User talk:Deltaneos

(Sun, Dec 19 2010)
you deleted an official ruling of MST

"Mystical Space Typhoon does not actually "negate" a Spell or Trap Card. You can chain any Spell or Trap Card activation with Mystical Space Typhoon, destroying it. The destruction of the card does not negate its effects. However, depending on the type of Spell or Trap card, it can prevent its effect from taking place. Continuous, Equip, and Field Spell Cards are the only Spell cards that will have their effects stopped if they are chained with Mystical Space Typhoon. The same rulings apply to Continuous Trap Cards. As long as you chain to the activation of the Spell or Trap Card with Mystical Space Typhoon and target it, when the chain resolves the Spell or Trap Card's effect will disappear. "

Should be on there to kill any questions on whether it negates or not. Yes its common knowledge but some new players do not know this


 * Next time, please tap ~ four times, as it will magical put your user name and date when you completed "save page" it. And Delta also said that it's unofficial and card "8" is not exist. So be careful of what you're trying to place on. Ever "Mirror Force" still resolved though if it's destroyed by cute MST. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 23:04, December 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * This may be true which is covered in that text "The destruction of the card does not negate its effects. However, depending on the type of Spell or Trap card, it can prevent its effect from taking place. Continuous, Equip, and Field Spell Cards are the only Spell cards that will have their effects stopped if they are chained with Mystical Space Typhoon." it may be unoffical but ask any judge and they will tell you exactly that Sephirothx12 (talk • contribs) 23:13, December 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * Making sense. If you still want it to be on the site, please put that in your own "Judge Page" under your user name. Like I have all over in my signature right now. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 23:27, December 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * I am aware that "Mystical Space Typhoon" does not negate effects. You listed that as appearing in the rulings for a card called "8". As FredCat said it was removed because "8" does not exist and the ruling was unofficial. While it was true, we only post the official card rulings that Konami or UDE have directly issued. These are the ones posted in the "card rulings" section of the Konami website and previously the UDE website. OCG rulings are taken from the Japanese Konami FAQ site. The page I linked to covers the established standards.
 * The ruling about Continuous Cards having their effects prevented is listed in the OCG section, because it was posted here. If we were to post the ruling on "Mystical Space Typhoon" not negating it would have to also have been posted on one of those sites. -- Deltaneos (talk) 01:42, December 20, 2010 (UTC)


 * After looking through the Japanese site, this rulings has been posted here, so I've added it to the OCG rulings section. -- Deltaneos (talk) 02:05, December 20, 2010 (UTC)

Storm of Ragnarok
Hi, a long time yu-gi-oh fan here (though I didn't really like GX, but I like the tuner-concepts of 5Ds)! I recently saw the Storm of Ragnarok, and I wondered when it's going to come out. It looks very awesome, looks able to stand up to the strongest zombies and/or dragons, so I wonder when I could buy a pack or two. Thanks for your time, --Sir_REX Strikes Back 03:33, December 20, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry to bit your head...
But I just wanna show you this error; PoD Talk Page. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 04:19, December 20, 2010 (UTC)

Cyber archetype
Seeing as "Emergency Cyber" is a support card, shouldn't be count "Cybers" as an actual archetype, with "Cyber Dragons" as a sub-archetype? We have the Cyber Style page. Would be a good bet to move "Cyber Style" to "Cybers" and make that the archetype page? It seems redundant to have both pages, and I think we need an archetype page for this. Let me know what you think and I'll start working on it. I didn't expect much interest in the topic on the forum, so I figured I'd just ask you.

Also, there seems to be an issue with some of the VG deck parameters in the character infobox. The deck names were previously visible and now are not, though they still appear when editing the article. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 06:00, December 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, I'll figure something out with it then. Thanks. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:37, December 27, 2010 (UTC)

Ryoga
Yes it was confirmed, there was a trailer released today which showed him summoning a giant fish against Yuma. Also within the clip, it showed his name as being Ayer Shark on the duel score board.

User Page Vandalism
The user 99.254.80.41 vandalized my user page. Is there any way to see if it is the IP address of a registered user? If not, sorry to bother you. Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 18:46, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * Not without CheckUser permissions. Due to the potential privacy issues around such functionality, only a very few people have access to it. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 19:17, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * I see. Thank you for responding. Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 19:23, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't think they have an account. It looks like this person vandalised your user page because you had recently reverted their vandalism to some character articles. I wouldn't worry about it being a registered user trying to mess with you while hiding their name. -- Deltaneos (talk) 21:40, December 21, 2010 (UTC)

Archive Locked up?
I am trying to move the old comments from my main Talk page to my Archive 7 but I cannot enter and edit that latter page. Is that such to be glitch or what? -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 20:59, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * I mean put old comment into Archive #, not just main talk page... -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 22:25, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * Never mind, I take care of it already. Thanks for give me the way to get in. I think it should stay, the edit on Archive #... -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 22:29, December 21, 2010 (UTC)

Masked Heroes
Considering we're confirmed to get Goka and Vapor in the OCG as Warrior-type Fusion Monsters, would it be safe to assume that the rest of the Archetype would get the same treatment? Or, at the very least, can we make all the Masked Heroes Warrior-types since all the other Hero archetypes are composed mostly of the same type. --Blackstone Dresden (talk • contribs) 21:37, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, considering we're working solely with the manga lores here, I think it would be reasonable to add "This card cannot be Special Summoned, except by the effect of a Spell Card that includes "Change" in its name." and then modify that line as needed once more Changes or Masked Heroes get released. Also, since, IIRC, Goka was first Transformation/Fusion Summoned using Rekka, and since Mask Change needs the same Attribute in the OCG, could we then reasonably call Rekka a FIRE-Attribute, like Goka? One more thing: This Transformation/Fusion Monster thing sounds a lot like the Dark Synchro/Synchro Monster thing we had in 5D's, so should we do the same thing as then (Leave them as Transformation Monsters until they're released in the OCG) or should we make them all Fusions? --Blackstone Dresden (talk • contribs) 22:55, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * And are we going to make them all Fusions and treat Transformation Monsters as something like Accel Synchro Monsters, same thing just called something else, or are we saying that they're separate in fiction but the same in the OCG, like Dark Synchros and Synchros.... Ya know, this would be a lot easier if they would color one panel with a Masked Hero in it. But yeah, I'll get to work on changing them to Warriors. --Blackstone Dresden (talk • contribs) 00:47, December 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I can see that. Maybe we should put it up to a site wide vote on the Transformation Monster page? But, in the interim, I doubt anyone would object to adding in a presumed Summoning condition, and, if people do, well, we'll just add that to the ballot. --Blackstone Dresden (talk • contribs) 00:16, December 23, 2010 (UTC)

I noticed you have been updating CardTable2.
1. I shall quit adding width = 400 to pages as it is useless. No Prob.

2. Is it possible one of the edits broke the link to the image file page (where you can upload a new version of the file.)? Now when I right click to open in a new tab on my browser it goes to a view image page rather than the page with the links already there and filled out with the proper filename. See my page for example images. If that could be corrected I would be grateful. Glittersword 21:57, December 21, 2010 (UTC)

Annoyance on Gold Series 2011
That user kept rejecting mine and other member edit that should be "JP001" stuff into his own "JP01" craps. That article should be lock for at least a day or two. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 02:51, December 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * I blocked for three months. I wouldn't have gone nearly so long, but he was here reverting other editors on March 2010 Lists back in February as well - he hasn't made a single constructive edit at all. 「 ダイノ ガイ  千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 05:56, December 22, 2010 (UTC)

Deck hacking
I think that article should be lock up, because some unregistered user continued to change the list that BEWK don't authorizing to list. Ever that Unregistered User not answering my question that I leave at it Talk page. That therefore prove that he's not BEWK himself. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 00:55, December 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, and that link is in the title that I posted. Honestly, it's inappropriate to change other user's "User Page". Didn't you mention that it's against ruling to do that way? I did that couple time, but all of that, only to correct the mistake; number and spells. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 01:45, December 23, 2010 (UTC)

User:Deathseek
Can you block that user? His account is just for valdalism purpose. He inserted false ruling, removed correct content, ignored and modified other people comments. You can see his contribution for more. Blackwings0605 (talk) 06:06, December 23, 2010 (UTC)

Wasn't's Talk Page
Since he didn't really know how to making his own Archive Page, so I had to manage it for him. That which cause the result of the page lock up. Can you help us untie the stuck up on his page? Here's his talk page that is current lock-up. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 21:54, December 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * I fixed it for you/them. ;) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 00:05, December 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Fwiw, the problem was with the apostrophe.  was giving   rather than , hence messing with the switch. -- Deltaneos (talk) 00:16, December 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Interesting, it seemed not a problem when it was post in my Archives version... But thanks for updating my knowledge of how those Archives code work. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 00:27, December 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, the original code should work in both of our talk pages, since neither of us have an apostrophe in our user names. -- Deltaneos (talk) 00:31, December 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Aah, that would explain it. I couldn't see any immediate problem in the code and didn't feel like taking the time to find the actual problem (especially since I came by immediately after bashing my head against a template issue on another wiki), so I just swapped out the #switch for a #ifeq. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 00:33, December 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * I just catch up with that vocabulary... Now I understand why his Talk Page is lock up because of that. Good to know that. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 00:40, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Attribute spirits on ((Six Attributes))?
Hey Delt, would you care to come have a look at this and comment? Thanks! 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 00:57, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Inappropriate User
Tumamameama posted an inappropriate image of hand in Marik's page twice. He should be banning. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 22:56, December 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * It's gone madness... consider page lock? -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 23:08, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Card Rulings:Blue Rose Dragon
I don't think this card will ever become a real card because it's just like Stardust Dragon to Debris Dragon and Stardust Phantom. "Aki's" pack focus' more on ...(forgot)and "Yusei's" pack focus more on Special Summon, negations, competition. Finally Jacks pack mainly focus' on ATK "Power" and ...--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 23:54, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * What about "Machine Divine Emperor Machinecle Infinity Ruling page; it's not open and is a real card"

Can I open it?--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 00:02, December 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * O. I don't understand Japanese.--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 00:10, December 25, 2010 (UTC)

Cardtable styles
Hey Delt, would you care to update User:Deltaneos/cardtable.css with User:Dinoguy1000/cardtable.css and tell me how things look (the two sample pages I used mainly were Blue-Eyes White Dragon (CM) and H - Heated Heart, but you also get a decent test rate with just Special:Random/Special:Randomincategory/Duel Monsters cards)? I've tested in Google Chrome 10.0.612.3 dev, Firefox 3.6.13, Safari 5.0.3 (7533.19.4), Internet Explorer 9.0.7930.16406 beta, and Opera 11.00 (build 1156), everything looks fine except for a few minor issues documented in a comment on User:Dinoguy1000/cardtable.css, so after you check in whatever browsers you have available and give the go-ahead, I'm going to copy the styles to MediaWiki:Common.css and MediaWiki:Wikia.css to allow testing across more browsers/browser versions and environments, and to get started on the 30-day decaching before we'll be able to deploy the new version of CardTable2. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 01:25, December 26, 2010 (UTC)


 * I haven't found any other problems so far on Google Chrome 8.0.552.224 or Firefox 3.6.8 so far at least.
 * I think the bug: if the right column comes up short against the card image, rows are not vertically stretched to cover the space and there is no border around the empty region is because of the unbalanced rowspans. The image column has its rowspan set as a governing 91 to ensure it'll never be less than the right column, rather than somehow set to equal the number of rows on the right. My mistake. You tried fixing that before. -- Deltaneos (talk) 16:46, December 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't suppose you have any pre-9 versions of IE installed, do you? I'm particularly anxious (and somewhat nervous) to see how the styles will look on IE 6-8.
 * I think we could probably live with it for now; it should end up being somewhat easier to fix once I start work on the /core system. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 17:32, December 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah. I have Internet Explorer 8. I'm not seeing any problems with it. Not even the two that you have listed. -- Deltaneos (talk) 18:45, December 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Hmm... I wonder if IE9 is having its compatibility mode (or quirks mode, even) triggered by something... How does it look when you force IE8 to use compatibility mode (or is it already)? 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 18:59, December 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * After playing around some in the IE9 developer toolbox, both issues only appear when the browser is operating in the "IE7 standards" document mode (regardless of what the browser mode is set to). Playing with the rendered CSS, the box-width problem is caused by the interplay between .navbox's 100% width and .cardtable td's 0.2em padding (meaning, it looks like a variant of the IE box model bug). I'm not completely sure how this might be fixed without problems for other parts of the table layout (or at least visual changes for other browsers); I'll have to do some more searching and reading and see if I can figure something out.
 * I have no idea how the doubled border might be fixed. I could hack it so that the first data row doesn't have a top border, but that would be a very fragile solution, and I have no idea how other browsers would react. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 19:24, December 27, 2010 (UTC)

Viewing History?
I was looking around my User Page to find the History section, but I couldn't find it. Is it still there somewhere, or was it taken away after the new Wikia look? Thanks in advance.Vavv Matsumoto (talk • contribs) 23:53, December 26, 2010 (UTC)

Delete picture
Hello :D

I wanted to ask you, if you could just delete this picture I just uploaded last? (AkizaIzinskiID- http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/File:AkizaIzinskiID.jpg) I'm so sorry, I just discovered that we must upload pictures for the wikia not only for the user page.

Please, I'm so sorry :(( AkizaIzinski (talk • contribs) 20:15, December 27, 2010 (UTC)AkizaIzinski

Dirty Image
I just found one that give out Luca in some bad place... Should that user being banned? Just checking my Contributions history for more information. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 00:22, December 28, 2010 (UTC)