User talk:Deltaneos

Rollback
Hey Delt, this might sound sudden for me to ask, but do you think I'd be trustworthy of having the Rollback feature (I'm aware any admin can give it out to users they trust)? Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 22:31, February 28, 2012 (UTC)


 * That's true on Wikipedia, but not here on Wikia; we'd have to request that admins be given the ability to grant (and revoke) the rollback usergroup here. I think bureaucrats can grant and revoke rollback, though, so Delt should still be able to do so for you if he wants. 「 ディノ 奴 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 04:28, February 29, 2012 (UTC)


 * I see. What do you think Delt? I'd like it so I can revert vandalism even quicker (It would also be useful for me since I revert vandalism often). What frusterates me is when A vandal is changing the page with more vandalism every time you try to restore the page to the last good version, you can't because they changed it again and you wasted your time with the undo and publish pages, and then have to do it all over again. With the Rollback I could bypass this with one click. I also know that Rollback should only be used for reverting vandalism. Any other use would be abusing the tool, and thus it would be revoked. There are times when you might misclick with it, in which case you just revert yourself, it also can be used to revert an edit you made a mistake on. The only times I would use it would be ether vandalism or someone inserting false information. Any other I would just Revert/give a reason/go to their talk page like normal). Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 00:51, March 1, 2012 (UTC)


 * Looking at your recent reverts, it seems fine to me. I don't see any problem with giving you the right. Does anyone else reading have any objections? -- Deltaneos (talk) 12:52, March 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * No objections, but can I get this as well? I'm doing fine with just going to the last edit before vandalism started and null editing, but if there's an easier way I'm all for it. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 13:40, March 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * You'll probably have enough support to become an admin, as you seem to need them for images, moving and deleting as well iirc. Also, if the rollback links are easily misclicked, you can move them or hide them from certain pages through css.
 * -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 14:20, March 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * I think it would be fine to give it to you too Golden Key. I'm sure that there are plenty of users deserving of rollback. I'd rather not have my talk page become the place to request it. I've made a request to have the mover usergroup (movefile, noratelimit, suppressredirect) set up here. If we get that, it might be worth setting up request pages for both rights.
 * Dinoguy: Your suggestion a few months ago about letting admins be able to grant rollback, isn't sounding so bad. -- Deltaneos (talk) 15:01, March 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * Adminship has been on my mind for the reasons you listed, Falzar, but I had seen on the forum that something was in the works for granting those other tools, so I haven't nominated myself. Hopefully by May we'll have something so that I can better assist when we start getting TCG Galactic Overlord names, images, etc.
 * And sorry Deltaneos, didn't mean to clog up your talkpage. :) --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 15:46, March 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm also sorry for taking up space on your talk page. I just wanted to know if I could be given the Rollback feature by you is all (it's up to you). I have an idea on how we could set up Rollback and Chatmod Requests if you're interested (mind you this took a while to type up, It's below)

(Rollback, available on Tuesdays, and Chatmod Requests on Fridays. Aside from those two days, nobody can add requests. I say this because you're the only one right now that I know of, that can grant those rights Deltaneos. How they work is below)

Rollback:

Dear candidate, do you accept the nomination (let's just say I used what I said above):

Questions to consider:


 * Does this user Revert vandalism politely?


 * Does this user keep his cool when dealing with many vandals at once?


 * Does he/she have an edit history that shows he can be trusted with it?


 * Has this user been blocked in the past?

Questions for the candidate (since this is not like adminship, I guessed a little less, after all this is just a tool to deal with vandalism quicker)


 * When is the right time to use Rollback, and when should it not be used (I pretty much answered that)


 * Suppose a user asks that you assist them in Dealing with a stubborn user. Would you use the Rollback in a situation like that (Me: only if the person is vandalizing, or the reason is obvious, like inserting false information. Otherwise I would find other means, like responding on their talk page)


 * When can Rollback be revoked (Me: if used to reverse good faith edits, or an edit that you merely don't agree with. Also using it in such situations some could see your action as rude and get offended, especially when the other user believes their edit is correct).


 * Support (judging from yours and Golden Keys comment, you were okay with it)


 * Neutral


 * Oppose

(Chatmod)

Dear candadite, do you accept the Nomination:(I'll use Nexushiker since he already is one)

Questions to consider:


 * How does this user behave in the Chat room? Does he get along with the others?


 * Has he/she tried to stop fights that brake out?


 * Does he/she keep his cool when insulted?

(couldn't think of any other questions for this one)


 * Support


 * Neutral


 * Oppose

So what do you think of these Delt? Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 17:16, March 3, 2012 (UTC)


 * All admins are capable of giving out chatmod rights.
 * I don't it's really necessary to restrict the days someone can make a request. It'll still be the same number of people who make requests.
 * For rollback and the proposed mover group, I was thinking something less complex than the admin requests, like Wikipedia's requests for rollback. For rollback it's just a case of checking does the user make much reverts, have they been explaining reverts when necessary and if they've done anything else controversial. For movers, it's also a case of checking if they have a need for the extra permissions and have proved that they know how to use it. I think most admins can be trusted with making those judgements.
 * Chatmod is complicated. The only thing you can do with it is (un)ban people from chat. I think people who cause trouble in chat usually aren't deliberately trying to cause trouble or are doing it because they have some other problem that should be looked at first. In my opinion, it's very hard to tell who'd be a good chatmod especially since unlike edits, there's no record of what people say. I don't think we're ready for formal chatmod requests just yet, but that's really just my opinion. I'll admit my way isn't perfect. We don't have very many chatmods and with banning criteria not to strict, things can get a bit out of control. Although there are a few potential chatmods I have in mind. -- Deltaneos (talk) 19:18, March 3, 2012 (UTC)


 * Yeah that's very true. I was just throwing a suggestion, but I think yours is better. Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 19:27, March 3, 2012 (UTC)


 * Okay. But on second thoughts, I don't think a chatmod request, like the admin one, would be a bad idea after all. Anyway I think I should hear back from Wikia by about Monday or Tuesday about the mover group. We can start a proper group discussion in the forum about setting up requests when that happens. -- Deltaneos (talk) 19:51, March 3, 2012 (UTC)


 * Adminship has been on my mind for the reasons you listed, Falzar, but I had seen on the forum that something was in the works for granting those other tools, so I haven't nominated myself. (copied down here so I can reply with proper context, and without breaking the flow of the above comments any further)
 * From a policy standpoint, I don't think this would be an either-or situation, and indeed, if someone showed they could be trusted with the Mover privileges, that'd be a strong bit of support for them being made an admin. In your particular case, Golden Key, I'd argue that you go ahead and nominate yourself for adminship; if for some reason your nomination were to fail, you would still be able to request Mover. =) 「 ディノ 奴 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 05:48, March 5, 2012 (UTC)

RaveEdge
He's arguing with Malicious Software, about some stupid thing called Wizard, associated with Konami, and they simply didn't want to stop. I think it's ok now, but it was really annoying.--Number Hunter (talk • contribs) 18:21, March 2, 2012 (UTC)

Trap Dustshoot is now Forbidden, Says Forbidden in Traditional
Trap Dustshoot is now Forbidded as of March 1, 2012. I was looking at the Forbidden page and saw that it has that card as Forbidden in TCG Traditional Format. It is the same on the card's page. How am I suppose to change that? -- LordGeovanni - ( Talk To Me ) *Kupo* 21:54, March 3, 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the notification. It has been fixed now. This should explain the problem. -- Deltaneos (talk) 21:59, March 3, 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you. I see what I should do if I see that in the future. Thanks for all the help. -- LordGeovanni - ( Talk To Me ) *Kupo* 22:04, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

CheckUser request
Hey Delt, could you run a CheckUser to confirm that the following accounts are related, and to check for any others? and might also be related, but I'm not sure. 「 ディノ 奴 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 16:57, March 6, 2012 (UTC)


 * The first three are indeed all the same. The last two seem to be unrelated. There doesn't seem to be any other accounts from any of those users' IPs. -- Deltaneos (talk) 17:10, March 6, 2012 (UTC)


 * All right, then, is 110.168.16.212 the only IP associated with the first two accounts? 「 ディノ 奴 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 18:28, March 6, 2012 (UTC)

Charlie
Hey Delta, Charlie has been swearing on wikia chat at Spongebob456. SolitaryRageDemonCharlie Spongebob = Scheiße. Thx.

--Powerup123 (talk • contribs) 18:41, March 6, 2012 (UTC)

Article that going to NOT delete
Divine Dragons; really need to stay or go? I still think it should be delete because it has no support at all - Like Elemental HERO that have full support from Spell/Trap Cards and Naturia supporting each other. "Divine Dragons" has nothing to support each other but just names. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:59, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

Chatmods
Status on the discussion we had in Special:Chat about adding new chatmods: -- Deltaneos (talk) 17:54, March 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * Scarecrowbill had a lot of users in favour of him. There was one user who was totally against it, one user who had multiple concerns and couple of users with minor concerns. While this wasn't a bad result overall, I won't be giving chatmod rights to him this time.
 * Lord Grammaticus had a lot of users supporting him too. Two users had some concern. I'm glad the two of you gave feedback and I respect your thoughts. But we need more chatmods, he came close to being unanimously agreed upon and the concerns didn't seem to be too major, so I will be giving him chatmod rights.
 * Princess of Time also had lots of support. One user was against making her a chatmod because she's only been here about a month. Two other users were also against her. I'm not sure of their exact reasons. I'd still like to make her a chatmod, but I think we need to discuss it a bit further.


 * A few people have already seen me post this. A few more users were against having Princess as a mod. I would have liked her to be one, but I want these decisions to be close to unanimous and there were too many users against her, so I won't be making her a chatmod this time. -- Deltaneos (talk) 21:10, March 8, 2012 (UTC)

Replying ""(archetype)" redirects"
Yes, it's necessary to delete "(archetype)" redirects. —This unsigned comment was made by IgorThunderMaster (talk • contribs) 23:10, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Spam
Someones spamming the chat like crazy plz helpEvolution is the key (talk • contribs) 11:30, March 9, 2012 (UTC)Evolution is the key

Newbs taking over READ
Its me isis. i got banned because of lg. im so pissed. PLEASE tlk on my tlk page. LG wasnt worthy. its it.PLEASEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE —This unsigned comment was made by PrincessPikeruBFF (talk • contribs) as Jigglyown (talk • contribs) 05:04, 11 March 2012 (UTC)


 * I know you're not happy with how the moderators, including me, have been handling things, but please believe me when I say I don't want you banned. There are times when you get along with most people and it's really nice having you around. Lately you've been getting involved in a lot of arguments. While it's great that you can be so passionate, especially when defending your friends, please appreciate that arguing and yelling a lot can be disruptive for the channel and it's not easy for any mod to handle. I can understand how hard it is to remain calm when people are annoying you and those people aren't without blame either. I am truly sorry about any grief it has caused you. Do you want to tell me anything more about what happened after I left yesterday and I'll see if anyone else needs speaking to?
 * P.S. I haven't forgotten about the favour you asked me. -- Deltaneos (talk) 16:28, March 11, 2012 (UTC)

I am so sorry what i did in chat i wont do it again please unbann me.