Forum:Queries on Mecha Phantom Beasts

So I've got some questions on Mecha Phantom Beasts that I've been wondering for a bit about.

The first being, if a Mecha Phantom Beast Token has its attack increased by Limiter Removal but its current attack is zero is it still destroyed during the end phase via Limiter Removal since its attack never actually changed?

To add to that, if I have a mecha phantom beast monster out like Megaraptor for example. Is it destroyed during the endphase if I had tokens out and it out at the same time when I activated Limiter Removal? The same question goes for Sonic Boom?

Another question, say I've got the trap card Security Orb face down and my opponent MST's it. Assuming they don't have a monster on their field and I have a Mecha Phantom Beast Megaraptor on my field with a token, can I target my own Megaraptor for destruction even though it won't work just to avoid the back draw in this scenario?

Are the effects of most Mecha Phantom Beast monsters such as Tetherwolf or Coltwing mandatory effects where if my opponent uses bottomless trap hole or torrential tribute the monsters will be destroyed (assuming I don't have tokens out) but I'll still get to bring out tokens from the summoning?

Lets assume I've used the effect of the equip spell Gravity Blaster twice on a machine monster I control increasing his attack twice by 800 points in two turns. I then use Sonic Boom on that Mecha Phantom Beast monster, now according to Gravity Blaster my monster keeps the attack even if he becomes immune to card effects however Sonic Boom makes the attack double. What happens in this case and is it possible to give my equipped Monster additional attack points that turn as well even though he's affected by Sonic Boom.

Last question, a friend of mine wanted to know if it's possible to special summon Brotherhood of the Fire Fist - Coyote if the only spell/trap fire formation card was face-down?

Sorry If I'm a bit long winded here but I really like this archetype and want to use them as effectively yet orignally as possible. --Eternumblaze (talk • contribs) 08:00, August 31, 2013 (UTC)