User talk:Trivi-AM/Archive 2

Re:Just wanted to check
Hey there, Trivi-AM. Indeed Luminous Cloud does not appear to have the Ritual symbol in the Japanese anime. As such, it would be more appropriate that Dragon Lady is not a Ritual Monster. Nice going there! PS: I'm not an admin! ;) PPS: You can easily sign your posts by typing four tildes (~ ~ ~ ~) without the spaces. -- Melik el-Al&#39;ab 19:17, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Crimson Crisis
Was this you logged out? If it was, the page was fixed about an hour before that message was left on my talk page. You wouldn't have noticed, since logged out users aren't shown the newest versions of pages immediately. -- Deltaneos (talk) 20:30, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Re:Thanks
No problem. And no need to apologize; it's not like you've insulted me or anything! =] -- Melik el-Al&#39;ab 13:51, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Ambulanceroid's trivia
It was fundamentally obvious. I would asume anyone who read the card's name or saw the artwork would have already figured out that it was based on an ambulance. -- Deltaneos (talk) 00:36, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Ancient Prophecy
I search in Japanese sites, I used several online translators and I have found the Synchro Monster Amusement King Huaibudeizu. Try the japanese names of boosters, decks and cards in your researchs.

Remember
I will remember u that the info of Amusement King Huaibudeizu is unconfirmed. I still looking everywhere to found more info about Amusement King Huaibudeizu and about Ancient Prophecy.

G.B. HUNTER
No, not quite. "G. B. HUNTER's" Japanese name uses 「 Ｇ．Ｂ．(グラディアルビースト) 」. It's the bit on the top 「グラディアルビースト」 that means "Gladial Beast". Actual "Gladiator Beasts" use 「 剣闘獣(グラディアルビースト) 」 in their Japanese names. Both the top; 「グラディアルビースト」 and bottom; 「剣闘獣」 mean "Gladial Beast". Any card that affects "Gladiator Beast" monsters affects monsters with monsters with 「 剣闘獣</rb>(</rp>グラディアルビースト</rt>)</rp> 」 in their Japanese name. Since "G.B. HUNTER" doesn't have that in its name such cards wouldn't work on it. In the English game cards that affect "Gladiator Beast" monsters affect monsters with "Gladiator Beast" in their name. If "Gladiator Beast" was in "G.B. HUNTER's" English name it would mean it would be affected by "Gladiator Beast" support cards, which would be different than the Japanese card game. -- Deltaneos (talk) 21:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Now that I think about it, it hasn't been confirmed that it has 「グラディアルビースト」 over the G.B. I just guessed it. -- Deltaneos (talk) 21:08, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for letting me know about not aloud images on your user page (I'm new to this site) :) --ShiningDragon55 15:48, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Don't worry
Don't worry about the Deck List it took 2secs to sort out. :)--ShiningDragon55 16:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Endymion move
It's fixed now, I just gave the page a refresh. -- Deltaneos (talk) 22:12, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Cosmic Fortress Gol'Gar artworks
Yes, it should be given an artworks page. Same with the "Harpie Ladies". -- Deltaneos (talk) 17:46, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

RE: Gol'gar
I put it up as a candidate for deletion because the supposed changes of the artwork are just because of the foil. I'm looking at the card and the foil just changes the look of the colour. 3-D 04:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Card Tips:Philosopher's Stone - Sabatiel

 * This is a valid tips page, because the card is in Tag Force. Danny Lilithborne 16:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll have to check with Deltaneos and the others. I recall that I thought that was the rule too, but I was reverted too. Danny Lilithborne 16:59, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Alchemy Beasts

 * I will watch the subtitled versions and get back to you. Deltaneos and TTF has said that subbed versions of effects when no other version is available take precedence. Danny Lilithborne 22:36, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The subtitle says "Because Alchemic Beasts can't be normal summoned, it can direct attack the opponent." This is a little bit confusing. It might be an error, because it's a strange thing to say. Danny Lilithborne 22:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Please block this IP address
You can revert all 4 edits at once, by going to the last revision before they edited it and click "edit" then "save page". There's no need to block the address unless they persist. -- Deltaneos (talk) 13:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Hardened Armed Dragon in RGBT??
confirmed Hardened Armed Dragon in RGBT?? and you have a source showing that Hardened Armed Dragon in RGBT??--Modo assalto 00:34, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Hey can you help me how you did the table and the hide/show for your deck list? I'm trying to figure it out at the moment lol. --Xsamuraizx 19:35, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
ah thanks, for the image thing, only yugioh related stuff is allowed? just noticed my pic I uploaded keep getting deleted lol. --Xsamuraizx 19:43, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Ah alright, thanks. Is there any easier way to message back like a reply option or something? or do I need to keep going to your page and go on discussion to leave a message?--Xsamuraizx 19:50, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Hardened Armed Dragon Deletion
Well, "Rose, Warrior of Revenge" was deleted more than once for not having enough information. But simply being similar to another article shouldn't justify something's keep or removal. It would be kept or removed for whatever reason the other one exists or doesn't. If there is isn't a sufficient reason why "Bone Crusher" was created in that state, it really should have been deleted too.

So... "not enough information" does makes sense. The table not functioning meant it didn't know if it was an Effect, Synchro, Fusion etc. (Could even be a Spell or Trap for what we know). So the colour and other things come out wrong. I am in favor of creating articles for official things with little known information. However, I am strongly against articles built on speculation or appear misleading enough for someone to post in some forum, "Hey the Yu-Gi-Oh! Wiki said this", have it proven wrong a fews later and have someone say "Don't ever believe the Yu-Gi-Oh! Wiki". -- Deltaneos (talk) 20:39, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Ack, but the more I think about it, the more I think it deserves an article. It is officail afterall and the notice at the top kinda covered that the card type is unknown and the degree of inaccuracy. Here, I think I'll bring it back and semi-protect to prevent people without accounts posting junk.
 * As for the Blackwing, I'll get to it... -- Deltaneos (talk) 21:21, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

double posted. sorry about that

Questions about effects and rulings
Do you mind if I ask a couple questions about trigger effects? --Xsamuraizx 19:01, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

I thought I had the rulings and effects speed and etc. figured out but unfortunately not.

I was asked some ruling questions and I wasn't sure myself. I was reading some example cards' rulings and it was completely different from what I was doing the entire time.

As soon as an opponent summon a monster that have an ignition effect, like cyber valley. The opponent can use the ignition effect right away if he does? Meaning I can't activate trap hole on cyber valley first if the opponent use it right away?

When can I activate trap hole? Activate trap hole as soon as he gets on the field (giving him no time to use the ignition effect, unless that's not how it work). or do I have to chain it to the ignition effect?

There is no chaining to summoning? (Making sure, people keep trap hole-ing my Jinzo lol)(sorry about that, I need to make it a habit of remembering to put the signature) --Xsamuraizx 19:20, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

oops, forgot he have 0 attack lol. well anyway, if the opponent chose not to activate any of the ignition effects, does that pass priority to you and you can activate torrential tribute? (I know you can but wanted to know in a more logical reason) and then the opponent lost his chance to activate the effect since it's a spell speed 1, which can not chain to spell speed 2 like torrential tribute?--Xsamuraizx 19:50, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

ah alright, thanks for clearing some things up. Had to re-read the spell speed rules. Jinzo comes out, the turn player's jinzo get priority first and makes all spell 1 and 2 trap cards useless and can not be activated, unless it's a spell 3 like Solemn Judgment.

I might have another question when to activate cards during the battle phase and how many times before you can do it. I'm going to read "Priority" and "Battle Phase" first though. Thanks again.--Xsamuraizx 20:03, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Royal Decree
Just thought of this just now. If Royal Decree is on the field already. I activate a trap card. My trap card would be chain 1, then royal decree would be chain 2 right? Am I able to activate another trap card to become chain 3, and its effect would not be negated?--Xsamuraizx 22:11, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

forgot to add this part. Would royal decree become chain 2 to anything or just trap cards? (meaning I can't do magic, royal decree, then trap chain)

Oh can you explain how continuous cards work on the field then? It doesn't chain or anything? And that's alright. --Xsamuraizx 15:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Wait.. does it "chain" at the end of the chain? Meaning it'll always be last in a chain so that way it can negate the effect of all trap cards that happened later in the chain.--Xsamuraizx 15:40, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

ah alright, so it's possible to chain with them, depending on the cards. (like ultimate offering).

Was trying to find out some things and came to a conclusion that Honest's effect (sending to graveyard as a cost to activate the effect) still works even if macro/banisher of the light/etc. is out on the field. (A person was asked me this question)

Thanks.--Xsamuraizx 17:38, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

lol, neither. Sorry about that.--Xsamuraizx 17:48, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Card Shuffle Rule (If there is one)
I was wondering for a while about this. Some cards say you have to shuffle. I understand that but some cards doesn't say shuffling at all. Do we have to shuffle? or can we memorize the whole deck and then finally pick the required card without shuffling? lol.

One more thing, what can the opponent do? (I shuffle my deck and then the opponent have the option of shuffling/cut the deck?) The opponent cut or shuffle? or both?

I'm asking this since my friend and I play a few cards that goes to the deck face up. (Like pharoah's treasure and parasite paracide) My friends were being cheap in cutting/shuffling my deck after I shuffle, trying to get the card either on top or bottom.

p.s. just read Colvusion of Nature rulings. My friend and I thought we can be cheap with the shuffling. but we can't since we have to shuffle while face down lol.--Xsamuraizx 23:09, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

This sounds annoying, not sure which cards that I'm suppose to shuffle or not. and not sure how to verify which text is the correct one right now. Just looked at terraforming and sangan.

If it doesn't say shuffle your deck, I don't have to shuffle? or do I have the option? If I chose not to shuffle, does your opponent have the option to?--Xsamuraizx 17:04, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Ah alright, any searching through your deck effect needs to be shuffle right after, even if it isn't on the text or not. Thanks, and I forgot we have to show the cards that is being taken out from the deck and into our hand lol. This will make the duel interesting if my friend saw spirit reaper (they hate the card lol. I bet they'll enjoy Marshmallon more when the card comes in already. waited over a week for it and still waiting -.-) --Xsamuraizx 17:21, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

RE: The Truth of Nonresistance
http://shriek.twoday.net/stories/5617282/ ^^

is not yet 100% confirmed

and Blackwing - Kalut the Moonlight and the name of the Blackwing - Qal'at of the Moonlight in TCG?

--Modo assalto 19:55, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Arcana Force 0 - The Fool
Am I able to play this card face down? And when it gets attacked, it won't be destroyed by battle?

If I can, I would definitely get me 3 of this card lol. The rulings didn't say much.--Xsamuraizx 05:14, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

lol. If I made an Arcana Deck, I would take that kind of risk. Thanks for the help. I was helping someone with their Arcana Deck and I had to read all the Arcana Monsters.--Xsamuraizx 19:27, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Battle Damage
If a card's effect turns Battle Damage to 0, would the attacked weaker monster be alive still or would be destroyed? I had this debate before with the old text of Waboku years ago. --Xsamuraizx 16:43, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Meteo the Matchless
Second Question. I saw a few card that is similar to this. It's kind of confusing me lol. If it attacks directly and makes your opponent lifepoint to 0, wouldn't you win the duel anyway without the card's effect?--Xsamuraizx 18:01, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Ah hah, I was right about waboku (old text, years ago when Chaos Decks were popular), I had a debate against my opponent that the battle damage you would receive will be 0. Battle Damage, key word there, doesn't help keep your monster alive.

and ah, never thought about that. Thanks.--Xsamuraizx 03:02, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

dark signerS VS. signers
Er, excuse me, but rudger summons his earthbound immortal in episode 56 without using his dark synchro monster ( uru was summoned on rudgers second turn.