Talk:The Seal of Orichalcos

Preview of the effects, as given by Konami

 * 1. Gives all your monsters +500 Attack Points.
 * Pretty self-explanatory, really.
 * 2. Highly resistant to removal from the field.
 * Sounds like just the thing for decks that require a Field Spell, like Earthbound Immortals or Malefics.
 * 3. Allows your stronger monsters to protect your weaker ones.
 * Probably not to the effect of the "use your Spell/Trap Zones as Monster Zones" effect of the anime, but again, sounds useful.

[source]

Wilren (talk • contribs) 02:21, August 6, 2012 (UTC)

I wonder what the card itself will say? regardless, I have always had this feeling it would eventually come to the card game as a REAL card. I have always wanted to use it!!! --I will Become #1 for everything I do best at! (talk • contribs) 22:28, August 8, 2012 (UTC)


 * It's not confirmed, but this is what the people on Pojo sussed out would likely be the effect:

All monsters you control gain 500 ATK. Once per turn, this card cannot be destroyed by card effects. While you control 2 or more face-up attack position monsters, your opponent cannot select your monster(s) with the lowest ATK for an attack. When this card is destroyed: destroy all Special Summoned monsters you control. You cannot Special Summon monsters from your Extra Deck. You can only activate “The Seal of Orichalcos” once per duel.

Vorpal Storm Pony (talk • contribs) 22:22, September 6, 2012 (UTC)

Given that the blanks in the unrevealed effects match the lengths of those words, that's about the same conclusion I've come to as well. However, the last line could also state that you can only activate it "from the hand," limiting the viability of cards like Demise of the Land. It could state that you can only activate it "from the Deck," but in all honesty, that seems exceedingly unlikely. All in all though, the "once per Duel" stipulation seems the most likely.

Wilren (talk • contribs) 00:53, September 7, 2012 (UTC)

To be exact "While you control 2 or more face-up attack position monsters, your opponent cannot select your monster(s) with the lowest ATK for an attack." would be written "While you control 2 or more face-up Attack Position monsters, your opponent cannot target your monster(s) with the lowest ATK for an attack." (Target instead of select), its nothing major though. Renard Chase (talk • contribs) 03:09, September 13, 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed
Why is this page still blocked for editing? The proper effect has been confirmed on http://shriektcg.twoday.net/stories/100916011/ ---TheGallisMan (talk • contribs) 17:37, September 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * It's not full confirmed till Oct. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:40, September 14, 2012 (UTC)


 * lol, Fred.
 * Then you would have to do it like that with each new card until it appears in the TCG.
 * Stupid excuse! ---TheGallisMan (talk • contribs) 17:49, September 14, 2012 (UTC)


 * That's TCG Extreme card, all other don't do that. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:54, September 14, 2012 (UTC)


 * I thought people would know this by now but Shriek isn't official. They just get the info from somewhere else or translate magazine scans. Besides, that's just the effect that's been guessed everywhere, very likely to be true, but still not confirmed. A card's only confirmed when actual pictures show up either through leaks or magazine scans, it appearing on an official vendor site like ideal808's blog, or confirmed by Konami themself on their product page or strategy site. - 魔法師 MoFaatSi (talk • contribs) (talk • contribs)


 * Yes they arent official but this wikia consider it a reliable source as they have always been right. If you and Fred would go onto that track, delete Cosmo Blazar and Assult of the Flaming King as they are from shriek SharkTenjo 01:18, September 15, 2012 (UTC)


 * No one is always accurate. There is no consensus that says "Shriek is reliable". Personally, I'd trust pretty much any other translator we've used over them. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:20, September 15, 2012 (UTC)


 * SharkTenjo, I never said that shriek wasn't reliable. Shriek is a decent place for leaks and translations of official proxies from scans and leaks, etc. However it is not "official" and cannot be used to "confirm" anything. And the seal's effect is unrelated to Cosmo Blazar and the fire structure since they were confirmed by a Japanese magazine. Regardless if they were on shriek or not, shriek did not confirm them to exist, the magazines scans did. However since no pics of the seal exist and no complete effect has been revealed by Konami, it is still unconfirmed, regardless of what Shriek says. - 魔法師 MoFaatSi (talk • contribs) (talk • contribs) 01:28, September 15, 2012 (UTC)


 * As far as i can tell it is not from a magazine where they get the infos as it means that they get their information in a certain day in a month which is not as they just have random info. Orly? They got Cosmo Blazar and Fire Structure from a magazine? Which one? Source? SharkTenjo 11:41, September 15, 2012 (UTC)