Forum:I hate Inzektors

No, not playing against them, though they do get annoying after a while, I mean talking about them. Seems like each time I slam the Inzektors for being a one-trick pony, and point out the combo that starts it all, I get the same crap being flung in my direction: "Oh, it's not Centipede that's the problem, you moron, it's Dragonfly. Dragonfly is a +4 and is always played first, while Centipede is a +2 and fuels Dragonfly. You're getting it all backwards."

BS. I've seen and dueled against Inzektors several times in the past couple of days, and all I've seen is the opposite; Centipede into Hornet into Dragonfly, or even Centipede into Hornet into another Centipede, half of the time. So what in the hell are these guys going on about Dragonfly being the key component of the deck? It's fuel for the Centipede/Hornet combo, at best, and a dead draw at worst without those two cards. But no, everyone seemingly wants me to worship the glory that is Dragonfly.

Can anyone, anyone at all, show me even ONE instance where this isn't the case? If so, I'll be majorly surprised and give you a cookie, because I don't believe it. I want to see an entire duel won by Dragonfly starting the loop and maintaining it. I want to be proven wrong here, because so far, I haven't seen anything that's done that. SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 17:42, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_xD9fxk5OM Inzecters win because Dragonfly. Are we done here?--Helix-king (talk • contribs) 18:11, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

...What? Inzektors didn't win because of Dragonfly, they won because of Centipede; all Dragonfly did was get out the cards needed to make Zenmaines, which did jack squat while Centipede/Hornet put the pressure on the opponent and forced them to scoop. So you fail, and I still see nothing that gives Dragonfly such high praise.

One thing that makes this more true is when you consider the nature of the cards in the loop; Centipede lets you earch out the cards needed for the loop, and Hornet allows for the destruction ability that starts and continues the loop, but all Dragonfly does is search out another Centipede, something that Centipede can do to itself, sine Centipede doesn't say it can't search out another copy of itself. So, while it's not as efficient as Dragonfly, the loop can still be pulled off by using Centipede's search ability to find another Centipede, then using Double Summon or Ultimate Offering to bring it out and summon another Centipede, etc. Basically, the loop doesn't need Dragonfly to work, it just makes the loop a little bit easier to work with. SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 18:23, January 4, 2012 (UTC)


 * The loop also doesn't need Centipede. One Summons, the other searches. With just that knowledge its a easy choice. Summon. Don't get mad a Draogonfly for being the one everyone choose, if Centipede is so much better, go and record duels of you winning. Or don't and stop complaining.--Helix-king (talk • contribs) 20:05, January 4, 2012 (UTC)


 * No, it DOES need Centipede, or else the loop can't exist; without Centipede, you can't search out for Hornet, thus you can't get the loop out. The most, and I mean the MOST I've seen Dragonfly do is whip out a Synchro that usually sits around and does nothing while Centipede/Hornet takes all the pressure to the opponent. And, if I'm right about Ultimate Offering, you don't need Dragonfly AT ALL, since Centipede can still search out for another copy of itself to continue the loop. So honestly, while Dragonfly makes the combo BETTER, it doesn't make the combo WORK. SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 20:10, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

Am I mistaken, or are you ranting because you believe a card that gives you a search to be better than a card that gives you a Summon? Really? By being able to Summon more Hornets, the card advantage should be obvious (Pot of Avarice makes it ridiculous), whereas the best Centipede can get you is either a +2, or a turn's wait before getting you a higher +. My very first experience of Inzektors was the Hornet/Dragonfly combo, and had it not been for Darklord Asmodeus, I would have lost. I've never seen Centipede do anything that bad. Battlemaniac (talk • contribs) 19:41, January 4, 2012 (UTC)


 * People have used that argument against me, and I still don't see it; none of the duels I've seen or been in against Inzektors has been anything but Centipede/Hornet spam, and if I'm right about Ultimate Offering, Dragonfly isn't needed to make the deck work, so yeah, I AM arguing that the searcher is better than the summoner, in this case. SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 20:10, January 4, 2012 (UTC)