Talk: Dragon Ninja

Revision as of 15:45, 2 November 2012

This is the talk page for discussing the page, Dragon Ninja.

This page is for discussion about the article, not general talk about its subject.
- See the Forums for general discussion.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~).
Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.

Please try to

Be polite
Assume good faith
Be welcoming

Speculation

With 3 different arrows pointing to the fact that there might be 3 more Dragon Ninjas, I think that is solid enough speculation to merit a spot on the page. (Hypothesis is that they will be WIND Insect Silver Dragon Ninja, EARTH Dinosaur Gold Dragon Ninja, and DARK Beast Black Dragon Ninja). 184.79.227.75 (talk) 14:02, November 1, 2012 (UTC)

I disagree completely. There is very little to suggest that there will be more Dragon Ninjas, or Dragon Ninjas for each Attribute/Type will be released. After all, these are Dragon Ninjas. You can relate Sea Serpent and Winged Beast back to Dragons, but Insect and Beast are not relatable to Dragons at all. Just because they can all be Special Summoned by the Ninjitsu Arts doesn't mean Dragon Ninjas will be released for each possible target Type. This is speculation and it should be removed.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 14:05, November 1, 2012 (UTC)

Winged-Beasts are as unrelatable to Dragons than Insects and Beasts are. 184.79.227.75 (talk) 14:53, November 1, 2012 (UTC)

Dragons have wings, therefore, they are winged beasts.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 15:07, November 1, 2012 (UTC)

Some what does that make Dragons without wings like this one? 184.79.227.75 (talk) 03:04, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

Let me rephrase, Dragons are traditionally depicted as winged creatures, therefore, they can be related back to the term "winged beasts." Regardless, speculation is disallowed on this Wiki, whether or not you can make a good point about dragons and wings. (You haven't.)--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 09:09, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

First off, seeing as this is a Japanese based game, the very thing that would be considered a dragon in their culture would be what they consider the base requirements for a dragon. Also, I figured the very card in this series that actually IS a dragon not having wings was a good enough point, but you're right, other than her, there are no others in the entire game. 184.79.227.75 (talk) 14:07, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

Tri-Horned Dragon

Mikazukinoyaiba

B. Dragon Jungle King

Yamadron

Divine Dragon Ragnarok

Frost and Flame Dragon

Interplanetarypurplythorny Dragon

Divine Dragon - Excelion

Rare Metal Dragon

Cave Dragon

Dodger Dragon

Vanguard of the Dragon

Okay, this has somehow transformed into a conversation about Dragons without wings. The original comment was that we should mention there may be more Dragon Ninjas to come because there is "solid enough speculation". We do not put speculation, period. If there are more, we add mention of then when they are actually revealed. Until them, we don't need to mention that there may be more to come. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 14:19, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

I agree. Anyhow Unregistered is wrong, we should not add speculation. Also the Dragon Ninjas are based from the Three Flip-Effect Ninjas which now is complete though if konami wants to include other then we can just add them, simple as that but right now, we got no proof so why bother adding them? We can just simply add them if some are coming. Also unregistered user, check more Dragons, the ones you listed aren't even halfway to the number of Winged Dragons out there so yea enough already, Winged Beast can be relate to Dragons. Also the Dragon Ninjas are TCG-Exclusives, meaning they are made in AMERICA, not Japan ----SharkTenjo 15:25, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

I would wholeheartedly agree that there shouldn't be speculation on articles if this wiki didn't have speculation on numerous other pages over the years. All I'm doing here is commenting on the fact that every argument other than "no speculation" that...Yami...Wheeler...is providing is completely baseless and has no intelligent thought put behind it. Completely disregarding the fact that the common Dragon type in Yu-Gi-Oh! is of the European variety, not as you put it "AMERICA[N",] the very one depicted in White Dragon Ninja herself is of the Asian variety, which is an interesting point considering that, as you put it, "the Dragon Ninjas are TCG-Exclusives", making your point about wingless dragons unable to exist in the Dragon Ninjas as irrelevant and under-researched as YamiWheeler's argument that a Winged-Beast can be remotely considered as a dragon on the sole purpose that dragons are beasts with wings. I agree that Beasts don't tie in with Dragons, but by his own argument, a wingless dragon can easily be considered as a Beast-type since dragons are beasts. 184.79.227.75 (talk) 15:45, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:28, 2 November 2012 (view source) 33royward (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:45, 2 November 2012 (view source) 184.79.227.75 (contribs) (→‎Speculation) Newer edit →
Line 47:		Line 47:

	:I agree. Anyhow Unregistered is wrong, we should not add speculation. Also the Dragon Ninjas are based from the Three [[Crimson Ninja\|Flip]]-[[Armed Ninja\|Effect]] [[White Ninja\|Ninjas]] which now is complete though if konami wants to include other then we can just add them, simple as that but right now, we got no proof so why bother adding them? We can just simply add them if some are coming. Also unregistered user, check more Dragons, the ones you listed aren't even halfway to the number of Winged Dragons out there so yea enough already, Winged Beast can be relate to Dragons. Also the Dragon Ninjas are TCG-Exclusives, meaning they are made in AMERICA, not Japan ----<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Caligraphy';">[[User:33royward\|SharkTenjo]]</span> 15:25, November 2, 2012 (UTC)		:I agree. Anyhow Unregistered is wrong, we should not add speculation. Also the Dragon Ninjas are based from the Three [[Crimson Ninja\|Flip]]-[[Armed Ninja\|Effect]] [[White Ninja\|Ninjas]] which now is complete though if konami wants to include other then we can just add them, simple as that but right now, we got no proof so why bother adding them? We can just simply add them if some are coming. Also unregistered user, check more Dragons, the ones you listed aren't even halfway to the number of Winged Dragons out there so yea enough already, Winged Beast can be relate to Dragons. Also the Dragon Ninjas are TCG-Exclusives, meaning they are made in AMERICA, not Japan ----<span style="font-family: 'Lucida Caligraphy';">[[User:33royward\|SharkTenjo]]</span> 15:25, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	::I would wholeheartedly agree that there shouldn't be speculation on articles if this wiki didn't have speculation on numerous other pages over the years. All I'm doing here is commenting on the fact that every argument other than "no speculation" that...Yami...Wheeler...is providing is completely baseless and has no intelligent thought put behind it. [http://fc06.deviantart.net/fs47/f/2009/229/4/c/quetzalcoatl_WIP_5_by_unded.jpg Completely disregarding the fact that the common Dragon type in Yu-Gi-Oh! is of the European variety, not as you put it "AMERICA[N]",] the very one depicted in [[White Dragon Ninja]] herself is of the Asian variety, which is an interesting point considering that, as you put it, "the Dragon Ninjas are TCG-Exclusives", making your point about wingless dragons unable to exist in the Dragon Ninjas as irrelevant and under-researched as YamiWheeler's argument that a Winged-Beast can be remotely considered as a dragon on the sole purpose that dragons are beasts with wings. I agree that Beasts don't tie in with Dragons, but by his own argument, a wingless dragon can easily be considered as a Beast-type since dragons are beasts. [[Special:Contributions/184.79.227.75\|184.79.227.75]] ([[User talk:184.79.227.75\|talk]]) 15:45, November 2, 2012 (UTC)