User talk:Deltaneos

Requesting Lock
Requesting lock against unregistered users on Turbo Pack 6 page due to excessive vandalism.BobaFett2 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:54, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Troll Pack 6 -- Er, Turbo Pack 6
As to see that you're in "active" list current, I would like to ask you if you think that unregistered user should be stop from spamming the article? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  12:58, August 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * Just taken care of it, from Boba's report just above this one. -- Deltaneos (talk) 13:01, August 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * Ah, never noticed that... Guess he got a speedy finger than I had. :-) -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  13:03, August 4, 2011 (UTC)

Image categories
Is Category:Images/by subject not used anymore? There are a LOT of uncategoriaed card images, and I actually created the ZEXAL category yesterday. Is categorizing images just something that fell by the wayside? Also, what's with the GX cat? Why is it only for card images and only those that don't have OCG/TCG counterparts? Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:13, August 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * The image categories are something that've been needing review for a long time. The GX category should be broadened to include any GX images, and they all need to use sentence case rather than capitalizing every word (so we need Category:Yu-Gi-Oh! ZEXAL anime images and Category:Yu-Gi-Oh! GX anime images instead of Category:Yu-Gi-Oh! ZEXAL Anime Images and Category:Yu-Gi-Oh! GX Anime Only Card Images).
 * I'm not sure about Category:Images/by subject. I suppose there's not much reason not to use it, though I must confess I don't care for the name (that's not to say I have any suggestions for better names, though =P ). 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 02:08, August 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah, that GX category is for images of GX anime cards that don't appear in anything else (OCG/TCG/video games etc.)
 * Category:Images/by subject is one of the ACG synced pages and a lot of old categories were dumped there when clearing out Special:UncategorizedPages, so category names and purposes are inconsistent.
 * I don't like the name "Images/by subject" either. A lot of the synced images and template categories use subpages. In my opinion, there are many organisational problems with subpages for articles, which apply to categories too. The short summary of most of the problems is the category structure here isn't simple enough to use a consistent set of subpage subcategories.
 * What do you mean you're not sure about Category:Images/by subject? Is there a problem with it other than its name?
 * As for categorising more images by their subject: Categorising OCG/TCG card images by subject (rarity, set, language, edition) should be easy enough with Dinoguy's Template:OCG-TCG card image template. How does this look for a category structure? -- Deltaneos (talk) 19:51, August 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * Me not being sure about the by subject category is more a result of my not having ever put much thought into overall image/file categorization schemes; should I ever start looking at them, I don't want to pigeonhole myself into one particular way when there's maybe a better way to do so (that's not to say I don't think we should use it in the meantime; we already have it in place and being used, and it would (should) be easier to simply switch over in the future if we wanted, then to stop using it now and wait around).
 * The structure you have there looks pretty interesting. What do you think of having a "[Card] Images by media" parent category for the anime/manga/VG cats (I think we should also have an "Images by card game" category, or the like, for Bandai, DDM, etc. stuff)? Also, "Card images by card"? I've thought about doing that, but it'd be a lot of categories... 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 01:27, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * One more thought (more just a general note than anything): We should probably start using  on any categories intended to handle images, since the vast majority of ours are fair-use, and we're generally wanting to restrict their inclusion to content namespaces (using the categories as galleries would be nice, but we arguably need a fair-use rationale template for every use, so it gets messy pretty quickly =/ ). 「 ダイノ ガイ  千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 01:31, August 8, 2011 (UTC)

Dai Grepher deletion?
I've only recently began using and editing this wiki, so I'm not sure where to direct this suggestion, but after sorting out some Trivia pages for the card "Warrior Dai Grepher", I'd like to suggest the deletion of the page "Warrior Dai Grepher (series)", given that almost all of the information belongs in - and has been added to - the card's own Trivia link, and because it's not so much a card 'series' as one card and a deluge of fictional speculation, especially since three out of the five cards in this 'series' already have their own series page: Dark Lucius.

Headcrab64 (talk • contribs) 02:46, August 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * I see you've since figured out how to nominate it for deletion. I've commented on the talk page. I didn't have much to add that you haven't already said, but you might find the last link I posted useful since you've been asking about the Master Guide 2 stories. -- Deltaneos (talk) 20:57, August 7, 2011 (UTC)

Decks For Free Archive Numbers
So, on the Forum:Decks for free!, Archive 10 went under Archive 1, Falzer explained why, and Dinoguy said to ask if you knew how to possibly fix this, if you can't that fine, D-Neos. Thank You. -- - Dark Ace SP™ ( Talk )  19:20, August 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * So you're saying make a Manual Archive System, like the one that's on our talk pages? Yours, mine, and Fredcat's, like that? -- - Dark Ace SP™ ( Talk )  03:45, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Just a quick question, you can reply on my talk for this one or whatever you feel is easiest. Could I just use

{{Navbox with columns
 * name = Forum:Decks for free!/Archives
 * title = Whatever
 * above = Whatever
 * fullwidth = true ...

, or would I have to follow everything this Article states?, just replacing the User parts with Forum:Decks for free, if I wanted to use this way. -- - Dark Ace SP™ ( Talk )  04:11, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Just check Dinoguy's talk for the first part of the message, because I actually like the first idea you had about having it align with when they were created, but I'll make the manual archives as a backup plan. -- - Dark Ace SP™ ( Talk )  04:13, August 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Actually just reply on Dinoguy's talk, so he can keep the entire discussion together. -- - Dark Ace SP™ ( Talk )  14:34, August 8, 2011 (UTC)

New Featured Card

 * I've created a new Featured Card article here. Feel free to look it over and inform me of any changes you'd like made. Also, I haven't seen you around for a while, and you never said where you live, but if you do live in the UK, I hope you're safe amongst the riot madness.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 20:49, August 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * D-Neos' alive, I have seen him editing some article yesterday and this morning. I am certain that D-Neos is somewhere in English-Europe area due to his using of "-our" voice over "-or" voice. (Such as "Favourite" over "Favorite") -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:57, August 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * Looks cool. Thanks for the concern. I hope you're doing okay too. -- Deltaneos (talk) 22:42, August 10, 2011 (UTC)

Judge Rulings
The one you post in the Talk Page of Yu-Jo Friendship's Tip Card, it seemed little off with the reference of people; like for explain; "A player has 39 cards in her Main Deck." it sound like if player is only female and never said "their". So that should be report to the Judge Center and have them fixing the whole texts? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:47, August 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * Where it says "A player has 39 cards in her Main Deck.", it's only giving a list of a few example scenarios. It's not covering all possible situations. Using a girl for the example doesn't mean it doesn't apply to boys like how using "39 cards" for the example doesn't mean it doesn't apply to "38 cards". -- Deltaneos (talk) 23:08, August 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * I see, so that explain is just set to one person; to be specify - one girl - right? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:19, August 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * Aah yes, the problem of how to refer to a gender-unspecified subject. Using "she"/"her" is a feminism-driven analog to the much older tradition of "he"/"him"; other methods include "they"/"them" (my personal preference), "he/she"/"him/her", "s/he", and "xe"/"hir" (I'm not even joking =. Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference, since no matter which one you pick, you're going to offend or confuse someone. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 23:49, August 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * I believed you, Dino, for "xe"/"hir" part, as I have seen the latter often in other site - same site that I asked you about that certain word at your own talk page - So I was just to be certain if it was just mistake or it was writing that way. But since D-Neos explained to me about that part; not many duelists have certain number to be same (40 exact cards), so they just put "one" person, accident hit "her" - which bring me to absolute understandable and approve of that Judge Rulings. Due to respect, you both have good explanations that I have missed from before. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:56, August 10, 2011 (UTC)

Nuke or salvage?
I think you have a function called nuke; that deletes bunch of stuff at once. Special:Contributions/Saad_safa; nuke it, or salvage it? No idea if they are official (konami-made), or just something random. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 03:41, August 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * They look official to me. It might be salvageable. -- Deltaneos (talk) 18:22, August 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * We do have at least one article already on toys like those: Yu-Gi-Oh! Tablet Monsters. -- Deltaneos (talk) 18:25, August 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * So... for most of them, someone who has spare time, can move them to similar names to the ones at Set Figure Galleries:Yu-Gi-Oh! Tablet Monsters. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 01:20, August 13, 2011 (UTC)

Anime Images
Hey. I've been finding so many Anime images that aren't link to anything. I really don't know anything about anime and I don't know what to do with those. I'm not talking about cards from animes but screenshots from those like This one. Delete them all? List every that i find in some user talk page who can take care of it? Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 20:01, August 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * I suppose we could make a template that flags images for deletion and after two weeks automatically moves them to the speedy deletion category. That way you would add  to the image, notify the uploader. If two weeks later, nobody has apposed the deletion, it can be deleted on the spot. -- Deltaneos (talk) 22:07, August 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * If you give me a list, I'll gladly find places to put them or delete them, depending on what they are. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:55, August 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * Try this. --The Goblin (talk • contribs) 01:00, August 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * That has card images too, but that's a good thing. In addition to a bunch of character images, there are plenty of anime card images I always assumed we didn't have. We do, but no one put them on the gallery pages. I'll start going through it later tonight and see what I can do. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:10, August 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * Note that images can land in Special:UnusedFiles if they are only used on pages through redirects, which is a good part of the reason I've harped on not using image redirects in the past. ;) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 16:27, August 13, 2011 (UTC)

Questions on Talk Pages
Is there anything in the rules against users asking questions on Talk pages? Lately questions have been deleted on sight, such as here and here. The main argument against it seems to be that the Talk pages weren't designed for questions, but I've never seen that argument posted anywhere other than on a Talk page, and I know that other wikis use Talk pages for questions. --Deus Ex Machina ✉ 02:57, August 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * Like on Project:Talk pages? There was also a forum discussion before we started cleaning up the talk pages; but I forgot the name for it... -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 03:07, August 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * It's always been a rule across all Wikia wikis and Wikipedia. It's in every talkheader among them that I'm aware of. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:27, August 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * Actually, Project:Talk pages says users asking questions about the subject that they cannot find in the article is allowed. That means questions like "When did Yugi get the Millennium Puzzle?" and 'Can I chain "Mystical Space Typhoon" to "Imperial Order"?' would be acceptable while questions like "Who would win a Duel Yugi or Yusei?" and 'Does anyone else think the 3 "(Cyber) Harpie Lady (1/2/3)" per Deck rule is dumb?' aren't acceptable. Questions about changing the article are obviously acceptable.
 * However that page was written before this forum discussion. -- Deltaneos (talk) 16:11, August 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * Ah, I forgot about that forum thread. I'll follow that.  Thanks for the help, guys.  --Deus Ex Machina ✉ 22:17, August 15, 2011 (UTC)

Poki Draco
I said it could be a reference to bakugan, because of the dragonoid named Drago. Drago, Draco, what's not to get? Plus they could be mixing the Dra archetype with his name. Mattwo (talk • contribs) 19:17, August 14, 2011 (UTC)


 * I do get that, but D-Neos don't, so can you please give him a link that he would know what you were meaning for. No offense if you just not give him enough information. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  19:20, August 14, 2011 (UTC)


 * "Drago" and "draco" are different words. I don't think it would use one if it's referring to the other. There are loads of things that use the names Drago and Draco (and loads that aren't listed on those Wikipedia pages). I don't see any indication that it's referring to this particular one. I don't think them both being dragons would be an indication since the words "drago" and "draco" are both variations of the word "dragon", so it's not unlikely that anything using those names would be dragon-like.
 * Also possessive pronouns don't use an apostrophe. -- Deltaneos (talk) 21:34, August 14, 2011 (UTC)

Bad User
Check it out, and please keep your pant on once you knew about it. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:39, August 15, 2011 (UTC)

Block Someone
There is this guy who keeps uploading porno pictures of Dark Magician Girl please can you block him or tell someone who can. the user is AAA456 --- —This unsigned comment was made by DarthRishda (talk • contribs) 20:45, August 15, 2011


 * I got it covered in above topic of this one. Simple, just click it and you will know where you are. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:47, August 15, 2011 (UTC)

Wind-Up Factory
I am not sure if you noticed that in it Talk page... but I am going to tell ya here anyways, I just found that the English Image was little fake, off the bat. Just grate me up if I am wrong. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  21:54, August 17, 2011 (UTC)

clean-up archtype pages?
the archetype pages should be focused more on describing the archetype instead of the playstyle. many pages only have one or a few lines describing the archetype, and one whole portion on the playstyle (example Agent). i suggest moving the playstyle to subpages (such as Infernity/Deck) -Lpoi (talk • contribs) 06:48, August 18, 2011 (UTC)


 * In the same vein, I think we should confine anime/manga stuff to a separate subsection, with the possible exception being mention of their users in the lead.. TCG players who don't watch the anime probably don't care about it and those that don't play the TCG (you know, just me) don't care about the rest of it. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:02, August 18, 2011 (UTC)


 * Adding a few more paragraphs describing the archetype shouldn't make the page too long to keep on 1 page... is it? -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 00:23, August 19, 2011 (UTC)


 * I agree with Falzar, I don't see why we should sacrifice gameplay coverage in favor of discussing the archetype itself. Most archetypes are pretty niche anyways, so even with the extra material, they're not going to be very long articles. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 22:32, August 19, 2011 (UTC)

a page for "Number Holder"
hey delta, I am wondering if you can make a page for "Number Holders" as i am sure there will be more unnamed characters, why not just make 1 page for them similar to the Duel Academy Staff page y'know. So what do you think? 33royward (talk • contribs) 02:32, August 20, 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't know much about ZEXAL, so I don't really know. But if it is worth an article, I'd say make it more like the Signers and Hirutani's gang articles. The Duel Academy staff article is a list left over from deciding to merge all minor character articles, then deciding to split them up again. -- Deltaneos (talk) 14:32, August 20, 2011 (UTC)

I Know Who The Dueling Champion should be after Yuma Tsukomo
I Know who should be the dueling champion after Yuma Tsukumo is Yusage. Just a suggestion if there were ever going to be a name like that or not. —This unsigned comment was made by Ki Di Mon (talk • contribs) 02:12, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

DL09-DL12
Hey just a quick question with the new Duelist League promo style. They are similar to Rare but have four different colors for there card name text. I was wondering what we should name this type of rarity due to the fact that the colors change each set. Maybe some thing like CR for Color Rare but that doesn't solve the multiple versions in each set. I'm just trying to find a way to upload and name all of these different types. Any ideas are welcome. Look234 (talk • contribs) 16:02, August 21, 2011 (UTC)


 * There was a discussion on this somewhere, but I can't recall where right now. I thought the end result was to use CardNameSETID-LN-RARITY-ED-Colour.jpg. e.g. File:Blackwing-BoratheSpearDL09-EN-R-UE-Red.jpg (Side note: needs the hyphen removed in the card name.) But File:BlueEyesWhiteDragonDL09-EN-RR-UE.jpg is using RR, probably meaning red Rare, for its rarity. I think the first way works better though. It's a bit more flexible and less likely to result in conflicting filenames. -- Deltaneos (talk) 16:41, August 21, 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm pretty sure it's been discussed a couple of times in the forums, and maybe once or twice on user talk pages. I'd also recommend the first method, myself, though (this also parallels how we've decided to handle "Magic" vs. "Spell" versions of very old English cards). 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 19:22, August 21, 2011 (UTC)


 * The mentioned discussion page can be found at Forum:New DL11 Coloured Titles Cards: Update needed .... -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 02:42, August 22, 2011 (UTC)

hey, remember me?? (lord britain space fighter pilot, or something like that) i'm not sure how long ago (my computer broke down) it was sent to me but you wrote something about trap cards not being activated whilest Jinzo is on the feild. does it not negate the effect of a trap card? so what if the cost is to tribute jinzo.. would it then work? yours truly - the ever curious,

--Blazen8 (talk • contribs) 22:31, August 22, 2011 (UTC)

DGk Talkback
Not sure if you saw my reply/question... 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 23:48, August 23, 2011 (UTC)

Archetype support in relation to Fusion Monsters
Certain pages list any Fusion Monster that is the result of Fusion of monsters from that archetype as being support for that archetype. Such as "Ma'at" being support for both "Kuribohs" and "Darkness". Is there something I'm missing here? Because that seems like very flawed logic to me. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:41, August 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm not seeing any solid reasoning for this either; it seems rather like the whole Uniform Nomenclature thing with different packaging. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 01:04, August 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * My argument excludes cards which ask for archetype members are materials, such as "Vision HERO Trinity". That does count as support. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 02:09, August 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes, that is a case where it should count as support (though personally, I see it more as the archetype supporting the card, but whatever =D ). 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 02:16, August 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * I'd list them as related, since they're connected to one particular member, but not the series as a whole, which was the original purpose of the archrelated section. -- Deltaneos (talk) 19:52, August 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * Works for me. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:43, August 24, 2011 (UTC)

Multiple accounts

 * Copied from User talk:Shardsilver

Thank you for understanding (I actually just warned him, that next time he makes an account, to tell me first so this doesn't happen again). Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 02:26, August 25, 2011 (UTC)

Harpie Guide
Can you please "un-archive" Forum:Deck Guide/Harpies?


 * You can do so yourself simply by [ editing it]. ;) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 21:24, August 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * Huh, the edit button disappeared.


 * Yes, that's by design. When a forum thread is manually or automatically archived, the edit button is replaced with a grayed-out "archived" label to help prevent pointless necrobumping. The edit link from the page's history page still works normally, though, so you can always use that route if you need to add something to an archived thread later. ;) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 21:31, August 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * That was the old habit from when our "Archived" Talk Page was archived couple years ago - so trying to get on the habit by that way. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  21:38, August 25, 2011 (UTC)

Other "Card" Article moved!
Since of your comment on my talk page like last few weeks ago, I memorized your order to moving "List of "Karakuri" members" into "List of "Karakuri" cards". So hope that help lighting your mood a little bit. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  21:55, August 25, 2011 (UTC)

Is it a great idea to have a King of Games before Yugi Muto or not?
Is it a great idea to have a King of Games before Yugi Muto because when Maximillion Pegasus created Duel Monsters, there should be a title for it when there are cards, shouldn't there? If there were a King of Games before Yugi Muto, it would be set in the creation of Domino City, wouldn't it?

Ki Di Mon (talk • contribs) 04:33, August 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm pretty sure King of Games applies to all games, and so far, Atem has only lost to one person: Yugi Muto. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 12:38, August 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Actually Atem did lose to Raviole as well (sorry if I missspelled his name). And he said he was going to lose that duel, unless he played the Seal of Oricancos, and even after he played it, he still lost (though he does win the second time they duel). Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 14:29, August 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Ah, Rafael. I forgot about that. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 14:31, August 26, 2011 (UTC)

Question.
I saw your changes to episode 48, and I have a few things I want to ask. First off you said "which she also seen in other places throughout the town, is doing there" (there is a few words missing in there, also the "IS doing there" wasn't needed and didn't make sense), shouldn't it say "which she also has seen in other places throughout the town"? Second another thing I noticed was that you revealed "Schwank" too soon when they had just arrived at the town (at this point in the episode the name was not revealed yet, so saying it too soon spoils it for those who're reading it, and because the name was not even mentioned yet, it is later, but not yet). Everything else I put that you changed (except the overuse of words) was actually said in the translations (though we still need to note dub dialog changes and other things). For example, Luna didn't just plea (she did, but she said "Don't!"), another example is she also did say as she ran after the spirits to please not run away. You also got rid of the "Flashback" as Luna thinks to a previous conversation in the past. Lastly the person Luna recalls was not "Someone", it was "Ancient Fairy Dragon". I'm not trying to argue or anything, but I just thought I'd let you know this. Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 00:26, August 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't really know what our "official" stance on this is, but I personally have no sympathy for people who read plot summaries and then get mad when the summary spoils the story for them (this is largely due to the time I spent on Wikipedia, which has a quite stringent policy on not avoiding spoilers). I'm not saying we shouldn't go out of our way to spoil plot details, but neither should we go out of our way to avoid doing so. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 02:52, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

List of Secret Rare cards
Any thoughts or suggestions for the revamp I've started on this list? In particular, if you can think of any ways to improve the lede; also note that once I'm through Booster Packs and reprint sets, I'm going to list promotional sets and the like as well. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 02:46, August 27, 2011 (UTC)