User talk:ATEMVEGETA

For other messages see: Archive 1, Archive 2, Archive 3, Archive 4, Archive 5, Archive 6, Archive 7, Archive 8

Card type terminology
Hey ATEMVEGETA, would you mind reading through User talk:Deltaneos and seeing if you can help us out any? Delt and I are wondering if there are any rulings that give anything like an official name for types of Monster Cards (e.g. Normal, Effect, Fusion - determined by having unique frame background colors) and types of monsters (e.g. Toon, Spirit, Gemini). 「 ディノ 奴 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 19:37, January 5, 2012 (UTC)

Mirror Gate

 * If I'm not mistaken, the ruling Kevin Tewart posted contradicts to the OCG; but I can't get links to a source. Can you check and get a source, and if I'm right, add something like this to the page and a source?
 * -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 04:07, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 04:07, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

RE: WC10 Rulings

 * Semi-official rulings include OCG rulings issued by Konami outside the rulings section of their site. Such rulings may be included, provided they are sourced. [1]
 * Since Konami made WC10, can't they be added to an OCG Semi-official section? -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 02:08, January 8, 2012 (UTC)


 * Except testing is interpreting rulings, which make it definately unofficial. These are copy/pasted direct from the game file. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 02:33, January 8, 2012 (UTC)


 * Then we can just make a new video game ruling section. Like how there is a video game tips section. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 03:00, January 8, 2012 (UTC)


 * It's the the ruling you were looking for from Forum:Flip Flop Frog
 * Also, for rulings marked with, why don't we add Notes telling people what it should have said? -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 13:19, January 8, 2012 (UTC)


 * We should use both is used to mark exactly where the errors are (and can be used to generate a list of pages which have errors). The notes add a link from the end of the ruling to the note at the bottom of the page. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 00:17, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

FredCat's Theory on Banned Cards Articles
I have posted 4 articles so far, counted the first one I informed you not so long ago (3 days is like long time). So I am curious of what do you think about them so far; you can suggest me something for some change - no, not money charge... -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  02:08, January 8, 2012 (UTC)


 * Updating; Which one of those banned cards with the updating lore do you think is most fairly at this minute? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:53, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

000#X Rulings
Damn, that's load of those numbers... are you sure they're just colored mark or are they linked if they don't have any rulings to be included - like the crossed one ? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:42, January 10, 2012 (UTC)


 * So if they don't exist, you're just paint them red and not give a link? Btw, please be sure to not ignoring my previous questions I left for you - you seemed to be overdue by that now. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:57, January 10, 2012 (UTC)


 * I know that they all look good, but I wish to know which one of them that have a fairly effect I created? Is "Fiber Jar's" new lore look better or ...? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  21:02, January 10, 2012 (UTC)

About Ruling Editing
Can you check Forum:About Ruling Editing...; it's about someone wanting to add rulings from other sites. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 03:52, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

New line added
How do I doing so far? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:59, January 13, 2012 (UTC)


 * Good to know I am doing it well :-) -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  18:09, January 13, 2012 (UTC)

Batteryman D's adaption
Do you think so? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  15:32, January 14, 2012 (UTC)

Thousand-Eyes Restrict
Hi. Im here because I know about your addings and I keep my trust in you. Last time I was editing the Rulings in "Thousand-Eyes Restrict"; and it was erased. The ruling said that you can´t unequip an Monster from "Thousand-Eyes Restrict", to select another one of the opponent and equip it to it again. In resume, you can´t voluntarily destroy a monster equipped to "Thousand-Eyes Restrict" to use its effect again and equip it with another, until you destroy the previous one with an card´s effect. Iam right, right??? In my believe, the difference in Thousand-Eyes Restrict and Relinquished is the another effect of "Other monsters cannot change their battle position or attack.". I put that rulings and I know Konami is making to take by unnoficials because were posted by Upper Deck times. Some players do the opposite for his own benefict. So, where can I find from Konami that rulings? They are correct, right? Koryuseness (talk • contribs) 04:51, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

Official Ruling Articles
My little beep draw your attention at last? I am glad to keep it in your own "order"; following the law of Konami/UDE ever if they made their own typo. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:37, January 18, 2012 (UTC)