User talk:Dinoguy1000

About the (ruby) tag
Some browser (like Firefox with XHTML Ruby add-on installed) will show the Kanji and furigana overlapping each other when the text were placed on a single ruby tag like this one. To prevent it, additional &lt;ruby> tag is needed to show it properly. --Aeris Ventaile (talk • contribs) 04:11, December 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * Can you visit http://yugioh.wikia.com/index.php?title=Loki,_Lord_of_the_Aesir&oldid=1298295&useskin=monobook and post a screenshot of that? Firefox, of all browsers, should not be having this kind of trouble with Ruby text. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 04:18, December 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * After viewing the page using two different Ruby add-ons, seems it was entirely depends on how the engine render it. The XHTML Ruby Support add-on with Default settings render it correctly, but it also render some contents as if it were a Ruby text. While the second add-on, HTML Ruby show the text overlapping each other like in the screenshot. So should it be rendered with single tag or multiple tags for compatibility sake? --Aeris Ventaile (talk • contribs) 07:23, December 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * It sounds like both addons have bugs. What version(s) of Firefox are they recommended for, and what version are you using? And to be valid Ruby annotation, the whole text should be contained in one Ruby tag. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 15:55, December 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * After doing some research, the HTML5 Ruby spec only indicates using &lt;ruby/>, &lt;rp/>, and &lt;rt/> tags, and I have updated ruby accordingly. Can you look at and  and tell me if the kanji and furigana are still overlapping in Firefox with the plugins?
 * I've installed the latest versions (as available from Mozilla's addons site) of both plugins in my Firefox 3.6.12, and I'm seeing the same results as you've reported so far. I'm working on some CSS that will hopefully help, though. The overlapping problem is definitely an issue with HTML Ruby as opposed to our markup, though. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 02:54, December 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * Still the same result so far, also tested with Firefox 3.6.12 and default settings for both add-ons. Definitely a bug on the add-ons. --Aeris Ventaile (talk • contribs) 05:48, December 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't suppose you know much about CSS, do you? I'm wondering if HTML Ruby will behave better with the right CSS styles. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 16:37, December 2, 2010 (UTC)

Not sure which Kalin that is.
Sorry allow me to introduce my self, i'm elementalknight (Duelist: The Elemental Knight/Le Chevalier Elementaire). As far as my avatar goes, I'm not sure which Kalin it is. At 1st I thought that it might be Kalin Kessler, but it mite be Kallen your talkin about. Either way i thought it was kinda cool with the entire Team 5D's in it. --elementalknight (talk • contribs) 20:11, December 15, 2010 (UTC)

I see what you mean now, maybe Mr. Takahashi might have used Kallen's designs from Code Geass to design Aki Izayoi (Akiza Izinski).--elementalknight (talk • contribs) 22:35, December 16, 2010 (UTC)

This might be a stupid question but when does Code Geass come on? Just curious. --elementalknight (talk • contribs) 23:32, December 16, 2010 (UTC)

Yep in Florida. So wat Ghost In The Shell Stand Alone Complex the only anime they have on thats good any more or somethin?--elementalknight (talk • contribs) 03:32, December 17, 2010 (UTC)

Well i hope if they change the line up they keep GITS SAC and dont move it to another night, but if they do maybe about 10:30-ish.--elementalknight (talk • contribs) 20:24, December 17, 2010 (UTC)

Good point there, it wouldnt b the same if they take things off.--elementalknight (talk • contribs) 02:35, December 18, 2010 (UTC)

Archive Locked up?
I am about to moving the comments from my main Talk Page to Archive 7, but cannot find the "Edit" button on my Archive #. How can it happened? Should I have to renew the whole page? -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 20:15, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * It looks from Delt's talk page that you got it all sorted out; feel free to ask if you need more help though. =) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 23:44, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yea... I just don't like the change too much. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 23:47, December 21, 2010 (UTC)

Lowlife User
I honest like to ban this user; Matynayu because he just shove up yugiohcardmaker in some article that I just revived twice. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 01:14, December 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't think they need blocked; they haven't continued their edits, and no one's talked to them at all yet. In addition, Deltaneos deleted the page, so if he thought it warranted a block, he would have done so. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 07:18, December 23, 2010 (UTC)

Archive failed
That user just rejected it out and revive it back to his version... Just felt unhappy that I just helped him went waste. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 01:33, December 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, it is his page... Ultimately, all you can do is offer advice; it's up to them whether to actually use it or not (and if so, how they use it). 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 02:12, December 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * He only make it worst... the shortcut sound easier to place in each archives if he is going to create... -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 04:20, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry to but in. If referring to me, I don't like creating "Templates", Archives, or any sub-accounts unless really needed because it's too much to handle, requires better topics for it, copies most people work styles, etc. Fredcat's and Dino, etc help to me wasn't waste. Besides I still don't know too much about yugioh.wikia; I use its command code to make adjustments like "<...>" +/- between word(s) What I do is...--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 21:26, December 26, 2010 (UTC).

Elements in Template:Six Attributes?
Can I or anyone put "Element" Archetype monsters in "Six Attribute" Template?; '''these are series of Light and Dark Monsters (3 each). Any Y?'''--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 18:08, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * "Element" are in "Six Attributes" Templates--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 18:53, December 24, 2010 (UTC).


 * Thanks for allowing me or anyone to add "Element" Archtype Monster in your "Template:Six Attributes‎‎" even though there not really Six Attribute Monsters since there only Light and Dark Attributes (3each)"--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 03:05, December 25, 2010 (UTC).


 * Once again, Six Attributes isn't "my" template; this is a wiki, and nothing (including user pages) strictly belongs to any one user. That being said, I would have to disagree with the addition of the Element monsters to the template - I have previously considered adding them, and it was previously discussed, but there isn't real evidence that they were intended as a Six Attribute archetype - they seem to be LIGHT and DARK monsters only to keep them from triggering their own or each others' effects. Therefore, I am opposed to their addition and will probably remove them (if more four-element card groups are tracked down, though, we could create a new Four Elements template for them, similar to the Six Attributes one). 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 06:04, December 25, 2010 (UTC)

Can I add Attribute Spirits Monsters and their "related form" to your "Template: Six Attributes"? Please answer. and Y--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 18:04, December 25, 2010 (UTC)?


 * Knowing now that Soul of Purity and Light is only tangentially related to the Attribute Spirits (at best), there is no longer any strong argument that the archetype is a Six Attributes archetype, as opposed to a Four Elements one. However, there are now three known Four Elements archetypes (the Elements, the Attribute Spirits, and the IOC group related to the Attribute Spirits), so there's a very good argument for creating a new Template:Four Elements. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 18:36, December 25, 2010 (UTC)


 * What's an "IOC group"--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 19:03, December 25, 2010 (UTC)?


 * The group of monsters in Invasion of Chaos related to the Attribute Spirits - Fenrir, Gigantes, Inferno, and Silpheed. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 19:16, December 25, 2010 (UTC)

Template:Six Attributes‎‎
I placed Equip Spell Cards and Field Spell Cards in one section because there both Magic Cards and Spell Speed 1--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 16:23, December 25, 2010 (UTC).


 * "None Yet" in Template: Six Attributes is gray I didn't want "(500 ATK▲/400 DEF▼)" and "(400 ATK▲/200 DEF▼)"to also be gray; that's Y I changed it to a different colour--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 17:47, December 25, 2010 (UTC)


 * Really the only thing the two spell groups have in common is that they're both spell groups, and they both modify monster ATK/DEF values. This isn't enough to say they're related, and besides, when they're grouped together, because of the ATK/DEF notes, the monster names no longer line up with the group names. As for the colors, both "None Yet" and "(500 ATK▲/400 DEF▼)"/"(400 ATK▲/200 DEF▼)" just serve as notes, so there's really not much of a reason other than aesthetics to distinguish them (and if we get into aesthetics, we'll be here forever - ask anyone on Wikipedia who was involved in the color discussions for wikipedia:Template:Ambox or wikipedia:Template:Navbox. If you really want colors for these tags, though, my talkpage isn't the place to ask for them; you should instead start a discussion on Template talk:Six Attributes. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 18:36, December 25, 2010 (UTC)

Suggestion
Suggestion: You should try to put "Template:Light and Dark" with "Template:Four Elements" as one "Template" since 4+2=6, and to save time and pressure--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 20:54, December 25, 2010 (UTC)


 * Would these same Elements go to your "Template: Light and Dark" group also--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 21:30, December 25, 2010 (UTC)?

Will you make "Four Attribute Monsters" section like U did with "Six Attribute Monsters"? so anyone can write about them--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 22:34, December 25, 2010 (UTC).


 * I've replied to both of the above questions on Template talk:Six Attributes. You don't have to keep asking questions in both places; I get emails whenever Six Attributes or its talk page is modified, so all you have to do is post there and I will see and respond. ;) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 00:12, December 26, 2010 (UTC)

Protection of highly vandalised pages
Would you consider protecting this page - for some reason it's got a lot of automated spam for a page - and as it's an old topic that's no longer been discussed, there'd be no harm in it -- Random Time  23:31, December 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Indefinitely semiprotected. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 23:36, December 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * For what it's worth, that page was reported earlier. -- Deltaneos (talk) 23:40, December 27, 2010 (UTC)

Polite Comment
You told me about that, and I didn't remember about it till Deltaneos posted the link that show me how it causing. So now I do remember the reason what you meaning. He just took it wrong way. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 21:25, December 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I wouldn't worry too much about it if I were you. The internet is not the place for people who so easily take offense, and if he doesn't change his attitude, he'll quickly find elsewhere that responses like that only tend to aggravate the situation. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 21:47, December 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Agreed... I just revert his bad mouth off recently. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 21:50, December 28, 2010 (UTC)

Template issue
Thanks for fixing Template:Cyber. Can you create another section on the template for cards that are in the "Cyber" archetype, but not in one of the three sub-archetypes? I asked Delt about it, and he didn't respond. I hate to be pest, so I thought I'd ask you instead. Templates are not my cup of tea. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:14, December 29, 2010 (UTC)


 * According to, , and , there are no cards belonging or related to the "Cyber" archetype without being in one of the more specific subarchetypes. I don't think it's possible to query according to part of an archetype name, which is what would be required for this. If you know of other subarchetypes we could try, though, that would work. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 02:19, December 30, 2010 (UTC)