User talk:Cheesedude/Archive1

I have replaced several OCG-to-TCG redirects myself; I think the de facto policy originally was to give priority to the TCG, but a lot of latter-day redirects remain. I don't think there's any real policy against OCG redirect names, and the concern was originally about the variety of translations for some names. But I think now it should be okay. As for your second question, I don't know if there's a real policy on that. Some people prefer alphabetical, some order of appearance. You could discuss it on the Wiki Forum here if you wanted. Danny Lilithborne 03:34, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * If someone gives you a hassle, I'll talk to them. (I made the redirect, btw.) Danny Lilithborne 07:51, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
 * TTF and Deltaneos compulsively choose not to leave redirects for some reason, but I don't think it would bother them if you recreated it. Danny Lilithborne 07:47, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Card Appearances:Horus the Black Flame Dragon LV6
You said to leave a reason on your talk page in case I reverted your edit. Axel Brodie did have this card in his Deck when he dueled Jaden for the first time, when he was sent by Professor Viper. At some point in the Duel, he was looking through his Deck, and you can catch a glimpse of that card.PoirotH 10:23, October 20, 2009 (UTC)

Well, in that subbed episode, did he, at any time, looked through his Deck due to an effect?PoirotH 17:42, October 20, 2009 (UTC)

Well, it is true that I based my statement on the dub version; I didn't take into consideration the fact that they might have changed some cards like in the past.PoirotH 17:49, October 20, 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for checking; and I also want to thank you for all the appearances you've added, I realize it must be quite tedious and tiring.PoirotH 17:54, October 20, 2009 (UTC)

I also watched both the dubbed and original episode, but I also didn't see it. Yet I swear I've seen it in his Deck; maybe it was in a different episode.PoirotH 07:48, October 21, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks.PoirotH 15:56, October 21, 2009 (UTC)

I also watched every episode (dubbed and subbed) of every possibility that O'Brien might show his cards, but I had the same results. Maybe I was just imagining it. In any case, I think we should just drop this until thee matter makes itself know again. No sense twisting our heads for something that most likely never happened.PoirotH 06:10, December 17, 2009 (UTC) Sure, if there wasn't any evidence, than it's the obvious thing to do.PoirotH 17:44, December 17, 2009 (UTC)

A couple of questions from the Community Team
Hi, Thanks for all of your work here on Wikia. We are constantly working to improve our site for users, and would love to get some feedback from you. Below are a couple of questions. If you could answer them here, on my talk page or send me an [mailto:sarah@wikia-inc.com email] with your responses, I would really appreciate it.


 * 1) Have you ever used our Help pages?
 * 2) If so, did you find them useful?
 * 3) How would you suggest improving them?
 * 4) Have you ever tried to contact Wikia staff for help?
 * 5) Did you find the help you needed?

Thank you and happy editing!Sarah (talk 02:27, November 20, 2009 (UTC)

Moving pages
When you move a page, please remember to move all of its "other card information" pages too. i.e. its rulings, gallery, trivia etc. pages. Thank you. -- Deltaneos (talk) 18:41, December 16, 2009 (UTC)

My sincere apologies, I wasn't aware of it.PoirotH 04:51, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Movie/10th card appearances
Okay, added. You can use  -- Deltaneos (talk) 14:19, January 27, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Weird infobox glitch
The episode 155 article mistakenly had 106 entered as its number, so both it and episode 106 were coming up when episode 106 was asked for. -- Deltaneos (talk) 02:13, February 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, that's right. It's because  already links to the anime article and displays as "Yu-Gi-Oh! GX".
 * is similiar to . I couldn't get the latter format to work in the infobox, while adding Yu-Gi-Oh! GX (manga) to the manga appearances (down at the very bottom of the page). -- Deltaneos (talk) 02:27, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Line breaks and removal of whitepsace
The s below Decklists were to create a space, when two Decklists were next to each other. They're not needed if there's only one Decklist, or if they are in seperate sections.

There is usually a space between categories and whatever text or table is above them, so it's easier to see where they start. The reason why so many pages are missing that spcae is because we were using the CategorySelect tool for a while, which had editors editing the categories seperate from the rest of the article and got rid of any space between them whenever the page was edited. -- Deltaneos (talk) 01:02, February 25, 2010 (UTC)


 * ... But there's only 1 category manually added to the Valon article. I added the space between the notes and the navbox and one between the navbox and the category. Are you counting the navbox as a category? I added a space between each, because they were all completely different things and the spaces make it easier to see where each starts and finishes.
 * If there had been more than one category, they wouldn't need a gap between each.
 * i.e. use


 * but not


 * or


 * -- Deltaneos (talk) 01:17, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

is also used to seperate Decklists and navboxes. The reason it wasn't on the Valon article, was they already have a Notes section between them. -- Deltaneos (talk) 01:19, February 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah.

No. of Decks needed for a seperate article
There's no actual policy on the amount needed. I did flag the three examples you gave for deletion shortly after they were created. Most responses I got were people saying "please don't delete this article", without giving any reason why not and people who didn't realise that the content would be moved back to the character's main article if the page got deleted. I didn't get much support for the deletions, so I left them alone. -- Deltaneos (talk) 01:36, February 25, 2010 (UTC)


 * Not really. Having additional user rights doesn't make you in charge. It just means that you've been trusted to use the extra access fairly. It's not fair for me to delete something if the rest of the community want to keep it. -- Deltaneos (talk) 01:48, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Novelization of PoL
I wasn't the one who originally added the complete Movie Decks, but yes the novel gives both Kaiba and Yugi's complete Decklists... as well as Pegasus'. You can see them here. -- Deltaneos (talk) 22:41, February 27, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Yu-Gi-Oh! World Championship 2004 parameter
Ah yes. Thanks for spotting. The video game article is at Yu-Gi-Oh! World Championship Tournament 2004. The infobox should link there now. -- Deltaneos (talk) 04:26, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Weird issue with Toei movie appearances:
Okay, fixed. -- Deltaneos (talk) 20:24, March 15, 2010 (UTC)