Forum:Fortune Ladies Update?

I'd be happy to make the changes (and clean up some of the typos as well), but I wanted to run this by someone before I did anything. After digging around the web, I realized that some of the information on the Fortune Ladies page seems out-dated. For instance, it lists Cyber Valley as a card to include in a deck build, but one of the recent rulings on Cyber Valley states:


 * For the effect "● You can remove from play this card and 1 face-up monster you control, and draw 2 cards." of "Cyber Valley", you draw the cards after removing from play the monsters; the two do not occur simultaneously. Thus, if "Fortune Lady Light" is removed from play by the effect of "Cyber Valley", then afterwards you draw cards, so you miss the timing and cannot activate the effect of "Fortune Lady Light".[7]

Given this, I don't think this card is one you wish to include anymore. A possible substitute to consider in its place might be Magical Exemplar.

Night's End Sorcerer also seems to be missing from this page too, and probably should be listed as a Tuner to be considered. (BTW, isn't Mist Valley Shaman a bit odd here, since she's a winged-beast and not a spellcaster?).

Let me know your thoughts. Like I said, I can make the changes if everyone agrees - I just wanted other opinions before I did.

Kungfu-mama 10:16, November 19, 2009 (UTC)