User talk:BritishCynic

''Also See: User talk:TwoTailedFox/Archive0001, 0002, 0003, 0004, 0005, 0006

Back from the Graveyard.
I am surprise that you have returning to your founder site. Welcome back, Founder! *bow* -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:44, June 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * Indeed, DeltaNeos, DinoMan1000 and few other activate Admins have keep this site in well shape while you were gone. ATEM is quite a perfection sniper when coming to Ruling conflict and post in the unofficial rulings. I respect them all. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:55, June 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * I would also like to welcome you back. I can't wait to see what your new contributions will be. Glittersword  Talk • Contributions 18:46, July 11, 2011 (UTC)

Buch 10 Promo
hi, do you remember where you took information about this set? because it seems to be the same as this one. i know that may be difficult to remember, but could it be this source?? /////||||||\\\\\ Jump Enemy (talk • contribs) 00:49, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

welp, as i said, i am impressed Thedarkdoor (talk • contribs) 00:28, June 6, 2011 (UTC)thedarkdoor

Two Things
Hmm...not really sure. I hadn't thought about it but I guess that's another thing I should do. Also, "appears to have" makes it sound as if it's not actually true-information on an encyclopedia should definitely be true unless otherwise stated.


 * You may be right but it still seems wrong.


 * I agree with BobaFett on this. It don't think it reads well when nearly every sentence n a character description starts with stuff like "it seems", "apparently" and "it appears". I haven't actually read the chapter/seen the episode, so I'm not positive about this particular example but for situations like this in general...
 * If Astral indeed acts scared around cats, I think it's fine to say that he is afraid of cats. We don't need to accommodate for the tiny chance of a plot twist that he was pretending or secretly afraid of something else, unless characters actually question his fear or it's otherwise hinted that he wasn't really afraid. Otherwise we may as well second guess everything about the series for things like a character could be dreaming, lying or secretly an impostor. If later episodes do indeed reveal that he wasn't actually afraid of cats, we can update the article and I don't think we're at fault for saying he was afraid previously, because it's what we were supposed to be believing while watching the show and weren't given any reason to doubt it.
 * I've seen many situations like this on another wiki; two characters turn out to the same person or characters said to be dead turn out to be alive. etc. The editors weren't at fault for saying the characters were separate people or saying the characters were dead, unless characters were shown to question either of these or there was in-show evidence that hinted they could be the same person or alive. -- Deltaneos (talk) 14:32, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

fix tuner list please
Hello. Is there any chance of recognising this list? http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Ask/-5B-5BMonster-20Type::Tuner-20Monster-7C-7CTuner-20Monsters-5D-5D/-3FJapanese-20Name/-3FCard-20Type/-3FAttribute/-3FLevel/-3FType/-3FATK/-3FDEF/-3FCard-20Number

and this please

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Ask/-5B-5BClass-201::Official-5D-5D-20-5B-5BMonster-20Type::Tuner-20Monster-7C-7CTuner-20Monsters-5D-5D/-3FJapanese-20Name/-3FCard-20Type/-3FAttribute/-3FLevel/-3FType/-3FATK/-3FDEF/-3FCard-20Number

it's the list of all tuner monsters.

Thanks in advance.--Stereotypical Gamer (talk • contribs) 11:57, June 8, 2011 (UTC)

Re;Obelisk
I realize that. But if that's the case, it needs to be added using the vglore parameters for that game, not the anime lore parameter. They have nothing to do with one another. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:28, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Request here
I would like to let you check this Forum out... Thanks for take your time to realize the foolish. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:32, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

W Nebula Meteor
You do realize that Solemn Warning and Royal Oppression miss the timing on trying to negate W Nebula Meteor, right? Tea-Girl08  15:14, June 23, 2011 (EST)
 * I'm not concerned with the accuracy of the ruling, I'm concerned with the content of the website it came from. If it is indeed true that the external website cannot be accessed except by those, that will be looked into. The ruling should be flagged for further investigation into it's source, rather than summarily removed.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 19:18, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see. So I should be flagging instead of re-editing, my mistake. Then can you please tell me how to flag a ruling? Tea-Girl08  15:26, June 23, 2011 (EST)


 * Thank you, the template really helps.

Tea-Girl08  15:57, June 23, 2011 (EST)

Re: Ruby Text
Thanks for pointing that out to me--it makes typing out the kana above kanji so much easier/quicker. And sweet talk archives, you've really contributed a lot to the site. Bhigpx (talk • contribs) 19:16, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Robert ignored your words
That user just make it wrong each way. Should suspense him for like a week? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:12, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * I already have for 3 days for him to cool off. If he continues to misbehave after the ban expires, a week may well be the next step.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 20:13, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * As I sensed that coming, you know, I am a feline. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:14, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Redirects
Well, first of all, the redirects are already on the main page of the set. + I'll upload every french scans of that set tomorrow so I was planning to add everything after that (included every other languages sets and redirects). I'm not Superman haha. Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 21:10, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah yeah I got it, I really can't do it now but i'll do it tomorrow. It can be very long to add the set to every card in every language and then create the redirect for every language but yeah i'll do it . Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 21:17, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Card Rulings:W Nebula Meteorite
Hi TwoTailedFox! I'm sorry but I don't think that new template is a good idea for the Ruling pages. First the way it looks now it seems exactly the same with the template of UDE's unofficial Rulings, and I think this will cause a lot of confusion to people. Second the "This Card Ruling has been flagged by a user on the Yu-Gi-Oh! Wikia as unverified by Konami, incorrect, misleading, or otherwise false and/or lacking detail in it's explanation." sounds like anyone unfamiliar with the Rulings or not can add this template to any Ruling that he thinks it is incorrect, even if the Ruling is way to far from wrong.

What I want to say is that I don't think it's a good idea for anyone to add a Template on any Ruling they want, just because they think it is wrong or it should work otherwise, ect. It will cause a lot of mess!

Btw, from what I see, this template mostly can be used for the Judge Program Forum Rulings (as those are the only ones that cannot be viewed by anyone). What I suggest is to not add any Template to the Ruling Pages, leave the Rulings as they are, and if someone have doubts about a Ruling we can give him another visible source to check, or if there isn't any, we can give him a picture of the Judge Program Forum's threat of that Ruling (That's not problem for me to do)!

Also, about the "W Nebula Meteorite" Ruling, I can add it also in the OCG Rulings with an visible official source. So it don't think there will be anymore problems with it. If you only can remove the protection so I can add the OCG Ruling. Thanks!

ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 23:53, June 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Very well, lets allow people to add a template like that to the Rulings of the Judge Program Forum if they have doubts about them as they cannot see the source. But is a picture of the thread with the Ruling (PrintScreen) enough proof to confirm the Ruling's authenticity and remove the template? If so then no problem from my part! ATEMVEGETA  (Talk) 17:23, June 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * Err, what do you mean that must be by a Konami's employee? The answer of the ruling or the uploaded picture?


 * Also you mean that even with a picture of the ruling the template will still be on it until it appears on an official site?


 * ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 17:52, June 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * The difference with UDE's Rulings and Konami's Rulings is that UDE's Rulings are now unofficial. Normally we shouldn't keep them in the Card Rulings but since without them the people wouldn't know how the most of the cards work we decided to keep them but in the Previously Official Rulings category. Thus the reason why we created their template.


 * Also, in case that you don't know, the Judge Program Forum is also an official site of rulings (there is proof of that). So if the picture is enough proof for the ruling's authenticity, then this makes it that the ruling has been confirmed that exists in an official site. Thus no need for the template. No?


 * Just to let you know, Konami made the Judge Program Forum as a site for judges that can get official answers to their questions. The rulings it has are as much official as the ones that appear in Konami's Gameplay FAQ in the pdf files. Also those questions can only be answered by Konami's employees and not by the judges.


 * ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 18:22, June 24, 2011 (UTC)

Hmmm, I see! So the template is on until the Rulings in the Judge Program Forum become viewable by anyone. Well, then shouldn't be better if we add this template then to all Judge Program Forum's Rulings instead of waiting for a Wikia's user to add it? Also what if instead of a template we had a note saying that those Rulings are unverified blah blah? The note could be either at the end of the Rulings or in the header. Something like this. ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 08:00, June 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, it looks better now with the note. But that colored board looks somehow .....! Is it really necessary for the Rulings to be in a board, or it's the same with just only the template? Like this. I think it should be excellent that way! ATEMVEGETA  (Talk) 22:23, June 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * Nevermind then! I'll leave it as it is for now, at least until the Judge Program Forum become viewable for anyone or find another way to prove those Rulings' legality. Thanks! ATEMVEGETA  (Talk) 22:46, June 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * One more little thing! The bullet at the start of the (first) Rulings doesn't appear like Wikia's style bullet, as all the other Rulings have. I don't know what must be changed in the template. Can you fix it? Thanks! ATEMVEGETA  (Talk) 22:59, June 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Great! Thanks for your help! ATEMVEGETA  (Talk) 00:09, June 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * One last thing! Can you remove the extra space that appears between the orange board and the OCG Rulings header? There should be only one space there. The other must be somewhere in the template! ATEMVEGETA  (Talk) 00:27, June 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * Excellent! Thanks again! ATEMVEGETA  (Talk) 18:03, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

You get a "Made of Win"
Good catch on episodes 77 and 78! Always heartening to see a fellow editor. Apparently, that fellow decided it'd be fun to have Joey play the Seal of Orichalcos in episode 75. Sounds like the factual equivalent of Whack-a-Mole, but oh well, c'est la vie. --Okamoto Takeo (talk • contribs) 18:52, June 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * It's a vandal using a Dynamic IP address. I think I've blocked him about 25 times by now. He keeps coming back. He's very persistent. If he edits in that a card appears in episode 75 when it doesn't, he also edit the card appearances page for that card and add it to the character's decklist. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:01, June 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * You can range block when the IPs are all numbered closely. In this case 166.137.128.0/20 blocks all IPs from 166.137.128.0 to 166.137.143.255. Instructions are in the first link. You have to be careful when using it. If you're not sure if you're doing it right, just let me know. -- Deltaneos (talk) 20:44, June 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * That's the problem. They are rarely numbered closely (though I'll look into rangeblocking if that comes up again). So it could be a bunch of people, but the pattern is consistent enough that I believe it's one person. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 20:56, June 25, 2011 (UTC)

Renaming?
Why did you rename the sets from WC11? Here, it's never been named with -VG. Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 17:43, June 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Do I really have to rename everything? The template at the bottom of every page shows that it's from the video game. It would be easier to just add a sentence at the top of every page saying "this set is from the ... Video Game. What do you think? Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 20:31, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

Parameters
Why are you removing the "image" and "jpanimelore" parameters? Someone will add images eventually, so there's no reason to remove the parameter and III usually has the lores up within a few days. Just because there is nothing in them right now doesn't mean their won't be. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:31, June 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. Thanks. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:49, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

Irritated Article
" Cards " should be deleted already, it's still building by useless users (unregistered) that only copied out of "Card layout". -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  19:34, July 1, 2011 (UTC)


 * "Soaring Eagle Above the Searing Land" should be lock up and you should give the user a long hard talk because he just continued to screw up that article I just showed. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:49, July 1, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, jeez...

 * Every single GLD4 image I added needed to have "-LE" in front? I didn't even realize. I'll help changing the Card Gallery/Article pages later, but I can't rename the images themselves, and there's 45 odd left. ._.;--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 10:48, July 2, 2011 (UTC)

Monster Reborn
"Guardian Dreadscythe" was one of few monster cards that "Monster Reborn" had used on, though she required "Guardian Eatos" to dead on the field. Also "Blue-Eyes Shining Dragon", again, summoned via Yugi Muto/Yami Yugi in the movie - as it needed "Blue-Eyes Ultimate Dragon" to be sacrifice in order to Special Summon onto the field. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:10, July 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, my honour Founder, I would like to remind ya that "Guardian Dreadscythe's" Summon Condition is similar to "Black Luster Soldier - Envoy of the Beginning". If BLS - Envoy of the Beginning cannot be Special Summoned from Graveyard, therefore the former also cannot be Summoned from the Graveyard as well. It happening same with "Blue-Eyes Shining Dragon", but I don't want to shove up the bullshit up your bums - I just want to give you a prove that was the one the unregistered user tried to put up on the "Monster Reborn" article. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:24, July 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * So, you're telling me that BLS - Envoy and Shining Dragon are Semi-Nomi or was I just confused? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:36, July 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * Alright, therefore only "Blue-Eyes Shining Dragon" cannot be Special Summon except by Tribute Ultimate Dragon. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:47, July 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * Got it, Founder, so now I understand them apart. And I should put that up in my Judge Ruling to prevent the further confusedly. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:51, July 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * Black Luster Soldier - Envoy of the Beginning; Condition - also "Blue-Eyes Shining Dragon" is including in that article. So feel free check it out and you have my permission to mend it and make it more clearly for anyone to understand. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:56, July 3, 2011 (UTC)

RE: BLS
Well, sorry, I should forgot about that - I should including "Various Barrier Statues except for Heaven" instead. My bad. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:57, July 3, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I was unaware they changed for everyone

Anime and manga appearances
Both commas and slashes work for separation, but Dinoguy decided that commas should be used for better readability while editing. He did after the parameter had been using slashes for quite a while, so there are many pages to be updated. Using slashes automatically places the page in Category:Anime and manga appearances transclusions to be updated. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:44, July 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah, you can smack me a good one for that. I'm going to run Dinobot through the category eventually, and then remove support for the slashes and extra unnamed parameters (the original style, before I figured out #arraymap), which will result in much simpler code in the templates. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 02:32, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Image policy (-)
Just in case you haven't noticed, the Image policy states that dashes (- – — － −) are to be removed from the monster name. (I think it's so that Template:OCG-TCG card image does not stuff up). -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 05:58, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Curse Report
Just to let you be information that someone post an insult in Forum:Help me?. Try look at the history for that stupidity user/unregistered IP user and let's see what you can do then. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:14, July 10, 2011 (UTC)

Butthead User
This new butthead user just won't to quit argue with me and about Formula Synchron's Anime Effect declare; with us said that F.S. can using effect to summon any Synchro Monster during opponent's turn while he declined it, said only that he had a power to draw a card once per turn. Can you making him eat his own dirt please? Thanks for leaning me your ears. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  21:29, July 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * TFF isn't back yet, as far as I know. As for the issue at hand, it looks to me that the lore in the anime artwork is shorter than it is in the OCG. So that user may be right. I don't know for sure though. Note that in his edit summary, he clarified that its "Shooting Star Dragon" that lets itself be Synchro Summoned during the opponent's turn. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:00, July 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * Then why did "Formula Synchron" had that line when I came around at this minute? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:40, July 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * It's possible that quite simply, no one noticed the error before he did (again, not sure if it is an error or not). Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:49, July 22, 2011 (UTC)

New Idiot Spammer
Can you please smacking this user - - down for put up an unofficial source rulings on the Tuningware's Ruling Article, I revived up to three times and warned him twice (first time after his mistake). Turned out he didn't listen and just shove them back in. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:16, July 25, 2011 (UTC)

Blog Question
Just kind of "Wikia Question" rather than Yu-Gi-Oh one; I am curious why this Wikia lacked "Blog" article that all other I had been visiting do? I am not trolling or revolution against your decide of not including it, just to know why. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  16:44, July 30, 2011 (UTC)

Anoying Spamming user
I dint know who else to talk to this about, so i thought i'd tell you. This user http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/User:Charon_of_styx keeps arguing and spamming stuff everywhere that you can special summon cards from the graveyard like Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon using it's summoning condition. He has become a nuisance on the chat. Could you please resolve the issue? Alboono (talk • contribs) 05:29, July 31, 2011 (UTC)

Move Conflict
Hey, Check it out! And no, it's not me who moved it. I tried to move it back, and it was locking. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:38, August 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * Oh never mind, it was someone who just moved it back in normal. So just crush the pointless redirect if possible. If you didn't get it, then my apologize for put up this silly message here. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:42, August 13, 2011 (UTC)

World Standard Championship?
I don't suppose you remember anything about this, do you? 「 ディノ 奴 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 03:34, September 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * *poke* 「 ディノ 奴 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 03:37, October 20, 2011 (UTC)

Civilian Conversation
I am absolute understand that I should cease being that insane in that article you caught. I am just little tired of being overshadowed by them who repeat what I just mentioned. It's like they had no common sense to just absolute understand what I was saying and just leave it there. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:18, October 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * Acknowledge, founder. But I am not blame you or anyone; it's just my trait that I am suffering at the minute. I am actually blame myself for speak [sic] like that. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:25, October 25, 2011 (UTC)

Found a vandal.
Right here. They've also registered as well, it seems. Already undid the vandalism, just thought I'd notify you so you can take action. I'dve delivered a warning myself, but I don't think it'd be particularly effective. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 14:11, November 20, 2011 (UTC)

Another couple of vandals
Right here.

Also, this user has been making edits that go against the manual of style, and has been warned and told to use the dub names when editing anime articles. I also asked that they read the manual of style before making any more edits; both warnings have gone unheeded. As such, I ask that you deal with this as you see fit. As for the edits, they have already been undone. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 20:57, November 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't think TTF is back yet. Also, Falzar offered to do a bot run to the fix the names, so it's really not that big of any issue. You don't need to inform every single admin about it. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:58, November 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * It was a bout of irritation, I apologize. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 02:00, November 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Cheesedude just detailed exactly the reason I haven't responded. I'm not particularly enthusiastic on blocking IP addresses, because that can cause issues for legitimate users. It also appeared as if the issues highlighted were solved, thus requiring no intervention nor comment from me.

While I may seem away, I check my talk page whenever it's edited to check I don't miss anything important. This wasn't important.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 18:18, November 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Understood. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 18:20, November 23, 2011 (UTC)

Number 39: Utopia Replay
I'm not sure how to phrase this, but we technically do have a ruling on the replay scenario with Utopia, "After you’ve announced your attacking monster and the attack target monster during a Battle Step, the attack target might be removed from the field, or a new monster may be placed on the opponent’s side of the field before the Damage Step, due to a card’s effect. This causes a "Replay"...

And since Utopias effect makes him kill himself before the damage step, a replay does occur.

So I just thought I'd let someone know this and see if they can fix it (the ruling is in a green box) since the last time I fixed a ruling (they had the wrong monster typed in and all I did was type in the correct monster) a few people here complained at me for fixing it. So better safe then sorry I'd thought I'd let you know and see if you can do anything. Please and thank you and sorry if this isn't phrased accurately.

Tea-Girl08  4:03, December 28, 2011 (EST)

from ycm maker wikia
I know it is not appropriate to talk about it right here, but i have to try to contact you from here. Since you are an admin at that wikia, please appoint someone to become admin, so they have the right to clean the wikia, there are too much junk articles there. Bakurayuri (talk • contribs) 15:57, February 17, 2012 (UTC)

Hey can i be an admin plz?

Last Night ...
Hey its me ^^. Sorry 'bout last night, I got a little... Over-exerted... My apolgies.I'm not doing a Boris and being nice when I want to, I'm nice now because I feel I haven't been nice enough, so from now on, I will contribute more and try and make necessary edits wherever I can. And my final question, quite an obvious one, when will I be un-kicked ?????? Thats really bugging me, because the Beyblade wikians are really quite boring alot of the time. They keep trying to cyber-kill me, which I must admit IS NOT amusing in the slightest. Thanks for metaphorically listening, Hope to metaphorically see you soon ! A bit of love from the heart of -Charlie --SolitaryRageDemonCharlie (talk • contribs) 05:31, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

I tried once. I just gave up and burst into tears after that. I am sorry for what I've done. I have cooled down. I had a slight misunderstanding with your message, I didnt get the part where you sais something about having been lenient towards me for too long, or something along those lines. I have stuck to what I said, I have edited. --SolitaryRageDemonCharlie (talk • contribs) 22:06, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

Rescue Cat/Winged Dragon of Ra
I don't know that "Rescue Cat" can search out both form of "The Winged Dragon of Ra"... I mean the one you recently switch over to that... -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  02:03, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

Unban
Will you unban me now?

Sorry....forgot to specify myself. Will you unban me now? Cd5464

I have never heard of such a ridiculous response in my life. Banning someone wont grant a change in behavior. Unbanning may provide different results with someone like me...consider it. I will be appreciated enough to try ceasing racial comments within the chat. Try it out. What do you have to lose? You can immediately ban me again if it happens.... Cd5464

Anyone with an ounce of comprehension wouldn't categorize that as a threat or blackmail. It was a simple suggestion and a reasonable psychological fact regarding my reaction to being unbanned. You either don't take enough time to think things over, suck at thinking things over, or you are a true dipshit. I will side with the first considering you took about 3 minutes to think it over... Cd5464

You are clearly a dipshit. I forgive your mistake of proving this to the public. There wasn't a threat present. I will go ahead and take this time to congratulate  you on how well your wiki has turned out. Its impressive. I may have to find a different wiki though, for the creator of this one has proven to me that he/she is a true dipshit. Forgive me if I labeled you as a he in the previous statements if you are a she and also if I labeled you as a she if you are a he. So how long will this ban remain? Cd5464

Does 2 weeks sound indefinite? I think in about two weeks time I will be well enough to be unbanned. Wouldn't you agree? Cd5464

Hey, I was just wondeing, when am I going to be unbanned ? The Beyblade wikians are kinda boring and I've learned my lesson. Please un-kick me. -Charlie PS, Have a nice day :D BUNILLA WILL KILL YOU ALL!!!!!

Dear TTF, I am ever so sorry about my disrespect and rudeness towards you. Can you please unban me? Sincerely, GigaWolf96

Will you unban me now? Cd5464

Charlie is avoiding kickban from chat
He made a new user called User:Cyber Rulezzz (just check the IP) and he even made it obvious, with this:

Number Hunter Imma report Charlie brb

Cyber Rulezzz Why are you reporting me ?

Deltaneos Block evading.

and BTW I'm surprised that Delta hasn't banned him yet.-- Let the Number take hold! 20:10, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

The Chat
Do you like, ever come to chat? o.o o.o

It's Vanfalco4ever

How bout that unban!? - CD5464

Sorry
Im sorry. But cmon. banning me for saying "you suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuccckkkkkkkk" isnt as bad as things ive done in the past. so please don't ban me too long. ''User:PrincessPikeruBFF 20:18, June 18, 2012 (UTC)

please do something about laserghost. he is saying things like "there u go now fucking change your name or else i keep calling u borg/cyborg >:D " u can ask daughter and she can prove he said that. now he has added to it. "Daugther-of-the-Devil:So Laser, could you please stop with annoying Mike and others?" "LaserGhost:others k mike no >:D" "lol borg u gave me headache and what are u anyway? nobody" Mike Borg 12:56, July 5, 2012 (UTC)

Comic-Con
Greetings! You may already know, but Yu-Gi-Oh! will be involved with Comic-Con this year. Wikia will have a physical presence at the 'Con once again, and we've created this badge:

to remind users of this, and provide them with a link to Comic-Con Wiki. There, we will be updating live for the duration of the event with images, info, and exclusives for those users who are unable to be there in person. Would you be willing to allow this badge on the main page here (hopefully at the top of the right column) until the conclusion of the event? Please hit me up on my TALK PAGE and let me know either way so I can add it, or make a note that you've declined affiliation. You're welcome to add it yourself using the code above, but please drop me a note as well so I can track which wikis are participating. Thank you for your time! :)
 * http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/xraydeltaone/images/b/b2/Siggy4.png @ (profile)•(talk)•(email) 02:35, July 6, 2012 (UTC)


 * Badge is up, thanks for joining in!
 * http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/xraydeltaone/images/b/b2/Siggy4.png @ (profile)•(talk)•(email) 18:47, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

Old Forbidden/Limited lists
Hey TTF, I don't suppose you'd have anything to add over at User talk:Deltaneos, would you? Thanks! 「 ディノ 奴 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 17:30, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

Cd5464 unban
Hey TTD. I was wondering if you could go ahead and unban me now. I mean, I haven't caused any trouble in like 3 months...at least on the wiki. I only tried to avoid the ban once (which was about 3 months ago...). I may be exaggerating a bit. I'm not sure really. I think it has been about 2 months maybe 3....maybe even 4. At least a month for sure. Sorry for the rambling. It gets me sometimes... I'm sorry for my racial slurs. I apologize for the rude remarks I uttered towards you and Delta too. Oh and I'd greatly appreciate it if I could test out my new deck on you lol. Its actually...fairly well. -  Cd5464

Charlie
Hey, I am just wondering what Charlie did to get a permanent ban. I am sure that whatever he did was not that terrible, but if it was, it should not deserve a permanent ban. Please do not see this as me harassing you or questioning your judgment, but at least weaken the ban for me. I know he cannot control himself sometimes, but it would be nice to see him again.

Thank you in advance for considering this

--Power Up! (talk • contribs) 09:40, July 7, 2012 (UTC)


 * That is a vague term. We could consider the time that has already passed as "indefinite". Would you? Whats your username on DN... - Cd5464


 * Whoa whoa....whats with the harsh words? I'm not a batman villain. That is a ridiculous concept. I've never even been in Gotham City. I don't recall ever getting a second chance, sir. I really don't. I'm hardly manipulative. Why are you being like this? You are sorta seeming unreasonable here... please tell me what have I done in the past 2 months that has caused you harm and/or anger? I have been patiently waiting, pondering on my mistakes, and seldom asked to be unbanned during this 18 week banishment. I seriously wish to duel you too with my deck...I'm not being two-faced. I'm just...being. I respect you. I hardly know you to not respect you, but what I've seen, you are beginning to have me question my respect. I wasn't in a good period in my life last time we uh communicated. My environment has been a hostile one for a very long period. It has a very...tight grip on my personality. Recently I broke one of its fingers metaphorically. The grip has loosened a bit. I only wish to stop my frequent visits to the runescape wiki chat and communicate with my fellow yugioh players on this chat. I don't see why you cannot simply unban me when the banishment is always in your hands beyond now. Probably its on a more personal matter? I chipped at your self-esteem? I have apologized. I know....I kinda want to slice the throats of a few people that have chipped at the ol block too. But I realized grudges devour our sanity and they can eventually make us lose much respect. If it isn't for that reason then why not? I'm not going to abuse the freedom since I know it can be taken swiftly away in mere seconds and I wouldn't want to offend anyone since I haven't been on in quite sometime. It'd be like Shawn Michaels coming back and beating the audience members up. He would be considered trash for the rest of his days... Another reason I won't is because I realize it is quite immature. Please TTF. I'd greatly appreciate your understanding.   Cd5464

Hey, TwoTailedFox, I see you're online and you're an experienced yugioh duelist (as well as the creator of this wiki). So I have a question for you. If I flip summon Fortune Lady Dark who has ? attack points but has a special ability that gives it attack points, does it get destroyed by Trap Hole? --Qim1 (talk • contribs) 00:06, July 9, 2012 (UTC)

Do trigger effects have priority?
so do cards like kageki and agent of mystery earth lose it's ability to activate its effects when they are book of mooned or compulsoraried on their summon. since these are trigger effects.

Could I get your help with something?
I'm trying to move the old page from "Card Tips:Madolche Mille-feuille" to "Card Tips:Madolche Mew-feuille", since the pun is now more obvious, but for some reason it won't let me move it, even though I moved Trivia, Rulings, etc. with no problem. Could I get this manually moved over? Thanks for the help. The Pope 23:38, July 15, 2012 (UTC)

Yo
User with an inappropriate name. They tried spamming chat, but Nexus canned them. Deal with it as you like. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 09:15, July 29, 2012 (UTC)

YamiWheeler and Pato M

 * I have to say that I found the "Kindergarten" comment uncalled for. Not everyone that edits this wiki has English as their first language. Its not hard to mix up words like that. Which is one reason anyone can edit - proofreading. I know you didn't mean the comment with malice, but it still struck me as uncalled for.
 * I also think that its would be quite easy to assume that Featured Card articles are not mainspace articles, hence the "ownership" thing (not that that makes it right). Its not as if we have clear documentation about it, after all.
 * I suppose the overall point of my spiel here is that malicious intent shouldn't be assumed even when editors are unhelpful. I honestly think the block threat on my both users (based solely on this argument) was a bit extreme. Perhaps I'm being too nice, I don't know. I also don't mean to offend you with these comments, but I felt like I needed to get that off my chest. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:18, September 7, 2012 (UTC)


 * I realize its a public article. Rather than simply tell them to use better grammar, why not just quickly fix the two problems you pointed out yourself and put "grammar" in your edit summary? You can't say you don't have time to do so if you had time enough to compose that message to them.
 * As for the block, fair enough. I didn't realize the issue went several days back. Sorry. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:34, September 7, 2012 (UTC)


 * Ah, so you did that too. Alright then. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:41, September 7, 2012 (UTC)

Both of you need to chill
Ok. I agree with the desision you made. On the subject "My threat" I hope he takes it seriously, cause you can see how many times i got insulted, and i do not come to this wikia to recieve that kind of treatment.

On a related note, does that mean that my edit is final, on the featured card page? --Yes, im Pato (talk • contribs) 22:19, September 7, 2012 (UTC)


 * Ok, If that's the case, you will be notified. I don't wanna make this a bigger deal than it is, but, I am tired of arguing with that person, and I'm more tired of having to face every single insult he has towards me. I officially have had it. The moment i wrote the previous comment, I had not read his comment in the forum of that featured card. I really don't want to read a wall of text that starts by calling me a d*ck. I don't think it's fair for people to call me so many insults in such a short time, for so few reasons. I know some may think it's harsh, but I really want him to have the concecuences someone has when he insults some other user, over jealousy matters. --Yes, im Pato (talk • contribs) 22:31, September 7, 2012 (UTC)

RE: Both of you need to chill
With all due respect, I've been writing the Featured Card articles for the better part of a year for this site. As Cheesedude mentioned above, there are no clear guidelines for the Featured Card articles. I have always written the articles in a certain style, my style, because there's nothing to go on at all. Nowhere does it say that what I've written in my own time and contributed to the site as a gesture of improving it is not my property. Even if it isn't, is expecting someone to consult me before they change something that much of a bad thing? I don't think so. If you could, please write up a list of guidelines for us to follow when writing the Featured Card articles so we are aware of which rules we have to follow.

Next is my issue of what is relevant to list and what is not. That is entirely down to personal preference. You can't say that I'm wrong when I don't list the Damage Step, because I expect people to understand that. I wouldn't expect anyone writing a Featured Card article to explain the basic rules of the game to me, so why is that necessary? I do play the game, and what I've written is based on my experiences. If you disagree, once again, exact guidelines would be helpful, because right now, the line between opinion and facts is being blurred.

Finally, it seems to me that you're taking sides, by saying things like Pato is "falling to my level." I'd like to remind you that I did not make threats to "punch people in the face" like he did, and not only did he make those threats, but he reaffirmed them in the talk page right above this, and nothing is going to be done about it? Me arguing about the article is put on the same level as someone threatening me with physical violence? Is that your stance?--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 22:38, September 7, 2012 (UTC)


 * None of that justifies threats of physical violence. I didn't 'bring it upon myself' by defending the article as being fine as it was - are you telling me that it's justifiable to make threats just because you get riled up with somebody, or because they may be wrong on a certain issue but are arguing? He was equally as rude as I was and any beginning hostility was from previous encounters with him. He may have 'recanted' rudely after you basically forced him to, but he was clearly not sorry for what he did because he restated it on your talk page. "I hope he takes the threat seriously." I know that you don't personally like me, which was evident from when you called me annoying on IRC, which I still remember, but honestly couldn't care less about. However, letting personal feelings get in the way of dealing with serious issues like threats seems like something a moderator should not do. Obviously, nothing more is going to be done, but I feel the need to make my point that threats should never be acceptable and you are never 'asking for them.'--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 23:06, September 7, 2012 (UTC)

Location of talk page replies
Hey TTF, I just wanted to comment on your statement that "...it is good manners to reply on the other person's talk page. Not doing so does indeed leave you open to accusations of being a coward." It has been my policy for a very long time to keep discussions together by replying to messages left to me on my talk page, and when I leave messages on someone else's talk page, to copy their replies back with my original message before replying (and by this point, a number of other editors do the same). I'd therefore be rather put off if someone accused me of cowardice for simply following this practice; I instead encourage people to tell me if they want me replying in some other manner, and also make use of Talkback where I feel it necessary. I'm not trying to suggest anything about you by saying this, but merely pointing it out. =) 「 ディノ 奴 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 22:57, September 7, 2012 (UTC)


 * Exactly. Just wanted to make the point that I was following this example, which Deltaneos also follows. There is no "cowardice" involved.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 23:00, September 7, 2012 (UTC)


 * I insinuated that some users brand it was cowardly for the reasons outlined by Pato M, in that it doesn't give fair response notification to the other party. I'm not suggesting that it 'is' cowardly, only that some users see it that way. How you reply to articles is none of my concern personally, I only pointed out how some users perceive a certain behaviour.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page)


 * All right, that's fine. I just thought I'd point it out. =) 「 ディノ 奴 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 23:01, September 7, 2012 (UTC)

Blogs
Nice to meet you, maker of the wiki! I'd like you to answer these 2 questions if you like:
 * why are the blogs feature disabled (and can I propose it on forum to re-instate them)?
 * can I make polls on Main Page (see my user page as an example)? E n e r g y X  ∞ 23:24, September 8, 2012 (UTC)


 * I would be able to answer first one: This Wikia is extreme busy with updating so Blog are out of the way. As for Polls, I don't know how can that be possible, but I will let you (TwoTailedFox) solving that issue. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:27, September 8, 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, I'll discuss about the polls about other users, see their opinion. Oh, and even if I made TP message to Deltaneos' talk page, he did not seem to take action. The Navigation Menu has the Community button - it lists:


 * top_users
 * Community portal
 * Current events
 * Recent changes

The issue is that when clicking top_users, nothing happenes. Can you change it? E n e r g y X ∞ 23:35, September 8, 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, "top user" is actually this user, TwoTailedFox - as he had highest edit counts. Try go to your User Page and click "Top User", you will be surprise. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:38, September 8, 2012 (UTC)


 * Never mind my explanation - that button is actually broken. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:40, September 8, 2012 (UTC)

So
2 people start ranting about me, both of them hating me (Kitten plain hates me: Last year I chose to stop trying to make him like me, as I did not want that kind of person liking me), and, when i tell them, that they have my permission of talking about me, wich they should have, I get the ban? I don't think I am confused, that just happened. I am more than confortable with not talking about people that i have nothing good to say. I am ok with people talking about me, yet I'd me more confortable, if I'd be told that this would happen. I had an issue with people talking about me, in 2 different wikias actually. I have to take that people are talking about me; I can't stop them. I'm not even mentioning the fact that I call that ranting, yet, it was witch hunt, firing at Pato, Duck season, or, well, you get the idea. Now, besides the fact that I do think that it'd be more correct to either ban us both, or just remove my ban, I believe that he, as well, should be taken care, after talking towards my person, how he did, after he was asked, not to. --190.226.80.173 (talk) 00:42, September 9, 2012 (UTC)

I think Joey had nothing "hostile" toward Pato as of right now - he just commented that he would not doing it again and seemed to welcoming him into talk with him if needed. Again, I have nothing against Pato for confirming his reasons toward Joey, as long as he don't show any hatred or hostile. I know truth does hurt sometimes, but it's better than lie at them and laughing at them as they went down in the fire. That was I who started that discussion, Pato is welcome to add his respond. I don't forbidden him or anything. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:48, September 9, 2012 (UTC)


 * Yami stated a personal opinion, whereas Pato M opened a personal attack. Pato M has also circumvented his ban, which has now extended his original ban length. He was warned, and he chose to ignore that warning.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 00:51, September 9, 2012 (UTC)


 * Ah well, it's up to your judge - I can't stop you at all. Maybe it's time for him to learn some formal manners. Glad to have you back in the action for this period ^_^ -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:55, September 9, 2012 (UTC)


 * Honestly I don't know what you are talking about at the moment(TTF). The moment i got banned, there was a little note that said I could ask about the ban, or something alike. So, i did. I don't see why you are extending my ban, as I only am questioning you, in order to get this thing ended once and for all. I'm not ignoring someone, and, if there are 3 people i think are highly suitable for running this place, they are delta, cheese, and you.

Again, I did not open a personal attack. I did as well, state my opinion. Anyone can see that both are opinions, and, in all cases, His was harder toward my person. I'm not going to discuss wich was more offensive, because that's subjective. I'm, again, stating facts. He had an opinion, I explained something real. None was worse than the other. --190.226.76.15 (talk) 01:41, September 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Your comment was designed as bait. The ban stands.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 01:44, September 9, 2012 (UTC)