Forum:E-Mailed Rulings from Konami

What should we do about rulings obtained by e-mailing Konami, such as the one recently added for "Morale Boost"?

I'd prefer it if we don't include e-mailed rulings. They can be falsified (this ruling was false, for example), and e-mails from Konami haven't always been 100% reliable. Moreover, we could get a lot of pointless rulings that would just clutter up the page (e.g. if someone gets an e-mail from Konami saying that "Judgment Dragon" can't be "Monster Reborn"-ed, then they'd add it, even though it is obvious [for some definition of obvious]).

On the flip side, these are *technically* official. Also, we don't have a Judge List any more, so this is the only way for people to get individual rulings answered. (Granted, the community went years without a Judge List, so we can function without one. We're just spoilt :P)

Opinions? --Deus Ex Machina (Talk) 17:52, July 2, 2010 (UTC)