User talk:Skullvarnish/Archive 1

Re: Card of Sanctity
I have never heard of a real world "Card of Sanctity" printed with that effect. Which magazine did you see this in and what exactly did it say? But I am positive the image we have is genuine. Pcouw uploaded it. He's one of the site's first members and is very reliable. He only uploads images from his own collection. There's no way he'd Photoshop a fake lore onto it. -- Deltaneos (talk) 12:43, June 14, 2010 (UTC)


 * I looked up the set number on Google. I found one Pojo thread and a couple of Italian forums. Beckett's seems to be the only place people have heard of it. Since it's missing the number in the bottom corner, has the wrong effect and nobody's heard of it anywhere else, they mostly agree that it's a mistake or hoax. -- Deltaneos (talk) 12:13, June 15, 2010 (UTC)

Do you have Yugioh Virtual Desktop (YVD)? Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 18:10, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

Oh well then. If you ever end up wanting to duel on it in the future, let me know. Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 18:36, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

Effect veiler
thanks for correcting me, that helps a lot NOT FrogtheJam (talk • contribs) 22:39, August 25, 2010 (UTC)

Cannon solider
Yo what's with the edit on the Cannon soilder's page?

RE: About the Quick-Play Spells thing...

 * That's okay, but I wouldn't revert edits from anons just because they're anons.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 00:27, August 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * That's good, then. But people will always vandalize. It's good to look at the reasons for why people might do something like revert an edit, though.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 00:33, August 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Kay. It's not really a big deal, though. It's just something to consider so you save some time is all.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 00:38, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

you
have completely confused me. What is it i'm not thrilled about? NOT FrogtheJam (talk • contribs) 20:45, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

was it the revised frog ftk? i remember not being thrilled about that... NOT FrogtheJam (talk • contribs) 20:50, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

OOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhh that. yeah thanks for stopping me from looking like an idiot (relatively) on the interwebs NOT FrogtheJam (talk • contribs) 21:01, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

King Pyron
here's a good question, why the hell was the original trivia page even removed in the first place? it's an obvious reference to darkstalkers AliceSKD (talk • contribs) 23:53, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * which I have just done AliceSKD (talk • contribs) 23:58, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Bro, uncalled for...

 * I'm sorry, I didn't realize your opinion was absolute and could not be challenged whatsoever. If you took offense, then you're too sensitive. It was 1 line. Get over it. If you don't like your opinion being challenged, then don't post on the forum. Simple as. And you said "not sure about Tier 1" - i.e. you thought there was a chance, but unlikely. A proper tier 1 deck is, atm, Gladiator Beasts, Blackwings, X-Sabers, Anti-Meta variants, Quickdraw Plants, etc. As for Mist Valleys, you'd have to be a pretty bad player to be beaten by that loop. It's so easy to stop. You can stop it altogether by using Solemn Warning on Apex Avian to begin with, Book of Moon it when it activates it's effect, Bottomless Trap Hole it before they get Thunderbird in play. It also can't use it more than once per chain. So, no, you aren't f**ked at all, if you're a decent player. And yes, I did insult your opinion. People will do that. What do you expect on a forum? Besides, what I said was tame. I could have and have said worse things before.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 15:48, September 11, 2010 (UTC)


 * LOL. You beat those decks with Mist Valley? I highly, highly doubt that. And no, it does matter very much how good of a player you are. That's why Mist Valley decks don't top YCSes. And what does Giant Trunade have to do with it? It's a loop, which means it can be stopped, even if you Giant Trunade when Apex Avian is summoned. And you are being too sensitive. I didn't say anything offensive. Get over it.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 19:36, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

YamiWheeler's talk
While going to message YamiWheeler, I noticed your message on there. As for it, first of all, I'm not the most retarded yugioh dueler you'll meet. I know a thing or two about the tiers. Second, you said to Yami that you never said Skull Servants would be top tier, more like tier 2? Yami never even said anything about them being in top tier; rather the opposite. Third, Mist Valleys do suck. It's a pain getting out Apex Avian, as it needs 2 tributes, and the current Mist Valleys aren't fast enough to make that a breeze. I've used Mist Valleys. I've made a Blackwing/Mist Valley hybrid before. It sucked because Mist Valleys do not cooperate and are a bad archetype in general. Hell, I didn't want to believe it. I thought for a second that Mist Valleys were somewhat potent, but facts are facts, they are a b-a-d archetype. As for tiers, do your homework a little. You see, here's the main reason Skull Servants and Mist Valleys don't have any shot at the tiers; no freaking support! Name me 1 tier deck that doesn't have any support to its name (that's not a hybrid), just try.| DED Dragoon ( (Leaving Me Messages Are Often Left Here) 22:53, September 13, 2010 (UTC)

Just saying hi.
How is work going for you?

im offended you would call it such a thing

I just woke up, cut me some lack god...but so how is work?Yokosmeargle (talk • contribs) 15:48, July 18, 2011 (UTC)

Re:
If they're equally absurb, you should remove them. That's what I've spent quite a bit of time doing. Also, the whole reason is that you don't need it. You don't want to get a -2+ just to do this.

I AM FAIRLY SURE THAT...
...you should take your time to read the subtopic for crying out loudly! You're just betrayed it from it own list. Oh, yes, be sure to have some coffee before kick yourself on this site. :-) -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:33, August 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * You removed the line of Victory Condition from the list that said it cannot be counter'd. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:49, August 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * That's the why I asked you to read the "subtopic" careful... >_> -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:54, August 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * That's a good plan, Summoned Skull... -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:58, August 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yup, you should take your time study them and weigh your decide very careful and wise. Yea, I rushed through sometimes, but I learned a big heck of it. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  18:08, August 4, 2011 (UTC)

Torrential Tribute vs. TTH
Well, that user should meaning for "Treacherous Trap Hole" as the only trap if you're running a deck that don't focus on Trap Cards too much, like Monarch Deck and all those shit. But yea, Torrential Tribute did better job than this trap. But not to disrespect you, you gave a good thinking only in bad words. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  15:40, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * That or if you have facing a big-hit monster (high ATK) and you have no monster on your side of the field, and your opponent is about to summon next cheap monster. With your Life Points at critical of loss, you are not going to play Torrential Tribute to save your ass from two monsters? Yea, that does happening sometimes. I usually playing my own Torrential Tribute whenever I am in mega-trouble like that situation I just explained. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  15:46, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Few times, I drew that card just one or two turns before the "doom" arrive to the field and about to kick my ass. Maybe you should shuffle your deck more often. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  15:49, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * 75% of the times I need right at the minute of horrible doomed. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  15:53, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yea, so Admins won't consider to block you from turn you into co-Admins in the future. I got picked but I was denied by themselves once. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  15:57, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Good thing we met earlier than they planned. Otherwise, you just get your ass creamed all over the bloodshed. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  16:19, August 8, 2011 (UTC)

Tip from veterans
You did very good work on add the tip on those Tip Cards; but you forgot one part - important part, actually - "Quotation".

Yea, Quotation is very important part of the cards itself - if you wish to know why it is important; you have to put them there so we (the common viewers, not just editors or Admins) can know that they are the Card's name, li3k "Light and Darkness Dragon" or "Exxod, Master of The Guard". The one that are not referring to card name can be link, such as wikipedia link to other universe, as Legend of Zelda. As for explain; "Celtic Guardian" resemble Link from Legend of Zelda.

That's what bring me to here when I saw you doing your work on each Spirit Monster Tip Card, you missed that often. Sorry but you have to go edit them through again because of Quotation. It's also part of your responsible. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:24, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Glad that it helped you roll through the hell and back. So again, be sure to remember that in the future if you don't like that article, do it all once (included quotation) -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  18:29, August 8, 2011 (UTC)

Tiras' Gender
Honest, did you just get a bone for Tiras being female? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:01, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * No, just don't want you to say that he's a female. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  21:09, August 8, 2011 (UTC)

Tylar in Stadium
Did you kindly forget that Dragon Ball Z had that kind of "Battle Sport" thing? That's why Tylar was in that picture as we seen. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  15:09, August 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * So is each "seat" in each other stadium. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  15:12, August 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * I am saying that each Stadium that have same seat feature as Baseball version, only different is the arena itself. To me, it look like race track - almost like Olympic or something. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  15:44, August 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * So am I. If you didn't notice the summary of my last edit (on this page) -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  15:48, August 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * And only User who bravely state it, but yes, first to you. :-) -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  15:52, August 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * Really, I am insanity now. At least, I am glad that we became friend through the shit. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  15:56, August 10, 2011 (UTC)