User talk:YamiWheeler

Welcome to YamiWheeler's Talk Page Please remember to use a header and to sign your posts. To leave a message, click here.

Admin Noticeboard
Thank you for point it out - he's getting on my last nervous and I was holding it longer... I only wish for him to "stop" there. That's all I can say here. For now, I am backing off. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:42, August 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * Just stop replying. I don't really even understand why this argument is still going on... I hope to God this isn't what I've been like in the past.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 22:43, August 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes, sir. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:49, August 27, 2012 (UTC)

Number 53
Er, I saw an anon undid your edit. If you think that is too long, what do you propose to shorten it? E n e r g y X ∞ 23:23, August 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * No, I don't think it's too long. I think it's unnecessary trivia that has no substance behind it.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 23:26, August 27, 2012 (UTC)

Number 53 Part 2
There, the two conversations are separated. --Rocket.knight.777 (talk • contribs) 21:42, August 28, 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes, I saw. That's fine.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 21:43, August 28, 2012 (UTC)

Official Rulings
Good thing I questioned him in his own talk page... Doubt he will listen. This article is also under his affection - which was what bring me to "questioning" him if it was alright for him to change it. You're welcome to fix it back. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  12:23, August 29, 2012 (UTC)


 * I don't see any edits made by that user in that page's history.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 12:25, August 29, 2012 (UTC)


 * Indeed, just realized that he edited one EB article, not two. So be sure to inform him on his own talk page. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  12:27, August 29, 2012 (UTC)


 * I told him to talk to you first... but no, he went back to square 1. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  13:17, August 29, 2012 (UTC)