User talk:YamiWheeler

RE: Shien

• How was my reason superior-sounding? I was merely trying to make a point of how unrelated they were. PoirotH 17:07, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

• That's just how things go around here. If you see something you think is wrong, you remove it, right? But then comes another that thought it was right in the first place, and naturally places it back. If that would happen to you, would you leave it as it is or once again remove it? PoirotH 17:12, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

User subpages

Users are free to create subpages of their user page. Restrictions are the same as regular user pages; no copyright violations, personal attacks, spam or excessive info unrelated to the Yu-Gi-Oh! Wiki or Yu-Gi-Oh! in general. There isn't really a limit on how many each user can make, just as long as they don't go overboard. -- Deltaneos (talk) 16:17, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Alien, Locked

Just a note, you're supposed to resolve disputes on the Talk Pages, not by fighting it out on the article's main page. Don't modify the article's main page - even if it's to undo their edits - until you all sort it out. --Deus Ex Machina (Talk) 21:08, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Really cute...

That's really cute, Yami-Monkey. --FredCat100 22:05, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Nope, I am not embarrassing of those stuff you done. I just find that funny and you think you're better than Lord and I. --FredCat100 22:11, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Oh really, go ahead, have fun with Reimu... and come back to me after you done with it. --FredCat100 22:13, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Honestly, you take over Reimu's place in the argument, as far as I can see. But I am not 8 years old, I am actually 22 years old. So if you want to clean this site up, cooperate with us, not hate us. --FredCat100 22:18, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

PROBLEM: LordGeovanni insists his precious wall of text is worth something --Reimu_H, Touhou fanboy 22:22, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Seem like Admin is on Lord's side, so you're out of my legend. Good day, Yami-Monkey. --FredCat100 22:26, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

I wish the mods had a rule against this stuff. By Yami-Monkey the Gay-Lover. --FredCat100 22:34, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Then wish you never say that. --FredCat100 22:37, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I feel that my hard work is worth something. I put time into it so it at least has value to me. I am still able to compromise. Yet even not neither of you has made any effort to do so. --LordGeovanni 01:20, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Userpage Rules

Yes. Here. -- Deltaneos (talk) 23:06, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

Flame Offense

Do that again, and I will report you to Admin for call me that again, ok? --FredCat100 01:06, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

For the love of Ra, don't get involved

Leave them both alone, seriously. This has escalated to a ridiculous level already. The last thing we need is a third person slinging insults. I don't mean offense by this, I'm just giving you advice. Cheesedude 03:31, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

Fair enough then. But yeah, I do agree. He seems to legitimately think that GrouchMan's edits are vandalism, despite them not being so. He legitimately thinks he's in the right. That's what concerns me. Cheesedude 17:26, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I know. Regardless I'm staying out of this myself, unless they specifically ask for my input again. Apparently, I was mistaken for an admin. Cheesedude 18:15, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

No, I'm just a fairly active user who is usually good at keeping a cool head. Cheesedude 18:51, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

Harpies page edit

Hello again. I just stopped by to kindly ask you to not leave a comment similar to what you did when you edited my revert on the Harpie page. I have been watching that page for a while and I did see the "discussion" over if Harpie Lady 1 can have Inferno Reckless Summon activate to its Special Summon. At the time, an Admin stepped in and edited the page with the topic the way it was. Since then, that paragraph has not been edited since. I was not in the "discussion" nor did I edit anything on that page during the time of the "discussion". All I did was revert that edit to what the Admins said to leave it as. Your comment when you edited is as follows:

• (Reworded so you don't repeat yourself over and over, and to make it easier to understand. Also, your edits aren't more important than anyone else's. You have no right to tell people not to remove it.)

It seems that your comment on the revert is specifically saying that I believe that my edits are more important that other people's. This is not true. However, I do have the right to tell someone that they are wrong and to not remove something. Telling me that I do not have that right is just as arrogant as you believe I am. The fact that you rearranged my edit and reworded it was nice and was just as sufficient, however I am asking you to not leave negative comments nor order me arround in the comments. Is this acceptable to you? --LordGeovanni 19:25, May 11, 2010 (UTC)

Great games indeed

Took me a while to figure out that you were Tamaru. Runer5h 16:23, May 22, 2010 (UTC)Runer5h

• xD Hahaha. Sorry.--YamiWheeler 16:28, May 22, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Kuri-master

He probably didn't notice your first edit summary explaining that "Dark General Freed" can only get Level 4 monsters. I'm sure he'll see your second one. It's unlikely he'll re-add them after seeing it doesn't work. -- Deltaneos (talk) 23:42, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Okay, forget that. Please use the talk page to ask other editors if they agree it shouldn't be included rather than arguing over it through edit summaries. -- Deltaneos (talk) 23:45, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Seems to be coming along nicely so far. Just so know, I did move each page to (promo card), rather than (Promo Card). Cheesedude 23:45, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

"Obelisk" was originally a disambiguation page, which listed the effect monster, promo monster, and the GX dorm. Deltaneos changed it to redirect to the effect monster back in January, according to the edit history. I don't have a particular problem with it, but would have preferred it to stay a disambiguation page. *shrugs* Cheesedude 02:45, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Your deck PWNS

Thanks! I've been working on it ever since Dragunities were announced, so it's gone through a lot of revisions. As for Alector... eh. I suppose it would work, but I feel like it could just as easily end up being a dead draw against people that don't swarm. Runer5h (talk • contribs) 20:49, June 26, 2010 (UTC)Runer5h

BEWD edit

The only reason I stopped because i started getting a little cramp in my fingers. I got the idea to do this from the the Dark Magician page. I can finish what I've started with a second ago.Rkdew0 (talk • contribs) 01:03, July 2, 2010 (UTC)

• As I'm pretty sure you can understand how time consuming it can be too put it on any page. But, I think if others who are interested in the site can help it would be finished in a shorter amount of time. Luckily the template makes it so much easier.Rkdew0 (talk • contribs) 01:03, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
  • Template:Card table set. In the end it's going to be the people who rarely edit or the ones that spam the site that complain. This keeps it more organized so i doubt if any of our usually and more distinguished editors have a problem with it.--Rkdew0 (talk • contribs) 01:36, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
    • While you did update the BEWD page with the template, you didn't finish it. You also need to include the video game packs when you're adding the template, makes it look more uniform. Sorry if I'm sounding a little mad about the little mistake.--Rkdew0 (talk • contribs) 01:36, July 2, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for helping

Thanks for fixing the Scrap Archfiend page. I saw the pic and i wanted to add it (LQ) but had no idea how to make it the centerpiece.

Your Machina Gadget Deck

Have you thought about running one or more Jinzo - Returners? You can easily discard them for Machina Fortress and if Jinzo is in the graveyard, you can special summon him as well. He will get destroyed during the End Phase, but it could give you a pretty big advantage.Radmire (talk • contribs) 00:58, July 15, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Deck List Template

Because you asked. You can. But you do know that you can change the colour of the text and background in the regular Decklist template as well right? Falzar FZ (talk • contribs) 14:00, July 15, 2010 (UTC)

Actually, I would prefer it if you'd used this template (it does the same thing). Not only is the coding shorter and easier to understand when using the decklist (which is why I just converted my own page to using it), it should also allow me to keep track of who's using it. Falzar FZ (talk • contribs) 02:40, July 16, 2010 (UTC)

Just noticed that you were playing around with the italics and stuff before using the template; and it seemed like you weren't getting very far.

Anyways, just to let you know. Even with the template, you can still change things, such as the font size and style.

To do this, you change the line "|fontcolor="

If you make it "|fontcolor=#000000; font-size:25pt; font-style:italic;"

then that should make the non-linked text black, make the font much bigger and in italics.

If you make it "|fontcolor=red; font-size:25pt;"

then that should make the non-linked text red, and make font must bigger.

If you make it "|fontcolor=#000000; font-family:Palatino;"

then that should make the non-linked text black, and change the font type to Palatino.

That should be enough examples, if you have any problems, feel free to ask, since I know quite a fair amount of HTML and CSS coding.

Oh yes, I just remembered. It's a good idea to use the Preview button, it can be found right next to the Save page button. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 10:31, July 17, 2010 (UTC)