates", Archives, or any sub-accounts unless really needed because it's too much to handle, requires better topics for it, copies most people work styles, etc. Fredcat's and Dino, etc help to me wasn't waste. Besides I still don't know too much about yugioh.wikia; I use its command code to make adjustments like "<...>" +/- between word(s) What I do is...--Wasn't (talkcontribs) 21:26, December 26, 2010 (UTC).

Elements in Template:Six Attributes?

Can I or anyone put "Element" Archetype monsters in "Six Attribute" Template?; these are series of Light and Dark Monsters (3 each). Any Y?--Wasn't (talkcontribs) 18:08, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

"Element" are in "Six Attributes" Templates--Wasn't (talkcontribs) 18:53, December 24, 2010 (UTC).
Thanks for allowing me or anyone to add "Element" Archtype Monster in your "Template:Six Attributes‎‎" even though there not really Six Attribute Monsters since there only Light and Dark Attributes (3each)"--Wasn't (talkcontribs) 03:05, December 25, 2010 (UTC).
Once again, {{Six Attributes}} isn't "my" template; this is a wiki, and nothing (including user pages) strictly belongs to any one user. That being said, I would have to disagree with the addition of the Element monsters to the template - I have previously considered adding them, and it was previously discussed, but there isn't real evidence that they were intended as a Six Attribute archetype - they seem to be LIGHT and DARK monsters only to keep them from triggering their own or each others' effects. Therefore, I am opposed to their addition and will probably remove them (if more four-element card groups are tracked down, though, we could create a new Four Elements template for them, similar to the Six Attributes one). ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 06:04, December 25, 2010 (UTC)

Can I add Attribute Spirits Monsters and their "related form" to your "Template: Six Attributes"? Please answer. and Y--Wasn't (talkcontribs) 18:04, December 25, 2010 (UTC)?

Knowing now that Soul of Purity and Light is only tangentially related to the Attribute Spirits (at best), there is no longer any strong argument that the archetype is a Six Attributes archetype, as opposed to a Four Elements one. However, there are now three known Four Elements archetypes (the Elements, the Attribute Spirits, and the IOC group related to the Attribute Spirits), so there's a very good argument for creating a new Template:Four Elements. ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 18:36, December 25, 2010 (UTC)
What's an "IOC group"--Wasn't (talkcontribs) 19:03, December 25, 2010 (UTC)?
The group of monsters in Invasion of Chaos related to the Attribute Spirits - Fenrir, Gigantes, Inferno, and Silpheed. ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 19:16, December 25, 2010 (UTC)

Template:Six Attributes‎‎

I placed Equip Spell Cards and Field Spell Cards in one section because there both Magic Cards and Spell Speed 1--Wasn't (talkcontribs) 16:23, December 25, 2010 (UTC).

"None Yet" in Template: Six Attributes is gray I didn't want "(500 ATK▲/400 DEF▼)" and "(400 ATK▲/200 DEF▼)"to also be gray; that's Y I changed it to a different colour--Wasn't (talkcontribs) 17:47, December 25, 2010 (UTC)
Really the only thing the two spell groups have in common is that they're both spell groups, and they both modify monster ATK/DEF values. This isn't enough to say they're related, and besides, when they're grouped together, because of the ATK/DEF notes, the monster names no longer line up with the group names. As for the colors, both "None Yet" and "(500 ATK▲/400 DEF▼)"/"(400 ATK▲/200 DEF▼)" just serve as notes, so there's really not much of a reason other than aesthetics to distinguish them (and if we get into aesthetics, we'll be here forever - ask anyone on Wikipedia who was involved in the color discussions for wikipedia:Template:Ambox or wikipedia:Template:Navbox. If you really want colors for these tags, though, my talkpage isn't the place to ask for them; you should instead start a discussion on Template talk:Six Attributes. ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 18:36, December 25, 2010 (UTC)

Suggestion

Suggestion: You should try to put "Template:Light and Dark" with "Template:Four Elements" as one "Template" since 4+2=6, and to save time and pressure--Wasn't (talkcontribs) 20:54, December 25, 2010 (UTC)

Would these same Elements go to your "Template: Light and Dark" group also--Wasn't (talkcontribs) 21:30, December 25, 2010 (UTC)?

Will you make "Four Attribute Monsters" section like U did with "Six Attribute Monsters"? so anyone can write about them--Wasn't (talkcontribs) 22:34, December 25, 2010 (UTC).

I've replied to both of the above questions on Template talk:Six Attributes. You don't have to keep asking questions in both places; I get emails whenever {{Six Attributes}} or its talk page is modified, so all you have to do is post there and I will see and respond. ;) ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 00:12, December 26, 2010 (UTC)

Protection of highly vandalised pages

Would you consider protecting this page - for some reason it's got a lot of automated spam for a page - and as it's an old topic that's no longer been discussed, there'd be no harm in it -- RandomTime 23:31, December 27, 2010 (UTC)

Indefinitely semiprotected. ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 23:36, December 27, 2010 (UTC)
For what it's worth, that page was reported earlier. -- Deltaneos (talk) 23:40, December 27, 2010 (UTC)

Polite Comment

You told me about that, and I didn't remember about it till Deltaneos posted the link that show me how it causing. So now I do remember the reason what you meaning. He just took it wrong way. --FredCat Ta.P.F.P.J.R.W.S.Th.P.S.C. 21:25, December 28, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I wouldn't worry too much about it if I were you. The internet is not the place for people who so easily take offense, and if he doesn't change his attitude, he'll quickly find elsewhere that responses like that only tend to aggravate the situation. ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 21:47, December 28, 2010 (UTC)
Agreed... I just revert his bad mouth off recently. --FredCat Ta.P.F.P.J.R.W.S.Th.P.S.C. 21:50, December 28, 2010 (UTC)

Template issue

Thanks for fixing Template:Cyber. Can you create another section on the template for cards that are in the "Cyber" archetype, but not in one of the three sub-archetypes? I asked Delt about it, and he didn't respond. I hate to be pest, so I thought I'd ask you instead. Templates are not my cup of tea. Cheesedude (talkcontribs) 22:14, December 29, 2010 (UTC)

According to [1], [2], and [3], there are no cards belonging or related to the "Cyber" archetype without being in one of the more specific subarchetypes. I don't think it's possible to query according to part of an archetype name, which is what would be required for this. If you know of other subarchetypes we could try, though, that would work. ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 02:19, December 30, 2010 (UTC)
That would because I haven't added them as being part of the archetype to any of the card pages yet. I wanted to have the template working first, but it appears adding them to the card pages needs to happen first. Since it seems quite likely that we'll be going with singular archetype page names, I'm going to wait until that goes through to add everything.Cheesedude (talkcontribs) 04:17, December 30, 2010 (UTC)
All right. Once that happens, you should be able to just add {{ArchetypeNavbox|Cyber}} to the template to pick the rest of the pages up. ;) ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 07:06, December 30, 2010 (UTC)
Alright then, great. Thanks again. Cheesedude (talkcontribs) 17:22, December 30, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for taking care of the Hidden Arsenal 3 Gallery page

I was communicating with FredCat100 about it and couldn't quite get him to understand where I was coming from. I had it all waiting in a preview page to change. but do not have the access required to fix the linkages of the (Perfectly good) files with their proper filenames (MOVE command). My way would have been messier out of necessity. Glittersword 21:22, December 30, 2010 (UTC)

No problem. In the future, when you notice card images with incorrect names, you can add {{OCG-TCG card image}} (with necessary parameters filled in) to the image, which will automatically mark it as needing renamed and provide a link for admins to perform the rename. =)
Also, would you mind considering adding a link to (at least) your user talk page in your signature? If you would like help styling it, I can help you out. Cheers! ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 21:33, December 30, 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for the offer, I would like help with that. Maybe something like FredCat100's but with a little less abbreviation. Glittersword 22:55, December 30, 2010 (UTC)
Here's a few samples based on FredCat's sig, but without any font resizing, and with different fonts:
There are a lot of other possible looks you can achieve just by experimenting with different fonts. ダイノガイ千?!? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 23:29, December 30, 2010 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.