User talk:FredCat100

Re:
I will not consult an admin before fixing something I know is wrong. I do not care if an admin put it there, it is still wrong. I don't know why everyone is so strict around here. --> Summoned Skull 2: Electric Boogaloo 19:18, September 19, 2012 (UTC)


 * Fred, no disrespect was meant to any admin. But I'm a big boy, I don't need them to hold my hand. I know my way around the site, and I know misinformation when I see it. If Falzar has a problem with the change, let him put it back. --> Summoned Skull 2: Electric Boogaloo 19:36, September 19, 2012 (UTC)

Lore Read Difference
I didn't really understand if you were insulting me (friendly) or just casually telling me, based on your grammar. But anyways, I resolved it; you can see the edit history for Number 92 for the explanation if you wish. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 01:49, September 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * My apologize - English is not my first language so I can be clumsy when coming to the grammar, like this line. And thank you for reminded me about that. I was just make sure you are aware about the reason why it was reverted, that's all. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  02:49, September 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * *squints eyes* I'm going to take both of your comments with a grain of salt, because I have seen you around here and know that you can become a little... "feisty" at times. But anyways, thank you for the heads-up. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 04:30, September 23, 2012 (UTC)

About your Theory of "New Summons"
Kinda disagree with your reasoning there. First, there are other available "face-down" Summons out there, such as "Morphing Jar 2" and "The Shallow Grave", so the text of "Eisbahn" does not necessarily foreshadow face-down Attack Position Summons. Other than that, the text for "Surprise Party Goblin" is wrong; the effect should be like "You can reveal this card to Normal Summon this card (from your hand) in face-down Attack Position." This is because you would have to show the opponent what effect allowed this (unless there was a new game mechanic of Summoning monsters in face-down Attack Position). The 1st effect like you had it wouldn't work because the Goblin would already have been Normal Summoned, so you couldn't "Summon" it again in face-down Attack Position. Also, 2nd effect would be irrelevant with either my text or your text, since all face-down monsters are flipped to face-up Attack Position when attacked. This is NOT related to the comments I made on your page earlier; I just browsed your profile and became interested, and thought you should know. Link to that article is here. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 04:46, September 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * I still disagree. I don't believe face-down Attack Position Summons were implied when "Darkness Approaches" was made (since UDE had control of the game at the time, and they had control of it for a LONG time). Also, I only believe "face-down" Summons were only implied because they didn't want to include it in rulings. While I stil think it is "possible" that Konami might make an archetype like that in the future, I don't believe they were planning "face-down Attack Position" Summons when they made that card, only cards like "Morphing Jar 2" and "The Shallow Grave" were taken into consideration. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 05:53, September 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, right now, Konami probably has higher priorities on making new lores for cards that would be used more often by the TCG. Battle Pack 2 might change this, as they would be releasing cards in it that weren't used in the original Battle Pack. Interestingly enough, there wouldn't be that much change in the lore of "Darkness Approaches" if it were edited; it would go something along the lines of:
 * "Discard 2 cards to target 1 face-up monster on the field; flip it face-down in its same battle position."
 * --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 20:10, September 25, 2012 (UTC)