Forum:Previous Official Rulings Conflict

I will be full responsible for bring this one up; as of few users who disagreed with UDE's former rulings being "still stand" though they are no longer official in Konami's eye.

I have thinking deeply since last night from that argument I had with "Helios Blaze", the stubborn user who think Konami is anything and is a god of Yu-Gi-Oh! games. This idea coming up that maybe have been discovered beforehand.

Why not we divide those previous official rulings into two separate groups, one that still standing and other that no longer true ever though they were written by UDE? That would ceasing the whole stupidity behind us and making the game running easier?

As for explain: Like "Van'Dalgyon the Dark Dragon Lord's" Previous Official Rulings about "Solemn Judgment" cannot negate his Special Summon (of course, as we all know; due to the Special Summon being triggering by his Effect) should be placing in "Still Standing" Semi-Official Rulings while rest of other whatever remains can put in either Still Standing Rulings or Unofficial Rulings.

Thank you for reading and please post your opinion here if you wish to add more details or at least against that. I am not argue with anyone, just wish to improving this site more so all those stupidity and stubborn users can ceasing ranting about Konami this and Konami that. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:13, January 26, 2012 (UTC)