User talk:D.Kaiser/Sandbox

Darklight Dragons 2.0
- Requirements: - Ok. What do you need? :D Chris427 05:23, 4 August 2008 (UTC) -
 * 1) This deck is a Cyberdark/Blue-Eyes/Dragon deck so it must satify all of those types.
 * 2) This deck must be able to summon Blue-Eyes Ultimate Dragon, Cyberdark Dragon, Dragon Master Knight, and Five-Headed Dragon.
 * 3) SHINING STAYS! END OF STORY!
 * 4) Needs to be able to play fast.
 * 5) Does not need common monster staples such as Cyber Dragon, Sangan and Neo-Spacian Grand Mole.
 * 6) Synchro's will go in but I am not concerned with them.
 * A million dollars, and some advice. Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 05:24, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Lol. Queries on the deck I posted? Chris427 05:25, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Dude. Do you have MSN? Add me if you do. It'll make things easier. Chris427 05:27, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * No I don't. Thoughts: I don't have 3 of each Cyberdark, Exploder Dragon, or even one of Prime Material Dragon or Elemental Hero Prisma (but I'll work on those two). Cyberdark Impact! costs $60, but I think I only need one. Why do I need Hand Destruction...or even three? I may add one Foolish Burial. Would Megamorph work instead of LR. I only have one of the Viruses (DDV). And which do you think is better, Solemn Judgment or Dark Bribe? Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 05:32, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * -_-" I did mention that requested decks I make are regardless of price. But of course, that is a totally understandable issue. I hate how money is such an annoyance. The only problem with Cyberdark decks is that Cyberdark Impact! is technically one of the most important cards in the game. We could, however, replace it with Power Bond, and it may be a cheaper solution, though it will nerf the speed. And I can't really say a Cyberdark Deck is a Cyberdark Deck without at least 2 of each Cyberdark. Megamorph could work instead of LR, but its preferable that LR remains. If you have DDV instead of CCV, then go for it. As for the trap negation, both Solemn Judgment and Dark Bribe are expensive/hard-to-get. But most of the time people go for Solemn Judgment. Other times when they don't really care about giving opponents cards, they go for Dark Bribe. It depends on the deck. Chris427 05:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * By Cyberdark Deck, I mean Cards that help CDD and the other Cyberdarks, not themselves. But what about Blue-Eyes (Shining STAYS). Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 05:44, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Shining can stay. It's nice to have a personal card in there. Keep the 3 Blue-Eyes though. Chris427 05:45, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * ...WELL NO F***ING DUH, of coarse I keeping my three BEWDs!!!! No but seriously what support cards should I use? Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 05:47, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Going to sleep, but here are my suggestions for your deck (as it is now). Remove Skill Drain. Remove Polymerization and put more Dragon's Mirror. Never consider Card Destruction over Trade-In in a Dragon deck like yours. Remove Draining Shield and Magic Cylinder. These cards are of no use. Chris427 07:28, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll think about Polymerization...I thought card Destruction was Hand Destruction (I know they are different). Trade-In does not really help me at all (HD would be better). Skill DRain has proven useful...if I use it right (BEUD vs. weak GB's and LS's). And WTH do you have against Magic Cylinder and Draining Shield (What is better in your opinion...DS or Divine Wrath)? Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 14:42, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Petpeeve number 1: Seeing Draining Shield in Dragon Decks. At least remove Draining Shield. It has nothing to do with a dragon deck. -.- Chris427 18:49, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I will replace it with Divine Wrath. But I am curious...MC and DS are, in a sense, Staples...they have little Drawbacks...why do you dislike them? Oh and is there a card (not Royal Oppression) that stops Special Summons (Continous please). Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 05:09, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey Dmaster have you thought about Dragonic Knight, nice surprise summon and 2800 ATK. oh and if you had two Dark Bribes and two Solemn Judgments you should add one more Van'Dalgyon the Dark Dragon Lord, just my two-sense, I like surprise summons :). -- Dragon of chaos 18:57, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Dragonic Knight's a good idea. But as for the negation, you want to focus them to one of the two. Dark Bribe OR Solemn Judgment - never Dark Bribe AND Solemn Judgment. Either trap negator, you should run 3, and that's it. Chris427 00:57, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * May I ask why (I did that on my game with DB, but I am just curious). Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 01:33, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, how about adding the Frembell-related Dragons (Frembell Dragunov and Guard of Frembell, since they would work well with Cyberdarks; once they're released in the TCG) and Stardust Dragon or Red Dragon Archfiend. Bluedog 02:32, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I plan on getting all of the Five Dragons, but GoF or Magna Drago are both good as tuners until White of Legend. As for FD...maybe. F*** they need to make a good Dragon Archetype. Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 02:42, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * You'd think that with all the Archetypes being made, there would be at least one for Dragons, but sadly, Konami hasn't made one. Hopefully the whole 5 Dragons thing will make them make one. Anyway, how about Elemental Hero Woodsman? He's useful in getting Polymerization for Fusions, and his effect also lets you abuse Polymerization for costs. Bluedog 02:55, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * It's okay not what I am looking for though...do you know any cards that could stop DAD, Lightsworns, Gladiator Beasts, and other powerful archtypes...or make this decks swarming/beatdown tactics? Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 03:05, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Light-Imprisoning Mirror, and Shadow-Imprisoning Mirror say hi. -- Dragon of chaos 03:14, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, to Blue-Eyes Shining and Cyberdark Dragon...screw that (sorry if that was harsh). Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 03:17, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * If you wanna stop GB's, cards that negate battles work well. Oh yeah, Destiny Hero - Plasma told me to say hello. Bluedog 03:22, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Does Dmaster have to choke a b****. STOP saying hello!!!!!XD Tell me Bluedog...would you use D-Heros's in a dragon deck? Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 03:26, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Probably not, but Plasma doesn't require other D-Heroes to be used. It's one of those things that can be Side-Decked for tournaments. And I also enjoy Chappelle's Show, lol. Bluedog 03:30, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thought so...I'm Rick James B****. Okay I'm done with that...I need ideas that support Blue-Eyes and Cyberdark Dragon (for example summoner of Illusions can bring out BEUD for a turn then when it is destroyed I can equip it to CDD) Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 03:34, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * As long as you don't say anything about my couch...*ahem*...Shadow Delver would work with Cyberdarks. Bluedog 03:43, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Dude! It just hit me! Penumbral Soldier Lady as a counter to Lightsworns, with few drawbacks to your current deck! Bluedog 04:57, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Do you think I should keep Luster Dragon? Because Mirage Dragon seems very useful. Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 05:00, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Perhaps 2 Luster Dragons and 1 Mirage Dragon. Or 2 Mirage Dragons and 1 Luster Dragon. I'd say the first one is better, because Luster Dragon can be a very good equip for CDD. Bluedog 17:22, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Out of these, which should be side-decked: Van'Dalgyon the Dark Dragon Lord, King of the Swamp, Kaibaman, Summoner of Illusions. Strangely enough I think Van'dalgyon. Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 18:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, either Van'Dalgyon or King of the Swamp. Bluedog 18:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Van'Dalgyon goes...he's better in my Dragon Lord deck anyway. Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 19:15, 12 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Your deck's still jumbled... Chris427 06:58, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah I don't know how to "fix" it. :( Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 16:01, 14 August 2008 (UTC)


 * What's up?
 * Okay you can see some of the new cards I have under "other", should I use any? And if I were to make a 40 card deck (20 monsters) What out of King of the Swamp, Kaibaman, Summoner of Illusions, Twin-Headed Behemoth, and Exploder Dragon should I keep or should I get rid of all my luster dragons add those five, but then what should I add? Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 04:44, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh what? You had a bottomless? Add that. Chris427 04:46, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I take it I should switch it with Dimensional Prison. Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 04:48, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes. Chris427 04:48, 17 August 2008 (UTC)


 * If you ever need to test your deck, this new system Airblade and Osmiu made in the forum section in collaboration with IRC is excellent. Chris427 04:51, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I saw it. Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 15:43, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, my question is, I have 22 monsters. I want 20. So out of King of the Swamp, Kaibaman, Summoner of Illusions, Twin-Headed Behemoth, and Exploder Dragon which two should I get rid of. Or should I remove my Luster Dragons, in which I have 19 monster and then add Mirage Dragon? Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 00:28, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Out of those, its best to remove Kaibaman and Summoner of Illusions. Chris427 00:33, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Exactly what I thought you would say, and I agree. So wanna duel? Dmaster (Contribs • Count) 00:37, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Ah, I needed a list like that. Up until now, I had been using various lists like that, but they were all over the place! Thanks for putting 'em all in one place. Bluedog 00:49, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Darklight Dragons 3.0

 * Hmmm... well for starters, why's Wulf in there? I get that Foolish Burial can send them to the grave and stuff, but it seems like such a strange choice (not saying it's bad, just... a bit odd xD). --Bluedog (Talk) 04:29, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Oppps, meant Ryko (he is the unconventional measure btw). Dmaster (Talk • Contribs • Count) 04:32, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that makes more sense now. Well with him, it'd be A LOT faster in terms of powering up the Cyberdarks... or sending a Blue-Eyes to revive it later. Plus his effect would be incredibly annoying (getting rid of ANY card x_x). I'd say it sounds like a good choice. Have you tested this deck out yet? --Bluedog (Talk) 04:37, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah but it never works as it should. My regular deck probably is better, but then again I've been going against Lightsworn and DAD Decks. Dmaster (Talk • Contribs • Count) 04:39, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Well what's the biggest problem with it? --Bluedog (Talk) 04:44, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The "getting my a*s kicked"-part. Actually I just had a duel with it. I hand no hand and just summoned BEUD and my opponent had JD, Wulf and Jain, they had 6000 LP, I had 150. I go to attack thinking "Your a*s is mine, b****" then they remove from play Necro Gardna. SON OF A B****! It's faster, but unlike my actual deck. it has very little to work with. PS. Currently busy, will you be on in an hour? Dmaster (Talk • Contribs • Count) 04:49, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I might be, can't say for sure. --Bluedog (Talk) 05:00, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Sup. --Bluedog (Talk) 06:19, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Nothing much, still getting my ass handed to me though. 2 of every 5 duels I win...about, maybe less. Dmaster (Talk • Contribs • Count) 06:21, 3 August 2009 (UTC)