Forum:Decks for Free!

DECKS FOR FREE STATUS: ''' Open! '''

Please make sure to check the Archives or Deck Galleries FIRST, before requesting a deck. If the deck requested is already in the Archives/Deck Galleries, the request will be marked as Finished.

''' Please note, any deck that doesn't follow the guidelines below will be removed. '''

If your deck request was removed due to inactivity, feel free to re-request it.

If you have any questions regarding an archived deck, feel free to leave questions on the deckbuilder's talk page, or that of Ace, if the deckbuilder has retired.

Decks for Free! Staff Application Center
This section is for any wiki users who would like to be a part of the Decks for Free! staff, in other words, a deckbuilder for DFF. You may be given other staffing positions, should a critical staff member retires or if more help is needed on certain update projects.

General Information
This page is dedicated to helping all duelists out there that need help with their decks. If you're a duelist that needs some help, we'll build you a deck. All you have to do is post here and tell us what kind of deck you want and how much money you're willing to spend getting the cards. If you already have a deck, if you post it in the Deck Template form, we'll revise it and give you our insight. We'll also make a side deck on request, but most likely you'll be directed to this list.

Example Requests

 * Ex1: Hi, could you make me a Jurrac deck? I have a money limit of $300. ~


 * Ex2: Hey, would you look at my Jurrac deck for me? ~

We'll make it a personal project and make sure that you'll be pleased with the final product. Each deckbuilder will only take one deck at a time and they will mark it by adding their name to the header of that section (See Rule 19) and will let you know when they're done with a project by posting "Finished" on the request.

Please note that it's your job to collect the cards, our job is to create the perfect decklist for you.

Rules and Guidelines

 * 1) Please check the top of this page to see if Decks for Free! is "Open", if we are "Closed", then we will not accept requests.
 * 2) Make all requests in their own section and not directly beneath another person's request. Click here to start a new request.
 * 3) Have a direction for your deck (Examples: Dark World, Burn, Spellcaster, Bounce, etc.). Random strings of cards will not be helped.
 * 4) Remember that if you ask for a generic theme, such as Swarm or Chaos, you're leaving your deck up to the deckbuilder. If you don't want that, be more specific in what you want.
 * 5) Do not ask for more than one deck at a time as others will have to wait longer for the deckbuilder to get to them. If you do post more than 1 request, we will close one of them, until the other 1 is finished.
 * 6) This is a free service, but we are taking time out of our lives to help you. Be courteous and respectful to the deckbuilders, and please don't leave us waiting for you to answer a question.
 * 7) If we believe a duelist has abandoned their request, we'll place a notice on the request warning of it's removal within 48 hours unless some activity happens, but this won't always happen.
 * 8) Completed decks will be moved to the archive after a few days.
 * 9) Decks that are not signed with 4 tildes (~) will not be helped, and the request may be removed without a notice.
 * 10) We reserve the ability to delete any and all requests for any reason we see fit, including attitude toward deckbuilders (Within DFF or outside of DFF), abandonment, or failure to follow rules.
 * 11) We expect that you'll have access to and/or be able to buy cards from online retailers or hobby stores, we base all card prices on TCGPlayer or Google Shopping. We can, on request, verify prices on other sites. We will automatically chose the lowest card price for you.
 * 12) Give us at least 2-3 weeks notice if you plan to take a deck to a tournament, it is very difficult to make a deck for a tournament with only a few days of notice.
 * 13) This page is not a page for people to post their opinions. Please, if you want to give your opinion on someone's deck, post it on the user's talk page.
 * 14) You may request a deckbuilder to help you, please note that it will only ensure that deckbuilder's help. It will not ensure the immediate help of that Deckbuilder.
 * 15) It is highly recommended that you browse the Deck Galleries or Archives before requesting, you may find what you're looking for before requesting our assistance. Please try to update the builds in the archives or galleries yourself before asking us, you may ask us if you have no idea what to do, but it helps lighten the load if you do update an old deck yourself.
 * 16) If you saw a deck on your post, and your post is now gone, check the most recent Archive.
 * 17) Please post all requests at the bottom of this forum, and not at the top of the Requests section, this is for Archival Purposes, and makes it easier on the staff.
 * 18) Please don't make your request title in all capitals, just the first letter of each word in that title.
 * 19) Please use proper spelling, grammar, and capitalization. Don't posts requests that have "I hav dek tht nds impvmt", it will be totally ignored.
 * 20) Please make an account and log in before posting a request. Mere IP signatures will not be accepted, because it makes it more difficult for the deckbuilders to contact you. Making an account is simple and easy, just go to the top of the page and click on “Create an account”, then follow the simple instructions. Requests signed by with mere IP addresses will be given 24-48 hours to make an account.
 * 21) Remember to use a Template:Decklist for all requests, if you are posting your own deck.
 * 22) Please do not ask about the status of your request. When a deckbuilder has taken your request they will tell you that they have taken it, and you'll see a part of their username in the Request title. Again, please don't ask about the status, but do at times comment on the deck, otherwise it may be removed because there is no activity from you or a deckbuilder.

ANY REQUEST THAT DOES NOT FOLLOW THESE RULES WILL BE GIVEN 24-48 HOURS TO COMPLY.

Contacts
''For more information or questions concerning this page, please visit the talk pages below. Do note that names higher up on the list are veteran members of Decks for Free!, and the most active members are listed.''

Archive Maintenance Notes
This section is for staff only. If you want to browse the archives, please look in the above section.

tag has been removed from Archive...

Deck Galleries
All the decks built on DFF, are in the galleries.
 * If you want a deck based around a monster, such as Yubel, look in the Monster Gallery.
 * If you want an Archetype, such as Gladiator Beasts, look in the Archetype Gallery.
 * If you want a deck based around a specific Type or Attribute, such as Beast or FIRE, look in the Attribute and Type Gallery.
 * If you want a deck based around a specific Theme, such as Chaos or Ritual, look in the Theme Gallery.

Deck Gallery Maintenance Notes
This section is for staff only. If you want to browse the deck galleries, please look in the above section.

= Requests =

BROOKLYN - Constellar Deck
I'd like to build a constellar deck. No budget. DarkestKnight16 (talk • contribs) 14:30, December 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * Any particular request on how it's built? --User:BROOKLYN RAGE! 14:45, December 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * I apologise for the time I've taken. I'm quite busy, so I'll post it tonight? --User:BROOKLYN RAGE! 05:48, December 5, 2012 (UTC)

Ace - It is Back! Hot Celestial Sphere V.2
Hey Ace, with the arrival of Cosmo Blazer Set and the new FIRE stuff, could you tweek the Deck you made for me a while ago? Thanks.
 * (PS: I thank Hastydemon2, Nephthy, Number Hunter and BROOKLYN RAGE! if you wanted to help, but I prefer that Ace could help with this since he is the original builder from the deck.) -- E. G.G.  (My Contributions) 15:04, December 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * Ignoring that you know how much I like fire decks, why don't you post the Decklist you have so to make tweaks from there?--User:BROOKLYN RAGE! 15:11, December 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * I know sorry for that, but I only liked that Ace would deal with it. But the decklist is the same, I can't copy the original template because the page is archived, meaning, I cannot edit or copy the decklist. But it's still the same, I assure you that. --15:14, December 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * I thought you would have made adjustments my friend. Still as lazy as ever I see :P--User:BROOKLYN RAGE! 15:18, December 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * The only change I did was replacing Brionac with Flamvell Uruquizas. Because Brio was banned in the meanwhile. -- E. G.G.  (My Contributions) 15:20, December 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * Was this the Flamvell deck I made a while back? Not sure how many changes I could really make but I'll take a look. -- - Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  15:56, December 2, 2012 (UTC)

Found the deck. I'll give it a look over. - Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  15:58, December 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * I will not mind if you add some of the Fire Fist monsters, Like Hawkei and/or Seiven Because they can help getting Choten and do combos, especially Seiven. But I'll see what you can do, then I'll tell you what I think. -- E. G.G.  (My Contributions) 16:01, December 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, while adding some of the Fire King monsters can work too, to make a deck based more around the destruction of your own monsters and then gain their effects, you could use something like Inaribi with Flamvell Magicain and Lyla, Lightsworn Sorceress to create quick and powerful Rank 4 plays, like Number 16: Shock Master in 1 turn, something that wasn't really possible before without Rekindling. But that's really all I can really think about, I mean the deck as it currently stands isn't bad, and if you want you could easily drop Choten and Merchant for 2 Inaribi and 3 Lyla, although I'm not sure how that would work. -- - Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  16:26, December 2, 2012 (UTC)

Although if you care for it, I have been playing with an idea that involves Garbage Ogre + Garbage Lord + Emergency Teleport. -- - Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  16:30, December 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * I don't know about Lyla, because I don't like to play with LS and I try to stay away from LS Engines, Inaribi should great. But Tell me the idea with Garbage and E-Tele. -- E. G.G.  (My Contributions) 16:31, December 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * Well it's nothing more than an idea really. The basic idea would be to search out Lord by using Ogre, then play Teleport (Which is now at 3, thanks Konami), and make a big synchro summon, for basically 2 cards from your hand that also thin your deck. Plus if you were to do all this on turn 1, you would get a big monster, and 1 Ogre, 1 Lord, and maybe a Krebons into your grave, which opens up the path for DAD. But it was an idea, and the cost attached to Lord might be risky. Plus, this was an idea I came up with on the fly, and DAD isn't really searchable, but the other pieces are, so at the very least you can turn 2 cards into big Level 7 or 8 Synchro summons, at the cost of maybe 2000-6000 Life Points over the course of a duel, so this automatically means no Solemn cards what so ever, and just compensate with Bottomless Trap Hole and Compulsory Evacuation Device, plus other Staples. Interested? -- - Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  03:54, December 3, 2012 (UTC)


 * Sure, never tried Tele, but I assume there's always a first for everything. -- E. G.G.  (My Contributions) 23:20, December 3, 2012 (UTC)


 * Note, I'll do this and the other request if needed over the weekend. - Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  03:10, December 5, 2012 (UTC)


 * Alright, don't worry about it, I'll be waiting. -- E. G.G.  (My Contributions) 08:58, December 5, 2012 (UTC)

Closed - Supremacy Sun
My next deck is one based round The Supremacy Sun Guardmaster (talk • contribs) 18:41, December 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * Okay, I'm going to be very brief here. First, how about you learn to say please when asking for a deck instead of demanding one?  We may give decks, but it is common courtesy to have manners.  Secondly, do you even use the decks we give you?  It seems you ask for decks just for the sake of having them, you are asking for a new deck about half an hour after we made you one.  And finally, how any decks can you ask for?  We are so busy with your decks that it is getting hard to get things done!  You need to calm down, and learn some manners while you're at it. --User:BROOKLYN RAGE! 18:47, December 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * Brooks right, you've asked for way too many decks in like 48 hours. Go play around with the other decks we gave you, and make sure you're actually happy with them, closing this request for a while. -- - Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  03:58, December 3, 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: I'll leave this closed until Sunday evening, then I'll open it up to anyone. - Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  23:21, December 4, 2012 (UTC)

Nephthy - Requesting Beastly Rat Toolbox
I would like to ask for help on a particular deck I want to make, come the TCG release of Cosmo Blazer; I'm still wanting to make a deck with Akz, the Pumer, but now with Leontaurus out, I'm thinking both cards would do best is a sort of toolbox-like deck, mainly a Rat Toolbox deck. I'm not too picky on what goes into the deck, so long as a good majority of the deck's monsters are Beast/Beast-Warrior (mixing and matching archetypes is okay, in this case; I don't particularly care what archetypes goes into it), and I don't have a set cost limit to this deck (I'm expecting to be able to get the cards I need through trade by the time the set comes out, so anything that is easily tradable for is good). Other than that, as long as Leontaurus and Akz are the main beatsticks in the deck, I don't particularly care what you do with it. If anyone here can help, I'd appreciate it. Thanks. Vorpal Storm Pony (talk • contribs) 19:30, December 2, 2012 (UTC)

I will pick this one, if you're okay with that. My idea now is a more-or-less simple Beatdown deck with the Seal of Orichalcos (It makes Akz a 2000 ATK direct attacker or a 4000 ATK beatstick, also it is protected by the Seal's other effects, and Leontaurus is a simple lv4 monster with 2500 ATK), but I can drop this idea if you don't like it, or I may realize later that it didn't work. I'll do the deck until next Sunday, probably faster.Nephthy (talk • contribs) 19:55, December 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * Hmm, Seal's getting more and more use, lately, isn't it? I'm iffy on the Seal, but I'll let you judge on whether or not it will work in this deck. Vorpal Storm Pony (talk • contribs) 20:03, December 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm loving Nep's idea from my own stance as a deckbuilder, Pumer becomes so much better at 2000 ATK, and a good Trap line-up makes it even better. Not to mention Leontaurus becomes a sweet 2500 beater in most cases. Nice thinking out of the box Nep. -- - Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  04:06, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Not the final form of the deck, but I think it's time to ask you if I'm heading to the right direction or not. This deck is made to fully utilize the ability of Akz the Pumer (If you banish Ür with Beast Rising and then double Akz's ATK while the Seal is on the field, Akz will have 11600 ATK). This is the simple Beast-Warrior deck. I used mainly old cards, as BW is one of the most unsupported types, and BW releases are very rare. The deck is more or less consistent, but not as strong as most of the decks nowdays.

So the actual question: Is this what you wanted and just needs some development, or I'm on the wrong track? I did not use archetypes, as the only existing BW archetypes are Fire Fist (coming out in Cosmo Blazer) and Phantom Beast. The former has nothing to hope from Akz, the card doesn't fit in their gameplay. The latter is empowered by having Phantom Beasts in your grave, so banishing 2 BW-type monsters to summon Akz is just bad for the rest of the deck. If you disagree, I can make a Phantom Beast or Fire Fist deck with Akz and Leontaurus. So let's hear your opinion on the deck. Nephthy (talk • contribs) 17:10, December 5, 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm of two minds of this; on the one hand, this is not at all what I wanted - I was expecting more with cards like Wind-Up Rabbit and the like. The reason why I thought Giant Rat Toolbox would be perfect for Leontaurus was because it was essentially a beatstick that can be brought out with it. On the other hand, I see where you're going with this, and how difficult such a deck can be, in which case... why not use the Flaming Dances to your advantage? They all give stat boosts and they can all make this deck more streamlined and consistent. On the third hand, with cards like Barbaros/Ur, the Koa'ki Meiru Beast-Warriors, and Gene-Warped Warwolf, why even bother with Leontaurus and Akz? You could make a generic Beast-Warrior Skill Drain deck with them.


 * Honestly, I don't think this is going to be the deck, at all. Don't get me wrong, I've already tried out cards like Beast Rising in decks before, and they worked great, but this isn't going to work. I specifically asked for a Beast-centric Rat Toolbox deck because of the point I made above, and I feel that's the only real use for it. If you want me to suggest a start for you to work on, then here:


 * I'm not sure how well you'll do, with this, but please try to make it work. 67.236.190.122 (talk) 23:27, December 5, 2012 (UTC)


 * If I can throw my own 2 cents in there, Nep's first idea isn't bad, but it brings up the question of will it be consistent? It just doesn't seem like that at the start, Nep, I think you'd be better going in the direction the poster wants, it offers more consistency, and strong overall monsters, in all honesty, it's not a bad option or path to consider, Seal boosts most of the weak stuff into bigger 1800 or 1900 ATK bodies, and add that in with Horn, you get something unique and interesting. -- - Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  04:05, December 6, 2012 (UTC) --~Insert non-formatted text here


 * My main issue with Nep's idea wasn't consistency, but the fact that, if you cut out the Leontaurus and Akz engine there, it doesn't impact the deck at all. As I said, Leontaurus seems to only really seem pertinent in a Rat Toolbox deck, as it's a beatstick that can be summoned via Rat; otherwise, it gets outshined by so many other Beast-Warriors, it's not funny. True, the Seal I can see as being an asset, and as I said, I've used cards like Horn and Beast Rising to great effect in other decks, but what's the point if you've already got cards like the Barbaros duo? 67.236.190.122 (talk) 14:49, December 6, 2012 (UTC)


 * Okay, thanks for the response. This is why I asked you, I was not sure how you exactly imagined the deck, and I was afraid that my own thinking resulted in a totally different one, which seems to be the case. So now I can and will work on something more appropriate for you. Nephthy (talk • contribs) 17:23, December 6, 2012 (UTC)

Ace - Swarm Deck
Hey, I was wondering if you would be able to build me a swarm deck. There would be no limit on money. For the cards, I don't really care much about the cards, I just want a strong swarm deck. --Jusqua233 (talk • contribs) 02:56, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Since you don't really have a preferece on what cards you want, I'll just give you my T.G. Wind-Up deck. It can swarm quickly on the first few turns, just watch out for Veilers and Skill Drain.

If you have any questions about how the deck works feel free to ask, and I hope the deck works for you. Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 04:08, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

I see that you are not using warning in the trap list, shame shame. Never leave home without that. Well since I'm not the biggest fan of T.G., I was wondering if you have anything else besides that. I will say that I'm not doubting that it isn't good enough, just wanted to see what you would give first then go from there. Jusqua233 (talk • contribs) 05:04, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

The only other deck I currently have is my Fire King deck from the WDC, if you want that I can get it for you. Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 05:12, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Well if its a swarm deck then no problem, if not then it looks like you will have to make me a deck. Jusqua233 (talk • contribs) 05:25, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

The deck can swarm, but its a very limited swarm and will be used to Xyz summon most of the time. If you want a specific type of deck that swarms just tell me and I'll make one, and I really don't feel like playing around just to make you more decks that are not needed. Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 05:29, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Well I did post a strong swarm deck, meaning not limited. I don't care if they use XYZ/Sychros, use what you need to. And if you are saying that its not needed then i guess i should take my business elsewhere since you seem like you won't work on the deck. I pointed out that I did not like T'G. and yet you do not offer much of the other options. If you want to know then a deck that is unique of either Infernity or Inzectors. Jusqua233 (talk • contribs) 05:35, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Well I took "strong swarm deck" as a deck that can swarm and be powerful, not one that can swarm like crazy. And you really don't have to get an attitude, we (all of DFF) do have lives outside of yugioh, so I'm sorry if I'm a little aggrevated right now. And its really hard to come up with a deck that can swarm when there are too many options to go with, if anything I can get you an Inzektor deck in a few days if thats alright with you. Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 05:42, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry but you got an attitude with me first so I think you should lose it since I was just responding to your anger. With an Inzektor deck there isn't much of options anyways but I wanted to see your uniqueness to them. A few days? Well I guess I can wait that long as long as its unique. Jusqua233 (talk • contribs) 05:45, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

A unique twist could be added to Inzektors, the same with just about any deck. And I'm onlying saying a few days since I can only test the deck for so long through out the week, so I'll say that I can have the deck done in about 2-3 days unless you need it for something? Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 05:53, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Yea I actually need it for a tourney one of my friends are hosting soon so I needed something to swarm and control thinking Infern and Inzekts were good for that. Jusqua233 (talk • contribs) 05:55, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Well when is the tourney? DFF has a rule for requesting a deck that you're going to take to a tourney, giving us a 2-3 week notice before it. Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 05:58, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

I said soon since I don't know the exact date, its not like a big one, just 4 or 5 friends playing together. You have some time. Jusqua233 (talk • contribs) 06:00, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

I'll try to get atleast a skeleton of a unique Inzektor deck ready in a day or 2, if you get any info on the date for the tourney let me know. Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 06:02, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

So I was able to come up with a pretty unique Inzektor build fairly quickly. I'll show you the deck, and explain it after I show it.

The deck consists of a few little engines that make the deck special summon like crazy when you can get it set up. The Frog engine works as a deck thinner while also setting up Gachis to increase the attack of everybody on your field. The Tour Guide engine will easily get you any Rank 3 monster in the Extra Deck, and the Leviair will bring back any banished DARK from Allure while you could take an opponent's monster too. Then the Inzektor engine, which I won't go much into detail if you already know it, if not just say so and I'll explain how that works.

Does this deck work for you? Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 16:07, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

3 engines in 1 deck? seems kinda odd but I guess I will have to test it out, wasn't looking for that many engines but who knows, probably won't work out as well as I or you want it to though. Jusqua233 (talk • contribs) 16:21, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

I've tested the deck in numerous of duels to see how the deck works, and quite shockingly it works really well. In one duel by turn 3 I had a field of Centipede with 2 Gachis and a Hornet in hand, the duel didn't last much longer. Also it shouldn't matter how many small engines a deck has, as long as it helps complete your goal you should be fine. Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 16:27, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Usually in the froggy engine they would use treeborn frog, which I do not see in there. Would there be a possible substitution to get that in there or no? Jusqua233 (talk • contribs) 16:42, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Personally I didn't see any use of Treeborn in this deck. But if you insist on using it I would just add it to the deck instead of substituting it, a 41 card deck that thins and searches easily isn't a bad thing. If anything you could just drop Veiler to 1 and add Treeborn, I don't think it will make that much of a difference. Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 16:49, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Well treeborn would give you a monster at the start of your turn almost all the time so it would be helpful to have them in there, just thought I should tell you that. Jusqua233 (talk • contribs) 16:53, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Yes, Treeborn would give you a monster most of the time, but what good would it do with a Level 1 monster that does essentailly nothing. You could use that monster zone for something a little more usefull. I'm not saying that you can't use Treeborn, go right ahead if you really want to, I personally found no use for it. Also are you fine with the current deck? Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 17:00, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

I haven't tested it yet but the thing about treeborn is that with 2 or 3 gachi's on the field then its a bit more powerful so its not essentially useless. Also it is a good defense when you do not draw a monster or have any traps to protect you. Jusqua233 (talk • contribs) 17:06, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

I can see your point about that, although with a max of 1300 Atk and Def it will still be ran over by just about anything. But you do have a point about not drawing a monster or having any traps. Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 17:09, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Well with 1300 attack that keeps reviving itself can be pretty helpful along with the other point that was given. If anything it is a good utility card. Jusqua233 (talk • contribs) 17:13, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Sorry but I forgot to add Giga-Mantis when I posted the build up earlier, its fixed now. Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 17:54, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

So I have been testing the deck out and I found out that it is not that good for me. It is interest to say the least but not good at all. Jusqua233 (talk • contribs) 22:16, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Look, I didn't wanna get in on another deckbuilder's request, but the guy offered you 2 decks considering there is an endless number of decks that swarm, so either pick one or take your 'business' elsewhere, if you think that would be such a huge loss for us.-- Let the Number take hold! 23:02, December 3, 2012 (UTC)


 * : How many duels did you play with each deck, before you rejected them? If the answer is less than 15, go play more duels. It takes a while to get used to a deck that you've never really played with before, and a deck won't be perfect on it's first run with a new owner. - Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  23:10, December 3, 2012 (UTC)


 * Also, if you still want to reject both of the decks. Then I suggest you go look at either a Six Samurai deck or another Wind-Up in the archives, as those are probably the best Swarm decks out there at the moment. There's also Flamvell, but they have a less of a swarm thing, and more of a combo thing. - Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  23:14, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

I asked him to make me a deck, he gave me one that he made and I told him something about it that I do not like. The second deck the he actually made for me was interesting but I said it did not work for me while testing it. I did a ton more than just 15 duels with it so it is not that for the problem. I asked him for a deck for a reason and I did not want to look through the archives to find one. Jusqua233 (talk • contribs) 14:47, December 4, 2012 (UTC)


 * Well then just pick one of the 2 I already gave you, so what you don't like the T.G. monsters but you have to deal with what I gave you. I'm not a big fan of Inzektors but I still made you a deck with them. Its not about whether or not you like some of the cards in the deck, its about giving it a chance and trusting the deckbuilder that you requested. And if you don't want to go searching through the archives then your out of luck, since I won't be making you another deck because I told you I won't be making any decks that are not needed. Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 16:20, December 4, 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, Haste tried, and it's not his fault you didn't want either of the decks. But now it's up to you, the original requester to pick a deck you want, as there are only a few decks that can actually swarm and make good use of that. So I'll go ahead and list a few decks that swarm and are really good, pick one of them: X-Saber, Wind-Up, Six Samurai, Geargia, Noble Rabbit, or Agent. -- - Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  23:17, December 4, 2012 (UTC)

Machine town
Hi, I would like to ask for a Machina Geartown Solidarity deck, that also include Dark Flattop and Flying Fortress SKY FIRE. Also, it must be cheap Copperfield (talk • contribs) 00:36, December 4, 2012 (UTC)


 * I am sorry but you should know that Dark Flattop requires a DARK Tuner and a Machine-Type monster, I might make the deck, but I can only use Dark Salvo and Genex Ally Birdman as tuners if you want Solidarity, but I personally think it would be more consistent with Dark Resonator as its Tuner and no Solidarity, your choice. I can also make it about 200-300$ at its cheapest, unless you want it for fun.-- Let the Number take hold! 10:34, December 4, 2012 (UTC)


 * Usually, Copper likes all the individual cards to be $5 or less, just so you know.


 * Have you seen the price of Ancient Fairy Dragon? Impossiburu. I'll pass on this one.-- Let the Number take hold! 16:31, December 4, 2012 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I know what Flattop need, I was thinking of Unknown Synchron or Birdman as tuner with Machina Fortress or Cyber Dragon. As the unknown person above says that's the price I want to the cards, and yes is for fun. Also I have 3 of all Gadget, Machina Fortress and Geartown and 2 of Gearframe, Gadjiltron and Recycler. Copperfield (talk • contribs) 16:44, December 4, 2012 (UTC)


 * Well did you know that in order to summon SKY FIRE from the banished zone or from the grave, you need to have properly summoned it first? Ignoring the summoning conditions. I am sorry but this deck is virtually unplayable, unless, of course, you'd like some reactors in it.-- Let the Number take hold! 20:29, December 4, 2012 (UTC)


 * What!? then can't I send Sky Fire to grave with Recycler/Fortress and summoning it it with Flattop?? Copperfield (talk • contribs) 21:11, December 4, 2012 (UTC)


 * That indeed seems to be the case. You may make a new request about a deck you'd like though, I am sorry for this one.-- Let the Number take hold! 21:52, December 4, 2012 (UTC)

Well, then without Dark Flattop and Sky Fire and the rest the same and in place of Sky Fire, some destrutive combo like Double Cyclone and Wild Tornado or Soul Taker or other card to destroy any card or stall that stop or slowdown the beatdown and some defense like The Huge Revolution is Over or Starlight Road... Also if it can summon Wind-Up Zenmaines (with some union like Heavy Mech Support Platform) and/or Genex Ally Triforce would be nice, ofcourse this is optional Copperfield (talk • contribs) 22:38, December 4, 2012 (UTC)


 * So now you basically want just a plain old Machina Geartown deck, right? - Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  23:11, December 4, 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes, with Solidarity and beatdown and destrutive power as much as posible with the above condition of price Copperfield (talk • contribs) 23:32, December 4, 2012 (UTC)


 * I changed my mind, a little, I still want Solidarity Machina Geartown but that use Superdimensional Robot Galaxy Destroyer and to summoning him use either Metal Reflect Slime or Malefic Cyber End Dragon with Galaxy Queen's Light (I have one copy of each the first three, ofcourse with the fusion). The rest the same Copperfield (talk • contribs) 02:54, December 6, 2012 (UTC)


 * Can you get at least 3 Galaxy Queen's Light? - Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  04:00, December 6, 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes. Also I have Double Summon x2, just in case. Copperfield (talk • contribs) 04:44, December 6, 2012 (UTC)

Hasty - Vampire Genesis deck
First of all, thank you very much to Dark Ace for the Zombie deck he built me previously, it works really well! For my request, could I please get a deck that works around Vampire genesis? This deck would be more of a fun deck, and so doesn't need to be particularly strong, and if possible could you try and use cards from the two zombie structure decks, as I have those. Thank you! :) Bleedinghippy (talk • contribs) 19:36, December 4, 2012 (UTC)


 * I'll see what I can do with this. I'll try to have something ready in 2-3 days, I will let you know if something comes up. Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 19:50, December 4, 2012 (UTC)


 * Also does it matter how many copies of a card I use? Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 19:51, December 4, 2012 (UTC)


 * Nah, not particularly, as long as its not one thats amazingly expensive :P Bleedinghippy (talk • contribs) 21:22, December 4, 2012 (UTC)


 * Just so I know before getting something set, is this going to be TCG only, and do you want an Extra Deck? Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 14:55, December 5, 2012 (UTC)


 * Yep, TCG only, and nah, without an extra deck is fine. Thanks! Bleedinghippy (talk • contribs) 21:12, December 5, 2012 (UTC)


 * Alright, I'll prbably just throw in a Utopia or 2 since he is fairly cheap, and works nicely when you can't get Genesis just yet. I'll try to have something up by tomorrow if testing goes well. Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 21:26, December 5, 2012 (UTC)

This is what I've come up with so far, tell me if you don't have/can't get any thing and I'll try to change somethings around so I can get you a deck with cards you do have. But I tried to use a majority of cards from the 2 Structure Decks like you asked.

I made it so it will through the deck fairly quickly so you can get Genesis in hand faster, since he really isn't searchable. So Morphing Jar, Necroface, and Reckless Greed are all part of making the deck thinner. Shutendoji works as a monster recycler, banishing 2 monsters to draw a card then you can put a monster on the top of your deck the next turn. Necroface works as a deck thinner and a beatstick, so if you have a Shutendoji on the field you can banish Necroface and another Zombie to draw a card and banish the top 5 cards of both your decks, and just have Necroface return to the top of the deck next turn to gain atleast 1000 attack points while recycling things Shutendoji couldn't. Its really easy to revive any fallen Zombie (besides Genesis) with Call of the Haunted, Book of Life, Monster Reborn, or Zombie Master. Forbidden Lance is to protect your Genesis once he hits the field, or to overpower an opposing monster. The Overpowering Eye is so you can still attack with just about any Zombie (best choice is most likely Vampire Lord or Goblin Zombie) if they have a stalling monster on the field. Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 21:49, December 6, 2012 (UTC)


 * Erm, a little confused, this deck only has 38 cards.. the spell section says 14 but you've only put 12 in.. Bleedinghippy (talk • contribs) 22:07, December 6, 2012 (UTC)