User talk:Lord Grammaticus

Status - Busy with life, will be on intermittently if possible.

Things to remember:


 * 1) Sign your posts, please.
 * 2) Always post the new messages below the older ones.
 * 3) Remember that I normally answer messages left on this talk page... well, on this talk page! So if you left a message here and I haven't replied on your talk page, check back here to see if I've replied.

Konami's new wordings
dude, can you stop editing the cards' lores from the yet-to-be-released Generation Force, because i see you changing it to old wording. i know it seems right, but it's not, anymore. Now konami has changed the wordings to make it shorter. you can see lores in the new cards from Starter Deck: Dawn of the Xyz. LastMinute (talk • contribs) 00:25, July 17, 2011 (UTC)


 * Alright, thanks for the heads-up. Just undo 'em as you see fit. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 00:29, July 17, 2011 (UTC)

New Advice for you
If you wanted to put in something that not original for us to accept, just simple post them in the Talk Page instead of try to change them. It will help us to discuss with you instead of spanking your butt for doing it wrong. It usually helps allot back when Ruling Articles were spamming with wrong rulings or non-source official rulings. Hope it helps. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:36, July 17, 2011 (UTC)

Got it. Thanks. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 00:38, July 17, 2011 (UTC)

Stubborn
Thank you for doing right thing at this time. I saw your action just recently. I am pretty sure that IP user would not listen to you for all the time. Give him last chance and if he scrapped it, just call the Admin and let them take care of it. Again, thank you for the graceful warnings. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:24, November 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * Welcome. They just more or less disregarded it again, as their last edit shows, so to the admin I go. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 17:45, November 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * Indeed, keep the good work up. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:46, November 22, 2011 (UTC)

RE: ignoring manual of style
I saw the stuff at User talk:Cheesedude; he said he'll handle it so I was going to let him do so. Also, as Cheesedude mentioned, reverting the whole edit shouldn't be done since other valid contributions were made at the same time. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 01:57, November 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Understood, I've recently taken to look through and adding some of the valid edits as well. I'll be sure to remember that, thank you. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 01:59, November 23, 2011 (UTC)

Dragon Article
I revived it because of load and load of those invalid were including. So my apologize for done that. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:36, November 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * It's fine, but I think you may want to fix your sentence structure, for future reference. I had a little trouble reading that.


 * Also I did the same with a bunch of episode articles a couple of days earlier, but I learned a better fix it. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 22:38, November 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Oh, forgive me. My language was not English at first, it was American Sign Language. Indeed, I borne as a Hearing Person, but only after 6 months, I lost that sense due to the High Fever. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:47, November 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Ah, that'll explain it. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 22:48, November 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Indeed, so now we are on the good side. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:02, November 23, 2011 (UTC)

Cyber Jar Image
Well, forgive me for being little lower... Just little clumsy from long slow day today. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:13, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

???
YOU have no right to edit MY talk page.I just don't want those things THERE.


 * 1. >implying you have the right to simply wipe other people's messages whenever they say something you don't like.


 * 2. Leaving a message on your talk page is by definition editing it, meaning no one is allowed to leave you a message if we follow that 'logic', which sounds quite childish.


 * 3. Simply archive it or something if you don't want it there; if someone comes to you and asks politely that you stop blanking articles and removing other people's messages on /other/ pages, that doesn't give a very positive impression of you. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 09:09, December 6, 2011 (UTC)

Are you making me abandon this profile and make a new one? Very childish indeed.--Boris12 (talk • contribs) 09:16, December 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * Nice assumption. You shouldn't be removing anyone's message trying to warn you to quit something that may result in an admin banning you, which was my main reason for the undo. By no means was I attempting to make you "abandon this profile and make a new one"; you quite obviously made that up in some severely botched attempt at a "no u" argument. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 09:28, December 6, 2011 (UTC)

Whatever made a new one.SEE YA (or not)--Boris12 (talk • contribs) 09:28, December 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * Berating me for making you do something when I never even brought it up, and then doing it anyway. I don't think any less sense could be made. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 09:55, December 6, 2011 (UTC)

So you finally cleared MY talkpage?:D :P--77.85.71.37 (talk) 16:27, December 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * I haven't touched your talk page at all sine my last undo, since it was clearly pointless trying to reason with you. Tell me, are you a middle schooler or something? Because that's the only way I can think of explaining your current mentality.

I'm 6th grade.--77.85.71.37 (talk) 19:55, December 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * That could explain so much of what's been going on. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 19:56, December 6, 2011 (UTC)

soooooooo much--77.85.71.37 (talk) 19:58, December 6, 2011 (UTC) Look, I honestly don't see what the problem is here.--77.85.71.37 (talk) 20:01, December 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * The problem is that when I tried to warn you not to remove messages and/or blank discussions, you did exactly that - you removed my warning and someone else's messages as well. The fact that you act this way when people try to help you honestly makes me wonder how you handle advice in real life.Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 20:10, December 6, 2011 (UTC)

Re:
Don't worry about it. -- - Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  03:13, December 7, 2011 (UTC)

Potato Article
I'm pretty sure Yugi used a potato to ward off evil spirits in one episode. --Anthonypotato (talk • contribs) 04:49, December 7, 2011 (UTC)Anthonypotato


 * Still trying too hard, I see. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 06:07, December 7, 2011 (UTC)

OK, if you're sure. --71.227.159.148 (talk) 01:34, December 9, 2011 (UTC)Anthonypotato

RE: Unsigned Temple
Yes, I am aware of that - I do that all the time in Ruling forums... I just rejected the comment because of my own law. It's my talk page, you know - no signature mean good-bye to that topic. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  15:00, December 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Alrighty, then. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 15:01, December 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * But hey, it's your talk page - you can making a law for your own. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  15:02, December 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm more than aware of this, but I doubt I'll need "laws" particularly badly at the moment. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 15:03, December 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Good to hear that. Keep your well-work up, friend. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  15:14, December 8, 2011 (UTC)

Re:
He was blocked a while ago, but only for 2 weeks. -- - Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  01:13, December 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * I understand that. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 01:13, December 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * Just a thought, you may want to take a screenshot of what he said, and save it, in case he deletes what he said. -- - Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  13:55, December 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * Will do, though I linked to a version of the page with what he says on your page already. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 22:09, December 9, 2011 (UTC)

Difficult to Summon
"Gate Guardian" begged to be difference. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  15:55, December 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * Gate Guardian: Three 2-tribute monsters that can also be Special Summoned by most other methods; in fact, as I typed this response, I thought of a possible (although with debatable practicality) combo: Painful Choice + Soul Release + Return from the Different Dimension/Dimension Fusion.


 * Horakthy: 3 3-Tribute monsters that MUST be Normal Summoned in essence, as two of them will hit the Graveyard during the end of that turn, and the third (Ra) cannot be Special Summoned period. That means you're stuck spending several turns trying to either a) Normal Summon all three one after the other and hoping none of them get blown up in the interval OR b) set it up so you can Normal Summon Ra and then Special Summon the other two in the same turn (not necessarily the same as Ra, but you get the point).


 * In the latter situation, you'd best be praying Ra isn't blown up; that anytime after Ra is summoned, an opponent could counter with something that removes Ra from the field, leaving you short at least that one card for Horakthy. You can't Special Summon the other two RIGHT after Ra, since you can't chain any card that would do so to Ra's Summoning due to its own effect. PLUS, if Obelisk and Slifer are Special Summoned, they don't get the temporary invincibility to effects that they would get with a Normal Summon, meaning Horn of Heaven and its counterparts (not to mention Torrential Tribute) could easily ruin everything if you attempt to Special Summon those two before bringing out Ra. The three components of Gate Guardian are just as vulnerable to these counters as well, but the setup isn't nearly as tedious.


 * Long story short: in terms of difficult conditions, Horakthy > Gate Guardian. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 16:35, December 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * I know, but just say that Horakhty is not first one to have difficult to summon, Gate Guardian back in Second Season is also difficult to summon. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:12, December 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * I didn't say that it was the first, either. I said that it may be the most difficult to Summon. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 17:13, December 13, 2011 (UTC)

Just so you know
I'm not an admin, ask User:Deltaneos. -- - Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  02:14, December 14, 2011 (UTC)

Got it. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 02:14, December 14, 2011 (UTC)

User:Crashsnake
This user has expanded the Card Appearances, but some of his expansions have poor grammar in it. It is very difficult to correct the grammar errors this guy made. Can you ask this guy to put correct grammar into his expansions from on? Also can you check the Card Appearances pages that he has edited and correct any grammar errors in those said pages? Thanks! 24.5.186.140 (talk) 02:28, December 16, 2011 (UTC)


 * I'll let him know, though someone else may have to fix it - I'm not going to be on as much in the coming weeks. Thank you for alerting me, though, I'll do what I can. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 13:09, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

WDC 25
Decks are due today and tomorrow. -- - Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  15:12, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Watthopper
And who wanted your help?

You're so deep as ever...IT WAS A JOKE. P.S. I'm not WEDC I'm WEMC.


 * You're obviously bad at being funny, then. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 17:40, December 21, 2011 (UTC)

RE:
If the user, regardless of how many usernames he/she uses, continues to persist, he/she will eventually get blocked. And the first user (YugiYoshi) you mentioned is still allowed to edit on talk pages, but even that right will be stripped if he/she continues to use said right merely to write vandalism on talk pages.--PoirotH (talk • contribs) 19:14, December 21, 2011 (UTC)


 * Understood, just wanted to make sure you were aware. Thank you. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 19:15, December 21, 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for protecting my talk. -- - Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  19:33, December 21, 2011 (UTC)


 * Heh, not a problem. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 19:41, December 21, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Yo-Yo
Thank you for keep me update. I already sent a message to that person on his PM, check it out if you want. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:47, December 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * He just did now, but I put my foot in his throat and fixing them up. Also be sure to watch him; if he ignored my new order - immediate report to activation Admin asap, k? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:52, December 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * I didn't put that in them, just said it here. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:08, December 23, 2011 (UTC)

Three points
1) I was going to say how Yu-Gi-Oh! inspired Mongau, if you'd let me finish. 2) You are in no position to tell me what to do, you are not an admin or anything. 3) Lastly, you don't intimidate people and be so rude, you could end up in prison for that.

JosephAsherFord PS Remember to add section headlines in my talk page! And make sure your grammar is all correct in English.

Another point of backup
I have a good point: firstly, looking at your talk page history, I would think that you were a major vandal. We all have bad points...

..just admit you're in the wrong and I'll never bother you again,

Did Santa come to your house? Merry Christmas, J

I would like you to stop vandalising my page.