| Forums: | Index → Yu-Gi-Oh! Wiki Community Discussion → Deck List Tables, standardized? | Post new comment |
| Please sign your comments with ~~~~. See Help:Signature and Help:Talk pages for further information. | ||
Okay, it has not really been too long since my last major idea was made, however there is something that has been bugging me for almost two years. There is a possibility of this being resolved with a quick fix answer or an already made practice that I am unaware of, I am just not sure.
Let me begin with a simple statement: I in no way have any true formal understanding of most/all computer programming or languages. As such, this is a question that I truly have no skills in and I am unable to create a working answer on my own due to the lack of most/all knowledge on this subject. Please do not irritate me with jokes or comments on my knowledge in this subject.
I have had a Deck List Table that was created for me on the "Alien" and "Frog" page for almost (or more?) two years now. I greatly enjoy the benefit of it with the easy adaption of new cards and the opportunity to say why that card is recommended. The sad state is that a majority of Deck Lists used on the different pages seems to be some sort of spoiler. This is best shown on the "The Agent" page.
The page has four separate lists.
- The first just lists the different monsters out. The "table" actually doesn't exist. I actually like this idea for the "basic" Deck on any Archetype page and so that is not my concern for this topic at all.
- The second and third use the spoiler table. I hate this idea because it is so bland and allows nothing to be said other than the card itself. See "Wight" under "Basic 'Wight' Deck" for an example for how this can go wrong.
- The fourth way is the "+/- Fairys" idea on the "The Agent" page. It is a simple and clear way of relaying the information while also being organized.
The Main point that I have is that the second Deck List is horrible and the fourth is better aside one point. Is there any way to either make the table a built-in spoiler ability or place the table inside a spoiler? The only main problem with that table is the amount of space it involves and that would only need a spoiler to solve. --LordGeovanni- (Talk To Me) *Kupo* 08:20, May 31, 2012 (UTC)