User talk:MasterMarik

OCG-TCG card image
The template has since been updated. All you need to do know is insert the card's name, and that's it. Example:

--UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 16:42, August 18, 2016 (UTC)

Why did you remove my contribution to Necrovalley? Zombie World is the only card to my knowledge that changes card Type in the graveyard, so I think it would be good for players to know this. Thefigg88 (talk • contribs) 16:26, June 9, 2017 (UTC)thefigg88

Return of the Red-Eyes
Actually, I checked RRE's effects. The first one(Reviving a Normal Monster) is a Quick-like effect. Quick-like effects can be activated during EITHER player's turn. It says so right on the Quick-like article.RedEyesBurn69 (talk • contribs) 00:05, June 14, 2017 (UTC)

How Good Is It?
After becoming more familiar with Crystal Wing Synchro Dragon, that's honestly one of my favorite Synchro Monsters. BOTH of its effects make it a critical threat against Kozmo and Monarch Decks. However, its battle-related effect alone can give you an edge against...

Qli(It's a lifesaver against Apoqliphort Towers and Skybase, but Towers is a bigger threat) Unstoppable Obelisk(It will gain Obelisk's 4000 ATK) Tyrant Neptune OTK(Again, gain ATK during damage calculation)

I'm asking if you can think of any other Decks that Crystal Wing endangers. The five I've just mentioned were the only ones I can think of.

Plus, it's a minor threat against Shaddolls, since it can negate El Shaddoll Construct's battle-related effect and destroy her, and if they try reviving her with Shaddoll Falco, Crystal Wing will negate its effect and destroy it.

It's a no-brainer that Crystal Wing is a good card, but the question is, HOW good is it?RedEyesBurn69 (talk • contribs) 14:14, July 15, 2017 (UTC)


 * You're asking someone whom has never actually used the card. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 15:11, July 15, 2017 (UTC)

Maybe, but you seem to be a guy who is knowledgeable about the best cards and which cards are strong enough for the Metagame. I don't know how, I just got the vibe from you.RedEyesBurn69 (talk • contribs) 15:47, July 15, 2017 (UTC)

Last Turn
I'm sorry if I am going too far with Last Turn. It's just a really good card to have in your Deck, and with it in my Graveyard Dragon Power deck, I have had enjoyed many victories. That is one of my reasons for making those tips with Uria, King of the Skull Servants, and Rage of the Deep Sea. I thought that Last Turn would also work with other boss monsters that are powered up by the Graveyard(Or banished cards, in the case of Tyranno Infinity and Gandora Giga Rays). It always worked out for me, so I thought it would work out that way for other people.

Even without REDD and BESD, there are plenty of Dragon type monsters I can think of that work well with that card. Kaiser Glider, Exploder Dragon, Starving Venom Fusion Dragon, Deep-Eyes White Dragon, any Dragons Ritual Summoned w/ Djinn Releaser of Rituals, Mirror Force Dragon, Crystal Wing Synchro Dragon, etc.

Yes, I am aware that it's banned because of its effects and requirements. But its flexibility should be ANOTHER reason why it's banned. It can work with A LOT of Decks, so this card can be just as--if not more--flexible than Exodia.

Timelord(Metaion or Camion, the Timelord)

White Aura(White Aura Whale or Dolphin)

Spellcaster(Mainly because of Jowgen the Spiritualist)

Cyber-Stein Lockdown(The Last Warrior from Another Planet)

Kozmo(Expect to pay a lot of LP)

Wicked Gods(The Wicked Avatar)

Egyptian Gods(The Winged Dragon of Ra)

Unstoppable Obelisk(Do I need to say it?)

Shaddoll(El Shaddoll Construct)

Yubel(Yubel - The Ultimate Nightmare)

Legendary Dragons(Mirror Force Dragon)

Speedroid or Windwitch(Crystal Wing Synchro Dragon)

Ally of Justice(Ally of Justice Castator)

Fairy(Mainly because of Archlord Kristya)

Fiend(Mainly because of Vanity's or Majesty's Fiend)

Graydle(Level 3 Graydles)

Bujin(Mainly due to Bujingi's influence when in the Graveyard)

Nimble(Most Nimbles summon other monsters from the deck)

THAT'S why I favor Last Turn so much. It's just that good. But one deck I think it's a bad idea to use this card against is Dragon Rulers, since they can just summon the "Adult Rulers" from the Graveyard and counter what you did.RedEyesBurn69 (talk • contribs) 00:11, July 18, 2017 (UTC) I consider Last Turn to be highly risky, even if it does have its uses. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 01:08, July 18, 2017 (UTC)

Talk Page
What have you done to my gorgeous talk page?--F88f (talk • contribs) 00:22, July 29, 2017 (UTC)
 * 1. I didn't remove that content. You can check the page's history via Edit > History. 2. What you wrote isn't what the talk page is for. 3. When posting on somneone's talk page, post a subject title first (the big A at the top among the row of buttons). --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 00:42, July 29, 2017 (UTC)

Ok thank you--F88f (talk • contribs) 01:00, July 29, 2017 (UTC)

hi--F88f (talk • contribs) 05:07, July 29, 2017 (UTC)

Listen MasterMarik, I'm sorry for everything I've done. I promise that I'll never do bad behavior ever again.--F88f (talk • contribs) 03:37, July 30, 2017 (UTC)

Sorry
] For evrything I've done--F88f (talk • contribs) 03:38, July 30, 2017 (UTC)

Edit
Finally my edit was god, right? On the Swordstalker page and the Negate attack.--F88f (talk • contribs) 21:28, August 2, 2017 (UTC)
 * The edits are better but 2 things. 1. The trivia you mentioned for Swordstalker is already mentioned on its anime page. 2. The Negate Attack error is best mentioned on the episode it refers to (and I believe it's already there). --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 22:03, August 2, 2017 (UTC)

Darkness Approaches
It may not been a tip and yes it compared effects, but I simply followed Card Tips:Gather Your Mind and thought this would be treated the same. My apologies if I assumed wrong. GoldenDragonRider (talk • contribs) 23:17, August 4, 2017 (UTC)

Watermarked images
Marik, the images you've been uploading are watermarked. You should tag them as such by adding  to the template or just by adding the Watermark template to them. In this particular case, you may be able to get replacements, but letting you know in case you don't know. Becasita Pendulum (talk • contribs) 12:42, August 6, 2017 (UTC)

Elemental HERO Stratos
I've been thinking a lot about Elemental HERO Stratos being banned lately. Believe me, he's a major threat in HERO Decks, kind of like how Dark Armed Dragon is in Chaos Decks.

In the OCG, Stratos is free(Yes, I'm referencing the memes), being Semi-Limited. Given how much HEROs have grown over the years, I'm surprised no one is topping with them in the OCG right now. They're capable of doing way too much at this point. This is weird coming from a guy who's a big fan of Forbidden cards, but it's honestly shocking that Masked HERO Dark Law isn't banned too. He's a huge problem for so many Decks, one of them being Tyrant Neptune OTK(The Tyrant Neptune has to copy the effect of a monster in the Graveyard used for its Tribute Summon. No Graveyard, no OTK).

I know this is kind of a stretch due to the current meta, but do you think Stratos--and possibly Dark Law--could get banned in the OCG too? Given how large the archetype as a whole is right now, I wouldn't be surprised if that did happen. In fact, I really expect Dark Law to become Forbidden in the future.RedEyesBurn69 (talk • contribs) 15:53, August 24, 2017 (UTC)


 * Stratos shouldn't have been unbanned in the first place. Dark Law is basically a one-sided Macro Cosmos but it has a summoning requirement. I never thought it was that great to begin with. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 16:07, August 24, 2017 (UTC)

Well, I can't say I blame you for thinking that about Stratos. With him, you either lose no advantage, or put your opponent at a disadvantage each time he's summoned, and it's not limited to once per turn. This can give you complete control over the duel if used correctly, and HERO Decks' history of OTKs and FTKs are proof of this.

And Dark Law's continuous effect mean that you can use discarding effects against Dark World or Fabled Decks without repercussions. That's just the tip of the iceberg! Obviously, that effect is a giant middle finger to Burning Abyss, Qli, Buster Blader(Since it more or less revolves around manipulating the Graveyard), Nekroz, Chaos Dragons. I could go on, but we'd be here all day. Plus, with Mask Change II, it can give DARK Graveyard-reliant Decks like Skull Servant or Dark World an edge against others. This card is no Utopia the Lightning, but it's currently one of the best Warrior monsters out there. So I still think it has a good chance of being banned.RedEyesBurn69 (talk • contribs) 18:02, August 24, 2017 (UTC)
 * Even so, I don't consider cards specifically centered around a theme that good unless it can be used elsewhere. So yes, not even their combos are good enough for me to consider using it. I do give it credit for being that one-sided Macro Cosmos though. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 18:54, August 24, 2017 (UTC)

Care
why Do you care? Mohamed13 (talk • contribs) 19:53, August 25, 2017 (UTC)
 * I care because I enjoy this wiki. You should care too because repeated offenses can get you blocked on here. If you're going to be a member here, you need to contribute wisely. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 20:17, August 25, 2017 (UTC)

can you do edit or new page for me what i say to you in yugioh wikia 11:35, August 26, 2017 (UTC)
 * Well you're capable of doing it yourself aren't you? Just takes time to make the pages. Also sign your posts. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 11:53, August 26, 2017 (UTC)

Card Tips
I understand that I have been attempting to add a bit more useful information to the Card Tips Raidraptor - Pain Lanius page and also that my edits don't seem to last long. Each time your username shows up, so I ask If you are the one who changes the page back each time, Why? The tip might be useful to those who play a Raidraptor deck

Microson (talk • contribs) 00:11, August 28, 2017 (UTC)Microson
 * Your tip isn't possible. You cannot take 0 ATK as damage because that's the same thing as taking 0 damage. Since Pain Lanius requires you to take damage to obtain the other half of its effect (and if you do), you cannot use the effect to revive Rudder Strix. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 00:14, August 28, 2017 (UTC)

Why wouldn't it work?
To/ MasterMarik

I'm still confused as to why the Pain Lanius thing wouldn't work.

First, Raidraptor - Pain Lanius' effect requires you to take effect damage equal to the ATK or DEF (whichever is lower) of a Raidraptor monster on the field in order to Special Summon itself.

Second, The ATK of Raidraptor - Rudder Strix is 0 which is lower than it's DEF of 1600.

Third, so doesn't it stand to reason that if you Summon Pain Lanius by targeting Rudder Strix, a player would take effect damage equal to Rudder Strix's ATK of 0, satisfying the effect "take damage equal to it's ATK or DEF (whichever is lower), and thus become a level 4 like Rudder Strix, it is simply a loophole that presumably Konami didn't realise they created when they released Rudder Strix which can be exploited.

Is there anything I've missed or been mistaken about.

Also, if it doesn't work, it might be a good idea to put it on Pain Lanius' rulings page with a very clear explanation as to why it doesn't work.

Thank you for taking time to read this and if you answer, for answering as well.

Microson (talk • contribs) 09:25, August 28, 2017 (UTC)Microson
 * If you don't take any damage by choosing a 0 ATK/DEF Raidraptor, you don't get to Special Summon Pain Lanius. It's as simple as that. ChaosGallade (talk • contribs) 10:13, August 28, 2017 (UTC)

Hey i went to a yugioh tournament and one using a destiny board deck i am a good duelist but yugioh is a colossal waste of time --F88f (talk • contribs) 20:25, August 29, 2017 (UTC)
 * That's just your opinion. The game is still highly popular. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 20:45, August 29, 2017 (UTC)

Sory I won't get blocked--F88f (talk • contribs) 03:20, August 30, 2017 (UTC)

I'm very sorry I din't know how much this means to you (hence care)--F88f (talk • contribs) 03:22, August 30, 2017 (UTC)

Revue Dancer card tips page
To/ Whomever it concerns

I gather that you undid my edit of Revue Dancer's

Tips page because it's banned but I changed it because that card was in the list twice.

Microson (talk • contribs) 12:53, September 25, 2017 (UTC)Microson

Obelisk's Effect Discussion
Sorry that I just took away what was written, maybe I should start a discussion at the forum before I ripped all that what standed there. What do you mean to the original effects I posted at Obelisk's Effect ?

Also these Anime cards are so used in ygopro (by Percy and The Dawn of a new era) If you don't know: the PC game, just watch on youtube. Stricker-319 (talk • contribs) 06:37, October 6, 2017 (UTC)
 * You shouldn't use a video game as proof for things like that. What you wrote made things worse. The page had indicated the effect was the same for anime and manga. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 11:21, October 6, 2017 (UTC)

To Kuribohs Effect
As it stands in the wiki (http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Yu-Gi-Oh!_-_Episode_118):

Noah's "Yamata Dragon" has just attacked "Kuriboh", but Yugi activates his face-down "Nutrient Z" to increase his Life Points by 4000 before Damage calculation (Yugi 100 → 4100). "Yamata Dragon" then destroys "Kuriboh" (Yami Yugi 4100 → 1800;

So "Yamata Dragon" attacked Kuriboh in Attack Position and inflicted 2300 battle damage to Yugi and destroyed it.

Stricker-319 (talk • contribs) 16:03, October 7, 2017 (UTC)


 * Yeah but you make it seem like it's an effect of Kuriboh's when it's not. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 16:24, October 7, 2017 (UTC)


 * Can you tell me a scene or another source from where this effect of Kuriboh come from ?

Stricker-319 (talk • contribs) 16:36, October 7, 2017 (UTC)


 * The effect is gathered from multiple episodes. The last bit comes directly from when Pegasus' Thousand-Eyes Restrict absorbed the thousands of Kuriboh, which then self-destructed and left TER blind. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 16:41, October 7, 2017 (UTC)

Yazi, Evil of the Yang Zing
hi, I keep editing the "yazi evil of the yang zing" page, and you keep changing it back, for an incomprehensible reason!! i'm not talking about XYZ summoning, I am talkin about LINK summoning. yazi enables a 2 card combo tha could get a link 4 on board, yazi gets "mare mare" on board> mare mare summons 3 tokens by it's own effect> you get 2 link 2 monsters, or 1 link 3, or even a link 4. and link 4 monsters not being usable in many decks is irrelevant to the validity of the combo.... I personally use this 1 card combo: summon Armageddon knight>use its effect to send destrudo to the GY> summon destrudo by its own effect> synchro summon yazi> destroy yazi by its own effect> summon mare mare by yazi's effect> summon 3 tokens by mare mare effect> summon links, and you have still a full hand left, and you don't have to only summon a link 4, there are many cool combos that can be done using mare mare and its tokens, combining synchro and link summoning.

plus, both ABC(fusion deck) and Spyral(link deck) decks, which are currently meta, already use destrudo, which enables them to incorporate this strategy without too much alteration to their decks.

so please allow this combo on the page, it's definitely a good one :)--Dnahelix (talk • contribs) 20:54, November 7, 2017 (UTC)

Except how often are you going to be able to pull off that combo? The more cards a combo requres the less viable it is. Plus, using Destrudo's effect costs you half your LP. Not worthwhile when you can Link Summon much better without wasting your LP. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 20:57, November 7, 2017 (UTC) heavy cost indeed, but the most prominent current uses for destrudo are to summon black rose dragon and wipe the board(dark hole style), or ancient fairy dragon to search a field spell(half of LP for a terraforming?!!), in a spiral deck, LP doesn't matter, because with the spiral lock(tri-gate wizard + sleeper + resort), LP is irrelevant facing such oppressing field control, and this combo enables it, since anything but double helix can be done with generic monsters and even tokens. and concerning destrodu(the enabler): it can be easily searched using dragon's ravine, which can bee easily searched using terraforming, metaverse, and set rotation, which make it as if you have virtually 13 copies of destrudo in your deck. it is not a hard combo to pull off, especially since destrudo's effect can be use from hand, not only GY. back to half LP, in late game, that's not such a bad bargain, after all, that's why solemn judgment is banned, and it can always be used since you can always half the LP. And finally, it's up to the player to choose to use such a costly combo, but I don't think the cost is an argument for it to be a bad combo....--Dnahelix (talk • contribs) 21:16, November 7, 2017 (UTC)

Yeah but if you want to bring out Evil, use Marauding Captain with a Level 4 Tuner. That's much easier and costs you no LP. If you pay the LP and bring out Evil, you're in trouble if that summon fails. Judgment is just using one card to stop a threat that could leave you down bigger LP. Plus it's much more versatile than Destrudo. The only thing Destrudo has is being a Tuner. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 21:33, November 7, 2017 (UTC)

I never said destrudo was the only way😁. I bring up destrudo because he's kinda meta these days. but that's beside the point. the point is, yazi = 4 monsters on the field, and one of them is a tuner, and you can synchro with them, or link, or both! if someone already uses yazi, they're probably already aware of its synergy with mare mare, but this combo may be useful to decks that can make yazi, but don't because they don't know that it can be used this way, and that's the whole point of the tips page!!! it simply trades 2 monsters for 4, and 1 minus for the opponent, and in a link based deck, that's a very good advantage to gain. idk.......in the end, I won't try to add the combo again, if no one knows about it, it'll give an edge in my game. I just felt like as a member of the yugioh community I should at least try to share my combos. sorry for wasting your time, and thank you for taking the time to discuss with me your point of view😊--Dnahelix (talk • contribs) 21:49, November 7, 2017 (UTC)

Trap
Dear mastermarik, i am the same user as battlebots. I just wanted to tell you that i was deeply hurt when you blocked me. Also, yugioh is so bad. I dont want you to fall into the same trap as me, getting addicted. Please read and think about this till you decide what to do. Yours truely,--F88f (talk • contribs) 02:26, November 8, 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes I know you are the same user. When you post over here after registering over at another wiki, you're automatically registered for other wikis. You were blocked on Battlebots due to your own actions. I did later on block all wiki contributors there because of the countless vandals that were just adding categories to pages that didn't apply to them. Plus I don't know anyone that is addicted to the card game. I certainly am not and find it quite hard to believe it's possible given that success means generally having lots of money only to have those cards go down in value later and/or get hit by the banned list. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 12:21, November 8, 2017 (UTC)

Good Times
But remember all the good times we had? Like when we joined forces to block asbessostar on battlebots? Your wasting your life, being on this stuoid website 24/7. You know whenever someone does anything on this website. Don't you have a life, instead of being on this stupind website every single second? Answer me quickly.--F88f (talk • contribs) 19:33, November 13, 2017 (UTC)


 * As a fan of Yu-Gi-Oh, I don't see it as a waste of time. If you find it as a waste of time, you're the one that shouldn't be here. Plus, your good times have been completely trashed by all the bad you've done. Plus I'm not on this website 24/7. You're exaggerating greatly. Also, stop making demands of me just because I blocked you. I don't have to answer you at all. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 19:48, November 13, 2017 (UTC)

You are. I'm doing this because I care about you. So please stop cyber bullying me--F88f (talk • contribs) 20:01, November 13, 2017 (UTC)

I'm cyberbullying you? You don't have a clue what that even means if you think I'm the one cyberbullying you. If I'm the one cyberbullying, why have YOU been harassing ME on multiple Wiki accounts with spam and misconduct. You're nothing but a liar and a vandal. I'm not talking to you anymore. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 20:10, November 13, 2017 (UTC)

You can't even solve problems. I'm 14 and your 27 and I'MItalic text the one cyber bullying you?? I don't care if you don't answer. I tried to be your friend but you won't let me--F88f (talk • contribs) 20:18, November 13, 2017 (UTC)

Sword Arm of Dragon
Hello. Just so you know, User:Shirkahn was referring to the spelling of Jurassic in the TCG English text box description, not the actual card itself. I've just fixed it. --Axlerate (talk • contribs) 17:34, November 19, 2017 (UTC)
 * Even so, there was no need to mention it as trivia. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 17:36, November 19, 2017 (UTC)
 * True. They must not have read the description on the card image. Anyway, it's fixed now.--Axlerate (talk • contribs) 17:39, November 19, 2017 (UTC)

Fool
Are you too sad to answer? I'm sorry--F88f (talk • contribs) 19:21, November 19, 2017 (UTC)

Stop saying I'm a fool.--F88f (talk • contribs) 19:23, November 19, 2017 (UTC) Sotp cyber bullying me--F88f (talk • contribs) 19:24, November 19, 2017 (UTC)

Colossal Fighter Misprint
What exactly is the misprint error in the card image you uploaded? In advance, where did you get the picture from? --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 22:56, November 27, 2017 (UTC)


 * It's the one mentioned on the misprints page talking about how the front of the card has some logo and the card back. Found it via google images. --MasterMarik (talk • contribs) 23:05, November 27, 2017 (UTC)

Box of Friends
Hi MasterMarik,

I undid your change on Box of Friends.

Box of Friends + Dragonic Diagram is a 2 card combo that doesn't even consume either Normal or Pendulum Summoning, gets 3 cards out of your deck and fuels your Extra Deck for Pendulum plays.

For a number of reasons, I don't think that counts for something that requires "too much effort" to actually do.

Regards, ZabanyaGundam

ZabanyaGundam (talk • contribs) 15:23, November 30, 2017 (UTC)