Can we change most of the card lists from "all" to just "non-official", so that it'll be less redundant? (talk) 03:16, October 2, 2011 (UTC)

I have no issues with putting anime/manga only cards in their own table instead of in the combined one. However, I question why we'd call it "non-official" as opposed to "anime/manga only" or "non-game". Cheesedude (talkcontribs) 23:19, October 2, 2011 (UTC)
I don't really care what you call it; you can change it if you want. (talk) 02:05, October 3, 2011 (UTC)
I see you're going with AniManEx? I'm not sure I like the sound of that. --Golden Key (talkcontribs) 01:47, October 6, 2011 (UTC)
(sigh) what do you suggest then? i thought it was better than "non-official". (talk) 01:57, October 6, 2011 (UTC)
Seriously, why is it that when i give someone the opportunity to rename it, they just walk away, then comeback complaining about the name change? (talk) 23:45, October 6, 2011 (UTC)
As I pointed out on my talk page, there are issues with using [[Class 1::!Official]] to list non-OCG/TCG cards (namely, that any such query will not list any cards that do not have a value in Class 1). One of these days, I intend to rework that entire system of properties, but it's probably not going to happen for a while yet. In the meantime, for archetype card lists, {{Archseries card list}} should start being used; this will allow all such lists to be updated with a single edit once the new property system has been worked out and deployed (I'll create sister templates for Type and Attribute lists at some point too). ディノ千?!? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 01:45, October 10, 2011 (UTC)
*Disclosure: Some of the links above are affiliate links, meaning, at no additional cost to you, Fandom will earn a commission if you click through and make a purchase. Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.