User talk:Deltaneos

Carly
In WC11 downloads, Carly Nanosa is called Carly Carmen, where do I put the image and stuff? -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 13:23, May 1, 2011 (UTC)


 * I'd say rename the article and add the image to it in the same manner as the other Charisma/5C's characters. -- Deltaneos (talk) 13:55, May 1, 2011 (UTC)

Loads of work...
Hey boss, i just found out that those whole images in this gallery, this one, this one, that one and finally that one have to be renamed... And the galleries are just messed up with some 1st ed pictures next to unlimited editions... I would love to help but i don't know where to start... Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 21:41, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * It's actually the same for the Gladiator's Assault galeries... Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 21:56, May 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah, there's those images and thousands more. In the past we didn't use the -UE, -LE, -1E part of the filename and only uploaded either the 1st or Unlimited Edition print of a card but not both. So there's still loads of images that need to be renamed since the name format was changed.
 * Moving all of them is a lot of work to do in one go. I'll try and set aside a few time intervals to move them. -- Deltaneos (talk) 23:53, May 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * Allow me to also point out (again, actually ;) ) OCG-TCG card image, which takes a lot of potential error out of checking card file names and allows us to rename the files when necessary with a single click (as I said before, it relies on the still-really-incomplete Set system, but placeholder bits can be added pretty easily for sets as they're encountered, and later fleshed out or replaced (depending on what I figure out, but you don't have to worry about that (it's my problem ;) ))). The template also complains if it thinks it doesn't have enough info (IIRC, there may be cases where it doesn't ask for the card's edition when it should (mostly for Japanese cards, which are usually Unlimited Edition (in which case the template doesn't need the edition) but can also be Limited or Duel Terminal Edition (in these cases, the template *does* need the edition)), or vice versa, but it should usually be accurate), with the correct parameter names included, so remembering how to use it is in most cases as simple as adding  to a file page and previewing. And no, I don't normally make a habit of nesting parentheticals like this; this comment may actually be a new record for me. =D 「 ダイノ ガイ  千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 04:37, May 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * There are a lot of anime/manga card images that aren't named properly either, usually they lack the series part. I guess I'll take this opportunity to ask something I've been meaning to ask for a while. Why are png images "by far preferred"? Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 04:51, May 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * Just a guess on my part, but the most likely reason can be summarized in two words: "lossless compression". ;) As for anime/manga card images, I've said elsewhere that I intend to add support for them to OCG-TCG card image (semantically, it doesn't really cover animanga card images, but a separate template would just duplicate the majority of the current one, and there aren't any really big differences in naming that need to be accounted for); I just haven't gotten around to it yet. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 05:02, May 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * Is there really any way for regular users to help in renaming all of these, or only admin can do it? Cuz, I mean, you're doing a massive and great job but there is so much to do... I'll do my best to help you doing some stuff such as modify the galeries with the future "good" and "corrected" names. I also found a great Special Page that helps a lot finding images on the wiki that are not related to any pages yet: Special:PrefixIndex Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 06:49, May 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, only sysops... like admins. However, you could fill out Yu-Gi-Oh!:Requests for adminship for a chance of gaining access to it; proof required of course.
 * Special:UnusedFiles should do exactly that, however someone in the past decided to do it the easy way and move images and leave redirects behind and not rename the images on the page instead :/
 * Now that that is 'disabled', I guess that's the only way to do those. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 06:57, May 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, I'm the main sysop on the french version but I won't try it here since I know I didn't work enough here to be able to become an admin. Maybe i'll try one day.
 * Yeah I saw thos redirects... So you guys will actually have to rename some files and also to delete some useless redirects... Tough job haha! Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 07:02, May 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * Don't worry too much about the amount of work for us admins; Falzar, Delt, Cheesedude, and I all rename files, and if need be, either Delt's or my bot can be given the admin bit to rename files en masse - the really tedious work is actually everything associated with renaming the files (mostly updating all the places the files are used; unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be any way to automate this with AWB that wouldn't be almost as much work as doing it all by hand), as opposed to the actual act of renaming the files in and of itself. ;) And don't be so hesitant on requesting adminship here; based on what I've seen of your work so far, you look to be a promising admin candidate (and the fact that you're already an admin on the French wiki means you also have (at least a bit of) experience with the tools). =)
 * Falzar: My (extreme?) long-term goal is actually to empty Special:UnusedFiles (and Special:WantedFiles) as much as possible, so it can actually be *useful* again, but it's gonna take (quite) a while even with four admins moving stuff and however many users updating pages. =/ 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 08:19, May 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * and Blackwings0605. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 08:28, May 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * Oh yeah, i didn't know that you had a Bot. At least it will be quicker but yeah, there so many Unused files... I'll think about the request for adminship, I'm really not confident with my english and I'm afraid it could be penalizing. I think that knowing the tools isn't enough to be a good admin... But anyway, it's no the subject of this talk. I really do think that the major and the biggest work to do here is about the pictures... It can be such a mess! So let's get to work i guess! Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 08:36, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Forum:UDE's Rulings now unofficial
Hi Deltaneos! Can you please take a look and post your ideas at Forum:UDE's Rulings now unofficial. Thanks! ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 11:16, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

XHTML Ruby Support alternative
I've found another program that appears to do the same thing, and is compatible with the current versions of Firefox. See here. Assuming it does work as well as it appears too, maybe adding the link to the ruby text explanation page (which I cannot bloody find right now) would be good. Let me know. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:56, May 5, 2011 (UTC)


 * The ruby explanation page is Help:Ruby characters. It's linked to from the Main Page. Looks like someone else added that link a few hours ago. -- Deltaneos (talk) 19:00, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

We need your advice!
Hi Delt, we need Here your advice about naming cards from old sets in languages that don't use the english set reference (SDK in english / DDK in french for example). What should we do? Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 08:31, May 6, 2011 (UTC)

Set card lists
On the Extreme Victory page, it appears some cards on the OCG side of the table still use their OCG names. Is this intentional? I don't see a lot of this on most other set pages. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:55, May 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * They probably just weren't changed after the English names were confirmed. -- Deltaneos (talk) 18:57, May 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * Damn. Alright then. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:00, May 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * And also, this site is little slowly to change. I noticed that when couple latest packs (before EXVC come) were adding into English. But still, don't worry, this site will be able to catch up and eat all English name before you know it, Cheesy-- Er, I mean Cheese -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  19:14, May 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * The "damn" was actually because I think that using the OCG names for the OCG column is a good idea. So I was disappointed that we weren't doing it that way. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:17, May 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * So you referred to those article of OCG name next to TCG name column? So D-Man denied it and ripping them apart into two clones? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  19:28, May 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * What? Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:18, May 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * *cough* I meant by this, a spoiler list and stuff, you know? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:28, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'm saying that I think the spoiler lists should use the OCG names in the OCG column. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:38, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * And I am think we should shove those kind of style in old, ancient than dirt packs (such as LOB, etc.) because I don't see any at first. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:45, May 7, 2011 (UTC)

Request for adminship
Hi, I recently presented my request for adminship Here and, as a sysop yourself, I would love to get your point of view and I'm ready to answer any questions you might have. Thank you in advance --Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 08:50, May 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * I just wanted to thank you for your answer about how you like mines. I'm glad that my honesty made you happy ! Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 19:11, May 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't wanna make you feel that I might be pushy but it seems like everyone gave its opinion except you :p I hope it will be postivie! Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 16:32, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

Not sure if you noticed...
...this. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  18:00, May 7, 2011 (UTC)

Property:WC6 Deck
This is still linking when used in the character infobox, despite using string values. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:46, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

220.255...
Almost every edit from an address from that IP is vandalism in some form. The most recent bunch are these, haven't checked anything before that, but it should be conclusive enough for a ranged block:, Special:Contributions/220.255.1.66, Special:Contributions/220.255.2.37, Special:Contributions/220.255.2.72, Special:Contributions/220.255.2.168‎, Special:Contributions/220.255.1.37, Special:Contributions/220.255.1.56, Special:Contributions/220.255.1.68, Special:Contributions/220.255.1.76, Special:Contributions/220.255.2.86, Special:Contributions/220.255.2.98, Special:Contributions/220.255.2.28, Special:Contributions/220.255.2.169, Special:Contributions/220.255.2.103, Special:Contributions/220.255.2.109, Special:Contributions/220.255.2.171, Special:Contributions/220.255.2.167, Special:Contributions/220.255.2.103, Special:Contributions/220.255.4.30
 * -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 05:10, May 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * The range 220.255.*.* (220.255.0.0 - 220.255.255) is 256*256 = 65,536 addresses. That's a bit much to block. 220.255.1.0 to 220.255.2.255 is 512 addresses and covers most of them. You can block that range using Special:Block/220.255.1.0/23. If you didn't already know that, you can find more information here. -- Deltaneos (talk) 13:36, May 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * You should also untick the "Prevent account creation" box. -- Deltaneos (talk) 13:42, May 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Alright, thanks. I wasn't 'certain' on how it worked and the page said don't use it unless you're sure. Also, I wasn't sure if the rate of vandalism was bad enough for a ranged block to be used. I'll only use it if it continues at a similar or higher rate.
 * Also, can you please share some thoughts on Talk:Speed Spell, it's not urgent, so you can take your time with it. Thanks again. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 14:07, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

Deja Vu
There it go again... -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  13:10, May 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * The page was moved properly this time. I've checked Episode 104 of the English anime and Primo says "When I've managed to complete the circuit and summon the Divine Temple I will be the favourite so it won't matter what Jakob thinks.", so it looks like the name is also official. -- Deltaneos (talk) 13:18, May 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Therefore that user was true first time, right? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  13:22, May 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well the first time it was moved by copying and pasting the contents from one page to another and then redirecting the old page. That messes-up the page history. And they didn't say where the new name was from, so it was harder to check if it was true or not. -- Deltaneos (talk) 13:33, May 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * I see, so it's all good that user learned to use "Move Topic" part. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  13:36, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

Chaos Spear!
Different Dimension, nuff said. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:36, May 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * What's the problem? -- Deltaneos (talk) 20:58, May 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * The picture is shoving in wrong place, should I rip it out or let you go check it out? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  21:37, May 9, 2011 (UTC)

Summary question
In your opinion, what is the best way to deal with a character that has not yet been formally introduced in a summary. At Yu-Gi-Oh! GX - Episode 001, my insistence of not writing omniscient caused me to refer to Yugi as "the stranger", Sho as "the Duelist that faced "Leghul" and Misawa as "the applicant". Should the names just be used even if we wouldn't know them at the point by watching the episode. This is even more important in later episodes, due to Yubel, who wasn't really introduced until about twenty-two episodes after its debut. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:21, May 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * There's two different scenarios. One where the name just isn't said and one where the identity is a secret. In the first case, I don't think it's too important. e.g. the Syrus and Bastion examples and characters like Usui and Sakamaki, whose names as far as I know are only mentioned in the credits. In the second case, it's better not to say their name, e.g. Rudger (or was it Demak) spinning the "Ancient Fairy Dragon" card at the end of 5D's ep 19. Yubel probably falls into this category too. -- Deltaneos (talk) 00:09, May 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * You can also link to characters' articles without explicitly naming them in prose, e.g. the stranger. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 21:45, May 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * Oh, I do. And that's how I do plan to link things like Yubel and Tragoedia before their formal introduction. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:39, May 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * Aah, I should have figured as much. =) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 02:00, May 12, 2011 (UTC)

High Level Summoning Error
I just notice that there is a life point flaw. You know the player have 10 Life Points, right? And I just saw "Beta" attacked "Judge Man", which is stronger ATK than Beta. That will put a result of loss, if there are any kind of cards that can prevent the damage from inflict the owner. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  15:51, May 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * The "Judge Man" was in Defense Position. -- Deltaneos (talk) 15:52, May 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * Ah, that must be the reason, thanks for point it out. I maybe need to wash my eyeballs in the bleach soon if I have misread again. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  15:55, May 10, 2011 (UTC)

Shonen Jump Subscription Promos
I know that the information on the site is correct so I've been wondering something. My brother got an Exchange of the Spirit and I got Cyber Harpie Lady, Embodiment of Apophis, and Ancient Lamp in Shonen Jump Issues. I'm also nearly certain that I got a Winged Kuriboh LV9 in a more recent issue. I think the early ones may or may not have come from a used-book store but I know for sure that the Cyber Harpie Ladies were in a few different copies of one issue that I go. Do you know anything about this sort of oddity? BobaFett2 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:01, 10 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I can find a few sites where people are talking about getting Sneak Preview promos in Shonen Jump. You can see a list here. But I can't find any information on "Winged Kuriboh LV9" coming an issue of Shonen Jump. -- Deltaneos (talk) 19:29, May 10, 2011 (UTC)

Rank 5
I saw the scans of rank 5 on Janime, and the duel was pretty much the same but it went:

Tokunosuke: - Set 1 monster - Set 1 Spell/Trap - End

Yuma: - Summon Gagaga Magician - Attack Tokunosuke's set Chuubone (summons 3 Chuubone Jr's) - Exceed summons Baby Tragon - Tokunosuke chains Uratra C to get Hope from Yuma.

The scans are on a website where you can view them for free (but can't download). —This unsigned comment was made by TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 20:33, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Karakuri Komachi image
In File:KarakuriKomachimdl224NinishiEXVC-EN-C-1E.jpg there is the French version of the image. Lon3wolf (talk • contribs) 09:37, May 14, 2011 (UTC)


 * I was mass moving 002517's images to the correct name. Guess I missed how 1 out of the dozen was in FR, and how he uploaded it saying it was EN as well. It's removed, you can upload the correct image, thanks for letting us know. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 09:51, May 14, 2011 (UTC)

Synjo DeoNecros
Could you please explain to User:SynjoDeonecros that this is a wiki and that anyone can edit? He thinks that everything I say is elitist crap and saying that I'm harassing him. All I did was suggest taking out some cards (due to large deck size and the fact that many lose a lot of advantage) and switch around some cards and he starts going crazy.

http://yugioh.wikia.com/index.php?title=Forum:Themed_Jackal_Lockdown&s=wldiff&diff=0&oldid=1458551

See that and

http://yugioh.wikia.com/index.php?title=Forum%3AKing_Tiger_Heat_Stun&action=historysubmit&diff=1458550&oldid=1458548

I understand that, however...
The only reason I deleted the argument was because it was headed inexorably toward a flame war, a fact that I listed as my reason for deleting it. Check the history. And while I did respect his opinion, he was the one who kept on pushing it on me after I explained my reasons for dismissing it. He refused to take "no" for an answer, hence I had no choice but to delete it. SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 13:59, May 14, 2011 (UTC)


 * So sue me, I was frustrated with the growing flames and I just wanted it to end. It's over and done with, Im ready to move on here. SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 00:56, May 15, 2011 (UTC)


 * I am sorry for the whole mess here and there, but at least I managed to keep them from make the flame going bigger. I am sure that they have hard-headed to deal with what each other were trying to dissolved. So thanks for take a notice and calm the rest of flame down. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  14:03, May 14, 2011 (UTC)

Featured Card

 * http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Yu-Gi-Oh!:Featured_Card/T.G._Hyper_Librarian. <-- It's up. Tell me if you think it's okay.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 02:11, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Could a mention of R5h's Cloudian Turbo Synchro be included?


 * I'd rather not, because it's a gimmicky and niche deck type. There's a lot of random decks that have the capacity to abuse Lib, but we don't have space to list them all.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 02:18, May 16, 2011 (UTC)


 * Looks good to me. -- Deltaneos (talk) 12:08, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Synchro Divided by Zero
Split Synchro Summoning -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:50, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

1st Edition
Are all English Starter and Structure Decks 1st Edition (excluding the original TCG Yugi, Joey, Pegasus, and Kaiba decks)? If not, which ones aren't always 1st Edition?BobaFett2 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:53, 17 May 2011 (UTC)


 * 5DS1 has an Unlimited Edition (link) and so does 5DS2 (link). I haven't checked the others, but if you Google Image search a set number and "Unlimited Edition", you can find more such images to confirm if Unlimited versions exist. Proving they don't exist is trickier. -- Deltaneos (talk) 19:29, May 17, 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm pretty sure I have UE cards from almost every English Starter/Structure Deck released to date, though I'd have to check to be completely sure. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 20:08, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * That's odd...I've gotten many copies of Structure Decks and found that they're always 1st Edition for me (at least the "Ultras" are, that's all I've been checking as I organize my binder.)

blocked
Hi Deltaneos, sorry if it is not very good but do not speak English and I am using a translator. I xhunter2005@hotmail.com user and I have a problem as they blocked me permanently and I really do not haver done something so bad, if I did something to get that far. I can accept that block me but I would like to give me goo haverlo done, and if I like that I will unlock. The last thing is that I am sending this message this way because I can not send it as user locked. I await your response, thanks in advance. —This unsigned comment was made by 200.29.151.154 (talk • contribs) 8:33, 17 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Is Spanish your first language? I'm not sure what you mean by "I would like to give me goo haverlo done".
 * I think you were blocked because you were using an e-mail address as a username. I remember someone else having that problem. If that is the case you should be able to create a new account or request to have your old account renamed. You can see w:c:help:Help:Changing your username (Spanish) for how to do that? -- Deltaneos (talk) 19:13, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

Admin Tools
I'd like to have the Administrative Tools (just to clarify, I'm not asking for them, I'm wondering about the process). Is it a bad idea to nominate oneself after being on a wiki for about 5 months, regardless of overall wiki experience or editing?BobaFett2 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:51, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Users can be nominated for adminship here. Being here a long time helps, but isn't necessarily required.
 * P.S. When you leave me a new message, could you click the "leave message" button/tab. Clicking edit on the previous section header leaves a misleading edit summary, unless you change the edit summary field. -- Deltaneos (talk) 17:14, May 18, 2011 (UTC)

Dark_Dragunity
Dark_Dragunity - Should it be delete or leave? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:22, May 18, 2011 (UTC)

Revise Dragon's Name Loco
Some foolish tried to removed the true name from that card's mask. Can you explain to him about the proof and name change? I already warned him three times and he didn't listen to it as well as no proofs - obviously. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  21:31, May 18, 2011 (UTC)


 * At the same time, this guy is completely ignoring my explanation, which makes perfect sense. He's also calling me an idiot on my talk page for saying that Shriek isn't an official source. Could you please sort this mess out? Burnpsy (talk • contribs) 21:42, May 18, 2011 (UTC)


 * In first place, BURNPSY is the one who said that Shriek is an unofficial source. As width evidence in my talk page and Revise Dragon's talk page. Therefore he's an idiot. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  21:44, May 18, 2011 (UTC)


 * Japanese doesn't have as many syllables as English, so sometimes uses similar ones instead. For example, they don't have a "le" syllable, so use "re" (リ) instead. There're many other examples. As a result some foreign words have the same spelling when written in Japanese. "リバイス" is a valid spelling for both "Revise" and "Leviath". "Leviath" is what the English version is using and the card is a Leviathan, so I think we can assume it was the intended Japanese name too. -- Deltaneos (talk) 22:23, May 18, 2011 (UTC)


 * Then that's coming to where I am defending on. And Burnpsy, along with new friend, continued to deny that. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:25, May 18, 2011 (UTC)


 * And now, you should know the reason why I had declaring to not be Admin again at this month. Those dudes are quite stress-creation, and like to make a funny of me while I am an Admin. I am now emotion-hurting by them for erase the Revise Dragon's original name off the face of this site. If they want that out, then they should take ALL old Shriek's translation names out of this site already. It's coming to the point I cannot trust Burn and his buddy anymore. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:47, May 18, 2011 (UTC)


 * If Revise = Leviath, then perhaps all that should be done is to put a note on the page under the Japanese literal translation saying that.

Spirit of the Books
I own an Ultra Rare version of Spirit of the Books that looks fairly real. It's Japanese and I got it at an international culture fair a while back. I don't see any listing of Ultra Rare Spirit of the Books on any pages-is mine fake?


 * It might help if you give the set number it has (if it doesn't have one, does it have the first card layout?). 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 04:02, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think it has the first one, I'll upload a later picture today or tomorrow.

Pot of Duality
FredCat100 seems to be insisting on putting Shriek's fan-term "Pot of Greederosity" onto the Pot of Duality page. He does this, even after I explain that the Kanji clearly states the name as "Pot of Greed and Modesty" in Japanese, and continues to revert my attempts at reverting it.

Please sort this out. Burnpsy (talk • contribs) 01:11, May 19, 2011 (UTC)


 * I've commented on the talk page. -- Deltaneos (talk) 14:12, May 19, 2011 (UTC)

New Ignorance User...
The user who turned against me about "Scrap Searcher's" Ruling Article that he had a non-proof source of rulings to put in there. I warned him three times and he just being rude to me as well as called me ignorance for "creating Yu-Gi-Oh!" crap. You can find that in my talk page for the further reasons. Thanks for your times and read the whole confusedness he had. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:33, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

Problem with images
I've recently noticed that when i look at galeries, I only see cards that we have. Like here, I cannot see on my screen the images we don't have and it looks really weird, jumping from EXVC-FR002 to EXVC-FR006... Is it the same for you? Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 18:56, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

According to Falzar, it's another one of Wikia's "improvements".BobaFett2 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:58, 20 May 2011 (UTC)


 * It's same for me, as I could see no FR019 and so-so. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  19:15, May 20, 2011 (UTC)


 * Improvements? That's damn not an improvement... It was so easy to just click on the missing picture to upload it... Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 19:29, May 20, 2011 (UTC)


 * I know, I also rather the old version, which was bigger and comfort than this shit change. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  19:32, May 20, 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't know if it's an intentional change or a bug. I'm asking about it though. Someone else has asked about this on Central. It might be worth keeping an eye on that forum for replies too. -- Deltaneos (talk) 19:39, May 20, 2011 (UTC)


 * If this chaos is keeping up, I will vote to bring back old version of Wikia looking from past. I already disliked this new version, it's not so fun anymore. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  19:43, May 20, 2011 (UTC)


 * Thought I said it was probably an 'upgrade'. It's a bit different to saying it 'is' an upgrade. It's probably a bug as well.
 * Unfortunately, most new people decide to upload files to the incorrect name anyways, and they edit the galleries. Not only does it take longer for them, it also takes time to move the images back and then revert their edit in the gallery. That being said, why aren't we interested in adding Edit Notices? -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 00:08, May 21, 2011 (UTC)


 * I trusted you, Falzar, and honestly, I don't like this change. As of seen in France Gallery, it's still lousy and waste of time, and I wish to have old version back already. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:19, May 21, 2011 (UTC)


 * Makes it a lot harder to upload now since they removed the upload image button and the other thing.
 * That's making me want old version more. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  13:27, May 22, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Card Rulings:Brain Crusher
The only Rulings it has are some Judge List Rulings with the deleted yu-judges site as source. Unless the correct UDE's (archive) page is placed as source to those Rulings, they shouldn't exist there.

Right now I'm doing an update to all TCG Official Rulings. If after that I ever get around to updating all the UDE's Rulings too I will add also the Judge List Rulings with their original (archive) UDE's page as source (including Brain Crusher's Rulings).

ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 22:20, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

Categorizing set info pages by set type?
Is Category:OCG Booster Pack Set Card Lists et al. something we really want to do? I don't see the point to it myself and have been removing these categories as I come across them, but figured I should get your input before going on any sort of out-and-out removal campaign. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 16:17, May 21, 2011 (UTC)


 * It's not a project I'm particularly interested in. I think the amount of effort in adding those categories to all the set info pages outweighs their usefulness. -- Deltaneos (talk) 17:12, May 21, 2011 (UTC)


 * Cool. So we're sticking with categorizing them by region/language and edition, then? 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 02:54, May 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * I would say so. -- Deltaneos (talk) 12:40, May 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * Should we worry about adding edition categories to non-Limited Edition Japanese set info pages? I've never seen anything but Unlimited Edition, but that also means it'd be trivial to add them. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 23:11, May 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * Don't forget that there is also the Duel Terminal Edition, even in Japanese. Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 23:33, May 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I actually thought of that just after posting my above comment. ;) Do we note DT sets in the same way we note the other editions currently (and if not, should we)? 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 00:35, May 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, for the images, we don't add -UE to Japanese cards but we do add -DT. We might just categorize DT but that's it. I really think we don't need to categorize UE because if it's not DT, that means it's UE. Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 10:18, May 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * While that is true, I plan on eventually developing a Navigation analog for set info pages, and one of the things it'll do is handle categorizing these pages (just as Navigation currently does for card info pages). Auto-categorizing Japanese UE pages would only be maybe 2-3 extra lines of code in the template. And despite how it looks, I am not necessarily lobbying for this categorization; merely pointing out that it would be trivial to do so if we want to try it out for whatever reason. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 16:46, May 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Also, as I mentioned above, Japanese sets can also be LE, not just UE or DT. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 16:47, May 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Would it have any impact on how the japanese Unlimited cards images are named? Will we have to rename everything to include -UE? By the way, do you have an example of Limited Edition japanese cards, I can't think of one... Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 16:56, May 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Nope, no change there (though there's a (IMO) strong argument for consistency in requiring Japanese cards to be named with -UE). I can't think of any offhand either, and looking around some, can't find any, though I'm sure I've seen them before... Maybe Delt can fill us in (or correct me, if I've been misremembering)? 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 17:33, May 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * TCG only as far as I know. You would expect Limited Edition Pack cards to at least be Limited Edition if it existed in the OCG. -- Deltaneos (talk) 17:40, May 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * That's actually what I thought but I wasn't sure at all... In that case, do we really have to categoriez -UE images? Would it be possible to categorize every DT cards manually (since there's not too much of it compared to UE) and then, with a bot or something, categorize every other japanese (which will be of course UE), so both problems would be solved... But I don't know if it's technically possible? Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 14:08, May 24, 2011 (UTC)

yugioh episode 1
in yugioh episode 1, I changed it to blood-curdling because every other website has blood-curdling in the title instead of terrifying

Talk:Number 17: Leviath Dragon
I responded back.--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 20:49, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1 thing you said "Read above for arguments in favour of each". They seam to be fighting rather than solving problems. User:Burnpsy saying +/- Shriek or monjoyme not official site.... Fredcat saying it is; He's very mad. "Wilimut" wants them to relax and saying basically what I wanted to say (similar) "Please never forget that we're all here because we share the same passion. We shouldn't get mad at each other. Try to relax and talk to each other with respect" This also happened in "Shooting Quasar Dragon"'s and "T.G. Halberd Cannon" case--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 21:06, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * I would like to add that even if english isn't Fred's first language, he could make some efforts on how to deal and talk when he is involved in an argue with someone. English isn't my first language but I know that you can't say to someone "you're a foolish idiot" or whatever stuff he says... He's a fantastic contributor who does an excellent work but he really has to improve that behavior. Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 21:42, May 21, 2011 (UTC)


 * I agree. A lot of the conversation isn't very constructive. The arguments in favor of each name I was referring to were the context in which each name makes sense (Leviath: it's a leviathan and the English version uses the name. Revise: another "revision" to how the game is played, Shark's personality is "revised" when the card possesses him.) -- Deltaneos (talk) 22:04, May 21, 2011 (UTC)


 * I only said that because we all used Shriek/Manjyome site as back-up for all information and translation. And since Wasn't and Wilimut did hit the score about my personality alone. Back then, I didn't realize that the sites that we used were unofficial and I only tried to defend the requirement of translation when it came to that user who think Shriek did something bad. Also the reason of try to change the article is only to respond in the Talk Page first, like we all had to do with Ruling Article. We all have to discuss of what to change before literally change the article itself. You all, Admins, are powerful enough to change is fine with me, but Burnpsy and some common user, indeed, included myself, cannot do the change, except to undo the wrong. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:35, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Fredcat: I don't know "Wilimut", I wasn't referring to your personality. Even I use Shriek/Manjyome for... or whatever site I find. Try not to go too off-topic.

Burnpsy: (???) This is my 1st time meeting him; I have noting to say though I feel sorry for him/her.
 * The whole issue was "su". This is the 2nd Water-Dragon that has a similar name. 1st one is "Levia-Dragon - Daedalus". TCG suggested "Leviath" because it's similar to (above); OCG Suggested "Revise" because of how it sounds or... after... Konomi agreed with TCG/Eng; "Deltaneos" told me. That's Y I suggested "Revise" for OCG/Jap and "Leviath" for TCG/Eng since they're very close. guys see: "Talk:Number 17: Leviath Dragon"--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 00:04, May 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * Honestly, I am male, which was obviously in my Profile page. And I am not going off-topic, I was talking about Revise Dragon's name that was being defend by myself, since that name was coming from Shriek/Manjyone site. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:07, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Fredcat: sorry about that. about the "male" part I was talking to "Burnpsy"

"Deltaneos": From the context of these name; I favor both since they're very close.--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 00:14, May 22, 2011 (UTC)

Please Lock Leviath Dragon's Page
Unregistered members seem to be either vandalizing it, or changing Leviath to Revise, completely ignoring the really long chat on the talk page. Burnpsy (talk • contribs) 23:23, May 23, 2011 (UTC)

Thank you.
Thanks for fixing it. As soon as I looked at it in the revision page it seemed out of place. Moving on, what are your thoughts on Yugioh zexal? To me it hardly compares to yugioh 5ds.Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 21:40, May 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * My first impression was that it looked childish. I've only seen the first episode and read about the first chapter, so I don't think I've seen enough to develop a solid opinion. -- Deltaneos (talk) 23:52, May 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * That's exact same what I had witnessed, except that I only saw a sneak peek and that's enough. I found ZeXal a waste of show. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:57, May 24, 2011 (UTC)

Amazoness Trainer/Trainee
I see no reason why Amazoness Trainer is listed as "Amazoness Trainer (anime)", since there is no other Amazoness Trainer, just an Amazoness Trainee. However, "Amazoness Trainer" redirects to "Amazoness Trainee", so I can't change the name. How do you remove redirects from pages? Golden Key (talk • contribs) 23:04, May 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * By add &redirect=no at the end of that link, that's how I manage to get when I created link for passcode to card's name. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:13, May 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you, Deltaneos. Golden Key (talk • contribs) 00:00, May 25, 2011 (UTC)

Deletion
Is there any set amount of time a discussion should take place before an article can be deleted? There seems to be a clear consensus to delete "-End Dragons" on the talk page, though it's only existed for less than a week. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 20:16, May 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * There is no set time. If something doesn't stand a chance of being kept, it can be deleted whenever this is clear. If a few days might sway the general opinion it might be worth leaving the decision until later. -- Deltaneos (talk) 22:48, May 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * I honestly find that article worthless space for this site. Only with 4 monsters (Cyber End Dragon, Light-End Dragon, Dark-End Dragon, and Thunder-End Dragon) exist in the universe of Yu-Gi-Oh!, and they all are unrelated, except for middle two (Light/Dark) are only related to Light and Darkness Dragon. I would like to get rid of it sooner. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:01, May 25, 2011 (UTC)

Forum:Anime and manga summary guidelines?
Would you please give me your opinions on the few questions I asked at the bottom of that page? Just respond here instead of unarchiving it. I'd like to actually go ahead and write up a policy page for this, as it seems we both agree on most of it, and no one else seems to care. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 02:48, May 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * I've been thinking a lot lately of going back on an old decision. Each Duel used to have their own article. Then it was decided to merge them with the episodes. The Duels are possibly the most significant events in the series, but don't get their own individual in-universe articles. Many other events, objects etc. of lesser importance get their own detailed articles, rather than leave the reader look up the relevant episodes. Their own articles would allow for more formats without having to worry about how it affects episode pages.
 * I do like the footnotes, but yeah, something like "This Duel uses Duelist Kingdom rules" with a link to a page explaining those rules is probably better. -- Deltaneos (talk) 14:55, May 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Hmm, I'm surprised, but I like the idea of each Duel having its own article. I would assume we would just put a "main article" link in each featured duel section? I always did find it odd that things like Aporia's father get articles when more significant things do not. Guess we should start another forum discussion, huh? Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:48, May 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Would the featured Duels sections still be needed on episode pages? Are there other major topics you think are lacking articles? Yeah, I suppose we should start a forum. Do you want to do it or would you rather I did? -- Deltaneos (talk) 17:20, May 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * I think keeping the Featured Duel section with a main article link is the best option, since Featured Duels are such a mainstay in the articles. That section being absent would be odd. Actually, as long as there's a link in the article somewhere to the Duel article, I suppose it doesn't matter. I think we're lacking a lot of "out-of-universe" articles. I was very pleased when you started making staff and voice actor articles. There are some other topics that I've thought "we need an article for that" in the past, though I can't currently remember what they were (I'll let you know when I do) Go ahead and start the forum. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:06, May 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * 'Started an example/demonstration page: Akiza Izinski VS Commander Koda. I'll try start the forum later. -- Deltaneos (talk) 01:12, May 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * Wow, it was nominated for deletion seven minutes after it was created. As for other more major topics without article, there are plenty of things for DM and GX that we really need to create, mostly locations and vehicles. I've been contemplating making (may be a good idea for one of us to make a list so we don't miss anything. Oh, one other major thing. We need an article for darkness of the heart, which is all over the place in both GX and 5D's. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:56, May 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * Forum:Duel articles.
 * I take it darkness of the heart is when characters become corrupted. It seems to apply to Yu-Gi-Oh! (Duel Monsters) too. See the episode 176 title for example. "Darkness of the Heart" is also a composition from the Yu-Gi-Oh! Duel Monsters anime. It's on Sound Duel 3. -- Deltaneos (talk) 17:41, May 27, 2011 (UTC)

StnjoDeonecros

 * Del, could you please deal with this user? He already put it on Falzar's wall, but he isn't online and I have a feeling he'll be leaving huge walls of text for him. There's an edit war here. Could you lock it, or do whatever you think is best. I already deleted his part of the argument, since he didn't want it up, but he wants mine deleted too, which I consider unfair.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 15:56, May 26, 2011 (UTC)

User:71.136.52.233 trolling "Exodia" article
Look at this history of his contrib! He trashed the article into someone's talk page... I already warned him once and he just went to screw it up. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:11, May 26, 2011 (UTC)