User talk:Cheesedude

Welcome to my talk page. Feel free to leave any messages below. However, do not ask me for help with your Deck. I have not actively played the TCG in a very long time, and have not kept up with current rulings. If you leave me a message, I will put your talk page on my watchlist. You may respond on my talk page or your talk page. I will check both.

Number 69
I am debating through through the effort of undoing the rename to Number 69 due to the fact the person that went through with making it Coat of Arms did not provide any actual proof that it is supposed to be Coat of Arms. Is it worth going through, or just leave the possibly mistaken name up until we get something else to prove it once and for all beyond the image I linked on the talk page. - Axel Shiokawa (talk • contribs) 02:10, May 5, 2013 (UTC)


 * Since posting this notice about the potential need to reverse a rename, Number 69 has been renamed for a second time, once again to something that is not backed by what is shown in: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-aakK6uiWqKY/UYLR2tEphRI/AAAAAAAABaA/uEcovDftjqU/s1600/39acd5dbfa3fe7987f6d576700ff413c.jpg As I can not rename the page back to Heraldic Emblem as supported by the link, I have to leave this up to an admin to settle since this appears to be ready to turn into an edit war. - Axel Shiokawa (talk • contribs) 03:34, May 5, 2013 (UTC)


 * Until we have an actual source that says the English name (which should come fairly soon), I'm inclined to leave it as it is. My time is short on the weekends and I must go soon, and I don't want to spend the little time I have on the wiki today moving that article again. If you wish to contact another admin instead, that would be fine as well. Thanks, Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 11:23, May 5, 2013 (UTC)


 * I thought to bring it up because the previous edits were without any source at all and the provided link does suggest that the name is Heraldic Emblem. Along with Number 8's name and the rest of the archetype being Heraldic Beast also implying that the name should be Heraldic at the very least. - Axel Shiokawa (talk • contribs) 17:50, May 5, 2013 (UTC)


 * Alright, I'm back for the day. Seems its been moved again. A source was provided this time, but the link is dead. I'm looking into now and trying to find a source somewhere. As for your other comment, check the card's talk page, I've answered that part there. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 20:27, May 5, 2013 (UTC)


 * I just took a look to the source posted, which just happened to be Shriek listing the card in the English spoiler without an image of the card. I've been hesitant to use that as a source for renames on the Dragon Rulers because they either could just be pulling names out, or taking them from the wikia as I have seen them called out for doing before. For the time being I put the rename template up on the page in the off chance that the name doesnt change from its Spanish > English translation and left it at that. - Axel Shiokawa (talk • contribs) 20:37, May 5, 2013 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I'm not a fan of Shriek myself. The rename template should be fine for now. If it gets moved again without a source, I'm locking it down. Anyway, thank you for doing what you've done. You went about this right way for sure. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 20:41, May 5, 2013 (UTC)


 * It beat the throwdowns I had over Hope Ray V/Victory. Also helps that this is a case where I feel like I'm in the right and can back up why I am for that matter. Either way, I'm already out of the options that I could through on my own so it has to be up to the staff at this point to put an end to the rename battle going on. - Axel Shiokawa (talk • contribs) 20:52, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

Number 69
Here's the link to Number 69's TCG confirmed name: clicky --''' Yes, it's PSYCHID! He talks! He does stuff!''' 22:06, May 5, 2013 (UTC)


 * That really isnt a source. For all we know, Shriek took the name from the wikia and they do not actually know. This is why I have put the rename template in place on Number 69's page so that it can be handled by staff - Axel Shiokawa (talk • contribs) 22:23, May 5, 2013 (UTC)


 * Also to address the issue of using Shriek as a source, they also have the little Dragon Ruler's named in that spoiler for the TCG set. Yet no one here has renamed those respective pages because they doubt the authenticity of the translations/localizations for their names. They may be accurate at reporting events, but they are not very good at translating anything for themselves. - Axel Shiokawa (talk • contribs) 19:25, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

Confused IP-Addressed User
It sound like he was not Master D, but I have nothing to against with that. So feel free to extending the situation to him of why he was blocking. And yes, I know that he can playing a trick, making himself as if he was another person. If you don't like how he act, lock the edits on him further to prevent him from making himself a joker. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  13:44, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

My Wikia App
Hello. My name is Nic and I'm from the Community Development Team. As you may or may not have heard, we recently released an application called My Wikia. We are hoping to bring this app to the attention of more people and for this reason could use some cooperation with this Wiki. We are hoping that you will allow us to display this Template in the upper-right hand column on your wiki. If you are fine with us displaying this, please let me know. Thanks. - Wagnike2 (talk • contribs) 14:10, May 6, 2013 (UTC)


 * I've mentioned it to some other admins. I'll let you know as soon as I can. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:06, May 6, 2013 (UTC)


 * It seems fine. Feel free to put it up. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:05, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

Overlay Network
You should take a look at Overlay Network article. It explains the portal which Vetrix and Barian race use to teleport. (Bring it 'em --- User:Avatarr) 00:33, May 8, 2013 (UTC)


 * If you look at Overlay Network close and what it for. You can impale that it is portal used to travel through dimensions such as Xyz Monsters used it to come to earth. (Bring it 'em --- User:Avatarr) 01:39, May 8, 2013 (UTC)


 * From my observation, I think they do resemble to Xyz summoning. As you go inside the Overlay Network portal, it look like The card frame of Xyz Monsters which stylized by having it appear as if one is flying through space with many stars in the frame giving the appearance of one streaking by them and other stars appearing stationary due to relative distance. Similar to the Photo where Vector is travel through dimensions. (Bring it 'em --- User:Avatarr) 02:01, May 8, 2013 (UTC)


 * I guess so. We should wait for few more episodes because they might explain more about portals used by the Barians and Different Dimension Airship. (Bring it 'em --- User:Avatarr) 02:07, May 8, 2013 (UTC)

Vandal
I take it you handled the precautions regarding our latest vandal, right?--Hawk00Refferencer (talk • contribs) 18:46, May 11, 2013 (UTC)

(Transferred by i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  19:42, May 11, 2013 (UTC))


 * Yeah, he's blocked. Thanks. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:45, May 11, 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks, sorry to be a bother. I was afraid I posted this conversation under the wrong cathegory. If so, I appologize.--Hawk00Refferencer (talk • contribs) 21:09, May 11, 2013 (UTC)


 * No worry - you just posted it in wrong article after all, lucky that I was really nice to help you out by place your comment in here instead. Just like your Talk Page, be sure to be careful when you're going to post in the comment. And if you're using Monobook skin, it will be known as "Discussion" next to the "User Page", like I am using right now. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:29, May 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * Aye, I sure messed up that. Gomen. --Hawk00Refferencer (talk • contribs) 22:32, May 11, 2013 (UTC)

Battle Ox
So, any more comments on Talk:Battle Ox (character)? I got no more reply. :/ LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 21:10, May 12, 2013 (UTC)


 * I've been busy, sorry. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 21:13, May 12, 2013 (UTC)


 * Nah, don't worry. Thanks for replying. LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 21:42, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

Dexter 98 reference
Can you fix this? I've been trying but I don't know why it's still not displaying (I've been in the preview 5 times over trying to figure out what's up). Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 22:49, May 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * Dexter's Laboratory or Dexter from Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's? -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:51, May 12, 2013 (UTC)


 * Where am I supposed to be looking, Shard? Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:01, May 12, 2013 (UTC)


 * Here. For some reason the episode 98 reference won't display, and if I try to remove it, the next reference is affected the same way. (edit) 'face-palm that I didn't see that'. Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 23:12, May 12, 2013 (UTC)


 * No problem. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:14, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

Number 74
I'm pretty sure you've had it with this by now, but may I hear your reasons for it once again?--Hawk00Refferencer (talk • contribs) 16:04, May 13, 2013 (UTC)


 * What? Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:10, May 13, 2013 (UTC)


 * He means the trivia talk page of Number 74. Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 16:51, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

Accidental rv
Sorry for the recent revert, accidently hit Rollback when I was actually only trying to click diff. Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 16:51, May 14, 2013 (UTC)


 * No big deal (I do that at least once a month myself). Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:52, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

GX is part of Yu-Gi-Oh! Second Season!
I swore to Sophia, that user is one stubborn user, he just kept revert his own edit back to what he believed. I had to revert it back to the way you thought it was right. Wouldn't it's time to lock up the article for a day or two, OR go ahead and slap some sense in that IP-Addressed User? -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  01:23, May 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * No, because he offered a perfectly reasonable explanation for the revert. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:26, May 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * Well, though they are using the same structure (Yu-Gi-Oh! cards and game ideas), they are still separate show. I am aware that Yugi made his appearance more than his rival (Seto) but that's not enough to making GX become part of Yu-Gi-Oh! Second Season. I would say same for 5D's and ZEXAL, though Dark Magician Girl, statue monsters, etc. are all common appearance through all shows. I would be damned if he put in some more logical thought of why GX is same as Second Season, they are stay separate. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  01:29, May 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * I never said they were the same show (nor did the IP), I said the IP's reasons were valid because the articles are structured like that. If you care that much, I suggest you go fix them in the all the other articles, then revert the IP's edit. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:33, May 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * He didn't "undoing" my edit as of lately. And that article is only one he vandalism'd on. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  01:35, May 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * Fred. Go read his last edit summary. Then read my last post again. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:47, May 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * Hey, my dear coffee guy, if you still disagreed, just go and revert it - I usually left all edits from my friends (yes, included you) alone. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  03:04, May 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure you're understanding me. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:07, May 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * *poking your shoulder* -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  03:17, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Addition to the Index Page
Would it be alright if you added Forum:Weekly Deck Competition to the list of blue links on the Forum:Index page? All the other forums have a link that lets users go to the forum they need, but the WDC Forum doesn't, I think it might be a way to advertise the contest to new users. Just a thought. Also, Cheesedude, if you're not the person to ask, who should I ask? -- Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  02:59, May 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * Sure. I'll add it now. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:01, May 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks. -- Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  03:03, May 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * No problem. Let me know if the text I used for the pipe needs to be changed. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:04, May 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * No, I like the text. But, could you add in to before show off? That way it makes sense with the first part of the question proposed, Do you want.... -- Dark Ace SP  ( Talk )  03:07, May 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * Yeah, that might help. Done. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:17, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

Images
Hey Cheesedude. Jx900 has uploaded many fan-made images which are really of no benefit to the wiki. I'm speaking to him in the chatroom now and it is all in good faith; it isn't 'vandalism' as such. The images are of cards, but are fan-made versions. 'Mind having a look?. Thanks, 18:55, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Yea, anime pictures, Bob456... He would have a serious stack cut off his job. If he still don't listen, a week of ban would deal with him. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  19:14, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * As far as I'm aware, he's stopped uploading them after I told him the issue. It's all out of good faith; a block isn't necessary. 19:15, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Indeed, it must hit him like a truck would stopping on the dime. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  19:58, May 20, 2013 (UTC)

Ruling Vandalism?
*thumbed over the shoulder, at GrouchMan's Profile* Ain't that forbidden to have artwork of Characters in the User's Page? -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  21:32, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * It is? I wasn't aware of thet. Why is it forbidden?--Hawk00Refferencer (talk • contribs) 16:03, May 21, 2013 (UTC)


 * Copyright violation. Fair use covers the article space, not the user space. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:04, May 21, 2013 (UTC)

RE:User page
Oh sure, Cheesedude, sorry about that. -- GrouchMan  ( My trash can ) 22:48, May 20, 2013 (UTC)

Artwork page guidelines
Right, I'm shocked this is even an issue, but some people seem to think that cards have genders, so it has become one. I have two points.
 * It made perfect sense to begin changing cards from, for example, "The artwork of "Foolish Burial" was edited to... [description of change]" to "This card's artwork was edited to... [description of change]" because the name of the card is obvious. The card name is listed on the page already, why do we need to repeat ourselves? This is something Fred doesn't seem to understand, and although it's logical, a lot of users still use the former way.
 * The use of "her" to describe cards. Cards do not have genders. The monsters depicted in the artwork have genders, but in artwork pages, we are referring to the artwork itself, not the monster. I'm not completely against using "her", because it can be awkward to describe artwork changes otherwise, and because it's such a tiny thing blown out of proportion by one disillusioned user, but a more professional sounding alternative would be preferable.

My point is, can we have a draft of Artwork guidelines now that we've finally finished dealing with Trivia guidelines, with a sample of how the card artwork pages should be worded?--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 19:06, May 29, 2013 (UTC)


 * Along with Joey's own comment, I would like to suggest you to read all lines that other articles had before this issue was hit the fan and shattered all over here now. I meant, why bother deal the theory on Elfobia if there are already many other girls' articles had those lines in that way? -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  19:10, May 29, 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes, that is exactly the current standard that I feel should be reviewed.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 19:15, May 29, 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes, we should probably make an artwork policy page. I can try to make a draft tonight. As for the issue at hand, UK suggested using "this monster instead of "this card". That should satisfy both parties. The wording is a problem though. You're right that its like that on all the pages and it shouldn't be. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:27, May 29, 2013 (UTC)

Voice actors
I'm just curious, where do you guys get your information on who voices who in the English dub? ChaosGallade (talk • contribs) 15:40, May 31, 2013 (UTC)