User talk:Dinoguy1000/Archive/2011/08

Question
Can we put the "Bandai" version of any card in a archetype it belongs to like "B. Skull Dragon (Bandai)" in "Red-Eyes" archetype 23:24, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks "Fredcat" I though I put 4 of " ~ " I don't think anyone is upset.--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 23:33, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem, I just said it to be casual. So just watch to your fingers' move; ok? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:40, July 20, 2011 (UTC)


 * To be honest, I'm not sure whether we should or not (but if we do, we also need to do the same for Capsule Monsters, DDM, etc. versions of cards where they exist). None of these cards are playable in the current OCG/TCG, though, so I'm thinking probably not. Delt, do you have any thoughts (since I'm pretty sure you stalk my talk page ;) )? 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 01:02, July 21, 2011 (UTC)


 * Oh you and your petty sixth sense, Dino... -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  01:13, July 21, 2011 (UTC)


 * He doesn't have six scene; he's only guessing. How can stalk talk page? Anime-only cards are also listed in any related archetype even they aren't in OCG/TCG like "Masked Knight" series so we could do the same with other "Yu-Gi-Oh!" games like what you mentioned: "DDM" The only side ▼side to this is space like with the "HERO" series.


 * Pretty easily, actually; it's just a matter of watching others' talk pages and occasionally commenting on discussions that you're not otherwise a part of. ;)
 * Anime-only (as well as manga-only and video game-only) cards are listed as parts of archetypes because, other than a far looser ruleset (at least for the anime and manga), there isn't a difference between these media and the actual OCG/TCG anything like the difference between the OCG/TCG and the other card games such as Bandai; most OCG/TCG cards are, in fact, first introduced in the anime, manga, or a video game. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 18:55, July 21, 2011 (UTC)


 * Indeed. At this point, this talk page and Delt's may as well be extensions of the forum. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:57, July 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * "Forum:Talk to Dinoguy1000 and Deltaneos"? =D 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 02:00, July 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * So can we put the Bandai, DDM, in the archetype their related to even if....--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 21:19, July 21, 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm still leaning toward "no", but as I said above, I'm wanting to hear Delt's opinion first. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 01:40, July 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * I would also say no. I can't think of a compelling reason to put them in. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:56, July 22, 2011 (UTC)

I don't think Deltaneos is here or he might not reply to this.--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 20:38, July 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * I saw it. I just didn't have much to add when I first read it. Are there any archetypes within other games? There's "Hecate" in Bandai if that counts. It is possible to filter out other games when making list pages, but ideally if that can be avoided it should, because lighter SMW queries are less of a strain on Wikia's servers. -- Deltaneos (talk) 01:06, July 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * lighter SMW queries?--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 02:08, July 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Lighter SMW queries are one which strain servers less. Generally the less filters, the lighter the query. e.g., which gets a list of all monsters with less than 3000 ATK has one item.  , which gets all monsters with less than 3000 and greater than 2000 ATK has two items and is considered to be a  heavier SMW query.
 * To the point, I've just noticed that Template:Archetype navbox has a section for Bandai cards. 'Thought I should mention it. -- Deltaneos (talk) 19:39, August 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * How many archetypes are there in the Bandai game (and are all of them documented here)? Since we've agreed not to add Bandai etc. cards to TCG/OCG archetypes, and since the Bandai game will never get new cards now, I think we might as well just use hardcoded navboxes for any Bandai archetypes, and remove that code from Archetype navbox. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 04:30, August 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * If you go by a really strict definition, you could say none. Possible archetypes within the Bandai game would be "Exodia", "Gate Guardian", "Harpie Lady", "Hecate" and maybe "Blue-Eyes". Archetypes from other games which have cards in Bandai include "Archfiend", "Dark Magician" and "Red-Eyes". -- Deltaneos (talk) 00:18, August 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * Do you think any of them besides the Hecates are worth documenting? Should I go ahead and remove the Bandai support from Archetype navbox? 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 00:53, August 24, 2011 (UTC)

ergent news
Someone took out archetypes. If you go to http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Power etc. you don't...--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 00:59, July 28, 2011 (UTC)


 * That's because SMW was shut off. The archetype navboxes should be back up sometime later today/tomorrow (depending on your time zone). 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 01:58, July 28, 2011 (UTC)


 * It's still not there.--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 19:51, July 30, 2011 (UTC)


 * Nope. DaNASCAT said that he'd try to get it re-enabled for us by yesterday, but that evidently didn't pan out. All we can do is wait for further messages from him, or for SMW to just start working again. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 20:07, July 30, 2011 (UTC)

I think it'll take a long time to turn on the archetype. Is yours on?--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 23:14, August 5, 2011 (UTC)


 * No, SMW is still down. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 23:16, August 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * It's back now.--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 23:23, August 8, 2011 (UTC)

Boilerplate
Kind of yeah, I like this aesthetic and I love when every pages are identical! Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 03:10, August 2, 2011 (UTC)

Action 5
Can you check out the funny thing with "Action" link in "Super Polymerization"? I put it in and it bring out red link. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:24, August 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * It was also a redlink in Aged Goblin's edit. The page simply hasn't been created yet. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 17:30, August 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * So may I create it? Or you think it's just ridiculous to be there? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:33, August 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * I think it would be better to have "Sends from [the/your/your opponent's] field to the owner's Graveyard" (or even possibly just omit "owner's"), since cards always go to their owner's Graveyard upon being destroyed, sent to the Graveyard, etc. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 17:38, August 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * Which is referring to Action 1, right? It had no limitation of which going where. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:40, August 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * No, it would refer to "action3" and "action4" - "Sends from your field to your Graveyard" should be "Sends from your field to Graveyard", and "Sends from your opponent's field to your opponent's Graveyard" should be "Sends from your opponent's field to Graveyard". As I said, cards that go to the Graveyard are placed in their owner's Graveyard, so specifying the target Graveyard would just mean four different actions, which would always have to be used together. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 17:55, August 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * Ah, should scratch "your" word out of those two. Let's hit them up. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:56, August 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * That article is would only apply to anime cards. There are zero situations in the TCG where this would happen. Also, the few anime cards that would have that effect have been released without it already, so that parameter is completely uneeded. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:05, August 2, 2011 (UTC)

Royal Cards
I am surprise that it still living with speedy delete mark you left like 2-3 months ago. I am curious why you considered it delete, though I edit it later on. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  10:55, August 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * I really just tagged it in response to Furuzuki's message on the talk page... I think, ultimately, what happens to it should be determined by the outcome of Forum:Archetype definition (again). 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 15:59, August 3, 2011 (UTC)

*CRASHED*
* unmounted my rocket ship* Sorry about broke the wall here - I have to invite you to the Forum - Massive Mult-Idea and tell our good, French, friend about what he thought for rest of "Main Article" of the cards. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  18:58, August 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * Looking at it now. =) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 21:32, August 4, 2011 (UTC)

"Relationship"
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/relationship :( I know that it sound oddly by the first look, but I meant... why does Yusei have a "relationship" with Jack if they don't... well, you know? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  13:15, August 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * The first definition is the one you need to be paying attention to here: "a connection, association, or involvement". ;) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 13:17, August 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * Alright, I just wanna know because one time when I mentioned "Relationship" in the journal (on other site), and had other person's name in same line; many users just exploded and gave me a day of shit because of "sexual" part. >_> So this is the reason why I came here to be sure if I got it right. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  13:18, August 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * To be honest, for many people "relationship" does have sexual connotations (probably because increasingly fewer people know how to keep it in their pants in their own relationships =P ), so it probably wasn't the ideal choice of vocabulary in that situation, but it isn't wrong by any means (regardless of the conclusions other people want to jump to). =) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 13:21, August 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * So I am just surround with bunch of idiots? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  13:23, August 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, this is the internet, so that is, unfortunately, a strong possibility. =D 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 13:24, August 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * At least I am in, currently, a good hand. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  13:27, August 7, 2011 (UTC)

Forum:Decks for Free Archive Numbers
So I created a new Archive for Forum:Decks for free!, and Archive 10 went under Archive 1, is there a way to fix this? Falzer kinda explained it to me, because 1 comes before 2, and said you might be able to help more. Thank You. -- - Dark Ace SP™ ( Talk )  14:41, August 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * Could you reply on my talk page? -- - Dark Ace SP™ ( Talk )  14:42, August 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * Looking over the templates used, I'm not sure I'd be able to fix this without rewriting ArchiveList (maybe there's some feature of DPL that would allow the correct ordering, but I'm not very familiar with it at all and so can't say; Deltaneos may know something I don't in this case, though). Your other option would be to rename archives 1 through 9 to have leading zeroes (Archive1 --> Archive01, etc.). I'm replying on both of our talk pages so I can keep the whole discussion together; feel free to reply wherever since your talk page will be on my watchlist. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 17:42, August 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * I went ahead and asked D-Neos. -- - Dark Ace SP™ ( Talk )  04:02, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * I wouldn't recommend renaming the pages.
 * The simplest fix I'm aware of is changing the ordermethod to "created", which would order the archives by the date they were created. But if any discussion page for example creates "Archive 2" before "Archive 1", which isn't as unlikely as it sounds, the order would be messed-up there. Although the likelihood of that is probably less than the likelihood of a page having at least ten archives.You could also create a manual list that you update yourself every time you create a new archive. We've all done that for our own talk pages. -- Deltaneos (talk) 20:23, August 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * I believe all the Archives were created in order, so the first option D-Neos listed would probably be the best, and would the fix also apply to future archives, like Archive 11,12, etc.? If not I can just start on creating a new Archive System, like the one on my talk page. -- - Dark Ace SP™ ( Talk )  04:02, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Right, I'd look into setting DPL to use page creation time instead first. Generally, if I say something and Delt corrects me, you should ignore whatever I said because I probably didn't know what the hell I was talking about in the first place. =D Now, once this discussion has settled down across all the talk pages it's taken place on, I get to stitch it together so it's all in one place, *somewhere*... This is why I prefer keeping comments and their replies all on the same page. ;) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 06:38, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Hmm, bad news, D-Neos and Dinoguy, Resk decided to go ahead and rename the Archives, so yeah. I told him I was asking you about the issue and didn't tell him not to mess with the Archives, so what are our new options? Can his renaming be undone? -- - Dark Ace SP™ ( Talk )  17:51, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, he's only moved Archive1 and Archive10 so far. I'm not sure if that'd affect DPL's sort-by-created option, though, and it definitely wouldn't have any effect on a manually-maintained archive list. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 17:57, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Could, we just change them back? And if the DPL's sort-by created option doesn't work I can just make a manual Archive, and just a quick question do I have follow everything Fred's Article states?, or could I just use,


 * , replacing the User name parts with Forum:Decks for Free, directly on the page, instead of creating a new page, then linking it to the Decks for Free page? I hope you both understand what I'm asking, if not then I'll try to rephrase this. -- - Dark Ace SP™  ( Talk )  01:08, August 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * That's fine, though I'd recommend some code more along the lines of:


 * 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 01:19, August 9, 2011 (UTC)

Thank You, I'll start on the manual version, then, I'll also rename the pages back. Thank You both. -- - Dark Ace SP™ ( Talk )  01:30, August 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * Dinoguy, could you help me move the Archive 001 and 010 back to just Archive 1 and 10? I can't rename them, because they already exist. -- - Dark Ace SP™ ( Talk )  01:36, August 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * Also why would I turn the Navbar off? Is it so that no one else can edit it? -- - Dark Ace SP™ ( Talk )  01:39, August 9, 2011 (UTC)

And I think I need a clear answer, can I just place the code directly onto the Decks For Free page, or do I need to create new page, then insert the code into that new page, I'm following Fred's Article so its a little confusing. -- - Dark Ace SP™ ( Talk )  01:41, August 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * So I just placed the code directly on the Forum:Decks for free! Page under a new section, why is the gaps between the Archives, so large? -- - Dark Ace SP™ ( Talk )  02:17, August 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * Never mind to pretty much everything, I got my questions answered, and there shouldn't be problems from placing the Navbox code directly on the page, correct? -- - Dark Ace SP™ ( Talk )  02:32, August 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * Whether you want the navbar on or off depends on whether you keep the archive box on the DFF page or put it on its own page, and that depends on whether you want the archive box just on the main DFF page or whether you also want it on all of the archive pages: if you want it on all the pages, it's far easier to keep everything updated if the box has its own page, since updating that one page will also update all the pages transcluding it. In that case, the navbar just serves as a simple way to have access to the box's page to make updates - if the box is placed directly on the DFF page, the navbar would serve no purpose. (I hope that all made sense; I kind of rambled through that and maybe didn't explain myself all that well)
 * I'll get the archives renamed in a second, if no one else got them already. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 18:01, August 9, 2011 (UTC)

Gallery Connect Name Conflict
So not just SMW is down, Gallery's Name reference (in language) also failed to connect to correct languages, like for Germany Painful Return -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  01:11, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yep, because that functionality relies on SMW. ;) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 01:15, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * That's interesting... at least I don't discover this alone; though I am slower. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  01:19, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * If you're curious, you can look at the code for GalleryHeader Cardname. Any time a template uses,  , or   (much to my disappointment, since   is an astoundingly useful parser function quite apart from SMW), that bit of the template relies on SMW, and will break when SMW goes down unless a fallback is in place (e.g. with IfSemantics or SMWF). 「 ダイノ ガイ  千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 06:38, August 8, 2011


 * I see, and you forgot something... -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  14:50, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Forgot? Nah, I don't know what you're talking about... ;D 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 17:45, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * I meant for your own signature, but just now I see you put it to evade being not aware of it. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:55, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yep, my comment was just for lulz. =D 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 18:03, August 8, 2011 (UTC)

Trishula
Not sure if seriously, Pojo leader who rated this dragon in their "Card of the Day" declared "Trishula, Dragon of the Ice Barrier" 'She', so is that ok if I threw "Female" in Trishula's misc? I only wish to ask you about it. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  15:55, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * "Trishula" has always struck me as a female name (not sure why, exactly; that's just how it sounds to me). The real question is whether it's referred to as female in the anime/manga/any video games (this may be easier to establish from the Japanese version, since Japanese uses gender-differentiated pronouns). 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 17:47, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * So the name is only evidence right now, right? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:54, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * And not much evidence at that. ;) Looking at the real-life trishula doesn't help clarify matters, either (though if I had to assign a gender to a trident, it would have to be "male"). =/ 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 18:01, August 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Em... that's weapon you're referring to... Yea, Tri-Pointy spear thingy. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  18:03, August 8, 2011 (UTC)

Template Problem
Just check out the latest topic in my Current Talk Page, and let's see what wrong with his own Archive parts. It's just something I cannot understand alone. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:55, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * I fixed it for him. For some reason, the archives were using the code from User:Dark Ace SP/Archives, instead of just transcluding it. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 01:03, August 9, 2011 (UTC)

Curse of the Circle Name/Lore
If Name is official, what about it Lore? Is that because there are no English Image of this card? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:10, August 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * Nah, I just didn't bother to check. Besides which, it's not that unusual for a card's English name to be confirmed as official before its English lore is. ;) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 22:21, August 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * * groan* Well, if English is official, then entire details are becoming official. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:22, August 10, 2011 (UTC)

Monobook
Is it working properly for you right now? It's completely borked on my end. I actually have to switch to Wikia skin *rolls eyes* Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:16, August 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah, it looks fine for me. Are you seeing stuff like this, perchance (if not, could you upload a screenshot)? 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 18:21, August 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * Gee, hope that your cup ain't break along with them, Coffee-Dude. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  18:24, August 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * No, that wasn't it. Now it seems to working again though. Nevermind. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:27, August 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * Look like the coffee did the trick... Making you hyperaction for few minutes. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  18:31, August 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * All right, if it happens again, try to grab a screenshot. =) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 18:32, August 11, 2011 (UTC)

Patrol
Didn't want to clog up the forum discussion with this and don't want to comment there until I have this answered. What is autopatrolled? I've seen the logs for a few times when messing around with general logs, but haven't been able to figure out what it's used for. Oddly enough, I never heard about it when I was on Wikipedia. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:22, August 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * "Autopatrol" is a user right which automatically marks a given editor's new pages as patrolled (search for "autopatrol" on Special:ListGroupRights), which in turn prevents those pages from being listed on Special:NewPages, once you click "Hide patrolled edits" there. Special:NewPages, in turn, lists every page that has recently been created on the wiki (except for files, which are covered by Special:NewFiles, and thus allows admins a quick way to look through new pages for stuff that needs cleaned up or just deleted. When you click on a page from Special:NewPages (if you're an administrator), you are taken to that page, and a "mark this page as patrolled" link appears in the bottom-right corner that otherwise does not appear.
 * Unfortunately, because of the way patrolling and Special:NewPages works, the special page is the only way to check for unpatrolled pages and to mark them as patrolled (not that this really has much to do with anything; I just figured it'd be a logical question for you to ask ;) ).
 * Some other information can be found at meta:Help:Patrolled edit, though note that Wikia does not seem to have $wgUseRCPatrol set to "true", so parts about patrolling individual edits, or patrolling pages from RecentChanges, don't apply here. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 00:39, August 23, 2011 (UTC)

listify
Can you see why this isn't working? should appear as an unordered list. Using Chrome's "inspect element", none of the styles from the class are being applied. Doing the whole thing manually works:   I have cleared my browser's cache multiple times to no avail. -- Deltaneos (talk) 00:08, August 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure myself... It works fine on Wikipedia, both on Monobook and Vector, but here... =/ 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 01:00, August 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * I guess the cache just needed a bit more time to catch up. It's working now. -- Deltaneos (talk) 23:45, August 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * All right, cool. Where're you wanting to use it at? 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 23:59, August 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * On the RFA templates to list all of a candidate's nominations. 'Should be used in way that still works when they're transcluded on Project:Requests for adminship, meaning they can't be too reliant on things like . Ideally it shouldn't rely on SMW, but can if necessary. -- Deltaneos (talk) 23:05, August 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't think there's any way to do that the way we currently have the RFA stuff coded, but it should be pretty straightforward with a single tweak - we just need to get the candidate's name hardcoded into a parameter somewhere (basically, we're going for the same thing Navbox does with its "name" parameter). 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 03:45, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

help to move?
Set Card Galleries:Revivial of Black Demon's Dragon (OCG-JP) to Set Card Galleries:Revival of Black Demon's Dragon (OCG-JP). thanks -Lpoi (talk • contribs) 06:06, August 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * Got it. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 06:08, August 25, 2011 (UTC)

Feminine on Male Cards
I am wondering why you decided to spamming those female misc on some cards that are already discussing to be MALE in first place? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:14, August 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm looking through the cards listed on an old version of the list (shortly before most of the manually-maintained sections were replaced with SMW queries) for cards listed but not tagged as female. If I come across such a card, and it is not obviously male/I don't recall it being specifically discussed, I tag it as female. My basic reasoning is, it's easier for someone to notice it in the list and ask about it or point out a mistaken tagging then it is to try and remember that it's possibly female but not tagged. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 00:18, August 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * "Future Samurai" is referring as male due to "square chin" or whatever D-Neos called it. Therefore I reverted your edit and put in latest image. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:22, August 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I noticed that. FS is actually fairly androgynous in appearance (similar to Jain), so a quick overview like I did would miss the chin, etc. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 00:25, August 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Er, I don't recall saying anything about square chins or the gender of "Future Samurai". What conversation are you referring to? -- Deltaneos (talk) 00:40, August 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Ain't you, I was referring to other user (D-Neos, not Dino-Guy) Here's a proof! -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:44, August 26, 2011 (UTC)

Out of sheer curiosity...
...why are you adding the female parameter to non-monster cards. I honestly never would have thought of doing so and always assumed it was exclusively for monsters. I don't have a problem with you adding them to Spells and Traps but it really doesn't make sense to me. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 06:30, August 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, List of female cards has listed non-Monster Cards for longer than I've been involved in it. Looking quickly through its history, it seems the first Spell and Trap Cards were added to it in May 2007, so this actually predates the majority of my involvement on the whole wiki. Besides that, non-Monster Cards often feature characters and monsters that are never featured on Monster Cards, and many of these are female; there's little point in noting female monsters on Monster Cards but not on Spell and Trap Cards, IMHO. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 06:38, August 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Like a hand in some bug-squishing killer "Spell Card"? Yea, I gotta agree with you, Phillip. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  15:22, August 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * I suppose it just seems strange to me. When you put "female" on a monster, it means the monster is female. Doing the same on Spells and Traps implies that the Spell/Trap itself is female, not what happens to be in the image with what may or may not be the Spell/Trap. I guess it's the parameter name that makes it murky for me. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:02, August 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * I suppose that Phillip is referring to the image of the card, not the card itself. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  16:04, August 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * I know. I'm saying the parameter name makes no sense if that's the case. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:15, August 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Before I simplified the headers, they all contained the phrase "Female-related", if thinking about it in that way helps any. Another thing to consider is that there are a number of Monster Cards featuring multiple monsters; even if only one or two of these is female, the card itself is still tagged as female. If it weren't for the fact that it could cause some potential ambiguity itself, I would probably suggest we start using "Female-related" as the parameter value. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 16:32, August 26, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Female cards
Every cards have a Categories under it. Click the Categories and it will show you a list of cards in the category. For example, if I found a card and it has the Category:Duel Monsters cards. I click it, it show me the list of cards that is under this categories. So far, the Category:Duel Monsters cards have 7,949 cards and it will take time to go through each one just to found a female cards. WinterNightmare (talk • contribs) 20:59, August 26, 2011 (UTC)

Second series cards
Is there a way to make the second series cards list? -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 02:31, August 28, 2011 (UTC)


 * Believe it or not, there were none tagged as such - it was the result of some faulty logic in CardTable2 (I'd actually noticed it before and was suspicious of it, but had never taken the time to make sure it really was broken). I fixed it, so cards should start listing there. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 03:41, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

Move
Could you rename the following image? Current name is incorrect. --The Goblin (talk • contribs) 20:21, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

File:BoltageSummon-JP-Anime-ZX.png → File:VoltageSummon-JP-Anime-ZX.png


 * Done. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 20:23, August 29, 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks. --The Goblin (talk • contribs) 20:25, August 29, 2011 (UTC)

Toei

 * Firstly, could you please archive your talk page because I can't even type on it without my computer dragging, JEEZ.
 * Secondly, what is the proper file name for cards from the first YGO anime? The Toei one, I mean. Huajun Chen (talk • contribs) 00:19, August 30, 2011 (UTC)


 * Finally, someone whine about the long-overweight page... -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:28, August 30, 2011 (UTC)


 * Heh, yes, I suppose it is about time I archived again, isn't it? =D If it helps any, you can avoid having to edit an entire talk page when adding a section by clicking the "leave message" tab next to the "edit" tab if you use the Monobook skin (unfortunately, the Wikia skin doesn't seem to have a built-in method to add a new section to talk pages, but you can click the big "Leave me a message" text at the bottom of the Welcome box at the top of this page to add a new section here (some other users have similar links on their own talk pages, as well)).
 * According to the image policy, Toei anime images should have "Toei" in their name, e.g. File:BlueEyesWhiteDragon-JP-Anime-Toei.jpg. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 00:36, August 30, 2011 (UTC)


 * ... you want me to whine about the absurdity of your signature's HTML script too? Because that thing looks freakin' intimidating.
 * Thanks a bunch x a million. Huajun Chen (talk • contribs) 00:53, August 30, 2011 (UTC)


 * It would be much cleaner, but Wikia doesn't like broken markup nearly as much as Wikipedia. =) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 01:17, August 30, 2011 (UTC)

Misunderstand User
It seemed like really not understand the work of Wikia itself. I tried to put some sense in him and he just continued on and on. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:14, August 30, 2011 (UTC)