User talk:Deltaneos

(Sun, Dec 19 2010)
you deleted an official ruling of MST

"Mystical Space Typhoon does not actually "negate" a Spell or Trap Card. You can chain any Spell or Trap Card activation with Mystical Space Typhoon, destroying it. The destruction of the card does not negate its effects. However, depending on the type of Spell or Trap card, it can prevent its effect from taking place. Continuous, Equip, and Field Spell Cards are the only Spell cards that will have their effects stopped if they are chained with Mystical Space Typhoon. The same rulings apply to Continuous Trap Cards. As long as you chain to the activation of the Spell or Trap Card with Mystical Space Typhoon and target it, when the chain resolves the Spell or Trap Card's effect will disappear. "

Should be on there to kill any questions on whether it negates or not. Yes its common knowledge but some new players do not know this


 * Next time, please tap ~ four times, as it will magical put your user name and date when you completed "save page" it. And Delta also said that it's unofficial and card "8" is not exist. So be careful of what you're trying to place on. Ever "Mirror Force" still resolved though if it's destroyed by cute MST. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 23:04, December 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * This may be true which is covered in that text "The destruction of the card does not negate its effects. However, depending on the type of Spell or Trap card, it can prevent its effect from taking place. Continuous, Equip, and Field Spell Cards are the only Spell cards that will have their effects stopped if they are chained with Mystical Space Typhoon." it may be unoffical but ask any judge and they will tell you exactly that Sephirothx12 (talk • contribs) 23:13, December 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * Making sense. If you still want it to be on the site, please put that in your own "Judge Page" under your user name. Like I have all over in my signature right now. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 23:27, December 19, 2010 (UTC)


 * I am aware that "Mystical Space Typhoon" does not negate effects. You listed that as appearing in the rulings for a card called "8". As FredCat said it was removed because "8" does not exist and the ruling was unofficial. While it was true, we only post the official card rulings that Konami or UDE have directly issued. These are the ones posted in the "card rulings" section of the Konami website and previously the UDE website. OCG rulings are taken from the Japanese Konami FAQ site. The page I linked to covers the established standards.
 * The ruling about Continuous Cards having their effects prevented is listed in the OCG section, because it was posted here. If we were to post the ruling on "Mystical Space Typhoon" not negating it would have to also have been posted on one of those sites. -- Deltaneos (talk) 01:42, December 20, 2010 (UTC)


 * After looking through the Japanese site, this rulings has been posted here, so I've added it to the OCG rulings section. -- Deltaneos (talk) 02:05, December 20, 2010 (UTC)

Storm of Ragnarok
Hi, a long time yu-gi-oh fan here (though I didn't really like GX, but I like the tuner-concepts of 5Ds)! I recently saw the Storm of Ragnarok, and I wondered when it's going to come out. It looks very awesome, looks able to stand up to the strongest zombies and/or dragons, so I wonder when I could buy a pack or two. Thanks for your time, --Sir_REX Strikes Back 03:33, December 20, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry to bit your head...
But I just wanna show you this error; PoD Talk Page. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 04:19, December 20, 2010 (UTC)

Cyber archetype
Seeing as "Emergency Cyber" is a support card, shouldn't be count "Cybers" as an actual archetype, with "Cyber Dragons" as a sub-archetype? We have the Cyber Style page. Would be a good bet to move "Cyber Style" to "Cybers" and make that the archetype page? It seems redundant to have both pages, and I think we need an archetype page for this. Let me know what you think and I'll start working on it. I didn't expect much interest in the topic on the forum, so I figured I'd just ask you.

Also, there seems to be an issue with some of the VG deck parameters in the character infobox. The deck names were previously visible and now are not, though they still appear when editing the article. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 06:00, December 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, I'll figure something out with it then. Thanks. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:37, December 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * I created the page and adapted Template:Cyber based on Template:Hero. What I don't know how to do is create another section on the Cyber template for cards that are in the "Cyber" archetype, but not in one of the three sub-archetypes. If you can let me know how to do that, I'll start editing the card articles to include the archetype. I don't play the TCG anymore, so it would be a better bet for someone else to come along and write the sections about play style and such. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 02:27, December 29, 2010 (UTC)

Ryoga
Yes it was confirmed, there was a trailer released today which showed him summoning a giant fish against Yuma. Also within the clip, it showed his name as being Ayer Shark on the duel score board.

User Page Vandalism
The user 99.254.80.41 vandalized my user page. Is there any way to see if it is the IP address of a registered user? If not, sorry to bother you. Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 18:46, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * Not without CheckUser permissions. Due to the potential privacy issues around such functionality, only a very few people have access to it. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 19:17, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * I see. Thank you for responding. Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 19:23, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't think they have an account. It looks like this person vandalised your user page because you had recently reverted their vandalism to some character articles. I wouldn't worry about it being a registered user trying to mess with you while hiding their name. -- Deltaneos (talk) 21:40, December 21, 2010 (UTC)

Archive Locked up?
I am trying to move the old comments from my main Talk page to my Archive 7 but I cannot enter and edit that latter page. Is that such to be glitch or what? -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 20:59, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * I mean put old comment into Archive #, not just main talk page... -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 22:25, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * Never mind, I take care of it already. Thanks for give me the way to get in. I think it should stay, the edit on Archive #... -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 22:29, December 21, 2010 (UTC)

Masked Heroes
Considering we're confirmed to get Goka and Vapor in the OCG as Warrior-type Fusion Monsters, would it be safe to assume that the rest of the Archetype would get the same treatment? Or, at the very least, can we make all the Masked Heroes Warrior-types since all the other Hero archetypes are composed mostly of the same type. --Blackstone Dresden (talk • contribs) 21:37, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, considering we're working solely with the manga lores here, I think it would be reasonable to add "This card cannot be Special Summoned, except by the effect of a Spell Card that includes "Change" in its name." and then modify that line as needed once more Changes or Masked Heroes get released. Also, since, IIRC, Goka was first Transformation/Fusion Summoned using Rekka, and since Mask Change needs the same Attribute in the OCG, could we then reasonably call Rekka a FIRE-Attribute, like Goka? One more thing: This Transformation/Fusion Monster thing sounds a lot like the Dark Synchro/Synchro Monster thing we had in 5D's, so should we do the same thing as then (Leave them as Transformation Monsters until they're released in the OCG) or should we make them all Fusions? --Blackstone Dresden (talk • contribs) 22:55, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * And are we going to make them all Fusions and treat Transformation Monsters as something like Accel Synchro Monsters, same thing just called something else, or are we saying that they're separate in fiction but the same in the OCG, like Dark Synchros and Synchros.... Ya know, this would be a lot easier if they would color one panel with a Masked Hero in it. But yeah, I'll get to work on changing them to Warriors. --Blackstone Dresden (talk • contribs) 00:47, December 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I can see that. Maybe we should put it up to a site wide vote on the Transformation Monster page? But, in the interim, I doubt anyone would object to adding in a presumed Summoning condition, and, if people do, well, we'll just add that to the ballot. --Blackstone Dresden (talk • contribs) 00:16, December 23, 2010 (UTC)

I noticed you have been updating CardTable2.
1. I shall quit adding width = 400 to pages as it is useless. No Prob.

2. Is it possible one of the edits broke the link to the image file page (where you can upload a new version of the file.)? Now when I right click to open in a new tab on my browser it goes to a view image page rather than the page with the links already there and filled out with the proper filename. See my page for example images. If that could be corrected I would be grateful. Glittersword 21:57, December 21, 2010 (UTC)

Annoyance on Gold Series 2011
That user kept rejecting mine and other member edit that should be "JP001" stuff into his own "JP01" craps. That article should be lock for at least a day or two. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 02:51, December 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * I blocked for three months. I wouldn't have gone nearly so long, but he was here reverting other editors on March 2010 Lists back in February as well - he hasn't made a single constructive edit at all. 「 ダイノ ガイ  千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 05:56, December 22, 2010 (UTC)

Deck hacking
I think that article should be lock up, because some unregistered user continued to change the list that BEWK don't authorizing to list. Ever that Unregistered User not answering my question that I leave at it Talk page. That therefore prove that he's not BEWK himself. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 00:55, December 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, and that link is in the title that I posted. Honestly, it's inappropriate to change other user's "User Page". Didn't you mention that it's against ruling to do that way? I did that couple time, but all of that, only to correct the mistake; number and spells. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 01:45, December 23, 2010 (UTC)

User:Deathseek
Can you block that user? His account is just for valdalism purpose. He inserted false ruling, removed correct content, ignored and modified other people comments. You can see his contribution for more. Blackwings0605 (talk) 06:06, December 23, 2010 (UTC)

Wasn't's Talk Page
Since he didn't really know how to making his own Archive Page, so I had to manage it for him. That which cause the result of the page lock up. Can you help us untie the stuck up on his page? Here's his talk page that is current lock-up. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 21:54, December 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * I fixed it for you/them. ;) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 00:05, December 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Fwiw, the problem was with the apostrophe.  was giving   rather than , hence messing with the switch. -- Deltaneos (talk) 00:16, December 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Interesting, it seemed not a problem when it was post in my Archives version... But thanks for updating my knowledge of how those Archives code work. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 00:27, December 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, the original code should work in both of our talk pages, since neither of us have an apostrophe in our user names. -- Deltaneos (talk) 00:31, December 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Aah, that would explain it. I couldn't see any immediate problem in the code and didn't feel like taking the time to find the actual problem (especially since I came by immediately after bashing my head against a template issue on another wiki), so I just swapped out the #switch for a #ifeq. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 00:33, December 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * I just catch up with that vocabulary... Now I understand why his Talk Page is lock up because of that. Good to know that. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 00:40, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Attribute spirits on ((Six Attributes))?
Hey Delt, would you care to come have a look at this and comment? Thanks! 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 00:57, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Inappropriate User
Tumamameama posted an inappropriate image of hand in Marik's page twice. He should be banning. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 22:56, December 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * It's gone madness... consider page lock? -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 23:08, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Card Rulings:Blue Rose Dragon
I don't think this card will ever become a real card because it's just like Stardust Dragon to Debris Dragon and Stardust Phantom. "Aki's" pack focus' more on ...(forgot)and "Yusei's" pack focus more on Special Summon, negations, competition. Finally Jacks pack mainly focus' on ATK "Power" and ...--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 23:54, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * What about "Machine Divine Emperor Machinecle Infinity Ruling page; it's not open and is a real card"

Can I open it?--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 00:02, December 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * O. I don't understand Japanese.--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 00:10, December 25, 2010 (UTC)

Cardtable styles
Hey Delt, would you care to update User:Deltaneos/cardtable.css with User:Dinoguy1000/cardtable.css and tell me how things look (the two sample pages I used mainly were Blue-Eyes White Dragon (CM) and H - Heated Heart, but you also get a decent test rate with just Special:Random/Special:Randomincategory/Duel Monsters cards)? I've tested in Google Chrome 10.0.612.3 dev, Firefox 3.6.13, Safari 5.0.3 (7533.19.4), Internet Explorer 9.0.7930.16406 beta, and Opera 11.00 (build 1156), everything looks fine except for a few minor issues documented in a comment on User:Dinoguy1000/cardtable.css, so after you check in whatever browsers you have available and give the go-ahead, I'm going to copy the styles to MediaWiki:Common.css and MediaWiki:Wikia.css to allow testing across more browsers/browser versions and environments, and to get started on the 30-day decaching before we'll be able to deploy the new version of CardTable2. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 01:25, December 26, 2010 (UTC)


 * I haven't found any other problems so far on Google Chrome 8.0.552.224 or Firefox 3.6.8 so far at least.
 * I think the bug: if the right column comes up short against the card image, rows are not vertically stretched to cover the space and there is no border around the empty region is because of the unbalanced rowspans. The image column has its rowspan set as a governing 91 to ensure it'll never be less than the right column, rather than somehow set to equal the number of rows on the right. My mistake. You tried fixing that before. -- Deltaneos (talk) 16:46, December 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't suppose you have any pre-9 versions of IE installed, do you? I'm particularly anxious (and somewhat nervous) to see how the styles will look on IE 6-8.
 * I think we could probably live with it for now; it should end up being somewhat easier to fix once I start work on the /core system. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 17:32, December 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah. I have Internet Explorer 8. I'm not seeing any problems with it. Not even the two that you have listed. -- Deltaneos (talk) 18:45, December 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Hmm... I wonder if IE9 is having its compatibility mode (or quirks mode, even) triggered by something... How does it look when you force IE8 to use compatibility mode (or is it already)? 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 18:59, December 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * After playing around some in the IE9 developer toolbox, both issues only appear when the browser is operating in the "IE7 standards" document mode (regardless of what the browser mode is set to). Playing with the rendered CSS, the box-width problem is caused by the interplay between .navbox's 100% width and .cardtable td's 0.2em padding (meaning, it looks like a variant of the IE box model bug). I'm not completely sure how this might be fixed without problems for other parts of the table layout (or at least visual changes for other browsers); I'll have to do some more searching and reading and see if I can figure something out.
 * I have no idea how the doubled border might be fixed. I could hack it so that the first data row doesn't have a top border, but that would be a very fragile solution, and I have no idea how other browsers would react. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 19:24, December 27, 2010 (UTC)

Viewing History?
I was looking around my User Page to find the History section, but I couldn't find it. Is it still there somewhere, or was it taken away after the new Wikia look? Thanks in advance.Vavv Matsumoto (talk • contribs) 23:53, December 26, 2010 (UTC)

Delete picture
Hello :D

I wanted to ask you, if you could just delete this picture I just uploaded last? (AkizaIzinskiID- http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/File:AkizaIzinskiID.jpg) I'm so sorry, I just discovered that we must upload pictures for the wikia not only for the user page.

Please, I'm so sorry :(( AkizaIzinski (talk • contribs) 20:15, December 27, 2010 (UTC)AkizaIzinski

Dirty Image
I just found one that give out Luca in some bad place... Should that user being banned? Just checking my Contributions history for more information. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 00:22, December 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Probably should check his contributions instead. Special:Contributions/Samsamsam123, it's not the first time, and it's a vandalism only account. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 00:25, December 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * I second FredCat's opinion I just checked through a sampling of his "Improvements" and it all appears to be vandalism. Glittersword 02:11, December 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Looking over his contributions, his first edit could well have been in good faith. After being reverted without comment and having his uploaded image deleted with an extremely terse explanation, he seems to have turned to vandalism in frustration, especially considering at least one of his later edits was not actually outright vandalism. I wonder if he couldn't be made into a useful contributor if someone would be willing to try talking to him and taking him under their wing. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 02:36, December 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Their first edit wasn't undone until 21:50 (UTC) that day and the image wasn't deleted until the next day. They had already vandalised several pages before either of those events.
 * Considering they've already been blocked, I won't object if you want to unblock and try talking to them. If you'd rather I do, let me know. -- Deltaneos (talk) 02:51, December 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * You're right; I should have paid attention to the timestamps. That being said, we shouldn't give up on them right off; they can still edit their talk page even though they're currently blocked, so we can try talking to them without first unblocking. I don't think it matters who does it, as long as it's someone capable of being level-headed. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 03:29, December 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * As long as they are posting their best behavior, then yes, we should do that way. I remembered what happened with mine while ago. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 03:33, December 28, 2010 (UTC)

zeXal
hey delta, just of courious, where did you get that info of the first chapter of the manga? can you give me the link if it's a clip? Yes, im Pato (talk • contribs) 14:58, December 28, 2010 (UTC)

Unsigned "Jerk"
Ancient gear king just responded to me on my talk page, tell me off from his page that I don't do anything. Should I remove his comment from my talk page n ignoring him? -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 19:38, December 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * I would say that's up to you. I don't know what forum topic this started over, but your comment on their talk page looked to me to be quite polite - just some friendly advice. At least within the context of that comment, their response was completely uncalled for. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 20:29, December 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, I don't remember what I have done to him... -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 20:37, December 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, it's up to you if you want to remove those comments from your talk page.
 * He does seem to get annoyed easily, so it is quite difficult to suggest he behave differently without upsetting him.
 * Dinoguy, I think the forum it started on is Forum:A whole lot of decks...! He seems to be altering and removing other people's posts. He has also posted similar comments on other people's user and talk pages. -- Deltaneos (talk) 21:12, December 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Ah yes, now I remember that, I was one removed his inappropriate responds. Thanks for reminding me out, D-Neos. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 21:14, December 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh, you were wondering why he was responding to you? Sorry, I misunderstood. I don't think he liked it when you spoke to him about his behaviour here. You were polite, as Dinoguy said, you just gave him friendly advice. But he seems to have taken it the wrong way. -- Deltaneos (talk) 21:21, December 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Indeed, that's what I want him to do. But he just deny them all off and told me off. So I just clean it off to be fair. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 21:24, December 28, 2010 (UTC)

IRC
I rarely see you there anymore. There's things I want to talk to you about! Flame Deity (talk • contribs) 22:19, December 28, 2010 (UTC)

Wait...
Episode and chapter names are supposed to be in quotes? Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:03, December 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, I guess. I do feel it clashes a bit since we put the card names in quotes. It's a bit awkward when things other than the card names are in quotes close to to card names. It's usually obvious what is and isn't a card, but it starts to look a bit strange. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:46, December 29, 2010 (UTC)

Possible Future Vandalism Account
I noticed that someone created the account User:I hate u Gee OH. Just thought it should be brought to your attention. Irohanihoheto (talk • contribs) 07:40, December 29, 2010 (UTC)

Request
Could you please block User:Vaggelis Ferkos? Preferably for ever. He has been vandalising the Greek names given by adding insults. -- ΜοｎtΕ cｈrísＴο ９5 11:15, December 29, 2010 (UTC)

Also block User:Crapman21. Same reasons as the above plus he vandalised my page. -- ΜοｎtΕ cｈrísＴο ９5 11:22, December 29, 2010 (UTC)

Also block User:Ichimaru Gin777 for the same reasons. Sorry if I'm becoming annoying, it's apparently the same person. -- ΜοｎtΕ cｈrísＴο ９5 11:30, December 29, 2010 (UTC)

Other Anti-Support Editor
This user; Autitomakinita, just filling few articles with rude and hateful comments. Does he deserve a ban? -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 18:39, December 29, 2010 (UTC)


 * So I guess I overpowered him then. And also Trivia seemed to forget about the Template Page I just moved. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 19:23, December 29, 2010 (UTC)

jerk2
Like I said to u and fredcat,leave me alone Ancient gear king (talk • contribs) 20:30, December 29, 2010 (UTC)

hmph
Whatever.just leave me alone. I live and play by my own rules Ancient gear king (talk • contribs) 21:25, December 29, 2010 (UTC)

Yugioh Duelist Pack Collection
I was told that you are the admin I could talk to regarding this matter. On the Duelist Pack Collection page there should be information about the blue Duelist Pack Collection tin that has Aster, Zane, Chazz, and Jaden on the front. It isn't the green one, but is similar. I know they exist because I have bought them before. Please look into this matter. I will add an image of the tin. thumb|This is it! Thank you. --YugiohGXfan (talk • contribs) 00:58, December 30, 2010 (UTC)

Is there anyway I can report users?
This kid named Ancient gear king edited my post saying that I suck at beating his "super weak" spellcaster deck. Then he deleted lappylizard's post about not deleting other people posts. I thought you are a admin or something. I just want him to stop starting stuff that is already over.CardMaster. (talk • contribs) 03:59, December 30, 2010 (UTC)

Please block card master/dawn of the gladiator beasts.he's really pissin me off

Curious
Is your episode subpage only for pages that had their summaries listed by you, or would you mind if I edited in the GX summaries that I've completed? Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:09, December 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I only noticed by accident when I clicked your contributions one day. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 16:55, December 31, 2010 (UTC)

Deck page
You deleted my page. I was serious about the tournament. JunkDestroyer2600 (talk • contribs) 23:49, January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Request
Guess who. Could you please protect the article under the name Deep Sea Diva from being edited by IPs? A plain visit at its history page will show you that the Greek name has been vandalised countless times, always being replaced by insults. I do not know where that obsession derives from... -- ΜοｎtΕ cｈrísＴο ９5 01:04, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Much appreciate it. -- ΜοｎtΕ cｈrísＴο ９5 01:40, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

Magic vs spell card images?
Are we worried about getting both the Magic and the Spell versions of any cards where it's distinguishable? Looking at Set Card Galleries:Legend of Blue Eyes White Dragon (TCG-NA-1E), it seems to have only Magic versions (though I haven't looked through the non-Magic/Spell card effects to see if any of them mention Magic/Spell cards), while the only Magic/Spell card currently uploaded for Set Card Galleries:Legend of Blue Eyes White Dragon (TCG-NA-UE) is the Spell version. If we do want both versions, how should we distinguish them in the image names? Alternate artwork? (And has any similar change occurred in any other region versions of the TCG, or in the OCG?) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 17:51, January 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * I used to think that there weren't any cards with the same set number and edition that were printed with both "Magic" and "Spell" versions. But I have seen this once before. I just added a -2 to the end of the Spell version:
 * File:HarpieLadySistersMRD-EU-SR-UE.jpg
 * File:HarpieLadySistersMRD-EU-SR-UE-2.jpg
 * I never looked into it since. There is a "Magic" version of that "Polymerization" image. Give the "Magic" ones the original filenames, I guess and add something like -2 or -Spell to the "Spell" ones and keep it consistent. -- Deltaneos (talk) 18:42, January 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * Okay, I'll go with adding "-Spell" (now to add this bit to TCG-OCG card image...). As far as what cards are like that, literally every card originally released with a mention of "Magic Cards" (be it actual Magic cards, or Monster/Trap card effects that mention them) was re-released as a Spell version, from what I've seen (at least, as far as Booster Sets are concerned) - I'm the type of person that actually focuses on this stuff in my collecting. XD 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 18:47, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

Anti-Archetypes
hat do you think about adding a section on to the archetype pages about cards or strategies that work against/ are typically used against the particular archetype? I think that it could help people to build their decks to better handle the typical opposition that they could face, and help others make their side decks able to handle different archetypes without having to hunt for cards that specifically stop a certain deck type. What do you think? Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 19:29, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Tetsuya Yanagihara
No, his character doesn't appear in Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's. It's my mistake, I thought that the debut and appearance listed his voice work, so that why I added Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's. Blackwings0605 (talk) 11:18, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

Vandal IP address
This IP vandalized a couple of pages. It needs to be blocked for a while User: 69.181.224.157.

Last Arc
Hi writing to ask if it should be ok to put the remining episodes on an Arc. If so should it be called ¨Ark Cardle Arc¨¨ or otherwise. DracoX (talk • contribs) 05:22, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah thats gonna be a debate on what episde to start. Because offically the WRGP itself ends with 137 and the Ark Cradle appearing begins there too. Thoguh im thinking that we could always leave 137 as the last episode of the WRGP Arc and put it also as the begining for Ark Cradle as well if it doesnt bring some confusion though. DracoX (talk • contribs) 22:35, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

Signer Dragons
Can you block 99.56.187.168 from editing the page? The user is vandalizing it repeatedly. Jon Kovacs (talk • contribs) 02:17, January 7, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Signature
Oh, I see. That also explains why | was used in the templates pages instead of the |. Thanks. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 01:46, January 8, 2011 (UTC)