I do not believe it should be erased as scaling is a valid part of YuGiOh. It is found very frequently as discussion in many YGO forums and I believe as such it deserves a spot on t his site.
-
Agreed. -- Lionheart2004 15:55, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Video and Pojo.com
The spelling mistakes in the video are deliberate, as part of the culture of e/b/uams world that the video is written by and aimed at. As for the two glory hounds, their names have been added should anyone have any questions on scaling. Both Balmung of Azure Sky and COTPS are easily found on Pojo.com forums, should any duelist have any questions on scaling.
A second, better and more grammatically correct video is going to be released in the next few weeks, again from Pojo.com, so until then I think this video should stay. --JerichoPojo 00:43, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Keep it as it is for now, we'll later consider your idea. --Dragon Slayer (Contribs • Count) 00:46, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- How later? And also, a fair few people do watch the video from this page (700) and a fair few have come back to Pojo.com forums with questions, because this page does offer very little information on scaling. Just seems stupid to cut back on a articles information, when its already stubby enough as it is. --JerichoPojo 00:52, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Scaling is not looked upon favorably by Upper Deck Entertainment. No video for this reason.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 00:53, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- So are you saying that this wiki is now biased, TwoTailedFox?--JerichoPojo 00:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- I admit it wasn't fair to say glory seekers, but mentioning your names on the article so people can refer to you for questions may be considered advertising. Self-crediting within articles is against policy, you're credited by having your username appear in the page history, people find out how to contact you through that if they want to ask more questions.
- As dishonest as some people may find it, we can't ignore the fact that it's a big part of the Yu-Gi-Oh! culture, hence it gets a article.
- Since how to scale is explained within the article there's no need for the video.
- Not being biased means we don't take sides and the video does seem pro-scaling. -- Deltaneos 08:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ok the glory seekers part I can understand, but the Video been Pro-Scaling? I'v watched the video alot, and there is arugment for either side of scaling. Its presents a quick guide to scaling, something this article lacks.--JerichoPojo 09:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- The article mentions what it's used for and how to use one. What more does it need? -- Deltaneos 09:40, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- The video goes one step further and shows an actual demonstration. How is that not relevant to the article? All that I see is three lines, the first explaining the concept and then the other two explaining what rarities cant be scaled. And if UDE doesn’t like scaling, then TwoTailedFox, maybe that should be discussed as well, within the article instead of just cutting information off.--JerichoPojo 09:47, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- The article mentions what it's used for and how to use one. What more does it need? -- Deltaneos 09:40, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ok the glory seekers part I can understand, but the Video been Pro-Scaling? I'v watched the video alot, and there is arugment for either side of scaling. Its presents a quick guide to scaling, something this article lacks.--JerichoPojo 09:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC)