|
This is the talk page for discussing the page, Lord of the Tachyon Galaxy. | |
|---|---|
|
Please try to
|
Source
Source? The fact that this booster pack dosen't currently have a image up bugs me along with its name, I just don't buy the tachyon galaxy name. If anyone could tell me where this information is coming from that would make me alot more convinced.
Pack name
Like with Galactic Overlord being mistakenly assumed to be named "Galactic Overload", perhaps this pack is "Lord of the Tachyongalaxy? (Unless there is a reason I don't know of that actually states or at least implies that it is in fact "Road") -Bhigpx (talk • contribs) 20:27, November 13, 2012 (UTC)
- I'd buy that. It sounds a lot better too. I guess we'll have to wait and see. --> Summoned Skull 2: Electric Boogaloo 20:33, November 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Also the Pojo link up there ^ claims that it's "Lord". --> --> Summoned Skull 2: Electric Boogaloo 20:35, November 13, 2012 (UTC)
- "Tachyongalaxy" is definitely two words. [1] 70.79.84.206 (talk) 08:22, December 21, 2012 (UTC)
Features
Where is that info coming from? Is it a translation of something or was it made-up? Because it reads like a really bad ZEXAL advertisement. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:43, November 14, 2012 (UTC) --Deathpyre (talk • contribs) 01:41, November 21, 2012 (UTC) I'm very skeptical about Konami implementing balance. Odds are balance is something like a water-imprisoning mirror.
Minor Edits
"Yu-gi-oh ZEXAL" not linked.ZEXALDragon7 (talk • contribs) 03:48, December 8, 2012 (UTC)
I noticed that you guys had a Fire Fist monster counted as an XYZ an Fire Fist XYZ as an effect monster. That is swapped. They are right below each other towards the bottom of the page. Just wanted to make sure you noticed. TechGenusMaster (talk • contribs) 18:19, December 17, 2012 (UTC)
Tachyon Galaxy
It looks like the name is Tachyon Galaxy not Tachyongalaxy. Should we remame it ?--Veriteo (talk • contribs) 11:09, December 21, 2012 (UTC)
- It's clearly Tachyon Galaxy from the image. Move completed. Blackwings0605 (talk) 11:20, December 21, 2012 (UTC)
second ghost rare in this set?
second ghost/holigraphic rare?
i dont know if its confirmed or if its just a mistate but Number C105: Burning Knuckler - Caestus the Comet
states that its also going to be ghost/hollographic rare on the card info page
is this true or is it just a mistake that someone needs to fix?
if that is true its kool that they r now doing 2 ghost rares per pack and he will look kick ass as a ghost rare
cant wait to see what the rest of the pack holds
armityle2013----
- That's impossible.--Power32840 (talk • contribs) 20:45, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
- It is very likely not going to happen and until there is a source that actually proves that it is true, the page should reflect that there is only one Holographic Rare, aka Ghost Rare. Axel Shiokawa (talk • contribs) 23:44, January 20, 2013 (UTC)
What happened?
What happened to the TCG-only cards part to the card list?--Computer Bug (talk • contribs) 02:07, April 11, 2013 (UTC)
- My bad. I was adding card numbers to the list and accidentally deleted it. I'll fix it. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 02:28, April 11, 2013 (UTC)
69
When I read it I cried: WHAT?! (although I'm not english XD) Number 69 is in this pack?! really? this is a great news! --XBrain130™「 Ｘブレイン１３０」 11:52, May 3, 2013 (UTC)
This page has the E dragons listed as rares but their is no proof for this and it is purely speculation
E drags as Rares
This page has the 4 e dragons listed as rares. This is purely speculation and has no proof. It is just a random german forum that says they are rare but has other incorret info on the same page. As we do not truly know the rarities please remove this info.