Forum:Errata Lore Colors?

As I am adding the lore that had seen difference each update. It was little hard when it was coming to second change, like Card_Errata:Amazoness_Tiger for explain. So I had recalling that one user - "Wasn't" or someone who tried that - tried to offering the idea of the main article of that card. It's a color difference that he wanted to place on the effect text that matched the condition. But since that idea was failure, I considered for a long while and came to this idea.

So instead of the main article, I would like to using his idea to put in the issue article like the one I showed above. As in Amazoness Tiger's first Effect Text, I would just leave it as italic;

Explain 1; Original Card You can only have 1 "Amazoness Tiger" on your side of the field. Increase the ATK of this card by 400 points for each monster on your side of the field that includes "Amazoness" in its name, or is named "Amazon Archer". As long as this card remains face-up on the field, your opponent cannot  select  another monster that includes "Amazoness" in its name, or is named "Amazon Archer", '' as an attack target. ''

Then by the first errata -

Explain 2; First Errata'd Card You can only  have  1 "Amazoness Tiger" '' on your side of the field. Increase the ATK of this card by 400 points for each monster on your side of the field that includes "Amazoness" in its name, or is named "Amazon Archer". As long as this card remains face-up on the field, your opponent cannot attack another monster that included "Amazoness" in its name, or is named "Amazon Archer". ''

And finally, as for second errata -

Explain 3; Second Errata'd Card You can only control 1 "Amazoness Tiger". '' This card gains 400 ATK for each "Amazoness" monster you control. Your opponent cannot attack other "Amazoness" monster. ''

As of those explain, the letter that are in red, which would leaning from Original Card into First Errata Card, then Green doing same for Second Errata, and blue color is showing to removing the word as the latter would show to NOT have the words. I only post this up so any members, included Admins, would be sure to agree or disagree with this idea I have bring up with. If you think it's good idea, but has conflict, please post your word below, and let's see what we can dissolving further. Thanks for your understand and read. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  16:20, May 20, 2011 (UTC)