Forum:Decks for Free!

DECKS FOR FREE STATUS: ''' Closed! '''

Please make sure to check the Archives or Deck Galleries FIRST, before requesting a deck. If the deck requested is already in the Archives/Deck Galleries, the request will be marked as Finished.

''' Please note, any deck that doesn't follow the guidelines below will be removed. '''

If your deck request was removed due to inactivity, feel free to re-request it.

If you have any questions regarding an archived deck, feel free to leave questions on the deckbuilder's talk page, or that of Brooklyn, if the deckbuilder has retired.

General Information
This page is dedicated to helping all duelists out there that need help with their decks. If you're a duelist that needs some help, we'll build you a deck. All you have to do is post here and tell us what kind of deck you want and how much money you're willing to spend getting the cards. If you already have a deck, if you post it in the Deck Template form, we'll revise it and give you our insight. We'll also make a side deck on request, but most likely you'll be directed to this list.

Example Requests

 * Ex1: Hi, could you make me a Butterspy deck? I have a money limit of $300. ~


 * Ex2: Hey, would you look at my Butterspy deck for me? ~

We'll make it a personal project and try to make sure that you're pleased with the final product. Each deckbuilder will only take one deck at a time and they will mark it by adding their part of their username to the header of that section and will let you know when they're done with a project by replacing their name with "Finished" on the request.

Please note that it's your job to collect the cards, our job is to create the perfect decklist for you.

Rules and Guidelines

 * 1) Please check the top of this page to see if Decks for Free! is "Open", if we are "Closed", then we will not accept requests.
 * 2) Make all requests in their own section and not directly beneath another person's request. Click here to start a new request.
 * 3) Have a direction for your deck (Examples: Dark World, Burn, Spellcaster, Bounce, etc.). Random strings of cards will not be helped. Remember that if you ask for a generic theme, such as Swarm or Chaos, you're leaving your deck up to the deckbuilder's preferences. If you don't want that, be more specific in what you want.
 * 4) Please don't post a request and ask for a Meta deck, you can find a decklist for almost any meta deck on most major Yu-Gi-Oh article sites, like TCGPlayer.com or Alter Reality Games. However, if you want to post a request for a meta deck, but want a unique twist to the deck to make it less meta, you may post that, just have something in mind when you do post.
 * 5) Give us at least 2-3 weeks notice if you plan to take a deck to a tournament, it is very difficult to make a deck for a tournament with only a few days of notice.
 * 6) Remember that we do build decks on a budget, but we can't make a great deck for under $20, the modern world doesn't work like that any more, so try to have a budget closer to $40 or $50.
 * 7) Do not ask for more than one deck at a time as others will have to wait longer for the deckbuilder to get to them. If you do post more than 1 request, we will close one of them, until the other one is finished, or just remove it. Also, don't post many requests back-to-back, as that creates more work as well.
 * 8) You may request a deckbuilder to help you, please note that it will only ensure that deckbuilder's help. It will not ensure the immediate help of that deckbuilder.
 * 9) This is a free service, but we are taking time out of our lives to help you. Be courteous and respectful to us, and please don't leave us waiting for you to answer a question.
 * 10) If we believe a duelist has abandoned their request, we'll place a notice on the request warning of it's removal within 24 hours unless some activity happens, but don't count on a notice, as a request can be removed without one.
 * 11) Decks that are not signed with 4 tildes (~) will not be helped, and the request may be removed without a notice.
 * 12) We reserve the ability to delete any and all requests for with or without a reason, including having an attitude toward a deckbuilder(s) on this wiki, abandonment, or failure to follow rules.
 * 13) Completed decks will be moved to the archive after a few days. Also, if you saw a deck on your post, but your post is now gone, check the most recent archive.
 * 14) We expect that you'll have access to and/or be able to buy cards from online retailers or hobby stores, we base all card prices on TCGPlayer or Google Shopping. We can, on request, verify prices on other sites. We will automatically chose the lowest card price for you.
 * 15) This page is not a page for people to post their opinions. Please, if you want to give your opinion on someone's deck, post it on the user's talk page.
 * 16) It is highly recommended that you browse the deck galleries or archives before requesting, you may find what you're looking for there before requesting our assistance. Also, please try to update the builds in the archives or galleries by yourself before asking us, you may ask us if you don't know how to update a deck, but it helps us if you do update an old deck by yourself.
 * 17) Please post all requests at the bottom of this forum, and not at the top of the Requests section, this is for archival purposes, and makes it easier on the staff.
 * 18) Please use proper spelling, grammar, and capitalization. Don't posts requests that have "I hav dek tht nds impvmt", it will be removed without further consideration. This also applies to the title of your request.
 * 19) Please make an account and log in before posting a request. Mere IP signatures will not be accepted, because it makes it more difficult for the deckbuilders to contact you. Making an account is simple and easy, just go to the top of the page and click on “Create an account”, then follow the simple instructions. Requests signed by with mere IP addresses will be given 24 hours to make an account.
 * 20) Remember to use a Template:Decklist for all requests, if you are posting your own deck. You can also post a Screen Shot of your deck from Dueling Network, if that's quicker. But a template is preferred.
 * 21) Please do not ask about the status of your request. When a deckbuilder has taken your request they will tell you that they have taken it, and you'll see a part of their username in the request title. Again, please don't ask about the status, but do at times comment on the deck, otherwise it may be removed because there is no activity from you or a deckbuilder.

ANY REQUEST THAT DOES NOT FOLLOW THESE RULES WILL BE GIVEN 24 HOURS TO COMPLY.

Contacts
''For more information or questions concerning this page, please visit the talk pages below. Do note that names higher up on the list are veteran members of Decks for Free!, and the most active members are listed.''

Archive Maintenance Notes
This section is for staff only. If you want to browse the archives, please look in the above section.

tag has been removed from Archive...

Deck Galleries
All the decks built on DFF, are in the galleries.
 * If you want a deck based around a monster, such as Yubel, look in the Monster Gallery.
 * If you want an Archetype, such as Gladiator Beasts, look in the Archetype Gallery.
 * If you want a deck based around a specific Type or Attribute, such as Beast or FIRE, look in the Attribute and Type Gallery.
 * If you want a deck based around a specific Theme, such as Chaos or Ritual, look in the Theme Gallery.

Deck Gallery Maintenance Notes
This section is for staff only. If you want to browse the deck galleries, please look in the above section.

= Requests =

Bob (and others who can help =D) - FredCat's Phantom Beastcraft Deck
Hello, this deck don't need a budget and is running under March 2013 banlist. So it's free to be fixing and improving - Lately I had running into the clumsy hand while playing with this recipe. Here's an image. I am kindly to posting the recipe in Decktemplate so anyone can understand the recipe easily.

That's pretty much it for my current knowledge. Thank you for taking your time to checking this recipe out and tell me what I had done wrong. As you can see, it's heavily base on summoning Token via "Mecha Phantom Beast" Effect/Xyz Monsters and using them in various ways - such as destroying opponent's cards, give use for Level Adaption, counter the moves and even protecting the "Mecha Phantom Beast" Monsters themselves, except for Tokens. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  13:05, February 23, 2013 (UTC)


 * Hopefully, someone else can help you Fred, sadly, I don't have enough experience with the archetype. Sorry, mate. -- Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  01:16, February 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * Howdy Fred. I must confess, I'm not too much of an expert with these cards so I'm not too sure how much help I can be. For starters, your monsters appear alright to me along with your Extra Deck; I'm sure "Sangan" would have been helpful in this deck! =D


 * In terms of your Spells and Traps, I'm noticing a fair few odd cards which do look a little out of place and otherwise conditional. For example, "Void Trap Hole"; might it be worth trading that in for another Bottomless? In my opinion, you want to maximise your chances of drawing a useable card during every draw phase. That's why I'm a fan of the splashable staples to be honest; just to get you out of jail when you're feeling down and out. You could possibly remove "Gravity Blaster" for say another "Mirror Force" or a 3rd "MST". You might even consider throwing in a "Birthright" for field advantage.


 * We also mustn't forget to side the obligatory "Road to all thing bright and beautiful :) Sorry I couldn't be an awful lot of help; I too am not an expert with this archetype. I have left this request open to the other deckbuilders to see if they can give further guidance. 10:31, February 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * Sound good, but you forgot that I am following March 2013 - which mean no "Critter"; he's banning in that list. And why "Birthright" if I am running heavy on Effect Monsters, with barely enough space for Vanilla Monsters? I can accept that if you meant it for "Call of the Haunted", which is flexible version of "Birthright". -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  11:28, February 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * Replied to my silly mistake on your talk page =D 11:46, February 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * Here's the current recipe, after heed the advice and details of Bob456's. I don't post the Extra Deck for Main because they remains same as above.


 * -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  11:50, February 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * Oh yes, nearly forget to put in the image. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:23, February 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * This is still opening just in case if anyone think it needed some more improvement. If you think it's fine that way, then I can admit this topic to closing with the approve. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:03, February 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * I'd have to say that the deck isn't that bad, I've used your build and it did fairly well. I don't know what to do about opening with a bad hand, some decks just open with a horrible hand while others can open with amazing hands. Have you tried adding any draw power to the deck? Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 19:31, February 27, 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your feedback - So for draw power, I don't know very much but Avarice and Hand Destruction. But I am not sure which cards that they can trade in. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:18, February 27, 2013 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the late reply, I was trying to come up with the best possible way to add 1 or both of the cards you mentioned. I believe Hand Destruction would probably work best, with another CotH or Iron Call while possibly dropping Stailth down to 2, I believe 3 is overkill and your oppoent will find out fairly quickly the only monster you set will have 2100 Def and not attack it. I'm not really sure what else to drop, I thought maybe Queen's Light or Resonance Device to add in another copy, but they both have their perks and couldn't really decide which would be better. Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 06:17, March 1, 2013 (UTC)


 * It's quite fine - I don't closed this topic until I get an approve. I will see if I can fitting them in. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  12:44, March 1, 2013 (UTC)

Update -

With a picture to prove. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  12:54, March 1, 2013 (UTC)

Upgrading Gurren Lagann
Hi guys, it's me again. I was simply wondering if you kind fellows can help me by "upgrading" the Gurren Lagann deck I had requested years ago to the current banlist. It got hit last ban list, but I had quit before that so I didn't care. However, I would like to see this deck make a comeback. Here's the list I was given:

Anything you guys can do to keep the theme and make it competitive, if possible, would be nice. Thanks again guys! Aporia&#39;s Apprentice (talk • contribs) 05:52, February 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * Maybe you could ask User:Resk? She's the one that made it, and I remember, I was here at the time as well. -- Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  18:13, February 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * Playing Traditional Format, are we? Just to confirm; the following cards in this recipe are current banning - "Glow-Up Bulb", "Trishula", and "Trap Dustshoot". "Sangan" will also be banning in coming Format. To replacing them all: I will give you the following cards - "Unknown Synchron", replacing Bulb; "Mist Wurm", replacing Trishula; "Treacherous Trap Hole", replacing "Trap Dustshoot". And for "Sangan"; "Debris Dragon"? -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  18:30, February 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * It was made prior to Bulb being hit on the banlist, Just to verify, it was a deck to summon Halbeard cannon?
 * - Resk ( ✩ )( ☯ ) 22:22, February 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * I know, I just help updating the current/next banlist. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:03, February 24, 2013 (UTC)

Well, the deck didn't focus on summoning one monster. The deck simply summoned monsters that either looked like Gurren Lagann or it summoned monsters that had more powerful forms, kind of like how Gurren Laggan becomes bigger in the show. I liked how the deck functioned, in other words, I like how it would seem like I'm going to lose, but the deck came back and won. That's the exact theme I was going for. I hope that helps Aporia&#39;s Apprentice (talk • contribs) 13:26, February 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * We all know that - Resk's just talk about those are the cards for "T.G. Halbeard Cannon" strategy. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  13:54, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Finished - Elemental Dragons Deck
hey I'm back from the network and a deck caught my eye. its the incarnate dragons. they at first glance look like they dont support each other but in reality work really well by using cost to full fill conditions so i was wondering can you build me an elemental dragons deck that uses these Elemental Dragon well. Killerman3333 (talk • contribs) 08:02, February 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * Putting them all together honestly clogs the deck, the fire one is better for fire kings, while the water one is better for Mermails. It would probably be better of you picked a single one.-- Evolution   Is The Key   08:40, February 24, 2013 (UTC)

well it might seem that way at first but with their effects they quickly replace themselves. also as the march list is out it should be easy to format this to that format. while maintaining hand advantage and not using their discard abilities as that will just clog the deck it can be a most intriguing deck. also by running red-eyes darkness it makes it easy to pull off the dragons refueling ability as well as spells and traps that banish/summon them. Killerman3333 (talk • contribs) 08:53, February 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm afraid I don't agree. Though you may want a second deckbuilder's opinion.-- Evolution   Is The Key   08:55, February 24, 2013 (UTC)

that is fine.Killerman3333 (talk • contribs) 09:32, February 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi, on this, I agree with Killerman, if you can get those dragons to the grave quickly, it seems possible to make a decent deck. Not really with their self discarding effect, but just to banish the others and swarm with the Elemental dragons (maybe even use for Xyz summon?). I'm too busy this week for deckbuilding and testing, but if it's still an open question next Saturday, I will make it. Nephthy (talk • contribs) 09:55, February 24, 2013 (UTC)

どうもありがとうございました Killerman3333 (talk • contribs) 10:01, February 24, 2013 (UTC)

Hi. This certainly sounds like an interesting deck and for me - it will either win or lose. If you can get the balance between the cards right, then it should be rather competitive. Nephthy seems to have a plan laid out, so I was thinking of leaving it to him; he has more idea of this than I do! =D 10:34, February 24, 2013 (UTC)

yes it seems that way because with the effect You can banish 2 other monsters that are "attribute" and/or Dragon-Type from your hand and/or Graveyard; Special Summon this card from your hand or Graveyard. they seem fast and with seven star sword they can gain even more advantage. Killerman3333 (talk • contribs) 10:39, February 24, 2013 (UTC)

here is what i have so far

Killerman3333 (talk • contribs) 11:38, February 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * You can also just banish a copy with Gold Sarcophagus to search out almost any Dragon you need. I personally have a build that just focuses on Blaster and Volcanic Shell. -- Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  13:55, February 24, 2013 (UTC)

ya i figured out Gold Sarcophagus was good for searching a little too late also i did not include the extra deck as i thought it would be obvious. i have decoy in there for when duels get out of hand. Killerman3333 (talk • contribs) 14:04, February 24, 2013 (UTC)

so i updated it and added an extra deck also i have gold sarcophagus in side chaos zone is in there due to it can get a lot of counters and then free return ability. i noticed that i can only play one dragon ability from each dragon but that just means 12 options and you can only use 4 of them in one turn but that is still fine also swords still make me draw like mad. if the deck slows down there are the "baby" dragons. this deck is overly consistent and if you are not careful you can misplay extremely easily. Killerman3333 (talk • contribs) 11:46, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * i have noticed that some players use ellipse wyvern as well as ladd so im wondering are those to be in side or maybe not i wonder Killerman3333 (talk • contribs) 15:06, March 1, 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I'm sorry I wasn't so helpful, I had a very busy week, I didn't have time for yugioh. I made and tested this deck yesterday and made some minor changes today. It's basically like your deck, just made some changes (explained under the decklist):

So, this is not so different from your version. I added D.D.R. because I found that you can banish all the dragons in just a few turns, and then you need recycling cards a lot. Hidden armory searches out or recycles D.D.R. for the cost of not normal summoning, which I don't do even when I can. I use Wyvern, it's a pretty good card and fuels the seaching effect of Tempest (This Tempest card may be awesome in a dragunity deck!) and it also has this cannot normal summon restriction. And lastly, I added Dragon Ravine, it can send a dragon each turn from your deck to your grave. You have enough dragons in your hand most of the time, so discarding them is not a problem. Even if you can use it only once, totally worth it. Other cards need no explanation. Nephthy (talk • contribs) 11:31, March 3, 2013 (UTC)

thanks this looks good but why did you not run the baby dragons? Killerman3333 (talk • contribs) 03:09, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

Bob - Spellcaster Deck
I've been a person who has watched this board for a while although never thought of joining up until now. I really wish you could assist me in further building the possible potential of the deck itself. The deck is listed below and is a spellcaster deck that focuses around rendering spells useless. So far the deck runs pretty smoothly, but I do want other suggestions on how to improve the quality of it.

Sorry for any problems with the code first time posting here.

Devmoscoso (talk • contribs) 05:27, February 27, 2013 (UTC)

Well I fixed any of the issues this previously had so I hope one of you can assist me in upgrading this deck. If there are key things you need please do not hesitate to ask. Budget is not a concern so please do not worry about that, however, I do like the fact that getting Sorcerer of Dark Magic out with Secret Village provides a spell and trap lockdown. So I would like to continue around that idea. I'm pleased to have your assistance

Devmoscoso (talk • contribs) 22:00, February 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi there. I'm rather liking your deck to be honest. It looks nice, smooth and fun.


 * I assume you're running it under the Traditional Format as Pot of Greed is otherwise banned. :)

Monsters
Your monster lineup is looking good although Dark Magician and Dark Magician Girl are fun to play, but aren't that effective on their own. I would suggest adding Skilled White Magician to deal with those.

Two Breaker the Magical Warrior would be better in my view - you could sub out Blizzard Princess for him.

Spell cards
Overall, the spell cards are are all looking a little out of place, random. To me, I would duplicate Ancient Rules in order to remove Pot of Greed as it is banned in Advanced Format.

Dark Magic Curtain is also a great card to add when using the magicians. If anything, I would prefer to have one or two of those instead of Sage's Stone which can be quite conditional.

It's very difficult to go through every card so, in general, I would perhaps try doubling up a few of the cards in order to ensure better draws.

Trap Cards
To me, Mystical Refpanel doesn't serve a great purpose in this deck. To be conservative, I would recommend adding one of the Solemns for extra security. Otherwise, Cursed Seal of the Forbidden Spell is great for abolishing disruptive spell cards which are often spammed.

My views are only at first glance at the moment. When I pop back later, I should be able to expand a few of these points. 20:41, March 1, 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. Yes, I am playing TCG as I really only play with friends, however, I do not mind taking into consideration the banned list should be fun to actually have a deck that follows the 'rules'.

Monster(s)

I think you meant the Skilled Dark Magician? Skilled White Magician is a monster used to Special Summon the Buster Blader.

Also Blizzard Princess although a high leveled card is much easier to get out as she requires only one sacrifice (so long as its as spellcaster) and during the turn she's summoned my opponent cannot activate spell and or trap cards. So it makes it easy to wipe the field or attack without fear of the card effects affecting my monster(s).

I've also forgot to mention I have an Arcanite Magician which I use Flamevell in conjunction with another spellcaster (usually rapid-fire) to bring him out.

Spell Card(s)

Yeah, I think I require a drastic amount of help with the spell cards to help better the deck itself. You said you'll take a look at it later so I'll hold off my input for now.

Trap Card(s)

As with most decks I tried keeping the trap cards to a minimum and yes I've realized that Mystical Refpanel does terribly here. It has worked a few times where I've used my opponent's terraforming, but besides that holds no greater purpose. At first it seemed like a good card, but was mis-read by a friend of mine who had suggested it to me which is why I took it up.

I'll go ahead and add a Solemn's Warning into the deck as soon as a I can while also waiting for more feedback. The Cursed Seal card you mention seems splendid much like Solemn's Warning I'll be sure to add this card as well.

Thank you for taking up the deck. I look forward to improving this with your assistance, time and knowledge.

Devmoscoso (talk • contribs) 20:57, March 1, 2013 (UTC)

Resonator Deck
Sup. I'd like to request a Resonator Nova deck, but I also want it to be as consistent and competitive as possible. Its priority is to always have a Synchro on the field and also bring out Red Nova as much as possible, like a Synchron Quasar deck, except with Resonators, you get it. No budget, I'd also like a side deck included. Thanks in advance.-- SLAY THE GODS! 11:17, February 25, 2013 (UTC)

66.108.246.40 (talk) 21:42, February 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * I built a deck similar to this a while ago, I'll find it and update it.-- Evolution  Is The Key   18:36, February 25, 2013 (UTC)

--Devmoscoso (talk • contribs) 13:09, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Darkness Word
Hi again, this time I would like to ask for a dark work deck that use Darkness Neosphere and Ceruli, with some combo like Darkness+Call+Trance/other to recicle all my banished cards/grave and make some awesome combo with that... I have the structure deck x3, and Trance x3, Raven x2, Morphing, DAD, Armageddon Knight, Heliopolis, Scrap Dragon, Dark End Dragon, Dark Highlander, and some basic staple. Thank in advanceCopperfield (talk • contribs) 21:10, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Bob - Ninja deck
Hello dear deckubuilders, i would like to ask for you to build me a ninja deck.First of,here are the ninja cards i alredy have http://i.imgur.com/FwR949x.png i also have dark horus and dark simorgh x2 I have acces to some most common staple cards like dark hole reborn heavy utopia pearl etc.(i have a s.warning),so my request for you is to make a good ninja deck that is budget,i dont have a definition of the budget,but try to keep it as low as possible without heavily changing the build because of that.Also,i tried to make a xyz rank 4 spam ninja deck with lots of traps to abuse upstart goblin ninja,but if you really dont like the idea or it cant be made budget,you are free to change it. Thank you in advance for your understanding and help,

Rider of the light (talk • contribs) 14:30, March 1, 2013 (UTC)


 * I'll take this deck. Be aware I won't be available tomorrow, so please expect the request to be fulfilled by Tuesday at the latest. Otherwise, poke me. =D 20:22, March 1, 2013 (UTC)

Thank you :D And,i have just one thing to add:scratch that budget thing,use whatever you need to to make a competetive xyz ninja spam deck :D

Rider of the light (talk • contribs) 19:21, March 3, 2013 (UTC)

Competitive Cyber Deck
Hi there deckbuilders, I have an unusual request. May I have a deck that revolves around Cyber Dragon/its fusions and is competitive? There is no budget, since I'm building this deck for YGOPro.

Thanks. ChutneyFTW (talk • contribs) 05:18, March 3, 2013 (UTC)


 * I made a cyber deck a few days ago, I'll tinker with it a little more and see what I can do.-- Evolution  Is The Key   16:05, March 3, 2013 (UTC)

Anyone that can work with this odd request - Clear World, Lava Golem and Grinder Golem.
Hello, I don't have a budget for this deck and would like it to run on March 2013 Banlist. The onl requirements are that it contains Clear World, Lava Golem, Grinder Golem and Mask of Restrict. I have looked for similar requests, but couldn't find any, so I'm sorry if there are any. Thanks to whoever takes up this task. --FlareSoldier (talk • contribs) 09:50, March 4, 2013 (UTC)FlareSoldier