Forum:Archetype Classification

Ok, I've gone around many of the Archetype pages and noticed that several of them consist of only a small group of monsters with similarities between them, such as the Ishtar Fairy group, the DNA family, and the various LV groups out there. These cards are classified as Archetypes, but have little in common other than a name or similar appearance/relation to each other. They have no external support designed for them and make it difficult for decks to be built around them.

I think we should classify card groups that are like this (small numbers, no outside support, etc.) should be classified differently from Archetypes; I believe simply calling them a "Family" of cards works better as a classification.

What do you all think? --火星 'Wages'War 18:15, February 20, 2011 (UTC)