Relation to Frog Cards
Why shouldn't there be a relation to the frog cards? It's kind of a frog (as told in the lore) isn't it? For me that's relation enough, moreover as a relation hasn't anything to do with the technical gameplay (or am I wrong?).Tersos 14:46, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
- It does in this sense. Frog cards relate to a very specific archetype (that is, ones whose OCG names include "gaeru"). Danny Lilithborne 14:49, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
It does not belong to the "Frogs" but as it is a frog it's related to them or not? (Otherwise I have a wrong comprehension of the "related" term) Tersos 15:16, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
- I think related means it supports/is supported by another card that belongs to/supports the archetype, but the card itself isn't part of the archetype, nor does it support the archetype as a whole... For example, Power Tool Dragon isn't a Morphtronic, nor does it support the Morphtronics specifically. But the card Double Tool C&D supports both the Morphtronics and Power Tool Dragon, hence it drew a sort of "connection" between them. So, we say Power Tool Dragon is related to the Morphtronics. -- Al-Malik ملك الألعاب 15:30, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
For me related means the card is something alike the archetype cards or has something to do with them (in the matters of appearance, name, lore, etc.) but isn't perforce connected to them in a technical way.Tersos 15:41, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
- Note that "Frog the Jam", whose name actually contains "Frog", is not included in the Frog archetype. Danny Lilithborne 15:46, November 26, 2009 (UTC)