User talk:Cheesedude

Welcome to my talk page. Feel free to leave any messages below. However, do not ask me for help with your Deck, I am a very casual player and probably won't be able to help you. If you leave me a message, I will put your talk page on my watchlist. You may respond on my talk page or your talk page. I will check both.

Reginald Kastle's Overhundred Numbers

 * Isn't it more better to keep the Number 10X cards in his decklist because it symbolized the power of his comrades he inherited as he already has their Chaos Forms? Dark Soul Taker (talk • contribs) 01:37, September 12, 2016 (UTC)


 * He never played them and if he had them in his Extra Deck, it would exceed the ED limit (which we don't know exists in the anime, but regardless). In the end, he never played them. He obviously owned them, but that's not the same thing. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:42, September 12, 2016 (UTC)


 * Since he already owned the cards wouldn't it be better if we made a separate Decklist with "Owned Cards" as cards he owned? Dark Soul Taker (talk • contribs) 22:58, September 12, 2016 (UTC)


 * In most cases, yes. But that article covers it in the Number Hunting secton. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:00, September 12, 2016 (UTC)


 * There is a section of the Owned Cards in Dennis Macfield and Sylvio Sawatari's which they didn't even used in duels and weren't their own cards.. but still added in a deck list as owned cards, so I suggest making a similar Owned Cards Decklist with a note describing they weren't used but still in his possession as he already possesses the CNumber version of each one. Dark Soul Taker (talk • contribs) 02:05, September 13, 2016 (UTC)


 * I am saying that we usually would do that, but we will not in this case because its already detailed in the Number Hunting section. That section specifies that he did indeed own all of those cards. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 09:17, September 13, 2016 (UTC)


 * Nothing clearly classifies that Astral absorbed the Over Hundred ones because they aren't parts of his memory, in other words they are still in his possession even after losing but each of the numbers lower than 100 aren't to be added in the section i'm trying to add. Dark Soul Taker (talk • contribs) 19:48, September 13, 2016 (UTC)


 * Astral didn't absorb them, no. But we have no idea what happened to them at all, so we can't say he still owns them afterwards. I don't think there's any reason to assume he doesn't have them, but there's not much reason to assume he does, either. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 20:10, September 13, 2016 (UTC)


 * What you're implying is the same as Quattro's deck after losing to him. What has happened to Quattro's deck after he died aside from the Number cards? In other words, where were the Gimmick Puppet cards.. absolutely we don't know. Same with these cards, we dunno what happened to them and Astral can't even absorb them, so they must be added to an Owned Cards section in his decks' page as we he was the last one who held them. Dark Soul Taker (talk • contribs) 20:31, September 13, 2016 (UTC)


 * The Number Hunting section specifies that Nasch lost the base Numbers to Astral. The show says nothing about the Over-Hundreds, so therefore we don't either. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 20:39, September 13, 2016 (UTC)


 * Even if the Number Hunting Section says that, adding the cards with a note saying that "They weren't absorbed by Astral and their last possession is unknown" beside them is a better choice in my point of view. Dark Soul Taker (talk • contribs) 20:53, September 13, 2016 (UTC)


 * please reply to me :) Dark Soul Taker (talk • contribs) 20:19, September 14, 2016 (UTC)


 * Such a note can be added to that line, sure. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:40, September 15, 2016 (UTC)


 * If I wanna search his decks, these cards must be added to the Decks' page so as to know he has them, otherwise i won't know .. (His page has very large amounts of information). Dark Soul Taker (talk • contribs) 00:47, September 17, 2016 (UTC)


 * But they aren't his Deck. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:50, September 17, 2016 (UTC)


 * They aren't "originally his deck", they are in his possession even after he died. He still owns them till the final minute, adding them in the deck's page won't mislead its viewer. Dark Soul Taker (talk • contribs) 13:56, September 17, 2016 (UTC)


 * They are not confirmed to be in this Deck. He had no need to run any of them, his entire strategy was using Spells/Traps to bring out the Number C forms while bypassing the originals. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:50, September 17, 2016 (UTC)


 * You said it yourself before, his Extra Deck will exceed the limit of 15. What i'm talking about isn't about strategy, it's the matter that during episode 142 Don Thousand's possession of all numbers were transformed to Nasch (being included are the Over Hundred Ones), when Astral absorbed the numbers, the Over Hundred ones weren't among them. Therefore, after Nasch had them and died, their location remains unknown (Same case when Quattro died, his deck aside from the numbers was in an unknown location or possession). To sum it up, the last location the Over Hundred Numbers was with Nasch, so a section in his decks must be added as Owned Cards or Inherited Cards or whatever. Dark Soul Taker (talk • contribs) 00:59, September 18, 2016 (UTC)

Here's the logical points from this discussion, summed up, as far as I can tell.
 * Character has X cards. => They should be in his Deck section.
 * We don't know that they're actually his Deck. => They should not in the Deck section.
 * He still owns the cards. => They should still be mentioned.
 * They are mentioned a more appropriate section; Number Hunting => No need to mention them in the Deck section.
 * Counterargument

Dark Soul Taker, can you provide a counterargument for Cheesedude pointing out that the "Number Hunting" section is more appropriate than the Deck section? -- Deltaneos (talk) 02:16, September 18, 2016 (UTC)


 * People always view the decks page more than pages with huge amount of information, thus, pointing out their location with a Note Number beside each of their names in the decks page is more helpful, direct, and would never be misleading. Dark Soul Taker (talk • contribs) 11:02, September 18, 2016 (UTC)


 * so what's the counter argument? Dark Soul Taker (talk • contribs) 00:14, September 21, 2016 (UTC)


 * What evidence do you have that points to the Decks pages being viewed more often? It would be misleading, though. The cards were never shown to be in his Deck, period. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 09:19, September 21, 2016 (UTC)

Evidences include : When consturcting a deck based on his plays, I would access the deck page. If looking for a specific card to see if he possesses it or not, I'd view it. To view a specific game deck as the Duel Terminal decks. To view Konami's constructed deck i'll view it. If viewing a specific duel and its episode.

People won't view the normal page alot because: The page contains information that rather describes what happened in the episode. May contain spoils for people who didn't view the anime yet. Contains alot of sections where viewing a specific card would be hard. People would tend to watch episodes rather than reading it in that page.

To sum this up, that's an edit war that always an admin wins :) I know that you admins would never respond to my request anyways because you do what you want and what YOU only see improves the wikia. The same idea was already done in Sylvio Sawatari's and Dennis Macfield's pages but you refuse to do it here. Dark Soul Taker (talk • contribs) 15:03, September 23, 2016 (UTC)


 * That is not evidence - that is simply what you yourself do. Of course you would view the Deck page specifically to see his Deck. That doesn't mean everyone views the deck pages more in general.
 * If you truly believe that,you are free to. But I already explained why the same metric used on those two pages does not apply to Nasch. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 20:29, September 23, 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm in favor of not displaying them there. They were not used by Shark and they weren't needed by Shark to perform his combos.
 * We also don't display "Number 5: Doom Chimera Dragon" on Vector's page, for instance.
 * In any case, it's one more vote on not displaying the Number 10X on Shark's decklists. Becasita Pendulum (talk • contribs) 21:39, September 23, 2016 (UTC)


 * @Cheesedude what I myself do is the same as what many people do, the purpose of accessing the pages. The decks' page is more needed then the others so its more accurate. I don't know if you can -as an admin- view such statistics or not, but its basic psychological thinking.
 * @Becasita Firstly, i'm speaking about their location right now rather than their unfitting to his combos, Secondly, Number 5: Doom Chimera Dragon's location is already known which is with Astral, Finally, Astral already has a Number section describing where he got them and that he owns them and that's why i'm saying that a similar section describing the location of the Over Hundred Number is better provided at his decks' page as Owned Cards. Dark Soul Taker (talk • contribs) 02:44, September 24, 2016 (UTC)


 * This proves my point about the admins :) Dark Soul Taker (talk • contribs) 20:02, October 1, 2016 (UTC)


 * Well, that's just unnecessary (and no, a smiley face doesn't make it any better). Couldn't this all just be solved by putting a link to the Number Hunting section on the Decks page? Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 00:12, October 2, 2016 (UTC)

TCG card legality split?
Just wandering if this is a thing that would be possible with how the pages work, but can cards that have that enjoyable state of being legal in the US, but not legal in the rest of the TCG, have their status' split to reflect as such?

As it stands, it seems rather mis-informing to say it's legal because of it's release in the US, but the majority of TCG territories can't us it, but also saying it's illegal because of the reverse.

PhotonLegion95 (talk • contribs) 10:18, September 12, 2016 (UTC)

Chazz's mannierism
I do not know why you deleted my information. Chazz speaks in chuncks (that means that he stops after every single word givin emphasis to all of them), At least in the Spanish version. Troly (talk • contribs) 08:25, September 14, 2016 (UTC)


 * Chunks? As in sentence fragments? I reverted it because I had no idea what you meant by that. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 15:03, September 14, 2016 (UTC)


 * Is like he speaks. pause. speaks again. pause. You know what I mean?--Troly (talk • contribs) 19:06, September 15, 2016 (UTC)

Egyptian God Cards in Yu-Gi-Oh! Duel Monsters 4: Battle of the Great Duelist commercial
Hi. It has been long time since I stopped editing in Wikia. I came back just for one thing: I was watching a video about the Yu-Gi-Oh! commercials about packs and games during Duel Monsters era, and I found a thing that I think it's very important about the Egyptian Gods. The commercial video of Yu-Gi-Oh! Duel Monsters 4: Battle of the Great Duelist shows the three God cards with some differences from the cards that were released. The Winged Dragon of Ra card is shown with a black box instead of it's artwork; Slifer the Sky Dragon card is shown with a different background and Obelisk the Tormentor is shown with a different pose and artwork. Here is the pic I took from that video. [IMG]http://i64.tinypic.com/212scnl.jpg[/IMG]

Video link: https://youtu.be/GPILWOK7PQ0?t=2m33s

I think they should be added to their God cards' artworks page. What do you think? --Siguiendo la luna no llegare lejos, tan lejos como se pueda llegar ♫ 04:53, September 16, 2016 (UTC)


 * I don't see a problem with doing that. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:47, December 24, 2016 (UTC)

Lancers
They're at it again. *Sigh...* obligatory lock needed? Sorry to bother you with this again. Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 03:24, September 17, 2016 (UTC)

What's the problem with putting them in the notes column? --Jackpo21 (talk • contribs) 23:54, September 19, 2016 (UTC)


 * Consensus was to not list them. Why would listing them in another location suddenly be acceptable? Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:57, September 19, 2016 (UTC)


 * But why can't they be listed? --Jackpo21 (talk • contribs) 00:34, September 20, 2016 (UTC)


 * Because everyone involved in the conversation who is not you agrees that there is no reason to list them. That's a consensus. You have attempted to convince myself and other uses that the summoning methods should be listed, but have no swayed anyone's opinion with your arguments. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 09:26, September 20, 2016 (UTC)


 * The only reason no one's agreeing with me is because your all sick of this and want it to end already. If it weren't for dragonemperor, you probably wouldn't have even cared about the summoning methods being added. Your just doing what's easier for you instead of trying to work out a compromise to make both sides happy, otherwise this would have ended long ago. --Jackpo21 (talk • contribs) 16:20, September 21, 2016 (UTC)


 * You're correct in that I would like to end this already. The fact is though, Dragonemperor brought up a concern and I happen to agree with that concern. Had he not, would I have noticed on my own? Not sure, but quite possibly no.
 * Sometimes both sides simply can't be happy. I have explained the way this works - you have yet to raise a reason for the addition of the summoning methods that convinces other users (myself included, but not limited to myself by any means. My own decision can be overturned by the community). Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:40, September 21, 2016 (UTC)

Marketing Team
Hello, My name is Dhiab Aldhaheri from Suffolk University, my Marketing team and I are working on a group project this semester about Wikia, Fandom and this project is very important to us and we have some questions we would like to have some answers for. Please contact me on dhiabmd96@gmail.com if you are able to do this interview with us

Thank you

Dhiabbmd123 (talk • contribs) 18:41, September 20, 2016 (UTC)

WSJ wiki
Are you free to do some editing on the Weekly Shonen Jump Wiki? http://weekly-shonen-jump.wikia.com/wiki/Weekly_Shonen_Jump_Wiki 17:23, September 24, 2016 (UTC)


 * I am not really familiar with any anime/manga aside from the various YGO series and I'm less familiar with the manga than I am with the anime. If there's something specific that is YGO-related that needs fixing/expansion, I may be able to give it a try. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 17:30, September 24, 2016 (UTC)

Allen
About the Allen page... They use the same archetype dude. Anna's last name on the Japanese TV show was KOZUKI. Allen uses the RAILWAY Series. So it's pretty safe to assume that his last name would also be KABOOM. He wears FREAKING ROLLER SKATES!!! Come on dude! Etriantactician (talk • contribs) 21:08, September 28, 2016 (UTC)


 * It was also thought to be fairly safe to assume that Starve Venom Fusion Dragon had 2500 ATK and was Level 7. This is why we don't assume. Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 22:55, September 28, 2016 (UTC)


 * Frankly, this is kind of an unprecedented thing (a character with the same last name appearing in another series, I mean). And frankly, I don't trust the dub not to screw it up. I'm not saying they will for sure, but I don't have enough faith in them to assume they'll be consistent between the two series.
 * Also, what Sanokal said. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:07, September 29, 2016 (UTC)

High Quality Manga Card Pictures
Hello, I saw the image you posted for Air Barrier and I became impressed at how large this image size was. I saw that you were the user who posted that image on Janurary of 2015. May I ask how you managed to obtain such a large image size? Usual manga card pictures are about 4 to 5 times smaller, and that's the optimistic estimate. Thank you for reading this message! Ur-Procyon (talk • contribs) 02:01, October 11, 2016 (UTC)


 * I just cropped the art from the best quality scan I could find and that's how large it ended up being. I use IrfanView to crop, if that makes a difference. I'm honestly not too sure how image size is determined after cropping. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 02:36, October 11, 2016 (UTC)


 * I see, thank you! One more thing: do you remember the quality scan you used to get that picture? I'm understanding that it was from a website. I've tried to find such, but they all are mostly equally small in terms of size. Ur-Procyon (talk • contribs) 12:22, October 11, 2016 (UTC)


 * Most of my Japanese GX scans were from Janime, which no longer exists. There is also a possibility I took and cropped the art from the the existing card image, which was not uploaded by me. I can't exactly recall, its been quite a while and I didn't always take the card art images from the same source because oftentimes one source would have a better scan for chapter x and another would have the best one for chapter y. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:42, October 11, 2016 (UTC)


 * Alright, I think I'll try out IrfanView out. Thank you! Ur-Procyon (talk • contribs) 19:47, October 11, 2016 (UTC)

Navigation nonGame question
In between many card galleries for anime exclusive cards for ARC-V, there are cases where WinterNightmare and Elvin Kara put nonGame (with a capital 'G') in navigation headers, however others such as yourself, IgorThunderMaster write nongame with a lowercase 'g'. Which should be the consistent name?Cardsknower (talk • contribs) 18:34, November 14, 2016 (UTC)


 * I prefer lowercase, but it doesn't matter either way since they both function the same way. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:37, November 14, 2016 (UTC)


 * Okay, did you once wanted the 'g's' in all nongame pages to be lowercase for consistency reasons as well as for past nongame cards? I'm not planning to do this at all. Just want to knowCardsknower (talk • contribs) 19:09, November 14, 2016 (UTC)


 * I tend to switch one uppercase to lowercase if I'm editing the page for another reason, so once again, it doesn't matter. Its only my own OCD tendencies that cause me to switch it, but I wouldn't go out of my way. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:29, November 14, 2016 (UTC)

Egyptian Gods
But we don't see the Egyptian Gods get sealed with the 7 millennium items..
 * What exactly are you referring to? Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 02:28, November 19, 2016 (UTC)

Numbers
Hey there. If it's not too much trouble, I'd like to have your input in this subject. Snorlax is suggesting we rename every manga Numbers exactly the way the name is shown in the pic we have for them, including even The Seven's Sins' hyphen instead of colon and Giga-Brilliant's lack of colon. Do you think that's necessary at all? LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 22:00, November 28, 2016 (UTC)

Reply and saw Becasita's message
I saw Becasita's message about two hours ago and I decided that there is pretty much nothing else in galleries I can do is add/remove/replace galleries and images. For that reason for that message, I wanted to remove the redirects on the card gallery pages since I initially believed that wasn't pointless and the fact that redirects are something that should be avoided, but with these recent messages, that's not the case anymore. While this will be a long shot, galleries I haven't edited yet will probably be listed down in one of my sandboxes until newer images are released for those galleries, but it will be well worth it in the end since those would be things I can edit without a problem.Cardsknower (talk • contribs) 17:06, December 1, 2016 (UTC)

Categories
Well, I moved Xyz Summons with card effect to Performs an Xyz Summon after noticing that SnorlaxMonster was changing all instances of the former to the latter on card pages. From what SnorlaxMonster appears to be doing, Performs an Xyz Summon is meant for cards that Xyz Summon a monster immediately after the resolution of an effect, while Treats Special Summon as Xyz Summon is for cards with the (This Special Summon is treated as an Xyz Summon.) text. Whether you think such a distinction should be made, on the other hand, is something you'll likely have to ask SnorlaxMonster about. I just saw what he was doing and helped him out, essentially, since he was the admin. (Lucafriz (talk • contribs) 12:30, December 6, 2016 (UTC))

Anime card pages
No problem. It has been a while since I left this and many things have been changed. Please answer me about this. --Dark-Shimy (talk • contribs) 22:33, December 23, 2016 (UTC)

Edit War (feel free to ignore if you're on holiday)
Sorry to bother you, Cheese...actually, I HATE to bother you at this time, this is the last thing that you need to deal with in the festive season, but I'm having difficulties with DragonEmeperor regarding the Zarc page. I accidentally added some bits regarding the dragon form, and Drags proceeded to completely rewrite the section, but even after I removed the parts from the paragraph that I'd written, he continued to undo the edits, and I'm not quite sure why. Don't ban him over this, and I know I can come off as petty, but I'm honestly confused what the...policy? (Don't really know if this warrants such a term) would be regarding this, since (warning, bias on my part) I find his entries to be overly long and poorly written.

Cheers. Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 04:38, December 26, 2016 (UTC)


 * I would just not worry about it. I intend to get around to merging the Zarc pages after the holidays. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 05:34, December 26, 2016 (UTC)


 * It's not the differences I'm concerned about (well, sorta, I did intend to sorta what was happening out at some point, so it's nice to have clarification); it's more the grammar/structure differences between our edits..I'm really not sure how to deal with that, because I don't want to start a crusade or anything. Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 09:33, December 26, 2016 (UTC)


 * I get that, but I'm saying the entire issue will become irrelevant once we merge them. We just fix the page that remains. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:54, December 27, 2016 (UTC)


 * Ah, gotcha, Rogee. Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 05:59, December 27, 2016 (UTC)

Questions
I got some question?

Two people duel but one cut in to join and how many life points take away? Intrusion penalty 8000-4000 or 8000-6000!

How you stop number 39? With card I can use to beat it in yu gi oh duel generation? Do you play yu gi oh duel generation?

From yuma10000!


 * There no real world equivalent to the intrusion penalty. If you're going to use that for real world fun duels, it would be up to the players.
 * I don't play Duel Generation. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:54, December 27, 2016 (UTC)