User talk:UltimateKuriboh/Archive001

Sigs
Articles do not include signatures. To sign user pages, type --~ .--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 23:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello.
Good evening UltimateKuriboh. I would like to be a friend to you. UltimateCombos 05:21, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Blackwing - Aurora of the Northern Lights
Apologies for the changes to "Blackwing - Aurora of the Northern Lights'" text. I missed the "Hundred-Eyes Dragon" comparison. -- Deltaneos (talk) 20:21, June 24, 2010 (UTC)

Malefic Mistake
Oh, I just thought that they all required to be single "Malefic" per field, while Malefic World is activate that allowed all Malefic to be on the field at same time and able to attack whatever. So forgive me for misunderstand the whole situation; as I have real Malefic Blue-Eyes White Dragon, and it has real effect. --FredCat100 (talk • contribs) 07:48, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

yugioh wikia
do u get paid for editing hundreds of pages?

No, you do not. (most unfortunately) I only edit anime/manga exclusive cards (and other OCG cards), in hopes that some Konami employee will look at those cards and maybe release them according to the way i write the text. I consider myself the ultimate expert on Yu-Gi-Oh! Wikia in knowing how the wording of effects go. Maybe Konami will hire me (doubtful though). --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 03:27, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Well...
I was like you too, it's just to simply explain him the references on Normal Monsters. OMG! You did it (talk • contribs) 00:25, July 25, 2010 (UTC)

Unknown effect
Well, I am not against you... I can only say this if you think that your own text is wrong, then I should say this - Wait and see. --FredCat100 (talk • contribs) 15:35, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Vision Hero Trinity
I calculated more or less in this way. I took 79 different Hero's and used the theorie of getting the number to unlock a bicycle. Because it's almost the same. So I multiplied 79 with 79 and with 79, which results in 493039. Using the same term and calculating for Stratos and such you get about 50000 more, so you come to a result of about 550000 possibilities of fusion summoning Trinity.

MasterSephiroth (talk • contribs) 10:25, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Troll User
Whatever he done really pissed me off, thanks for warning. But still, look what he had done to couple pages... (Though you didn't sign in, you still can respond here.) -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 02:25, November 9, 2010 (UTC)

Hardship
The equip part was already there. I just made an edit because according to the lore, the effect only lasts once, but by my card lore it can be used for the whole turn, just like in the anime. Master D (talk • contribs) 20:10, November 28, 2010 (UTC)

Ovelrinking
I realize every term is usually linked each time it appears in card articles. However, this is not usually a good thing. I would appreciate it if you cut down on this, since you do seem to edit a lot of card articles to fix the lores. Thanks, Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:10, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

Leviathan Dragon's Lores
I understand that you're trying to fixing them, but be sure to not accident remove 1 of either [ or ], since it can screw up the article. And that time I revived it, I was not angry, I just want to let you know that you're just mistake did it. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  16:26, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

telepon D.D.
hm...are you sure that "Telepon D.D." lore should be written with "when" instead of "if"? and does "Telepon D.D." have a word "target" in it's text? thank you. HyawehHoshikawa (talk • contribs) 19:35, July 23, 2011 (UTC)

RE: "Card Trivia:Chaos Number 39: Utopia Ray" (Forgot to... sorry) (sorry for the long message).
There's no accusation. The edit summary for reverting was too small for my reason. I didn't see any of this card's history at that time; '''i got it from it's 1st sentence. i also got it from its trivia: "This is similar to how..." (not "Stardust Dragon")'; those are all Nomi'' monster. This card relying on "Number 39: Utopia" while having at least 1000 LP for its summoning requirement sounds like a Nomi text. Anyway, You can revert my (that) edit if it's not a Nomi monster when it's released in OG/TCG--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 21:19, August 10, 2011 (UTC)

Problem Solving Card Text
Per this forum conversation, please do not change old anime/manga only cards or old cards that will not be reprinted to use Problem Solving Card Text. Thanks, Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 10:23, November 19, 2011 (UTC)

ZEXAL dub

 * Card Appearances:D.D. Murder Method - Vector Change
 * Card Trivia:D.D. Murder Method - Vector Change
 * Card Appearances:Ironhammer the Iron Giant
 * Card Trivia:Ironhammer the Iron Giant

You forgot these pages to rename. --79.101.251.175 (talk) 16:59, December 3, 2011 (UTC)

Prank Page
Could you get someone to delete this page please?Its spam and wrong for the site--Hikaruyami-having fun* (talk • contribs) 22:43, December 4, 2011 (UTC)

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Suck_Sangans_Dick

Kay.--Hikaruyami-having fun* (talk • contribs) 22:54, December 4, 2011 (UTC)

Lores
Standardizing lores is fine. But do not change lores so that they don't still follow what the Japanese cards say. I know this particular edit is from three years ago, but for an example: "Amber Pitfall" negates attacks. You changed it because it also switches the monster to Defense Position, so the attack would be canceled anyway. That doesn't matter. The Japanese text says negate, our translation should too. For a more recent one, the text on "Angolmois" says "destroy", not "send", so that shouldn't' be changed either. Please be careful. Thanks, Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:19, April 1, 2012 (UTC)

Manga Cards Lores
Well, I'm not very good on standard lores, but I think I'm the only one here at Wikia that gets info about the latest chapters, so I have to create the pages for the cards. If you don't mind, could I notify you when I post a new chapter with its new cards and you review the cards' lores for me? LegenaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 20:07, April 8, 2012 (UTC)


 * No problem. I'll do that starting on next month then, thanks for the help. LegenaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 20:54, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Don't know if you've seen this.
Check out Forum:Offer of affiliation from our sources. Any opinions on the matter would be appreciated. I know card lore standardization is your thing and this is certainly relevant to that. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:57, May 9, 2012 (UTC)

Video game lores
If an otherwise anime-only card appears in at least one video game, the video game lore is used as "lore" with "animelore" also being used. So please do not remove them as you did here. Thanks, Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:50, May 29, 2012 (UTC)

Lore Read difference
Seemed like an IP-Addressed User disagreed to your thought of adaption. Apologize for bring a such worst debt. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:08, September 22, 2012 (UTC)


 * Oh sure, and I do find your latest comment very merry-go-around. To be honestly, I just tried my best to respect each other users' way to commenting and editing. And also, I do notice your summary in that article. Now all the problems are solved and we can moving on the next series of troubles ^_^ -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  04:38, September 23, 2012 (UTC)

New Theory
Yes, I am aware - after all I wrote them all. What do you think of that article? It was only after two, very rare, cards that marked them as "Face-down" without change their position to Defense Position - Darkness Approaches and Eisbahn - so I maybe would guessing that Konami is trying to hinting us something about that. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  04:51, September 23, 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, that's not real card yet and I just guess how Konami will making that kind of new style. But I will take your word for that. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  11:02, September 23, 2012 (UTC)


 * Understandable. It's just little oddly that they don't correct "Darkness Approaches" lore. Like I told other user, Konami should dig them out and rewrite all of those old cards into clearly and better lores. I mean, look at all cards in Legend of Blue-Eyes White Dragon pack, they're godly horrible on the grammar and etc. More of Konami really need a divine shovel to get them out... -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  19:07, September 25, 2012 (UTC)


 * So you're saying that "Battle Pack" is just duplication version of Retro Pack 2? That's interesting theory. So that would be possible to happening if Konami took a gut. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:29, September 25, 2012 (UTC)

Translations
Tyrant Wing: Activate when your opponent declares an attack. Equip this to a monster on the field. The equipped monster gains 400 ATK and can attack twice per Battle Phase as long as your opponent controls a monster.

I am having difficulty translating Data Brain, mostly due to the blurriness of the card text. --Gadjiltron (talk • contribs) 02:23, October 28, 2012 (UTC)

It's a little difficult to read, but here's what I can make out so far:

Data Brain: Equip only to "Psychic Armor Head". If the equipped monster is destroyed by the effect of an opponent's Spell Card, during your next turn, you can treat this card's effect text as that Spell Card's, and activate it from your Graveyard. If this card is activated this way, destroy it during the End Phase.

At the very least, this will correspond to its only appearance in the anime. --Gadjiltron (talk • contribs) 02:59, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

title
Hi,

why is it that you want this page http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Chainable_Traps deleted so badly ?

Thanks in advance for a reasonable answer. (I'd especially be interested if you could link me to already existant pages)

RE: Signature for unregistered contributors?
I put the exact code I used in the edit summary, with the intention that people wouldn't need to ask me what I used. I Literally copy/pasted my edit summary onto the page. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 03:09, November 1, 2012 (UTC)

Re:Delete this Page
I would, but I haven't been approved for adminship yet and thus can't delete. Sorry. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 15:38, November 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * Yup. Since the page is tagged for deletion, a real admin will get to it soon. Since it's not an act of vandalism or have inappropriate content, there's no need to contact anyone; they'll see it eventually. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 15:50, November 2, 2012 (UTC)