User talk:TheScarecrow14

WC10 Decklists
Hi Scarecrow14. I notice that you're adding cards in characters WC10 Decklists, as you find them. Did you know that it is possible to find the contents of their Deck in one go? You can use "Dark Designator" and pick a card that you know isn't in their Deck. You are then allowed to look through their Deck to confirm that they don't have it (even though it's a video game and it can't cheat). To see the cards in their hand, you can use "Exchange". If you want to see the contents of their "Extra Deck", you can use "Success Probability 0%", if they have less than 2 Fusion Monsters. -- Deltaneos (talk) 16:09, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Your edits
First of all, thank you for adding video game decklists into articles. However, please do not remove relevant notes from the anime/manga deck lists. They are there for a reason. Cards that only appear as dub errors should be listed with such a note, so they don't get re-added without them. I appreciate your addition of vg decks, but please do not remove the notes from the deck lists. Please do not remove the Deck descriptions and the line breaks either. Thanks Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 17:07, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

@Deltaneos - I added the WC10 decks when the videos were leaked on Youtube.

@Cheese - o.o I only added the VG decks :S I didn't delete anything. I know how important the notes are ;D Also how come you deleted some info off Mako & Weevil? Mako won 1 Star chip off an unknown duelist in Duelist Kingdom & aren't Weevil & Rex's grand championship decks different to their Orichalcos decks? Also.... Mako was defeated by either Weevil or Rex since he placed 3rd in the tournament.
 * Someone else must have edited those changes in then. My apologies. As far as the star chip thing goes, go ahead and put it back in. It got in lost in my reversion, and should indeed be there. As for the Grand Championship/Orichalcos Decks, I'm not sure why we list them as one, that's just how they've always been for whatever reason. Someone mentioned it at Talk:Weevil Underwood, but the discussion never actually went anywhere. If you want to separate them, go ahead, I don't really have an objections (at the same time, I don't care enough to separate them myself). Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 21:31, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

Syrus
I really don't see a reason to split his Decks by season. Overall, he doesn't use all that many cards. I would say the same thing about characters like Alexis, Axel and Jesse. There's no clear distinction when one Deck ends and the next begins. This is sort of the case for Jaden as well, but his decklists would be massive otherwise, so it was best to split them for brevity's sake. I'm not going to revert your edit, I just thought I'd see what you think. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:10, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Your recent edits have actually caused me to change my opinion. Splitting the lists calls more attention to cards seen in the ending themes. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 02:29, November 29, 2010 (UTC)

Line breaks
Would you please stop removing the line breaks from between Decklists? It keeps the Decklists from running together when more than one is open. Thanks. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:28, December 7, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Chief
I revived it because you have accident screw it up. Just don't put it in the topic like Headline, as it won't realize which part you referring and will make the headline become lose forever. So if you want to add those decks, better off put them under the latest decks in that line. Oh, and please sign your name with this ~ so I can respond you faster that way. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 19:57, December 7, 2010 (UTC)

(GX) and (5D's) in record boxes
Please do not add more of these. I'm aware that you were not the one that originally added them, but they are not needed. They are in articles about GX and 5D's characters, so it's redundant to clarify that we're not talking about DM. It would be appreciated if you removed them as you continue to edit. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:18, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey, no problem. Since they're in so many articles, it's not surprising. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:34, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

Ground Deck
I'm not sure if you are adding this clarification to non-5D's articles out of habit or not. But it doesn't need to be there. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 17:08, February 21, 2011 (UTC)

Andre
Could you please explain this series of edits. I think you're a great contributor, but I think above looks very close to vandalism. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:59, February 21, 2011 (UTC)


 * Please stop removing the video game Deck descriptions and replacing "Duel Transer" with "Master of the Cards". The article is at "Duel Transer". Video game Deck descriptions are meant to be there. A lot of articles don't have them, but they should have them. By removing it, you're also removing a link to the video game article itself. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:43, February 24, 2011 (UTC)

Request
I have added a section to Sun that details that cards shown spread out on the table for each duelist. When you get a chance, could you take a look at it and see if I've missed any cards or made any mistakes? You originally added a lot of cards that I had missed to the character Decks articles, so I thought I'd ask. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 21:54, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

Several things
Would you please stop changing "Video games" to "Video Games"? Only the first word of a header should be capitalized, unless its a proper noun or a game term. If a character only appears in one season, there is no need to specify which season their Deck is from. If character has no Turbo Deck, there is no need to specify that the Deck is Ground Deck. If a character appears in only one video games, a separate "Video games" subsection isn't needed. The name of the game will suffice. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:06, March 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * Reason being redundancy. Subheaders and labels are to split content by subject. If there's only one subject there's no need to split it. Articles on multiple season characters have their Deck split by season. If it's a Season 1 only character, then it's automatically specified that it's a Season 1 only Deck. You don't need to add subheaders to be consistent. Similarly if it's there's an article on multiple characters, subheaders or labels might be used to specify which character which Deck belongs to. That doesn't mean an article on a single character should also have a subheader to say which character the Deck belongs to. If a section ends up with only one subheader, the subheader (or maybe the main header) is most likely redundant. -- Deltaneos (talk) 13:02, April 20, 2011 (UTC)

Suggestion
I would recommend that you cite the scan within Yuma and Ryoga's articles so that the cards are not removed again. Not everyone was aware of the scan. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 17:54, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Both articles already have a references section. What you would do is insert the following behind the first card in each Decklist that we only know from the scan:

.

Behind the other cards in each list, you would simply put. I'm assuming the scans are from V Jump. If they aren't, replace V Jump without whoever published it. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:16, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

Quick question
Where are "Levia-Dragon - Daedalus" and "The Warrior Returning Alive" in episode 1 of ZEXAL? I'm not seeing them the shot of Yuma or Shark's hands, played by the random duelists, or on Yuma's desk at the start of the episode. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 04:21, April 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * Levia Dragon is on the duel field just before Yuma and Kotori run to see Tetsuo lose, and you can see the corner of The Warrior Returning Alive on Yuma's desk. -- TheScarecrow14 (talk) 21:37, May 10, 2011 (UTC)

Image policy
Image policy is here: Project:Image_Policy. Please don't change Set Card Galleries:Generation Force (OCG-JP)‎‎. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 12:54, April 16, 2011 (UTC)

Episode 5 cards
I haven't read the chapter myself, but are you sure that the new cards from the fifth episode of ZEXAL also appeared in Rank 5 of the manga? -- Deltaneos (talk) 19:37, May 10, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Proposal
Nah, if the information is too little, then it remains with the main article. Like the Deck recipe for the idea, if the deck recipe is only in single box, or not enough, then it's stay with Character's Article. It's no need to separate those character's personality list into two. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:00, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Proposal
I think that's a great idea, personally. Bulbapedia does something similar with all the parallel continuities. I would recommend that you bring it up at Forum:Yu-Gi-Oh! Wiki Community Discussion to see what others think, though. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 20:01, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

Ryoga
Do not remove quotes from card names when you edit, per Yu-Gi-Oh!:Manual of style. I don't care how much new info you add, do not screw with what was there. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:03, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 18:25, May 30, 2011 (UTC) What do you mean remove quotes from card names? Also don't use the term "screw", because it makes it sound like im destroying it...


 * See this edit difference. You added a lot of good information, but changed "Deck" to deck" and removed the quotes from the card names. And I apologize for how rude I sounded. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:37, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 18:40, May 30, 2011 (UTC) I apologize too, I didn't mean to edit it in a wrong way. I actually didn't notice that I changed Deck to deck...


 * Honestly, it's not really a big deal, I'm just not in a good mood today and I let that affect my editing. I would appreciate it if you be more careful in the future, and I'll try to be...well, less of a dick about formatting, I guess. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:44, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

Drill Barnacle
When does this appear in episode 10 of ZEXAL?. I didn't see it, so I'm curious. I would think a shot of Shark's hand, but I don't recall them showing that at any point. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:20, June 15, 2011 (UTC)