Talk:Primal Origin

This is the talk page for discussing the page, Primal Origin.
This page is for discussion about the article, not general talk about its subject. See the Forums for general discussion. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Please try to Be polite Assume good faith Be welcoming

UNCONFIRMED INFO

Why do people keep adding the info from this link to the page?:

http://ygorganization.com/nov-unconfirmed/

What part of "Unconfirmed" is not understood? NMBRHNTR64 (talk • contribs) 14:22, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

2chan I know nothing about so I shan't comment, but Snake is one of the most trusted leakers for this sort of thing and gets it right pretty much all of the time. Photonkrios99 (talk • contribs) 14:28, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

I get that, but he even goes out of his to say "Unconfirmed" right there. "Pretty much" is no guarantee of 100% accurate info. NMBRHNTR64 (talk • contribs) 14:30, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

And yet you've never had this sort of fit over it every other month when the Orgs pages list them as unconfirmed every month but the info still gets added.

e.g. http://ygorganization.com/ocg-uncofirmed-lval-news/ Photonkrios99 (talk • contribs) 14:36, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

That was different. Those were inferred by the actual art. For example, you can easily tell that one of those monsters is Rainbow Kuriboh. In this case, there are no pictures and no actual confirmed proof. NMBRHNTR64 (talk • contribs) 14:58, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

Seeing as the previous link did nothing to help explain it here, http://ygorganization.com/ocg-unconfirmed-ocg-news-early-october/ Originally listed as unconfirmed until it was and NO ONE turned round and said 'lets remove it we have no proof'. We can't say that a source is valid/reliable in some instances and not in others. Also I wasn't on about the Vjump pic with the playmat, I was on about the report that Ark does for the Org every month when Snake starts giving leaks around this time at are more or less always proven to be real when the scans come through. Photonkrios99 (talk • contribs) 15:06, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

As it is unconfirmed, it shouldn't be listed until it is confirmed for sure, that should be all there is to it. (sigh) But whatever, I will drop it for now. It just doesn't make much sense to me to say something like you know it is 100% for-sure, while in reality it is unconfirmed. NMBRHNTR64 (talk • contribs) 15:21, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

Only the 2chan anonymous source can be ignored for now. However, the only reason this news is considered "unofficial" is because Snake doesn't provide pics. However, he has always been right, so what he said can be put down here. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 16:47, November 15, 2013 (UTC)

Can we Go ahead and put Number C102, 103, and c103 onto this page?

http://blog.livedoor.jp/maxut/archives/34124643.html

This source was directly from NeoArkCradle. And if you read through the japanese, you'll see a lot of references of C102, 103, and C103. Is this sufficient enough proof?--With Dyson Sphere at my side, the universe will kneel before me. - DysonSlinky (talk • contribs) 17:48, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

That's not reliable. That's just people speculating on whether or not they'll be in the set. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 18:24, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

Girag

It says that there are cards belonging to Girag, but unless I skipped over it or something I don't see any cards belonging to Girag. --StephenWalker97 (talk • contribs) 17:39, January 15, 2014 (UTC)

It doesn't look that way to me either, so I removed it. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 17:53, January 15, 2014 (UTC)

"The Seventh One"… NMBRHNTR64 (talk • contribs) 18:10, January 15, 2014 (UTC)