Forum:Rulings you thought were illadvised

I was just wondering if there are any card rulings out there that you guys think were made that created situations that shouldn't have existed or propeled already powerful cards more then they should be.

This should be more of a open discussion then arguement and please only list cards that having rulings that make them too good or unsual rather then cards that just naturally are.

For the start I have two

Don't know if it counts as a ruling but i felt that there wouldn't have been such a arguement over Honest if it had a flaw in its effect. The fact that it was ruled that Honest did not target either the monster getting the boost or the one that it had selected I felt was a major contributer to this

The second example I have is one that I felt broke a cardinal rule of the game and wonder why it was ruled as such. And that is Black Garden having the ability to superseed the field limit with tokens. Maybe it was just a local judges call but in my area it was ruled that if monsters are simutanously summoned when you have at least 1 free monster zone Black Garden would create tokens too equal the number of monsters summoned going beyond the normal limit of 5. Usually occuring on Macro Monarch decks.

Steelfallenangel 10:14, October 15, 2009 (UTC)