Forum:March 2012 Banlist Predictions

Only a prediction, just comment
Banned

Sangan

Limited

XX-Saber Darksoul Infernity Barrier Magician of Faith

Semi-Limited

Gold Sarcophagus Mystical Space Typhoon

Unlimited Zero


 * Brionic: possibly
 * Infernity barrier : unlikey, if hit it would probably be semi'd
 * Rescue rabbit: semi, or limited if it gets hit,(I think it will get banned in 1 of the future banlists)
 * Gold sarcophogous: no chance of going back to the banlist with pot of duality around, its too slow for searching, the only good combo it has at the moment is banish rabbit then use tour guide into leviar to get it back.
 * Mystical space typhoon should remain at unlimited
 * Darksoul: it's not very powerfull, the most likely x saber to get hit is "XX-Saber Boggart Knight"(I'm sure x sabers are 1 of the only meta decks not have any cards on the banlist yet)

matthew.lightbody@talktalk.net (talk • contribs) 23:45, January 3, 2012 (UTC)

How time flies
Wow. We're at this time of year again. How time flies. Anyhow:

I can see Brionac being Banned, as there are just so many Synchro Monsters out there that they've become too powerful. However, that would make Fishborg Launcher next to useless, so I doubt it. Infernity Barrier should be Semi-Limited, but the archetype hasn't been topping enough for it to be Limited. I doubt it will be hit. Rescue Rabbit might be but a Semi-Limit is all I can see coming. X-Sabers topped once and haven't topped again, so I doubt Darksoul will be hit. Magician of Faith should be Limited at the very least, but it could be dangerous. Gold Sarcophagus is never used. Most people only use two MST, so there's no reason to Semi-Limit it. Also, Boggart Knight is way worse than Darksoul - the most powerful one is probably Fulhelmknight. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 15:56, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

There is absolutely no reason to hit Darksoul. If X-Sabers really need hitting, Limit Faultroll and semi Boggart Knight. Battlemaniac (talk • contribs) 19:47, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Boggart Knight isn't that good. Even in triple Pashuul builds he isn't that good. Gottoms' Emergency Call, Fulhelmknight, Faultroll, Emmersblade, and Darksoul are all far better. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 19:49, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

I'm almost certain that Rescue Rabbit will be Semi-Limited and nothing more. I've been hearing rumours that Future Fusion could be made Forbidden but quite frankly rumours are all they are so far. Brioniac will stay limited, there are far worse cards out there that will get hit first. BLS could well find himself back on the banned list but if he stays at limited I don't think it's very likely that he'll ever go back on the banned list in future lists. With Agent Angels still topping most OCG and TCG tournaments they'll likely suffer some kind of hit like the Samurai's did though I can't think exactly what. Being as broken as they currently are I know Inzektors should take a hit but being a new archetype they'll probably walk away from the March banlist untouched. --The FireFALL (talk • contribs) 21:19, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

I think Witch of the Black Forest should go to limited. Its searching isn't the fastest kind around anymore, I'm sure people could survive it being limited instead of banned. 99.164.86.13 (talk) 22:32, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Witch can still search for Dark Armed Dragon, so no. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 22:37, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Some people think DAD should be banned though, so if it gets banned then the Witch might come back in my opinion. 99.164.86.13 (talk) 22:55, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

You think Chaos Emperor Dragon will come back and replace Black luster Soldier for future Chaos theme decks? --69.181.60.66 (talk) 23:12, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Konami would have to be nuts to do that. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 23:13, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

Will anyone feel odd if Slifer the Sky Dragon get semi-limited, Limited,or forbidden in the next Banlist ? --Sinfull Paradox 23:19, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * No, not at all. It's not even out yet. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 23:20, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Do you think Magician of Faith will ever come back? A lot of meta decks seem to consider flip-effects "too slow," except for maybe Ryko, Lightsworn Hunter, so it might be back some day. 99.164.86.13 (talk) 23:23, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

Want Crush Card virus to back .... love that card than let it collect dust in folder. --Sinfull Paradox 23:29, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * I want my Giant Trunade back... sniffle... 99.164.86.13 (talk) 23:37, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

Tsukoyomi should come back, most people generally agree it's not broken anymore Neon Rider (talk • contribs) 23:28, January 5, 2012 (UTC)

Royal oppression should be limited again, its not banworthy. With reborn tengu, tour guide and rescue rabbit being so frequently used, this card should be limited again to provide a counter against them, I would rather this and solemn warning were limited than this card being bannned, the banning of this card is very pointless. With a meta where most top tier decks can specail summon 3 or 4+ times a turn this card is needed to slow them down.

matthew.lightbody@talktalk.net (talk • contribs) 00:40, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Royal Oppression is an unfair card in so many ways. It's super beneficial to some decks and totally devastating to others.

I think BLS should be Banned too. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 00:41, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

I think royal oppression, is still vital for stopping mass swarming ,and to improve the speed and consistency of slower decks. Most of the decks that are at an unfair disadvantage to this card have an unfair adavantage over the slower decks, like inzectors who easily 3 monsters in a single turn and destroy cards.

matthew.lightbody@talktalk.net (talk • contribs) 00:48, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * It makes the game slower. Inzektors would just kill Oppression. Oppression is just an unfair card giving lots of advantage to one deck. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 00:53, January 6, 2012 (UTC)


 * Could Crush Card Virus get limited someday? It's extremely powerful, but it's probably not as horrible anymore, and I don't see too many meta decks that would extensively try to search out their single copy to use. 99.165.194.184 (talk) 02:16, January 6, 2012 (UTC) My ideal banlist would be Dark Armed Dragon and Brionac, Dragon of the Ice Barrier banned, Tsukuyomi, Witch of the Black Forest, Magician of Faith, Giant Trunade, and Fishborg Blaster limited, Rescue Rabbit semi-limited, and maybe Call of the Haunted unlimited. 99.165.194.184 (talk) 02:25, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

You can usually tell if a card is gone forever if they release a new card with very similar effects to it. In this case Rescue Cat, Crush Card Virus and Fishborg Blaster are never coming back as they all have alternates released now, them being Rescue Rabbit(which itself is certainly going to be hit), Deck Destruction Virus and Fishborg Launcher. Call of the Haunted is perfect being semi-limited, for Giant Trunade it's a case of it or Heavy Storm and I've gotta say I much prefer Heavy Storm over Giant Trunade any day. Also Tsukuyomi is NEVER coming back as there is far to many broken combos that can be done with her.

I am of the mind that Last Turn should come off the ban list for the first week that Number C39: Utopia Ray is released just for the hilarity that could be pulled off with it and then immediately banned again afterwards.

And on a more serious side to add to my last list Judgment Dragon needs to go back to being either semi-limited or just plain limited. Light Sworns were actually cool with him being semi-limited no need for the overkill that comes with him being unlimited. Same goes for Icarus Attack and Ultimate Offering, though with Ultimate Offering it needs to go to limited to stop Gadgets abusing it when Verz Ouroboros comes out.--The FireFALL (talk • contribs) 08:54, January 6, 2012 (UTC)


 * Last Turn will never come back. Everyone would build their deck around it and Fossil Dyna Pachycephalo. 99.165.194.184 (talk) 11:14, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

Fishborg Blaster never deserved a ban anyway. It's good, but what broke the deck were multiples of Formula (solved, since Formula has been Limited), multiples of Avarice (solved, since Avarice has been Limited), and T.G. Hyper Librarian. Ban Librarian, and Fishborg can come back completely. Battlemaniac (talk • contribs) 17:36, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Fishborg does deserve the ban due to the large number of overpowered things you could do. Even without three Avarice, Formula, and Librarian, there are still far too many reasons why it is too good. Any Tuner you can get back infinite times in a turn is too good. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 17:41, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Agreed there, it is too much (especialy in a Fish deck that abuses it to get "Shooting Quasar Dragon" out, and tons of other Synchros). Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 17:45, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

I think that they'll almost certainly hit one of the main components of the Plant Engine - Dandylion or Glow-Up Bulb. I really hope that they don't as I love the plays that these cards make possible...alternatively they might hit One for One. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 18:54, January 6, 2012 (UTC)


 * They might go for "Dandylion", since it can be somewhat abused by cards such as "Drill Warrior" to get more Tokens. Then there's "Quickdraw Synchron" taking advantage of them on your very first turn. Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 19:11, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Synchron Decks are not topping, Quickdraw Synchron and Drill Warrior aren't issues. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 19:15, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree with that (not to mention Synchron Decks are powerless against just about any Banish Deck). "Glow-Up Bulb" isn't so bad, because the effect can only be used once per Duel (if it were "Once every turn", then it would be banned for sure). Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 19:30, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

I know it's unlikely, but personally I hope Cyber Jar becomes limited. It doesn't seem any more overpowered than Morphing Jar 2, which isn't banned, as it sends the cards to the graveyard instead of back into the deck which usually hinders the opponent more, and has less deck destruction than Morphing Jar 2 as you both only draw 5 cards. Its a fun card to use when playing traditional format, and I'd like to see how it would affect advanced --2.100.10.105 (talk) 22:59, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

Why everyone hates on Dark Armed Dragon ? It has a semi-hard summoning condition to summon it on the field. Alot ways to remove/destroy/return/ counter it. I hope they remove it from limited to semi-limited. --69.181.60.66 (talk) 23:10, January 6, 2012 (UTC)--69.181.60.66 (talk) 23:12, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

I predict Evolzar Laggia being limited. Rescue rabbits are topping easy, and this card is the main reason, other than rescue rabbit it's self.

BLS should go..too much decks today use light and dark

many decks now rely on grave so monster reborn should be banned it tackes opponent's monster with no cost

if that happens my chaos deck is gonna be harmed LaserGhost (talk • contribs) 02:46, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Cyber Jar is insanely good in decks built around it, generating tons of advantage. The effect of Glow-Up Bulb, while only usable once per duel, is extremely good. Dark Armed Dragon is very powerful. Monster Reborn is fine at one, it's a great card that makes this game interesting. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 14:13, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Banlist Prediction
FORBIDDEN


 * Monster Reborn - just a feeling. But I think not.
 * Brionac, Dragon of the Ice Barrier - same comment as Monster Reborn

LIMITED


 * Royal Oppression - 3 MST, 1 Heavy Storm, and some other guys will just kill this card, before it can negate.
 * Goyo Guardian - If Brionac goes, I think Goyo goes back. But it depends.

SEMI-LIMITED


 * Rescue Rabbit - limit it to 2 for now, just like what they did to Rescue Cat. But if this card still affects the meta after limiting it to 2, maybe the next banlist it will be limited to 1.
 * Master Hyperion - to much for a boss card.
 * Inzektor Dragonfly - I mean if this deck would be hit this banlist, but I guess maybe in September.
 * Gladiator Beast Bestiari - Well, GB are not really kicking anymore.

UNLIMITED


 * Magical Stone Excavation - no one uses this card anyways.
 * Solemn Warning - Well, not really.
 * Call of the Haunted - Uhm. Same comment as Solemn Warning.

Jampong (talk • contribs) 05:29, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

As many people have stated earlier a lot of decks use the graveyard now and most of them have ways to summon their monsters from the graveyard without the need of Monster Reborn. Thus I'm of the mind it should stay at one so that decks which don't rely on the graveyard have a bit more of a fighting chance.--The FireFALL (talk • contribs) 08:31, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

Bestiari is too good to Semi-Limit, and they have topped recently so I doubt it will be Semi'd. Agents haven't topped recently, so the same would apply here. Everyone uses Solemn Warning, and three would be too much. Especially if Royal Oppression were Limited, which I really don't think it will be. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 14:37, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

By the way, Fishborg has 3 more targets besides Brionac. :3 And in all WATER deck where it's run, they should be able to easily pull Dewloren just as easily. Brionac COULD be banned because of loops (silly Infernity Trish loop :P), but I don't see it myself. When is Konami gonna learn that they can't safely make a card that can be used an infinite amount of times in 1 turn? Also, I think BLS will stay for at least 1 more format, as it's just more easily handled than in the past. Still tough, don't get me wrong, but not AS tough. Synchro Maniac10 (talk • contribs) 15:04, January 8, 2012 (UTC)


 * Fishborg Launcher? BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 15:01, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, wasn't signed in. :3 And yes, Launcher. Synchro Maniac10 (talk • contribs) 15:04, January 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * I've tried a Launcher Deck, it really sucks. If they do hit Brionac, Launcher is going to be dead. Dewloren really isn't that good without loops and Gishilnodon sucks, leaving just Gungnir and Trishula. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 15:06, January 8, 2012 (UTC)


 * That's just the point. :3 You're not playing it correctly. I'll have to show you my 2 decks I use it in. Actually, Dewloren becomes viable if you add just a few cards to recycle with him. Also, you can't summon Gishilnodon with Launcher, as Gishilnodon requires a Lv 3 non-Tuner, and 1 + 3 = 4, so, yeah. xD Synchro Maniac10 (talk • contribs) 00:07, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

my predictions
banned


 * monster reborn-with all these grave control decks its becoming broken
 * BLS-many decks modify themself to play it deadly effects
 * brionac-obvious...VERY obvious.lethal bounce effect.no specific monsters required WATER and sea serpant are becoming very supported
 * DAD-easy summon lethal effect high atk very supported attribute and type

limited

rescue rabbit-free rank 2-4 xyz
 * magician of faith-too slow VERY low stats gets only 1 spell back and takes your normal summon
 * witch of black forest-not very broken anymore

semi limited


 * master hyperion-lethal.easy summon good effect high atk
 * judgment dragon-lethal.mass destruction with low cost very high atk
 * level limit-area b-with xyz out its not that broken

thats the list i thought of LaserGhost (talk • contribs) 16:04, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

"Monster Reborn" and "Brionac" need to go for sure ("Brionac's" effect is a little overkill, even though there are many ways to get rid of it). "Rescue Rabbit" should definitly be limited. Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 16:12, January 8, 2012 (UTC)


 * There's a few flaws with a few of those. DAD is no longer as useful, since there isn't an easy way to search it, and that makes it inconsistent. This is one reason WotBF is Forbidden. There are many powerful cards that can be searched with her, including DAD. Monster Reborn is fine where it is. If you're gonna ban Reborn, you might as well ban Dark Hole. The 2 are about equally broken, since they can turn the game in your favor. Since when are Sea Serpents becoming well supported? Sure, because of Generation Fish, they are getting some support, but it's pretty bad. Brionac starts loops, but it's basically the only Lv 6 Staple Synchro now. Honestly, I think they'd bring Goyo Guardian back before they ban Brio. Magician of Faith is very searchable and can loop with The Shallow Grave. It's just that he can recover devastating spells you don't wanna see twice in one duel, such as Dark Hole and Heavy Storm. Dino Rabbits should be much weaker after you put Rabbit at 2 and limit Laggia, maybe. This makes their plays a lot more difficult to pull off. Hyperion is ok at 3, Agents haven't been topping. They just brought JD off the list last format, and I agree with that choice. Lightsworns are no longer as solid as they've been in the past, and now require too much luck to top. BLS, I still haven't figured him out, but I think it's Konami's call on that one, while Level Limit I agree with. Synchro Maniac10 (talk • contribs) 00:30, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Banned: Monster Reborn Solemn Judgement Maxx "C" Limited: Chaos Sorcerer Premature Burial Chaos Emperor Dragon - Envoy of the End Thousand-Eyes Restrict Metamorphosis Change of Heart Baby Tiragon Witch of the Black Forest

Semi-limited: Mystical Space Typhoon Pot of Duality Dust Tornado Spirit Reaper

Unlimited:

DAD won't be hit, but you can search it with Eclipse Wyvern. I don't see why they'd Semi-Limit MST, most players don't use more than 2. Nobody uses Dust Tornado outside of Side Decks. Metamorphosis is amazing. Chaos Sorcerer isn't worthy of a Limit. Solemn Judgment is fine at one. Maxx "C" isn't broken. CED is insanely good. Premature Burial combos with Wanghu and other cards. Restrict is far too good. Change of Hart is so broken. Baby Tiragon is bad. Witch is too good. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 00:45, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Everyone should remember that the ban list is always based on what's happened in the OCG and not the TCG and over there Agent Angels are still topping more often then not, if anything though I admit that the T.Gs will most likely suffer some sort of hit. As Agent decks are a lot less powerful without the T.G backup. I'm hoping that when ORC comes out in two weeks time that we see an emergency ban for the Inzektors in some way. As they're topping way to much to not be hit but then again being a new deck it may take until September until they get hit.--The FireFALL (talk • contribs) 01:38, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Yugioh Spring of 2012 banned list predictions
I am currently Predicting that:

Banned:

Brionac, Dragon of the Ice Barrier

T.G. Hyper Librarian

Limited:

Chaos Emperor Dragon - Envoy of the End - Broken though powerful. Several cards that are played can still negate it.

Thousand-eyes Restrict - Broke can be negated easily now and just got to tyhoon the monster to give this monster a atk0/def0

Pot of Duality - Over used.

Magician of Faith - needs to come back.

Chaos Sorcerer - Over used/ asked for.

Pot of Greed - Might as well come back.. not that powerful any more

Dark Magician of Chaos - not that powerful any more... takes 2 sacs to bring out.. with Synchros you can easily beat it.

Dust Tornado - More powerful then Mystical Space Typhoon

Metamorphosis - Only one good card to bring out with it... Restrict.

Graceful Charity - umm.. hello... you have to discard 2 cards so basically you aren't adding jack to your hand. -Graceful Charity can be abused with Dark World decks. I'd know, I run one, although I too would like to see it limited because I run a Dark World deckJa1lbreakr0cks (talk • contribs) 00:17, January 17, 2012 (UTC)

Semi - Limited:

Spirit Reaper

Unlimited:

None

Master of OZ (talk • contribs) 03:44, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

SEMI MONSTER REBORN? Limit Ced and pot of greed? Ban solemn judgmend? One of the main cards that can stop CED is solemn judgment. Konami isn't crazy you know LaserGhost (talk • contribs) 04:04, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Solemn Judgment and Pot of Greed will stay where they are. Judgment is the only card in Yugioh which can stop everything and the price to use it is high. Banning it would only serve to widen the divide between the meta decks and all other decks. Pot of Greed is never coming back as we now have Shard of Greed, which to be honest won't get touched until people realize just how good it is.--The FireFALL (talk • contribs) 04:04, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Just saw that Oz suggested unbanning Graceful Charity with the excuse 'umm.. hello... you have to discard 2 cards so basically you aren't adding jack to your hand. ' and yes while that is true if you're running either a Fabled or Dark World deck it gives you MAJOR pluses thus why it was banned in the first place. Honestly people before asking for a card to be unbanned at least think why it was banned in the first place!--The FireFALL (talk • contribs) 06:15, January 9, 2012 (UTC)


 * Back when it was banned Fableds and Dark Worlds weren't out. It was banned because it's a broken version of Pot of Duality, it's a 1 for 1 but you chose which out of your entire hand to discard. So it sets up your hand and grave with no downside at all.101.162.51.126 (talk) 06:38, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

My comments on everything seen here so far, and more
Brionac probably won't get banned, for the reason BF2 said: Konami wants money and banning it would make Fishborg Launcher basically useless. Furthermore, it isn't that overpowered. There are much better things worth getting banned. And no, if it gets banned, Goyo Guardian will not come back. If Goyo was a higher Level, such as 8, it would be fair. As a Level 6, it's broken.

I can see why Monster Reborn would be banned. If it is banned, as long as it and Premature Burial are both banned, I wouldn't mind DMoC coming back.

Premature Burial will never come back, not as long as Dewloren/Brionac are around. Use it on one, return it to hand by their effect, use it again. Hidden Armory can recycle it, too.

Giant Trunade will stay gone, especially with 2 Swords and 2 CotH. Speaking of CotH, it is EXTREMELY unlikely that it will go to 3. It is a great card, and it is too good to be Unlimited.

Rescue Rabbit will not go below 2 this next format. If it remains a problem at 2, it will go down further next format. Evolzar Laggia is fine where it is. I doubt they'll hit it, since most duels only 1 or 2 of it hit the field.

Darksoul? What? X-Sabers haven't even been topping. Same for Infernity Barrier. Once the decks start topping again, then you can think about it. I think both are fine even with the decks topping really. The problem with X-Sabers is Faultroll. The problem with Infernities is the Mirage + Street Patrol combo into the Trishula loop.

Magician of Faith should stay banned in my opinion. If they get rid of Reborn I wouldn't mind it going to 1 though. It's not that overpowered anymore.

Gold Sarcophagus is fine. Only Rabbit decks use it because it's so slow.

MST is probably fine, it's not that good of a card really. It's just a 1 for 1 card. Heavy Storm is fine, too, since it's at 1. If they ban Heavy Storm, MST MUST stay at 3, because Trunade is not gonna come back.

Future Fusion might be banned simply because of the HERO Quasar deck.

BLS-EotB could quite easily be banned again. It's also just as likely that BLS-EotB will stay at 1. Chaos Emperor Dragon - Envoy of the End will most likely never come back. It's too overpowered, especially with plays involving Sangan/Dandylion/Glow-Up Bulb/Spore/etc.

As for Agents, Hyperion is the most likely card to suffer a hit. I can see it going to 2, although it would be funny if they hit Mystical Shine Ball instead.

As for Inzektors, they can get hit in March anyways, but it's unlikely. They're already out in OCG though so who knows. They'll be out in TCG for around a month before the list. Dragonfly and/or Hornet to 2, maybe 1.

Witch of the Black Forest and DAD are inversely proportional in the amount of copies of each we get. If we have DAD, we don't have Witch. If we have Witch, we don't have DAD. End of story. Then again, they could both be banned. But they will never be out together. Sangan would probably get banned if Witch came back, too. As it is, I'm of the mind that DAD is less of a problem than Witch, so it should stay as is. Sangan could easily get banned regardless of a change to Witch's ban status, however.

Slifer the Sky Dragon is fine as it is. It's not that good. Only Frogs and Gadgets would use it anyways.

CCV comes back when--never. ESPECIALLY not with Sangan around. So many combos... Just what we needed, Tour Guide into a search and the death of all 1500 and higher ATK monsters.

Tsukuyomi should stay banned. As the List of Reasons for why cards are Currently Banned states, "Reusable Book of Moon effect. Hamster, Ryko, Hamster, Ryko ... OMG NOO!!!!!" Speaking of BoM, it would be fine at 2 in my opinion. Especially with the possibility of Priority going away, it would be great at 2.

Royal Oppression is a bit biased and broken. Really the only massive-swarm deck that can beat it easily is Inzektors, and only because they pop it before they swarm. However, with 3 MST and 1 Heavy Storm, it could possibly be alright to bring it back.

Last Turn will NEVER come back. EVER. Archlord Kristya, Jowgen the Spiritualist, Fossil Dyna Pachycephalo, and Vanity's Fiend all make Last Turn an OTK with a 0% chance of your opponent winning. There are also a variety of ways to almost always ensure a win with cards that will always have a higher ATK than the opponent's monsters: The Wicked Avatar, Kazejin, Sanga of the Thunder, and Suijin. Alternatively, pick any monster with more than 3800 ATK, since the highest ATK a monster Summonable by Last Turn can have is 3800 (Beast Machine King Barbaros Ür). Furthermore, you can almost always guarantee a draw with cards such as Neo-Spacian Grand Mole, D.D. Warrior Lady, etc. I'll just leave | THIS here.

Judgment Dragon, Icarus Attack, and Ultimate Offering? No, no, and no. They're all fine. Lightsworns don't top as it is, so 3 JD would be fine. Blackwings and Dragunities don't top as it is, so 3 Icarus Attack should be fine. Ultimate Offering is fine, too. While Gadgets do have a nasty swarm engine with it, until HA07 they won't have Daigusto Emeral, allowing them to recycle their Gadgets over and over and over, as well as granting great draw power. Tribute 2 Emeral and a Lavalval Chain for Slifer, Ra, or Obelisk. I've seen this combo used to get out Horakhty easily, on turn 2 or 3.

Banning T.G. Hyper Librarian will NOT allow for Fishborg Blaster to come back. The problem with Librarian is that its effect isn't just once per turn. Alternatively, that it doesn't require a T.G. monster. Alternatively, that it is Level 5. Make it Level 8 and people won't be complaining. Actually, they still would. One for One + Dandylion + Glow-Up Bulb in the Deck + Spore in Graveyard/Foolish Burial + any Level 4 non-Tuner = Quasar if Librarian was Level 8. Then again, it does anyways. Never mind. :S (1for1, dis dandy, ss bulb, 2 tokens, foolish spore, normal the l4, spore eff, ban dandy, ss spore as l4, sync lib (if it's l5, spore + token; if it's l8, spore + the l4), sync formula using bulb and a token, draw 2, mill 1 for bulb eff, ss bulb, sync for final stars needed (if lib is l8, bulb + token for recipro; if it's l5, bulb + the l4 for catastor), draw 1, sync quasar using the 3 synchros.) At least it would mean that Fishborg Blaster wouldn't be as big of a problem as it is with Librarian as a Level 5.

If any part of the Plant Engine is hit, it would be Dandylion, not Glow-Up Bulb. Bulb is once per Duel, while Dandylion can be used over and over. Also, Debris Dragon + Dandylion = win.

The reason Cyber Jar is better than Morphing Jar 2 is that Cyber Jar has a set number of cards. That made it much easier to abuse, allowing the controller to gain advantage with ease. Morphing Jar 2 was at 2 for a time, but then destruction of monsters by effects became favored to destruction of monsters by battle in '05, and it came back up to 3. Nevertheless, Cyber Jar is one of the banned cards most likely to return. (Information courtesy of the List of Reasons for why cards are Currently Banned.)

Gladiator Beast Bestiari is Limited for a reason. If it was at 2, I would fear for our lives as GBs took over the meta. Its effect isn't the biggest problem, really. The main problem is the part where Gyzarus annihilates the opponent's field.

MSE would probably be fine at 3, but who knows. It's at 2 for a reason: Empty Jar decks, etc.

Solemn Warning is fine where it is. I can see it going either up or down though. The cost makes it not so useful above 2, but it could also be cut to 1 just as easily as it could be raised to 3. Solemn Judgment is fine where it is. It costs half of your Life Points. It's fair.

Level Limit - Area B should stay at 1, although I can see it going to 2. With Gravity Bind at 3, I don't see a need for more Area B. And anyways, Area B is better than Gravity Bind in that most monsters have higher ATK than DEF.

I saw this: "Banned: Monster Reborn Solemn Judgement Maxx "C" Limited: Chaos Sorcerer Premature Burial Chaos Emperor Dragon - Envoy of the End Thousand-Eyes Restrict Metamorphosis Change of Heart Baby Tiragon Witch of the Black Forest Semi-limited: Mystical Space Typhoon Pot of Duality Dust Tornado Spirit Reaper

Unlimited:" ^Worst ideas ever. I covered Monster Reborn, Solemn Judgment, Premature Burial, Chaos Emperor Dragon - Envoy of the End, Witch of the Black Forest, and MST earlier. Maxx "C" is fine, although a drop to 2 would be okay. Chaos Sorcerer is fine. Nobody ever runs 3 anyways. Thousand-Eyes Restrict is staying banned, end of story. Too broken, and with Instant Fusion... Metamorphosis is staying banned simply because of Beast King Barbaros, Fusilier Dragon, the Dual-Mode Beast, and Metal Reflect Slime. Check its Card Tips page. Furthermore, it and Thousand-Eyes Restrict can never be at 1 in the same banlist. Change of Heart is staying banned forever. It's a free +1, and its worse counterpart Brain Control is also banned, and Brain Control's worse counterpart Mind Control is at 1. Change of Heart will never return. Baby Tiragon isn't nearly as good as Number 83: Galaxy Queen, and that's at 3, too. Pot of Duality is fine at 3. Few people even bother running 3. Dust Tornado isn't used anyways. It's fine as it is. Spirit Reaper is fine, nobody runs more than 2 really, usually no more than 1.

Pot of Greed will never come back, get that over your thick skulls everybody, EVERY banlist prediction, somebody says that. It won't happen. End of story. It's a free +1, and it speeds the deck up a lot. Allure + Pot of Greed + 2 Destiny Draw + 3 Trade-In would make Exodia decks very happy.

Graceful Charity will never come back. It's WAY too fast.

Please, people, read the List of Reasons for why cards are Currently Banned. It's a guide for what is likely to happen. Use it to make REASONABLE guesses.

This massive list was written over the course of 2 or 3 hours by Menace13 (talk • contribs) at 07:44, January 9, 2012 (UTC).

Well said Menace and I agree with a lot of what you've put. Also I want to state now that my earlier comment about bringing back Last Turn was a JOKE! Seriously, I would have thought people would have known it was a joke by the fact I said only bring it back for the first week that Utopia Ray was out then ban it again! Of course it's never coming back! Although now that I think about it, this list is devoid of one card which is being abused quite often nowadays. Leviair the Sea Dragon. If this took a hit then it would help to neuter the decks which run Rabbit.--82.44.42.171--The FireFALL (talk • contribs) 08:27, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

where there any infernity cards that were baned or limited they should take outt infernity launcher or was it wavine motion inferno off the list cause there hasnt been any good support cards for the infernity archetype in a while. --69.181.60.66 (talk) 08:14, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

they should make elemental hero stratos semi-limited as it can only search for HERO cards and its 2nd effect is too hard to get it to destroy several spell/traps KingDuque777 (talk • contribs) 12:55, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Leviair is an amazing card but you would have to Ban it to make much of an impact as Decks don't run more than one copy. Instead, Infernity Launcher should be Banned and Archfiend Semi-Limited. However, this will not happen until the Deck starts topping again. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 13:46, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Bann Infernity Launcher and semi-limit Infernity Archfiend and you will have killed what remains of the good points of the Infernities handless combos...I saw lot of people here only look for their own improvement. I disagree with Leviair or the Infernitys hiting the bannlist. Instead, I think Tour Guide, Rabbit and Black Luster will hit because they are topping too much. Maybe we will see again Judgment Dragon at 2, because 3 is overkilling indeed.

Koonami updated a thing about Dark World cards a while ago saying the they can not use their discard effects if the discard to the graveyard was a cost... therefore Graceful Charity is in no use to the Dark World cards AT ALL.

Master of OZ (talk • contribs) 14:49, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

No, Graceful Charity works in Dark World, because it's not a cost. It is one of the effects of the card. It's always been that way.129.1.192.124 (talk) 14:52, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Even Koonami states that the discarding of 2 cards in Graceful Charity is a cost.. If any card that states to do something without giving the option to do something else in its place its is a cost.. thus I draw 3 then my cost is discarding 2.. this has been a known face since Graceful Charity came out. Master of OZ (talk • contribs) 14:56, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Wrong on two accounts. First, Graceful Charity is an effect. It says "then discard two cards", so it can't possibly be a cost. Second, Launcher and Archfiend are extremely overpowered. If you want to hurt them, hit those cards. The Deck can still do things without them. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 16:00, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Guys costs come BEFORE the effect not after it! So graceful charity is still broken it benifits fabled/DW/any deck that needs cards in graveyard LaserGhost (talk • contribs) 16:07, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

I just messaged Koonami on what they say it is. When I get a response I will post it on here. Master of OZ (talk • contribs) 17:12, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Must you continue this? You're wrong and your explanation is wrong. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 17:51, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

If discarding 2 cards for graceful charity was the cost, then it would have to be at the start of the effect before the 3 cars are drawn.

matthew.lightbody@talktalk.net (talk • contribs) 17:54, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

I will continue this.. I don't believe you.. cost can come afterwards..
 * No it can't, actually. The cost has to come first, otherwise you're not paying for it beforehand. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 17:58, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

well I don't believe any of you because I don't know you.. thus I will find out from Koonami.. the creator of the cards... they'll know better. Master of OZ (talk • contribs) 18:04, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Ok this might be the first time me and BF2 agree about something but yeah if graceful charity's discard was a cost it would say:"discard 2 cards to draw 3 cards" So its an effect lol LaserGhost (talk • contribs) 18:04, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

like I said if I know know you I don't trust you unless you are the creator of the game... so STFU.. Master of OZ (talk • contribs) 18:13, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

implying that only the game creators have knowledge and understanding of the game....

matthew.lightbody@talktalk.net (talk • contribs) 18:29, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

K you can just belive anything graceful charity isnt coming back LaserGhost (talk • contribs) 18:38, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

true knowledge and understanding of the game yes.. Master of OZ (talk • contribs) 18:38, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Actually, while Kazuki Takahashi created the game, I'm pretty certain that his main focus is on the manga (and to a lesser extent, the anime) than the actual game, and I've heard that he doesn't play (although that may not be true). BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 18:53, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Give it up Oz, you're arguing with people who most likely are judges for Konami anyway and yes they are right Graceful Charity is NOT a cost. A cost is the price to activate the card, therefore you cannot have the effect before you've paid the cost. Thus Graceful Charity is NOT a cost as you draw before you discard.--The FireFALL (talk • contribs) 18:57, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Well they have people on staff that actually have played the game to help with the card rulings.And have a true understanding of the game... I've been playing since 2001/2002. Master of OZ (talk • contribs) 18:59, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * So have I. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 19:01, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

I have ODD don't tell me to give it up or I'll continue.. dummy... so STFU and go with my statements. Master of OZ (talk • contribs) 19:04, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Obnoxious Dumbness Disorder? BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 19:04, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Yes they do have people on staff and they're called JUDGES! But in this instance we don't need one because it can be solved with a piece of light reading on your part. Read Cost please, this is the page which explains the rules of what a cost is and quite honestly you need to read it. Also please stop falling back on to the 'I've been playing since 2001' because you know what SO HAVE I! And if you don't honestly know the difference between a card's cost and effect by now then really where the hell have you been playing this game?--The FireFALL (talk • contribs) 19:05, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

ODD = Oppositional Defiance Disorder - aka you oppose(disagree) me I can get really pissed. I have read the card and I disagree with you.I have judged it for myself.. and have decided it is a cost not an effect. Costs can come after words if explained in the text of the card that you have to do something after you do its effect. And I disagree with that article for the most part. Master of OZ (talk • contribs) 19:16, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

You can't just "decide" that it's a cost. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 19:17, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

yes I can.. I ran tournaments.. so I know what I am talking about. Master of OZ (talk • contribs) 19:22, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

I really doubt it. And you don't know what you're talking about. This article is right. Konami Banned Graceful Charity because of Dark World monsters. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 19:25, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Don't argue much Oz..im not saying that im the best here but i,firefall and bf2 know what we're talking about and GC is an effect you know what helped it going to the banlist? It has no costs LaserGhost (talk • contribs) 19:32, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

So you are saying because it helps out one specific monster type/meta it should stay banned that is illogical.. if that is the case then there are many many more cards that are like that that should be banned as well and are not.. there for it being banned is totally illogical. Master of OZ (talk • contribs) 19:35, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Right enough is enough. Oz even though I can't tell if you're just plain trolling or you really do believe that Graceful Charity is a cost. Everyone here has told you that Graceful Charity isn't a cost but you keep believing it's a cost until the Konami people get back to you. They'll tell you exactly the same as we've told you but if that's the only thing that will convince you then so be it. So let's all now drop this Graceful Charity bs and get back to our ban list predictions!--The FireFALL (talk • contribs) 19:35, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Right, i heared that the banlists are decided by weakening the decks that win in tournaments so can anybody give me a page that allows me to see the top decks in tournaments? LaserGhost (talk • contribs) 19:40, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

RABBIT WON'T GET LIMITED!
I just want to say a lot of people are saying Rabbit is gonna get limited but if they do we still have Guiba, Hydrogeddeon, and that new Evol coming out in Order of Chaos so if the limit anything they are gonna limit the Laggia and Dolka. Why would they limit the fuel when the machine using the fuel is the big problem.

The Evols aren't that great as a whole, and while Hydrogeddon is good, most decks are using Dimensional Fissure because of the edge it gives them. Guaiba does not deserve to be hit. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 21:22, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

There is even a ruling on the Wiki stating that it is an effect. ""Goblin of Greed" prevents discarding as a cost, but not as part of an effect. So "Goblin of Greed" will stop "Kuriboh", but not ... "Graceful Charity"."

As for Leviair, it doesn't deserve to be banned, and limiting it wouldn't fix anything. It's not the problem.

They would have to drop Laggia to 1 for it to help much. It's rare for two to be Summoned by the same player in the same duel. They usually go 1 Laggia and 1 Dolkka. Then the duel ends because they won. Limiting it to one would hurt the deck a bit, but not enough to kill it as badly as it needs to be killed. Menace13 (talk • contribs) at 22:51, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Rescue Rabbit should be banned just like Rescue Cat, konami has not learned anything fom rescue cat, it dosn't matter how many restrictions they give it. If it is a level 4 or lower monster who has no summoning restrictions, and MOST importantly the fact that he summons 2 monsters from the deck using only 1 card. Any level 4 or lower monsters who can specail summon 2 monsters from the deck during the main phase for no cost, can and will be abused. Especailly seen as it only ever used to get out the 2 evolzars. It was designed to be an xyz support card, but not specifically for juat these 2 xyz monsters. The 2 evolzars are both very overpowered themselves, laggia is a solemn judgemnt with 2400 attack, and dolkka is 2 Doomcaliber Knights in 1 card, they both deserve to be limited. Rescue rabbit would be so much fairer it's effect stopped you from xyz summoning on the very first turn of the duel. Finally I think it is unfair how you can call prioity with rabbit against Trap Hole, and how rabbit dodges the effect of Effect Veiler.

You can get Rescue Rabbit with Leviair the Sea Dragon. Dump rabbit in the banish zone with Gold Sarcophagus then use Tour Guide From the Underworld, to summon leviar then get rabbit back. Gold + tour guide is still a rabbit with 2 cards. Exact same as monk, getting a monster(tour guide) who is unlmited and the spell: Gold Sarcophagus. It's just as easy matthew.lightbody@talktalk.net (talk • contribs) 23:40, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Koonami stated that it was an effect of Graceful Charity... sorry... I wanted to be told by Koonami. Please accept my apologies everyone.. Master of OZ (talk • contribs) 23:44, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Will we see reborn tengu up on the forbidden list?Ja1lbreakr0cks (talk • contribs) 00:49, January 10, 2012 (UTC)

MY NEW PREDICTION of the Ban list 2012(March)
Banned:

Rescue Rabbit

Shard of Greed

Honest

Sangan

Morphing Jar

Dandylion

Marshmallon Reborn Tengu

Pot of Avarice << this card is more powerful then Pot of Greed.. hello adding 5 monsters to your deck then drawing 2.. over play much.

Thousand-Eyes Restrict - can be easily negated now.

Metamorphosis - hello there are more negate spells cards out there to negate it.

Limited:

Change of Heart

Pot of Greed

Call of the Haunted

Giant Trunade

Premature Burial

Chaos Sorcerer

Semi- Limited:

Spirit Reaper

Mystical Space Typhoon

Mirror Force

Unlimited:

Magical Stone Excavation

Laggia and Dolkka are fine as they are. Rabbit isn't anywhere near as broken as Rescue Cat (Rescue Cat could be gotten by Summoner Monk etc. while Rescue Rabbit can't be). The only thing necessary and appropriate to do to the Deck is to Semi-Limit Rescue Rabbit until it has been proven that it requires further hindrances.

No, Reborn Tengu will not be getting Semi-Limited or Limited this format. It's still TCG only.

As for you, Huguenot.Pirate, please use 4 tildes after your post so we know who you are.

As for your ideas, they all suck. All offense intended.

As I've said dozens of times before in this thread, Rescue Rabbit is fine. LOLWAT Shard of Greed? It's not even used much, and it's hardly good. And you want them to ban it while they unban Pot of Greed? Please, for goodness sake, read the thread before you decrease the intelligence of the entire thread in a single post. Honest is fine as it is. At one, it isn't easy to abuse, and almost no meta decks use it at the moment (Agents and Lightsworns have been going down in popularity and topping less and less frequently). Just search through the thread for my earlier opinion on Sangan. Morphing Jar? Why? It's not even used in any deck other than Dark Worlds and Fableds, and of course Empty Jar. Of those, only Dark Worlds have been topping. Dandylion is one of the few good ideas you had on that list; if anything in the Plant Synchro engine gets hit, it will be Dandylion. Marshmallon? LOL! Nobody uses it. NOBODY. Spirit Reaper is dozens of times better. Reborn Tengu, as I stated above, will not be banned. It's still TCG only, and it would never get fully banned. If anything they would only Semi-Limit it. That would be enough to kill it. Pot of Avarice is fine at one. It's not better than Pot of Greed in that Pot of Avarice isn't an instant +1. You have to have 5 monsters in the Graveyard first.

Assuming you mean Thousand-Eyes Restrict and Metamorphosis should be Limited, I will again refer you to my massive list further up in this thread. Same for Change of Heart and Pot of Greed and Call of the Haunted and Giant Trunade and Premature Burial and Chaos Sorcerer and MST and Spirit Reaper. Mirror Force will never go to Semi-Limited. It's an incredibly good card, and it should stay right where it is. I also covered Magical Stone Excavation above, although it wouldn't be that bad for it to be Unlimited.

Finally, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE read this list: List of Reasons for why cards are Currently Banned. If you never look at anything on the Wiki again, at least read that. It tells you what cards are likely to come back. If it is a Very Low chance of coming back, or Never coming back, don't even THINK about putting it on your Banlist Prediction. End of story.

Written by Menace13 (talk • contribs) at 01:21, January 10, 2012 (UTC)

TH3V1P3R's predictions....
Leviair will go to one. bottomless will go to three. forbidden lance will go to two.

matthew.lightbody@talktalk.net (talk • contribs) 01:43, January 10, 2012 (UTC)

Guys levair does NOT deserve a ban or a limit if they wanna kill rabbits just ban rabbit not levair! Some decks simply NEEDS levair.LaserGhost (talk • contribs) 03:27, January 10, 2012 (UTC)

I'm surprised at the number of people that can't read a single page on why a card's banned or that can't understand TCG are extremely unlikely to get banned. (If I remember correctly only one was banned and that was an emergency ban right?)

My thoughts
Banned: Limited: Semi-Limited: Unlimited: 101.162.51.126 (talk) 05:37, January 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Brionac, Dragon of the Ice Barrier or Future Fusion, an almost guarenteed first turn Shooting Quasar Dragon is completely broken.
 * Trap Dustshoot, although it has kind of strict conditions, it's an instant view hand and remove a monster from their hand. Although saying that, there are quite a few searchers in the meta so looking at your opponents hand isn't as broken as it once was.
 * Archlord Kristya, it isn't that hard to get 4 fairy's in the grave, once it's out it's pretty much game, it lets you add a fairy to your hand like Honest, then when it's destroyed it's top decked to be re-summoned.
 * As much as I hate to think it, Royal Oppression might come back. There are a fair few S/T destruction cards at the moment, but it'd slow to shut down most meta decks and probably make Gadgets, Inzektors and Frognarchs start topping.
 * Trance Archfiend, it's really too good when used with Dark Worlds, a discard and adding something you banished for gates, just too good.
 * Book of Moon, although this would help the Empty Jar OTK the card's been barely used lately. And it's not as amazing as other cards that could be used.
 * Rescue Rabbit may be semi'd but I don't think it's as likely as everyone thinks. The vast majority of Rabbit decks only use 2 at most anyway, the third is just for added consistency. Not to forget how expensive this card is, Konami isn't likely to ruin a good money maker.
 * I'm thinking Solemn Warning might be unlimited because it has quite a large cost and in OCG the only real difference between it and Bottomless Trap Hole is that it negates spells/traps too.

Last time I mentioned Leviair I didn't go into detail about it. It's not an unfair card; it only gets Level 4 and lower monsters. Sure, it's abusable. It's also easy to kill, and nothing it gets will be completely broken. It's fine as it is. BTH is fine at 2. Three would be a problem if we lose Priority like the OCG did. Forbidden Lance is fine at 3. Nobody uses more than 2 anyways, so why bother lowering it to 2? I agree that either Brio or Future Fusion will probably be banned, but it's not like the deck has that many outs once they lose the Quasar. Trap Dustshoot should be fine in my opinion. It's a one for one that has very strict requirements. It's fine at 1. Archlord Kristya is fine. Agents aren't topping at the moment. Nor are Lightsworns. If they begin to top, then I'll change my mind on that one. Royal Oppression could come back. I wouldn't mind it. The problem is that it's a little bit overpowered. It is extremely biased. And Inzektors don't need any more reasons to overpower the meta. Trance Archfiend won't get hit, it's not used much at all yet. Book of Moon should be fine at Semi-Limited, as I said earlier. Empty Jar decks aren't topping. It's not as useful of a card as it once was. Rescue Rabbit at 2 is a great idea. It's almost certain to happen, unless Konami decides to screw us over again. Solemn Warning would be fine at 3, yeah. I think it should stay at two, but it would also be fine at 3. Especially with the S/T hate in today's meta. Also, Solemn Warning>Inzektors. I hope we get 3. Written by Menace13 (talk • contribs) at 12:17, January 10, 2012 (UTC).

TO ALL YOU IGNORANT DUMMYS
IF I post here and make suggestions it is my free will to do so and if I choose to make ideas of unbanning and banning certain cards its because I want to..

I understand this game. If you can't get that through you thick skulls then go to fucking hell.

DO NOT INSULT ME.

It is my free will to make these suggestions.. so stop trolling on me I am sick and tired of you people insulting me stop it.

Master of OZ (talk • contribs) 14:57, January 10, 2012 (UTC)


 * Calm the hell down, Pirate... that kind of comment is what making them removed your from this article. Talk shit like this only making yourself into trouble and maybe mark a ban. So... go out and clear your mind please. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  15:21, January 10, 2012 (UTC)

He man they was insulting me look above because they didn't agree with me look for yourself.. I had a right to stand up for myself now you are saying calm down nothing it wrong.. to hell it is... they insulted me and that is wrong.. Master of OZ (talk • contribs) 17:32, January 10, 2012 (UTC)


 * After you joined the discussion this was the first insult i found:"I have ODD don't tell me to give it up or I'll continue.. dummy... so STFU and go with my statements.", sooo you started it, don't run crying now...S4suk3g13 (talk • contribs) 00:13, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ditto. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 00:19, January 11, 2012 (UTC)

Oppression does not benefit Frognarchs or Inzektors. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 17:41, January 10, 2012 (UTC)

Royal Oppression will help Inzektors for sure. They can use it to keep themselves safe until they can pull off the combo, and use the first Inzektor Hornet to kill it. Furthermore, Frognarchs don't get hurt by it: Treeborn Frog would just activate again, Ronintoadin can just find another thing to banish, etc. The only problems for Frognarchs are that it stops Swap Frog's Special Summon effect and their defensive monsters (Trag, Fader, etc.). While it doesn't technically HELP either deck, it does harm the opponent while not hindering them, which I think is as good as helping the deck directly. Written by Menace13 (talk • contribs) at 00:38, January 11, 2012 (UTC).

If they do ban Brionic will they replace him with goyo guardian? and leave OZ alone everyone here has a right to express their opinions and besides we are here to predict cards not bash on others. --69.181.60.66 (talk) 00:53, January 11, 2012 (UTC)

If you bothered reading the thread you'd see we weren't 'bashing' on Oz, well aside from Menace13 which I must say was slightly uncalled for with the 'all offence intended' line. All we have done so far is disagree with his choices and if you are going to post here you have to understand that not only will people disagree with your choices but also give reasons why they believe you are wrong. Again Menace13 needs to work on his people skills a little bit but all the reasons he gives are valid reasons and quite honestly Oz needs to be prepared to realize that everything he suggests will be considered and then people will gives their own opinions on them, it's not just his opinion that matters.

Anyway back to the banlist. While Brionac, Dragon of the Ice Barrier could well be banned next ban list make no mistake Goyo Guardian won't be coming back. Not only is he to easy to get out, his effect is still broken and just because they may get rid of another broken card doesn't mean that they'll add back in another.--The FireFALL (talk • contribs) 03:30, January 11, 2012 (UTC)

Banning Brionac is unlikely to bring back Goyo Guardian. It just has too high ATK, and too good of an effect.

@The FireFALL: That comment was aimed at Huguenot.Pirate, not OZ. I don't even know off the top of my head which ideas were his. Ah, that one. One of the many with lots of banned cards being Limited. I don't bash. I just say my mind. My mind on that is that he needs to read the list I have so graciously linked to over and over again. Nobody can make good predictions unless they: If somebody can't realize that Graceful Charity is going to stay banned until the end of time, and that somebody can't realize why this is true, then that somebody is doomed to make bad predictions. End of story. Same for Metamorphosis. Sorry if you don't like me speaking my mind. As for me not having good people skills, I take great offense at that. I pride myself on my abilities to shut down stupid people. Written by Menace13 (talk • contribs) at 03:42, January 11, 2012 (UTC).
 * Know the meta
 * Know the problems in the meta
 * Know the previous problems in the meta that have been fixed
 * And accept that some cards are simply broken beyond repair.

@Menace13, Master of Oz IS Huguenot.Pirate it's just for some reason he's chosen to post under the alias of Master of Oz in this thread, hovering over Oz's name will reveal that he's Pirate and I stand by what I said about your people skills. Giving reasons why their predictions are bad is fine, fair enough. As is listing to the reason why cards are banned, in fact I'm all in favour of that but telling a user of any kind that their ideas suck and that you mean all the offence that comment brings is out of line, people should be free to make whatever predictions they like without having to suffer insults from another user, even if they are terrible ones.--The FireFALL (talk • contribs) 04:15, January 11, 2012 (UTC)

1st of all I am just getting back in to yugioh trying to get into the new game format and all I stopped playing around 2005-2006... 2nd.. I never played by meta before..3rd I don't understand meta... teach me and I will learn.. yell it at me and I will scream and pound you.. insult me while telling me and I will tie you up and torture you... so teach me meta style..okay... 4th I mostly ran mixed decks and I won a lot.. but with this new style "meta" I don't understand... jack about it.... SO PLZ TEACH ME>>>>> Master of OZ (talk • contribs) 04:32, January 11, 2012 (UTC)


 * Ignorance is no excuse. If you want to learn about meta, try doing something yourself and searching for it, be it on the wikia or something like Google. Secondly, I can tell by the way your word choice, be it insults or just explaining yourself, that your either:
 * A. Anywhere from nine to twelve years old, or
 * B. Your older than twelve, but have the "maturity" of a child that age.
 * Either way, the arguing is quite unnecessary, and so are the threats of "pounding" or "torture". If your going to threaten people over the internet, you need to seriously rethink your life.


 * No offense. UndiscoveredSong (talk • contribs) 05:03, January 11, 2012 (UTC)

ok i get it.... but some people here has to be more .... whats the word creative with some of the predictions like change of heart, shard of greed, marshmellon and etc.. i mean come on there are reason why some of the cards are on the list which is why everyone read the link menace gracefully provided twice and not put up something stupid. --69.181.60.66 (talk) 04:55, January 11, 2012 (UTC)

That was a characteristic talk that I was stating about the pounding and the torture.. in other words teach me nicely.. I take offense to any other way. Master of OZ (talk • contribs) 15:51, January 11, 2012 (UTC)


 * Maybe you should stop viewing everything as offensive. Just a suggestion.
 * Also, the best way to learn I found was play on the games, slowly learn what happens when, then use the wiki for more detailed information.101.162.51.126 (talk) 10:06, January 12, 2012 (UTC)


 * Agreed. Also, you kept telling people to "STFU" which is swearing and not particularly nice, and even if that's how you talk, it's not something people want to be told. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 13:47, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

I would play if there was good places to go that ran tournaments for yugioh around where I live. Plus I don't like reading articles.. it bores me more then anything else. Master of OZ (talk • contribs) 15:54, January 12, 2012 (UTC)


 * Yea, read bored me too, but I was forcing to read in order to understand how the game works. Don't take this as offense; if you do not read enough then how can you understand the game work as well as each mother's card lore? Meta is what making the game end faster than you original planning, like in less than 5 turns of the whole duel, usually. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  16:06, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

This might sound odd but isn't Lavalval Chain a bit overpowerd? It works as a HUGE searcher and will be deadly with lightsworns..imagine sending a lightsworn to the grave and/or placing judgment dragon on the top of the deck to be drawn.so i think this should be limited as it searchs any unsearchable monster LaserGhost (talk • contribs) 17:36, January 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * It is but it's not out in the TCG yet and I they'd have to Ban it to hurt it. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 17:38, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

not powerful as banned.its second effect will be (in most cases)skipping a draw phase but the first is kinda good.here's a combo to get DAD in the very first turn (unlikley that it'll happen) play double summon and summon 2 armageddon knights and dump 2 darks and overlay them for lavalval chain and use the second eff to get DAD on top of deck then use any draw card to draw it and summon (you'll have 2 dark monsters dumped with AK and the detached AK is dark) LaserGhost (talk • contribs) 17:55, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

Double Summon sucks. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 17:56, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

If u hate double summon that much u can use any card that can get another AK on the field since his effect triggers upon ANY summon LaserGhost (talk • contribs) 18:03, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

"Double Summon" is okay, but I think "Brain Research Lab" is better. While it only works on Psychic Type monsters, unlike "Double Summon" the effect can be used once every one of your turns. Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 18:07, January 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * These are totally different cards. Double Summon is bad because it's a -1 - in Gadgets it has it's uses, but otherwise it's not worth using. Brain Research Lab isn't bad but at the same time it isn't good because it doesn't put in much work. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 18:52, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

No double summon is not a -1 its a 0 because u lose double summon and u get the monster so no loss LaserGhost (talk • contribs) 18:57, January 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * You already had the monster. It's a -1 because you lose one card and gain no cards. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 18:58, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

To reiterate BF2's statement, think about it this way: You have two cards in hand, the monster and the double summon. You play Double Summon. -1 hand. You summon the monster. -1 hand, +1 field. The net total is -2 hand, +1 field, causing a net total of -1 card. The action of summoning doesn't effect card advantage, but playing the spell does. This is why Double Summon is generally considered an inferior card, especially when Ultimate Offering is available. 129.1.192.44 (talk) 19:04, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

Ok my hole point is that lavalval chain can be broken in certain decks like the DAD based decks LaserGhost (talk • contribs) 19:13, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

I'll agree Lavalval Chain does come in very handy in some decks, as being able to search out any monster and place it on top of your deck is indeed powerful but it's no more broken than Leviair the Sea Dragon and neither would be affected unless they were banned altogether, as people usually only run one. Plus there's not even any word as to when it will actually see a release outside of the OCG making it pretty much a certainty that it won't get hit at all.--The FireFALL (talk • contribs) 19:35, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

So i think we all agree about rabbit being limited

I want to take a stab at this
Here are my predictions + reasons:

Banned: Brionac, Dragon of the Ice Barrier -The loop Infernities have that brings out Trishula over and over needs this card to pull it off. This card is also essential in a Future Fusion OTK that brings out Shooting Quasar and swings directly twice for game. But I'll address that....

Future Fusion -This may seem controverial, but this card needs to go. A bunch of people with too much time on their hands always seem to find a way FTK/OTK with this card. Plus, I've seen Chaos Dragon deck on DN win the turn they draw this way too many times.

Limited: Rescue Rabbit -Obvious reasons, and most people seem to agree.

Mind Crush -I know a lot of you probably won't agree, and it probably won't go back to 1. But, the way I see it, they were crazy to bring this to 2. It wrecks so much if you draw it with Dustshoot. Plus, Dark Worlds can just say whatever they want with no intention of getting it right just to discard. Though, I'd be okay with them just banning Dustshoot instead.

Dragged Down into the Grave -Makes Dark World decks that much more ridiculous. Plus, lets you see your opponent's hand to combo with Mind Crush.

Inzektor Dragonfly -This card is OP. It's that simple. Her with Hornet is so broken it's not even funny. But what I see being more likely is Dragonfly to 2, Hornet to 2. Or not hitting them at all because they are still new.

Wind-Up Carrier Zenmaity -Hunter loop. Hunter loop is impossible if Zenmaity is at 1. And Hunter on its own isn't that good.

Maxx "C" -Just an all-around messed up card. Forces your opponent to leave weak monsters on the field. Or let's you draw a huge chunk of your deck for just one card. Not just a +1, but a +Lots.

Semi-Limited: Grapha, Dragon Lord of Dark World -Not even gonna lie, this one is all personal opinion. But, wouldn't really be necessary anyways if other DW stuff gets hit.

Marshmallon and/or Swords of Revealing Light -Konami seems to be helping stall/burn decks little by little with each ban list, and I feel this trend will continue.

One Day of Peace -The best thing to happen to Exodia decks in ages. Not very likely, butI want to see this card restricted in some way. The usual strategy for beating an Exoia deck is "when it's finally my turn, I summon a lot of monsters and murder their Life Points". One Day of Peace says no to that.

Unlimited: Ojama Trio -Konami, as mentioned above, seems to have a thing for stall/burn decks, so this might happen.

Anyways, there's my useless predictions. --  Summoned Skull 2: Electric Boogaloo   22:14, January 13, 2012 (UTC)


 * I doubt rabbit will be at one. It's not even that great. Laggia is only a mini solemn and 2400 beatstick and if you want to hurt Rabbit decks you need to hurt the XYZ's. It'd be like limiting Six Samurai non-tuners but keeping Shi En unlimited.
 * Maxx "C" isn't broken enough to warrant a limit to be honest. All it really does is stop big pushes or stop massive loops, it helps a lot for drawing into Effect Veiler's or Gorz the Emissary of Darkness to stop OTK's too. They can do what they please but have to keep in mind you're plusing off every single special summon, with this in mind most people end up stopping after 1 summon so it's only a 1 for 1.
 * I wouldn't bet on Grapha being banned, Dark Worlds aren't topping much and the main problem of the deck is Snoww. Don't get me wrong, Grapha is a good card, but Snoww turns it into a much better card making it a 6/40 chance to draw a 2700 atk floater, and we all know how good Dark World draw power is.
 * I'd also like to mention Trishula, Dragon of the Ice Barrier usually works a lot more than beating an exodia deck down through a half deck of negate attack spells/traps/monsters. There isn't much they can do when their only win condition has a piece banished. And I agree with you, One Day of Peace should be at least semi-limited but I think Konami wants people to use different strategy's to win instead of the "Lower opponents LP to 0" one.
 * 202.169.221.112 (talk) 13:56, January 14, 2012 (UTC)


 * I don't see the point of hitting Laggia when Dino Rabbit is the only deck that consistently drops it (well, besides the occasional good Jurrac Deck). I agree that Laggia should go to 1 eventually, but for now, Rabbit needs to go to one. It can be abused in other decks. Gem Knights can exploit the hell out of it, and Gem Knights are Meta in the OCG right now. Verz decks, which will be hitting Japan soon, can exploit it too. Besides Heliotrope, they can throw in monsters like Archfiend Soldier or Vorse Raider. I've even seen a deck that used Rabbit as a way to quickly bring out Archlord Zerato of all things. Not to mention that this card creates absurd consistency by taking 2 cards out of your deck. It's only a matter of time before someone figures out something insane you can do with it. I'm surprised that  Foolish Burial Glow Up Bulb-> Play Rabbit get two monsters-> Mill for Glow Up-> Synch for Trishula hasn't caught on yet.


 * Maxx "C" might be a long shot, but I see it going at least to 2. It just does too much for one card.


 * lol, I said Grapha would go to 2, not be banned. But, you're probably right, they should just hit Snoww.


 * I hate to break it to you, but the FASTEST Exodia decks (as in, the ones that FTK) run no stall cards (unless you count ODoP). Also, dropping Trish doesn't mean you'll hit one of the pieces. If you even get a turn for some reason, they should have 6 cards in hand and can only have 4 pieces maximum. But it's more like they'll have 2-3 pieces. On a side note, my absolute favorite way I've ever beaten an Exodia deck is with Deck Devastation Virus. --  Summoned Skull 2: Electric Boogaloo   18:38, January 14, 2012 (UTC)


 * Verz Rabbit won't be a problem until a new level 4 normal verz comes out. There's currently only 1 normal they can actually use (for the decent cards that is), and they'd need more verz's in the deck to use it effectively. Are Gem-Knight decks really meta OCG? They don't seem that great. Their strongest monster has 2800 attack and they have very few effects to destroy monsters that're already on the field. Also, I love how the Evol archetype isn't used at all, even to get out the card that was made for them. I guess they tried too hard to make it not as broken and then thought "too much hassle" then made inzecters.
 * Yeah I meant Grapha semi-limited, I mustn't have read that part over.
 * And yeah, the fastest Exodia decks can FTK/OTK but with them it's either you OTK them yourself or you've probably already lost. 202.169.221.112 (talk) 02:14, January 15, 2012 (UTC)


 * You actually don't need very many Verz Monsters in the main deck. I really only use Verz Mandrago, Verz Castor, Verz Heliolope, and Verz Salamandra. The rest of the monster lineup is Rabbit, Vorse Raider or Archfiend Soldier and maybe a Dark Grepher. And I run a low-ish monster count (16-18) and just search with Duality, Creeping Darkness, or Lavalval Chain. It's pretty good I guess. No telling how effective it will be in the format we actually get the cards.
 * Gem-Knights were meta at a point in the OCG, don't know if they still are. The OCG has a lot of great support for Gems we don't have yet. Plus Gem-Knight Fusion is kinda broke. --  Summoned Skull 2: Electric Boogaloo   04:18, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

One more thing: was the stuff you didn't bring up stuff you agreed with me on? --  Summoned Skull 2: Electric Boogaloo   04:19, January 15, 2012 (UTC)


 * Yep, I tend to not bring up things I agree with because there's nothing really to discuss about it.
 * Also, a pure Laggia Rabbit deck doesn't really have any cards that don't support getting Laggia out successfully and keeping it there. A Verz Rabbit deck would need other Verz cards that don't really support getting out the summon, only the effects, which kind of blurs the overall aim.202.169.221.112 (talk) 10:37, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * If any Verz card is hit it would be Ophion. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 13:45, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

It would be great if we get "Dark Strike Fighter" back - at least on one. Konami could even give him an errata, such as: Once per turn ... or If you activate this effect, this card can not attack this turn. (like its anime effect). He also would be a good support for the newly released Dark Flattop. TheGallisMan (talk • contribs) 15:14, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

please tell me how does dark strike fighter inflict 4000 damage cuz if he tributed himself he inflicts only 1400 damage and the only way to inflict 4000 damage is to have the total tributed monsters levels =20 --LaserGhost (talk • contribs) 16:26, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

Attack directly then tribute himself. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 16:28, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * "Dark Strike Fighter" I think is pretty broken, and should stay banned. Shardsilver (talk • contribs) 16:32, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

that's how? oh thanks BF2 i also think that they should be semi limiting burial from different dimension as we need to restore banished cards--LaserGhost (talk • contribs) 17:49, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

Mezuki and Plaguespreader Zombie. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 17:50, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

@ LaserGhost: you can use Dimensional Alchemist or Trance Archfiend for that TheGallisMan (talk • contribs) 18:04, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

guys how can i know the results of tournaments?--LaserGhost (talk • contribs) 18:05, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

Gotta love how everyone is talking about Magician of Faith coming back. Clearly it won't unless Dark Hole, Reborn, and Heavy are banned. Those are the main targets to get with it, it's easily searchable with Sangan, and for the cost of a normal summon, considering yugioh these days have Special Summoning like crazy, 1 loss of a normal summon isn't devastating. BLS, I haven't seen it sucessfully summoned in a while against myself, so I'd say it stays at 1. (To many cards to negate it.) Royal Oppresion isn't coming back due to the game being about Special Summons. Ultimate Offering should be at 1 again, due to Gadget XYZ. Some guy said graceful charity at 1, hell no. It's a card that makes you get 3 and lose 3. You can set up combos from the graveyard with it, such as sending for example, Grow-Up Bulb or Plaguespreader and still maintaining hand advantage. Brio can go for all I care, Goyo isn't coming back due to it being a Mind Control monster that let's you have easy access to XYZ and more synchro summmoning, plus it's attack points are to high. Adamtheamazing64 (talk • contribs) 18:30, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

http://www.konami.com/yugioh/blog/ BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 22:21, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

So we all agree that everyone here wants to ban Brionac, dragon of the ice boundary cause after reading all the posts thats the top card on everyones list to get rid of. --69.181.60.66 (talk) 23:48, January 15, 2012 (UTC)


 * Pretty much, yeah. I was gonna suggest it be Trishula getting banned instead. But I noticed Trish is only a huge problem when Brionac is there bouncing it back so you can reuse it. --  Summoned Skull 2: Electric Boogaloo   00:23, January 16, 2012 (UTC)


 * For the one with "Dark Strike Fighter", they should let his Anime effect become real life... It was balance enough! But no, they just scrap whole balance crap and make him a lively cannon of doom that loaded up with shit. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:42, January 16, 2012 (UTC)


 * I agree Fred. I thought they usually made effects less broken in real life. Someone messed up in this case. -- Summoned Skull 2: Electric Boogaloo  00:51, January 16, 2012 (UTC)


 * Those idiots... just drink beer and smoke tobacco to make it insanity. If it was me, I would just let the Anime effect pasted there and making Brionac less broken by using it effect once per turn, instead of infinite toss away the hand. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t


 * A lot of duelists I know feel that Brionac should only be once per turn. And I sorta agree. It would solve so many problems. No Future Fusion OTK, No Infernity loop. But, I really think they'll permaban it instead. -- Summoned Skull 2: Electric Boogaloo  01:01, January 16, 2012 (UTC)

yeah, Brionac banned and Dark Strike Fighter (with Anime effect) limited. how awesome would that be !?! by the way, i hope Rai-Oh goes semi-limited and Maxx "C" goes limited. .TheGallisMan (talk • contribs) 08:28, January 16, 2012 (UTC)


 * I forgot about Rai-Oh! In my orignal list I had made I had him going to 1. But 2 should be fair. -- Summoned Skull 2: Electric Boogaloo  22:03, January 16, 2012 (UTC)

My predictions
I would keep an identical list to the current one, only I would ban Brionac. I would also throw in Inzektor Hornet and Inzektor Dragonfly to the limited list as these cards are the keys to some very broken and retarded loops over at DN. I've yet to duel them IRL, but I'm through with Inzektors already. It'd be great if they limited Wind-Up Carrier Zenmaity as this would stop the Wind-Up loop.

As for Semi-limiting I would Semi Rescue Rabbit and Master Hyperion, maybe REDMD as well, but I'm not sure RedOjama (talk • contribs) 01:16, January 19, 2012 (UTC)


 * Those are all legit, except Hyperion doesn't need to be restricted. Agents aren't doin' much right now. I'd put Krystia to 1 if anything. -- Summoned Skull 2: Electric Boogaloo  03:44, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

After playing two versions of the Inzektors at the Sneakpeak last saturday I've come to the conclusion that no matter what Hornet needs to either go to one or be banned outright. The version with the Dragonfly Hornet engine is broken beyond all belief but the version without Hornet while still a very tough deck was a lot fairer and actually made for a very fun duel. The duel with the Hornet engine though had my opponent destroy my field and keep it that way. Two destructions guaranteed each turn with one card is broken, throw in that if neither dragonfly or centipede go, which is what happened to me, and suddenly the Inzektors have 4 destructions in a turn. Anyway as I said I faced two versions and one didn't have the engine and that to me was the better and more fun deck to play against. Same goes for Wind-Ups with the Hunter loop, which needs to see Hunter be banned not Zen-Maighty as without Hunter the Wind-Ups just become a very heavy defensive deck.--The FireFALL (talk • contribs) 11:01, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

Kristya should be hit even though Agents aren't doing as well. Inzektors are a lot easier to deal with Game 2 but they're still definitely deserving of a hit - Hornet Limited, Dragonfly Semi-Limited would be fair. As for Wind-Ups, Limiting Zenmaighty would do the trick, although Banning Hunter and Semi-Limiting or Limiting Rat would also work, although be less fair as Hunter itself isn't overpowered - it's really all because of Zenmaighty and Rat. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 13:53, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

The reason I say ban Hunter over Zen-Maity is because my friend duels with Wind-Ups and for the past three days me and him have been doing test duels with different decks versus the loop and also what happens to the deck if you remove either Hunter or Zen-Maity, the result we've found is that if Hunter is not in the deck it's still a formidable deck but instead of it burning your hand instead it makes a pretty good defensive line of Zen-Maitys. Without Zen-Maity on the other hand the deck doesn't fair so well and kind of loses most of it's competitive edge and let's be honest here what we want to do is stop the looping hand loss, not make Wind-Ups a dead archtype in competitive play and the loop can be stopped outright without Hunter, which is why he has to go.--The FireFALL (talk • contribs) 18:24, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

You don't have to Ban either one - just Limit Zenmaighty as that kind of searching power is just too much (especially with three Rats - the ability to make three Zenmaighty and something else is just too much. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 18:51, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

Again aside from crippling the Wind-Ups ability to properly swarm, limiting Zen-Maity to one won't work. As all they'll do is XYZ into Daigusto Emeral, readd Zen-Maity to deck and start all over again. Which is very doable we found when testing the loop. There are also other ways to do the loop even without Zen-Maity which would also make the limit on him do just about nothing. So really banning Hunter is the only logical option as then all the loop is is spamming the field with defense monsters.--The FireFALL (talk • contribs) 19:12, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * They don't get Emeral as easily as they do Zenmaighty and the loop can't be done more than once in a turn without multiple Zenmaighty. A single discard is pretty good but not game-winning like forcing them to discard three cards. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 19:14, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

I don't see why everyone's saying limit Hornet. Think of it like Frognarchs, they only use one frog at once for a reason. Once they get it into the grave they're good from there unless it gets banished.

A limited Hornet wouldn't make a difference, if it got hit it'd need to be banned. A limited Dragonfly on the other hand would break the combo.

Also, I like the idea of a banned hunter. Because of that card alone the entire archetype strategy changed from swarm to first turn hand destruction.202.169.221.112 (talk) 02:27, January 20, 2012 (UTC)


 * Hornet to one would make a difference, but without outright killing the deck. Zenmaighty should definitely go to one. Banning Hunter would be stupid; he's terrible on his own. It would be like if they decided to hit Mystic Shine Ball to hurt Agents. -- Summoned Skull 2: Electric Boogaloo  19:24, January 20, 2012 (UTC)

Limiting MSB actually would be pretty harmful but is rather unfair as it's not the main reason that they're broken. Anyhow, Hornet should be Banned. Even at one, you've got Armageddon Knights, Summoner Monk, Foolish, even Dark Grepher. It's broken as hell. BF2 Talk  Deck Guides 19:27, January 20, 2012 (UTC)


 * I wasn't saying they should hit MSB, I was equating banning Hunter with hitting MSB; it would be outrageous. And I agree Hornet is broken, but banning it means the deck is no longer competitive. Hornet to 1 and Dragonfly to 2 seems more reasonable. -- Summoned Skull 2: Electric Boogaloo  19:32, January 20, 2012 (UTC)