"This is the first "Gemknight" Effect Monster in the Archetype, second being Gemknight Emeral."
I'm not so sure the 2nd half of that sentence is needed, but I'm willing to leave it in until we have a 3rd example. The first half probably should stay. Talk to me. Sabre Knight 18:43, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, then how can anyone not know that Emeral's exist as being Effect Monster? I just put it there to show other duelists and viewers that there are actually more than just one. --FredCat100 18:44, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
- "First" implies there are others, otherwise it should say "only." Again, I say for now, let's leave it in. Otherwise, when there's, say, 5 of them we don't have a long list of Gemknights. At least, that's my thouhts on the subject. Sabre Knight 18:48, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Only mean that there is one Effect Monster in that Archetype. That's prove you wrong since there are now two Gemknights in the Archetype are effect monsters. Unless if you say so about five Gemknights, then we can work on it. On the other hand, if those "effect" Gemknights happened to be Fusion, therefore it's not count as they're from Extra Deck, not Main. --FredCat100 18:55, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
- To be completely honestly, I have no idea the context of what you said. Although I probably should have said "would" instead of "should." Anyway what I was saying is called a "hypothetical statement." That means it may or may not be true, but a "hypothetical argument," such as what is stated afterward, assumes that the attached statement is true. Or in this case, that may potentially become true in the future. I'm always lookin' ahead (in more ways than one ;-)). Sabre Knight 19:02, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Then ask Admin for some deals. --FredCat100 19:26, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Um, what? Sabre Knight 19:46, June 24, 2010 (UTC)