Forum:Old Errata VS New

I hope this question isn't terribly dumb but, I read over the article, "Errata" and I was wondering do old errata cards follow their direct wording still, or are they meant to be considered/read as the newer version of the given card's errata.

The example in question is Fushioh Richie, it's original errata does not mention that it cannot be normal summoned or set therefore I'm assuming it could be tribute summoned (but guessing I'm probably wrong) but the newer errata states it CANNOT be normal summoned or set, does the original meaning have the same meaning as the newer one? or did I interpret it right as in it having a different effect? (and your just lucky to have the discontinued version)?

Another similar example is in the original errata of the MRL/SRL Spellbinding Circle, and its later on starter deck counter parts.

71.118.201.61 09:37, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

DarkDeckUser