User talk:Deltaneos/Archive 32

Aikawa in Tag Force 5
Mr. Shūji Maruyama (丸山修二, Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's character designer) that the names being used, and may be referred to the name.

Request for approval
Could you please take a look at this page and tell me if you are ok with the changes I made? Thanks! -- M  ontechristo95  talk •  count 20:38, September 17, 2010 (UTC)


 * It's good. -- Deltaneos (talk) 22:02, September 17, 2010 (UTC)

Admin, please delete this page
Card Tips:Polar God Sacred Emperor Odin

It is nothing but a vandalism created by an unregistered user, as you can see in page history. Moreover, this card isn't a real OCG/TCG card (yet), so it can't have a "Tips" page; I have marked the page to deletion, but it has not been eliminated yet. Sorry for my bad english, I am brazilian. Samurai Bruxo (talk • contribs) 00:22, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

A categories question...
Hey Deltaneos, take this page for example. Should the only category be "TCG Set Card Ratios", or should it mention "English Set Card Ratios", "French Set Card Ratios" etc.. too?--Hydronic (talk • contribs) 10:37, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

Rarities
There is a guy who has been changing rarities from their initials form to their full ones. To make it more clear, for example, he changed:

 Duelist Revolution (DREV-EN002 - UR/UtR) 

To:

 Duelist Revolution (DREV-EN002 - Ultra Rare/Ultimate Rare) 

Has this been discussed? If not, what's your point of view on it?--Hydronic (talk • contribs) 13:03, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

NorthWest had done it again
He's calling to destroy the "Episodes" of 5D's, only if they're not complete. Check out Episode 73 74 and 81 from what I know. -- F  red  C  at  T.P. • F.R. • J.R. • W.S. 13:53, September 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * As well as Episode 110. -- F  red  C  at  T.P. • F.R. • J.R. • W.S. 13:54, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Re:Lists of deaths in Yu-Gi-Oh!
I'll think it over and do something with it eventually. Not quite sure which route I'll go at this point. Thanks for the response. To be quite honest, I'd forgotten that I had even asked you about this. I've been working on other things in the interim, not actually finishing any of them as usual. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:39, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

Tag Force 5 opponents
Could not find a detailed list. However, I think the photo below will be helpful for some.   -- III (talk • contribs) 12:54, September 20, 2010 (UTC)

Mystical Sand
Sorry about uploading it over the wrong file. I reuploaded it correctly and changed the picture on the page. I hope that you do not mind but the booster 6 picture is clearer. Irohanihoheto (talk • contribs) 03:46, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

Hi
Hi, I'm not sure if your the head admin guy or whatever but if I wanted to become an admin(I know I need a lot more edits) but what kind of stuff would I have too do?? -- Drago99 Barodius  is coming for   YOUR ALLEGIANCE!!!!!!  01:32, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks a lot!! -- Drago99 Barodius  is coming for   YOUR ALLEGIANCE!!!!!!  02:35, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Kami's Deck Recipe
I know that she's been in four different Tag Games, but hat about her decks? If you want me to do so, I can scan up all Tag Forces that included her and absorb all cards she used in there and post on that page? -- F  red  C  at  T.P. • F.R. • J.R. • W.S. 23:55, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Grand Core
Dark Shimy asked to have it complete. Do you think you can finish it or not? I am just asking... -- F  red  C  at  T.P. • F.R. • J.R. • W.S. 01:51, September 23, 2010 (UTC)

5D's vs. Ragarok
Few users posted that 5D's have won the battle against the Semi-Final team, while the episode itself is not confirmed to be true. Can you please lock up both page (5D's team) and other team that was include in Semi-Final to prevent the "edit war"? -- F  red  C  at  T.P. • F.R. • J.R. • W.S. 19:04, September 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * ...And the war continued between the "Nameless" and Dark-Shimy. I would nomination lock the page up. -- F  red  C  at  T.P. • F.R. • J.R. • W.S. 22:01, September 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * I second that. I know it's freaking obvious but it's the policy (?) that we have to wait for the episode to confirm 5D's victory. Dark-Shimy (talk • contribs) 22:04, September 23, 2010 (UTC)

{{Hidden|Click [show] to expand
 * content=
 * As well as Nameless put wrong episode for finish, it's such to be 130, not 129. And he still going on and on and on; which would earn him a temperer banning. -- F  red  C  at  T.P. • F.R. • J.R. • W.S. 22:25, September 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * AND ID LIKE TO NOMINATE FRED TO BE BANNED FOR ONCE AGAIN THREATENING ME... HE THINKS HE HAS THE ADMINISTRATIVE POWER TO BAN ME AS HE WROTE ON MY PAGE WHEN I AM UPLOADING CORRECT INFROMATION....HE NEEDS TO STOP THE THREATS!!!!!!!! Nameless0666 (talk • contribs) 22:24, September 23, 2010 (UTC)

THE LAST STRAW
IM SICK AND TRED OF GETTING THESE IMMATURE THREATS AND HATEMAIL FROM FREDCAT100 TO WHICH THIS LAST QUTOE PROOVE THAT HE HAS GONE WAY TOO FAR....

Now stop before you earn the trophy of punishment. -- F  red  C  at  T.P. • F.R. • J.R. • W.S. 22:23, September 23, 2010 (UTC)

HOW CAN YOU LET HIM CONTINUE TO THRETEN ME EVERY DAY WITHOUT ANY PUNISHMENT. I WANT HIM TO BE BANNED...Nameless0666 (talk • contribs) 22:28, September 23, 2010 (UTC) }}


 * Guys, you need to learn to work together. On a wiki, you need to accept that nobody can get their way all the time. I can't step in and force a page onto the revision someone wants every time there's an edit war. Try to discuss this on the article's talk page. Give points in favour and against each version and see which users are in favour of which version. Provided you don't turn it into personal attacks, it should become clear that one version is better or at least favoured by more people. Whether that turns out to be the version you want or not, it should be accepted as what the community has agreed on and left at that. -- Deltaneos (talk) 22:37, September 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * Stop involving Deltaneos with this. Deal with this on your own talk pages.| DED ( (Leaving Me Messages Are Often Left Here) 23:12, September 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * Can I ask you both to please stop leaving such messages. It's really not helping. If you're only going to threaten or complain about each other, I can't side with either of you. If you please try and follow my earlier advice, this wouldn't be necessary.
 * If you're only going to edit the page to revert, please don't and instead leave a message on the talk giving your reason for wanting one revision. No attacks against the other person please. If you use the talk page, rather than revert, yes your revision won't be on the page immediately, but what's decided on the talk page is what will be went with in the long run. So you are better off using the talk page. And please try to be polite on the talk page.
 * Thanks for helping DED. (I keep getting edit conflicted every time I try saving this message.) But I'd ask that FredCat and Nameless don't continue this on each others' talk pages either. The angry threats and insults aren't helping the situation.
 * -- Deltaneos (talk) 23:16, September 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * ill stop talking period but he already has been leaving me hatful messages on my talk page so youll have to ask FredCat to stop...Nameless0666 (talk • contribs) 23:19, September 23, 2010 (UTC)

MASS VANDALISM
THIS GUY IS REPLACING EVERYTHING ON THIS SITE WITH HIS YOUTUBE CHANNEL PLEASE BAN HIM!!!!!!...

EXAMPLE... "cur) (prev) 22:42, September 23, 2010 76.121.143.130 (Talk) (57 bytes) (Replaced content with "GAY!!!! GO TO YOUTUBE.COM/DESTERPOT AND SUBSCRIBE ME NOW!")"

I think this is his IP adress... 76.121.143.130... for some reason someone signed my name next to the quoted comment, probably to attempt to frame me....Nameless0666 (talk • contribs) 22:53, September 23, 2010 (UTC)

Problem Report
There is something I have noticed a while. If you take a look at the Top Users page (full list) you will see that the order of the names is a bit messed up. Since they are supposed to change automatically there is probably some sort of glitch. It's not sth particularly important but would you bother taking a look? -- M  ontechristo95  talk •  count 10:43, September 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * It doesn't update automatically. The information is cached and usually takes a few days to update. -- Deltaneos (talk) 11:04, September 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * My bad then. -- M  ontechristo95  talk •  count 11:23, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

Image
Where did you get this http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/File:AnzuMazaki-fsa.jpg? It looks too good to be a screen shot.


 * It is a screenshot. It's from episode 10 of the first series anime. Although I didn't screencap it myself. I got it form Kokoro no Nake. -- Deltaneos (talk) 16:05, September 25, 2010 (UTC)

Generalised Duel outcomes and page naming
First, look at this page. Then look at this one.

Look at the Duel outcomes. On the Yusei Fudo page, I've edited it such that it was more general (at some point), with only Win, Lose, No result, or Draw(if applicable) as possible results of a Duel. However, on the Yugi Muto page, it's listed with a lot of outcomes, all roughly meaning the same 4 I mentioned. Should there be a basic "template" such that it becomes more consistent? Things like "by forfeit" and "intentional", because I think that putting it there doesn't make it anymore of a loss IMO, and if anyone wants to check it out, they can just go watch the episode (or read the episode page). What do you think? Also, shouldn't the pages be listed under [Character]/Decks? It is more or less a sub page of the article, since it WAS part of the main page at some point. Toob|Talk page 02:36, September 25, 2010 (UTC)


 * I certainly agree that details like "ran out of Life Points", "Decked out", "Exodia'd", "surrendered", "on purpose", "nearly won", "disqualified" and "fainted" are all details better left to the episode pages and characters' biographies.
 * Subpages don't work quite the same in the main article namespace as other namespaces or other wikis. Normally when you create a subpage, there will be links at the top of the page pointing back to the main article. We've this switched off for for the mainspace, since it would add unnecessary links to "Red Dragon Archfiend/Assault Mode" and the other "/Assault Mode" monsters.
 * I don't really like the idea of using subpages for mainspace articles. It's kind of hard to explain. Subpages introduce a hierarchy system. This works on wikis like Animepedia where its clear and consistent that every page is a subpage of the anime it's from. But in this wiki when to use a subpage would be kind of arbitrary. All pages related to Yugi Muto could be looked at as subtopics of Yugi Muto (making it Yugi Muto/Decks). Or all Decks pages could be looked at as subtopics of a Deck article (making it Decks/Yugi Muto). Even Yugi Muto could be a subpage, Characters/Yu-Gi-Oh!/Yugi Muto, Yu-Gi-Oh!/Characters/Yugi Muto etc. The Deck page could be anything like Items/Decks/Yugi Muto, Characters/Yu-Gi-Oh!/Yugi Muto/Items/Deck. I know that's all a bit a extreme and common sense would tell you Yugi Muto/Decks is the best option, but it's not as simple for other pages.
 * Wikipedia don't use subpages for similar and more reasons. -- Deltaneos (talk) 16:49, September 25, 2010 (UTC)

Problem Report MK-2
Just noticed that Ladycai and Hydronic are argue about two cards that are either true or fake. One of them is Dewdark of the Ice Barrier. -- F  red  C  at  T.P. • F.R. • J.R. • W.S. 22:47, September 25, 2010 (UTC)

French Hidden Arsenal cards
Hi, I found french images without any url written on it and I replaced the old ones which have an ulr printed on it (for example: File:WormCartarosHA01-FR-SR-LE.jpg) but somebody keep reverting my edits to use the one with an url written on it without justifying (I explained that mines don't have ads on it and are still easy to read)... Could you explain to us who is right? Yamimillenium - Me Contacter 16:05, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * High five for getting admins involved before even asking my point of view on the matter. *Sighs*. I don't feel much like talking over scans stuff with someone who doesn't (even) differentiate between NA and EW, like yourself. (Maybe now you remember me from your *Wiki*?). But anyways, I thought that the "no overprints" rule only applied to EN & JP scans. And since the scans with the overprint are the ones with the better quality here, we should keep them. Right?...--Hydronic (talk • contribs) 18:16, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

Wow I Thought of Something Weird
I think we are exact opposites. You have a lot of information on yugioh and I don't, you edit on information on yugioh and I edit on the general forum and you don't have any pictures and I do. Just letting you know and don't judge me. I just woke up figuring that out. Fallensilence (talk • contribs) 13:17, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

I really don't want to know and it would be creepy if I did. Let's just keep it simple I guess. Fallensilence (talk • contribs) 20:50, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Seven Sword(s) Warrrior
The official name for Seven Sword Warrior is Seven Swords Warrior the card has already bin realest with that name.It was in Shonen Jump Volume 8, Issue 11 Nov 2010. Yu-card (talk • contribs) 15:44, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Why you deleted that!
I haven't made that as my deck, I don't uses that. I just put that there like an Aggro Deck, Yubel Deck, etc. I just doesn't knew how to add that to the deck type category. It's not my deck, and if it were I would post on the forum, don't needed you to tell me. I'm not a noob y'know. Snetonobre (talk • contribs) 17:44, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Well then, okay. Forgive you, and I want you to forgive me by my way of talking, as I have a short temper, one of the few things of my personality that I hate, coming together with my pride. Also, I can't shake the feeling that you copy/pasted that there. You even forget to sign, y'know (Strange. I've been talkin' "y'know" a lot these days). By Snetonobre (talk • contribs) 21:09, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Oh! Haven't seen that. Well, I'm not talking about the deck content, I'm talking 'bout that part "If there's any mistake I'm overlooking, please let me know. If you disagree with the reasoning and think it should be undeleted, you can can go to the community discussion forum to see if other users agree or disagree". It seens something a computer could think of. I mean: calm calculated and it seemed totally heartless. By Snetonobre (talk • contribs) 21:33, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

arrrrr i wish that we could ban those unregistered users look what they did
http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Leo and also jack and luna s pages swaped content and also continued stuff like crashtown wrgp and other--Sartorias (talk • contribs) 17:57, September 28, 2010 (UTC)

Rarity Argument
One user; Happy0666, just kept put "Ultimate Rare" version in Test Tiger page each time I revived it back to normal version. Can you please check him out or put a temperer block on Test Tiger till next day? Whichever is up to you. -- F  red  C  at  T.P. • F.R. • J.R. • W.S. 23:41, September 28, 2010 (UTC)

Site glitched
What happened, I came to here in the morning and saw this with screw up. Almost like if code had been placing wrong or something. Can you please fixing it? -- F  red  C  at  T.P. • F.R. • J.R. • W.S. 11:07, September 29, 2010 (UTC)


 * Ah, little better, but it's also little hard for me to walk through the different technology. So let's hope to get it fixing. :-) -- F  red  C  at  T.P. • F.R. • J.R. • W.S. 11:41, September 29, 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for quick update. I appreciated your note. -- F  red  C  at  T.P. • F.R. • J.R. • W.S. 18:31, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

Page deletion warning notice
There's usually warning, but occasionally there isn't one; that was the case where there was no warning. Sorry about that. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 13:41, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

Quick confirmation on something.
Per here, I would assume that the "Footnotes" section is outdated, and "Notes" should be used on all applicable pages, regardless of content? Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 20:21, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

Mirror, Mirror, who is the most argument page?
Just to let you know that Mirror of the Ice Barrier has being patch and dispatch by Hydronic and few other admins/users respective about that being part of Ice Barrier theme. -- F  red  C  at  T.P. • F.R. • J.R. • W.S. 23:58, September 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * He is also doing the same with some other cards. Do anything please, he keeps edit warring. Dark-Shimy (talk • contribs) 16:00, October 3, 2010 (UTC)


 * You know, that's funny. 'Cause *we're* edit warring, not just me.--Hydronic (talk • contribs) 16:02, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

A mix up?
I'm very confused. I thought I was undoing vandalizm on this page, but it seems nothing changed think. I don't want to get the impression that I'm doing the vandalizm.| DED ( (Leaving Me Messages Are Often Left Here) 01:50, October 3, 2010 (UTC)


 * Excuse me for butting in but I do believe the issue has been solved. The vandal had edited the page twice and DED undid only his last edit thus making it look like nothing really hapenned. -- M  ontechristo95  talk •  count 01:58, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

IP's to ban

 * 220.255.7.161
 * 65.3.65.73

both spammer and vandalists Yes, im Pato (talk • contribs) 02:24, October 3, 2010 (UTC)