User talk:Wasn't

= {:User:Wasn't/Archives} "Rules"/"Facts"(I think) =
 * I like it like this; so just leave it.
 * You can say whatever you want: be rude, fight, argue, vote, rate, comment, even curse, quote, research, greet, interview, etc regardless of language (use) since it's only "humans" on this, but no real-life committing suicide. "Japanese people" love killing themselves over their honer, etc; I'm not sure about now and/or people like them.
 * Sign and date your post (talks).
 * I'm still researching on "Fairy Archer, "Attribute Reptiles" so if...
 * I don't have [multi-(sub)accounts] like "FredCat", "Dinoguy", etc.
 * People with unusua names like "FredCat", "Dinoguy", "Wasn't", etc are also "humans"
 * Don't edit on, above, and under "{:User:Wasn't/Archives}" ▲2 "== Card Rulings talk:Phantom of Chaos =="
 * No false and/or fake claim(s), complaint(s), idea creditor(s).
 * God knows.
 * last, I don't know too much about yugioh.wikia.com nor do I know how to change colour(s), font(s), style(s), background(s), etc as U C rite here.

● These idea Credits goes to "FredCat"; i got it from him without asking him/her's...

Card Rulings talk:Phantom of Chaos
Hi! This is about the question you left on Card Rulings talk:Phantom of Chaos.


 * Yes, "Phantom of Chaos"'s name will become "Elemental Hero Bubbleman". "Phantom of Chaos" copies all of "Elemental Hero Neo Bubbleman"'s effects, including the one that treats it as "Elemental Hero Bubbleman".
 * Yes, you still have to pay costs.

Also, it's usually better to ask questions on the Forum. Not only is it specifically set up for people to answer your questions, but it gets more traffic, so you'll probably get a faster answer. --Deus Ex Machina (Talk) 09:36, December 10, 2010 (UTC)


 * Also, about your question (I think it was yours?) about "Chain Material"... if you're using the effect of "Chain Material", then it changes how "Chain Material" works. You use what's written on "Chain Material", not what's on "Super Polymerization".  Thus, you don't use "from either side of the field"; instead, you use "from your side of the field, Deck, hand or Graveyard". --Deus Ex Machina (Talk) 09:50, December 10, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yep, you'd still double "Cyber Twin Dragon"'s ATK and everything. "Chain Material" only replaces the text that says where you can grab the Materials from (err, and where they go).  --Deus Ex Machina (Talk) 04:52, December 14, 2010 (UTC)

Double Tributers
While it is true that that would be the case, that is not the page to put it on. The Six Attributes page is SPECIFICALLY about the six attribute monsters themselves, not about strategies or uses for them. Put that on the Wicked Gods page if it isn't there already. Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 23:08, December 17, 2010 (UTC)

Nope. Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 03:02, December 19, 2010 (UTC)

Nope. Its your prerogative to add in that information, not mine. And no, I'm not a researcher. Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 20:07, December 19, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Contradiction between OCG/TCG and its Actual Card Text
I think we're going to devolve into semantics at this point, but...

"Phantom of Chaos" copies the effect of the monster -- as in, it copies the effect's cost, the effect's activation conditions, and the effect's effect. See Card Rulings:Neo-Spacian Dark Panther, since the two work the same way. So yes, "Phantom of Chaos" copies "The effect of "Fairy Archer" can only be used once per turn.". "Phantom of Chaos" gains access to the following:
 * During your Main Phase, you can inflict 400 damage to your opponent for each face-up LIGHT monster you control. This card cannot attack during the same turn you activate this effect. Only one "Fairy Archer" can have its effect activated per turn.

This is the effect of "Fairy Archer". It can only be activated once per turn. --Deus Ex Machina ✉ 01:18, December 20, 2010 (UTC)


 * As I said, "Phantom of Chaos" also copies activation costs and activation conditions. See Card Rulings:Neo-Spacian Dark Panther.  If you copy "Exiled Force", then you have to pay the cost and Tribute "Phantom of Chaos".  If you copy "Hand of the Six Samurai", then you can only activate the effect if you control another "Six Samurai" monster.  If you copy "Fairy Archer", then you can only activate the effect once per turn.  --Deus Ex Machina ✉ 11:36, December 22, 2010 (UTC)

Wicked Gods/Double Coston
I personally see the piece of information about the Wicked Gods and Double Coston as common knowledge, however, if you want to, you can go to the Wicked Gods page and see that it says:

Double Coston, while being neither of these, counts as two tributes, which is excellent as it reduces the Gods back down to two tributers.

Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 16:39, December 20, 2010 (UTC)


 * Also, do not take my removing of the information from the Six Attributes page as something I "love to do". I was merely removing information that didn't belong on that particular page.  Its like I'm out to get you or something ridiculous like that. Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 19:02, December 20, 2010 (UTC)

I see what you mean about Vassal. Also:

He/She does the same with mines so your not alone; he love deleting regardless of efforts spent on even though he has a good reason. I think we should delete some of his hard work, just kidding--Wasn't (talk • contribs) 06:00, December 21, 2010 (UTC).

Do not act as though I'm out to get you. I'm merely trying to make sure that the information put up is accurate and where it is supposed to be. The user who made the second "des frog otk" page was duplicating an already made page. Oh, and the tip you put on the Gravekeeper's Vassal page somehow bolded itself, just to make you aware. Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 17:56, December 21, 2010 (UTC)

Leave the text unbolded. And I understand what you said, but tips need to be as general as possible; the tip on Vassal's page can apply to any high attack monster, not just Armityle. Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 01:45, December 22, 2010 (UTC)

Because its my talk page, and I like to keep it as cleared as possible. What difference does it make? Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 18:23, December 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * Why else would I remove content from a talk page? Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 18:28, December 22, 2010 (UTC)

Six Attribute Template
Stop adding the word "romanticize" to the template. The word "romanized" is correct, as it essentially means translated. Romanticize, according to Merriam-Webster, means "Deal with or describe in an idealized or unrealistic fashion", which is not what the sentence is supposed to say. Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 18:33, December 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * The word romanized needs the "d" to be past tense... Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 18:44, December 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * Any language with roots in Latin is called a "romance" language, so the word romanize is correct. And here are the correct definitions.


 * http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/romanize

( often lowercase ) to render in the Latin alphabet, esp. a language traditionally written in a different system, as Chinese or Japanese.


 * http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/romanticize

to make romantic; invest with a romantic character: Many people romanticize the role of an editor.

Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 18:50, December 22, 2010 (UTC)

I don't want to start an argument when we don't have to. Just leave the text alone; the person who is apparently in charge of the template (Dinoguy) wants it to read "romanized", so lets just leave it that way, okay? Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 18:54, December 22, 2010 (UTC)

Alrighty then... Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 19:02, December 22, 2010 (UTC)

Just to be clear, I'm not "in charge" of the template... though I may be somewhat aggressive in my reverts. ;) As for "romanized" versus "romanticized", I have always heard the former used to adjectivally describe text transliterated into the Latin alphabet, and this fits the pattern started with "romanization", which describes both the process itself and the resulting text (it's further supported by the fact that the Wikipedia article I linked to uses "romanized" itself). "Romanticize(d)" and "romanticization" may well be alternate ternimology with the same meanings in some dialect of English, but most English speakers will much more readily recognize and correctly interpret "romanize(d)"/"romanization". 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 19:57, December 22, 2010 (UTC)

Talk page Error
Next time, if you wanna shove something like that in someone's Talk page, DON'T! Do that again, and I will report. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 21:46, December 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * If you need to record something like that, get note on the computer, it can hold anything here there. Or at least put it in your User Page or here, since those are your only legal permission to place the copied version. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 22:25, December 22, 2010 (UTC)

Theory of Yusei turn Evil
I know, but it's just a theory, that mean it may never true. I put it up because Atem (Yami Yugi) and Judai have turned bad for short time. (Atem only lasted 1 episode and Judai went on for few episodes, only dueled twice so far) Therefore the reason why I set this theory up as Yusei may becoming villain in later season. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 16:32, December 23, 2010 (UTC)