Talk: Panda

This is the talk page for discussing the page, Panda.
This page is for discussion about the article, not general talk about its subject. See the Forums for general discussion. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Please try to Be polite Assume good faith Be welcoming

Correction with my statement

I'm tired. Anyway, I didn't mean "source", but for it to be an archetype, it has to have support, which it doesn't, and for it to be a Series, it has to have 3+ members, which according to you, it doesn't. Not enough to make a page on it. Shinigami Queen (talk) 09:52, July 19, 2016 (UTC)

There should be more than 3 cards that is based on Panda in the Yu-Gi-Oh! verse. But even in that case, I'm completely against the existence of this kind of series, as I and some other users mentioned in Talk:Synchro (series), the connection is too weak and there is nothing interesting to note about. We already have cards that fall under too many archetypes/series which is really hard to navigate and categorizing them into more unnecessary series like this only make the situation worse. --Blackwings0605 (talk) 10:19, July 19, 2016 (UTC)