User talk:H-E-R-O HERO!!

Card Rulings:Royal Decree
Only rulings that specifically appear on an official sources (like the UDE Official FAQ) should appear on the Card Rulings pages. Although your ruling was correct, it did not appear on any such source, so it was removed. --Deus Ex Machina (Talk) 00:11, 7 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Ditto for Card Rulings:Big Core. --Deus Ex Machina (Talk) 01:06, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Same for Card Rulings:Crush Card Virus. Stop it.  --Deus Ex Machina (Talk) 18:29, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

RE:B.E.S Monsters and Big Core
Card Rulings:Skill Drain "This ruling applies to all monsters that can hold Spell Counters, Normal Counters etc., like "Skilled Dark Magician",and "Big Core" and"B.E.S." Monsters no longer have that effect while "Skill Drain" is active, so they cannot gain more Spell Counters,Normal Counters etc. and all Spell Counters, Normal Counters etc. already placed on them are removed."

It's the exact same thing. --Deus Ex Machina (Talk) 16:03, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Both Netrep and the Judge Resource Site directly copy-and-pasted the rulings off the UDE site. They both list the rulings I quoted.  --Deus Ex Machina (Talk) 19:12, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

RE:Elemental Hero Divine Neos Fusion Materials
He needs five Fusion Material Monsters. Think of it this way: his Fusion Material Monsters are --Deus Ex Machina (Talk) 21:29, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 1 "Neos" monster
 * 1 "Neo-Spacian" monster
 * 1 "Elemental/Destiny/Evil Hero" monster
 * 1 "Neos"/"Neo-Spacian"/"Elemental Hero"/"Destiny Hero"/"Evil Hero" monster
 * 1 "Neos"/"Neo-Spacian"/"Elemental Hero"/"Destiny Hero"/"Evil Hero" monster

Elemental Hero Deck

 * Do not list decks of your own creation. Danny Lilithborne 10:04, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

RE:Thunder King Rai-oh
No. "Thunder King Rai-Oh" cannot negate effects. It can only negate Special Summons.

Compare:
 * Thunder King Rai-Oh
 * Neither player can add cards from their Deck to their hand except by drawing them. You can send this face-up card to the Graveyard to negate the Special Summon of 1 of your opponent monsters, and destroy it.


 * Black Horn of Heaven
 * Negate the Special Summon of 1 of your opponent's monsters and destroy it.

And the following ruling for "Black Horn of Heaven": "Like "Horn of Heaven", this card cannot be used against "Premature Burial", etc. It can be used against inherent Special Summon effects like "Cyber Dragon" or "Dark Necrofear"."

And the following ruling for "Horn of Heaven": ""Horn of Heaven" cannot be used to negate a Special Summon that results from a Spell, Trap, or effect of an Effect Monster Card. ..."

"Thunder King Rai-Oh" works like "Black Horn of Heaven", which works like "Horn of Heaven". None can negate effects.

--Deus Ex Machina (Talk) 22:19, 2 May 2009 (UTC)


 * If someone disagrees, show them the rulings. They can be found on http://netrep.net/ or the the Judge Resource site.  --Deus Ex Machina (Talk) 21:39, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Stop editing other users' comments. Danny Lilithborne 11:03, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Certain Rulings
That is irrelevant. We only list rulings that appear on official sources.

The situation with "Royal Decree" is identical to the situation with "Imperial Order" vs "Mystical Space Typhoon": "When "Imperial Order" is activated, "Mystical Space Typhoon" can be chained to destroy it."

If the two cards are similar enough, then they should have the same rulings. If your opponent does not believe that the two are similar, ask him to explain the difference. For the situation with "Crush Card Virus"/"Deck Devastation Virus", the only difference between the two cards is whether it's > 1500 or < 1500, and the difference of a single number is not enough to change the core mechanics of how a card functions.

Alternatively, stop playing with idiots. Or also do something stupid - for example, "Space Gift" does not say from where you draw the card, so try drawing a card from your opponent's hand. If your opponent tries to argue that cards are drawn from your deck, then (a) say that there is no specific ruling for "Space Gift" which says that and (b) ask why he's relying on rulings for other cards in this situation, but not in others.

--Deus Ex Machina (Talk) 20:17, 7 May 2009 (UTC)