User talk:Jekogan

from where u got the information that this cards are real? their name and effects i mean not the numbers--Masterq (talk • contribs) 23:19, March 19, 2012 (UTC)

Name
It's better to leave it as "Reginald Kastle" because it's his biology name - "Shark" that he was called was only nickname. Otherwise, we have to moving "Yugi Moto" to "Yugi-Boy"? "Seto Kaiba" to "Sea-Kaiser"? That does NOT making sense! -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  14:24, June 26, 2012 (UTC)

Sorry I notice the name issue so I change it for you guys. Jekogan

King of Games
Yuma actually won as "Duel Champion", not "King of Games". Thank you. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  16:00, August 13, 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, i thought the King of Games was a "Duel Champion" tile alternate. I did not know that they are separate.--Jacob (talk • contribs) 16:04, August 13, 2012 (UTC)


 * Exact, they are complete unique titles. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  16:05, August 13, 2012 (UTC)

Gotcha--Jacob (talk • contribs) 16:09, August 13, 2012 (UTC)

Number 96's location
None of us know what happened to Dark Mist, so don't put that Yuma/Astral know longer owns him.

Archetypes
Stop what you're doing with the "Numbers". "Over-Hundred Number" is not an archetype. It has no support. It does qualify as a series, but series do not have support. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 21:22, April 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * Support = Archetype. Adding support means its an archetype. They are not archetypes, so you do not add support tags. Period. Legendary Number is a "sub-series" of "Number". That's it. ALL Legendary Number are Numbers. Its the same way with other archetypes - we don't list every single card that supports "Six Samurai" as also supporting "Legendary Six Samurai". Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 21:43, April 28, 2013 (UTC)

Aright, just trying help. I just believed that the Over-Hundred Numbers are a separate group. Even if it does quafiy, These Numbers are different from most. Just stating my opinion, hope you understand. Sorry also for going a bit extreme on the editing.im gay (talk • contribs) 01:45, April 29, 2013 (UTC)


 * I understand. I do think a page for both them and Legendary Numbers is appropriate, at least from a "plot element" perspective. There was nothing wrong with that. It was just the support part that that didn't belong. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 15:23, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Alright, thnaks.im gay (talk • contribs) 18:01, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Salute
I tip my hat to you, friend, for what you did to the Number 74 trivia. :) --Hawk00Refferencer (talk • contribs) 08:27, May 14, 2013 (UTC)


 * What he did was directly break Wikia rules by removing a deletion notice, especially while there was a discussion present on the talk page. To clarify again, an admin has also already said that the trivia is irrelevant. I don't know where you seem to get this idea that just because you want something to stay on the Wikia, you can break rules to do it. Your argument is weak, and you still haven't addressed my points that I originally put on the talk page, yet you want the trivia to remain "just because." It's extremely childish behaviour.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 10:32, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

Let's hope Joey would not step in to pull other all-night argument with you for removing the delete flag. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  10:28, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

You make a good point. Sorry, I understand now. Its just, you guys usually add lots of trivia facts to these Number card. I just wanted to add support details to Number 74. Its just a shame that its has to be deleted because of no interesting and wika material trivia facts. So [please add edits to the card trivia of Number 74 if possible. That will be swell. thabks again for expalin this to me.Italic text--im gay (talk • contribs) 17:38, May 14, 2013 (UTC)

Stop
Stop removing Numbers from Number C. Next time you make a suggestion, I would advise to wait until someone responds before changing something like that. I responded shortly after you made the post. You clearly either didn't see my post or ignored it. Please check it now. Thanks, Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:17, June 3, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I just wanted to categorized the Numbers section more clearly. I am just was wondering why the Number C are listed as members, and not related as there are evolved forms, not members. The same thing goes for the Over-Hundred Number. As for the Legendary Number, you can still list them as members but are technically related. Sorry again fir editing without waiting for a response, sorry. I be more patience next time. Hope you understand.--im gay (talk • contribs) 00:22, June 3, 2013 (UTC)