| Forums: | Index → Yu-Gi-Oh! Wiki Community Discussion → Questionable Card Rulings | Post new comment |
| Please sign your comments with ~~~~. See Help:Signature and Help:Talk pages for further information. | ||
For previously official card rulings, there is a section called "Out of Date" for older rulings which are out of date.
What about rulings that are questionable? For example, Catapult Turtle has a ruling that says you can Tribute a face-down monster, but now its problem-solving card text says ATK on the field. One group of judges I talk to says that the damage for a face-down monster will by 0. Another group of judges I talk to says to ignore problem-solving card text and use Dark Strike Fighter's (who has no PSCT) ruling.
Should there be a section for questionable, unanswered rulings like that? Or does listing them under previously official do that well enough?
Chaosgodkarl (talk • contribs) 04:06, July 17, 2013 (UTC)
By the way the reason for confusion is because its PSCT says "ATK on the field".
Chaosgodkarl (talk • contribs) 04:07, July 17, 2013 (UTC)