User talk:DragonEmeperor

Welcome
Hi and welcome to the Yu-Gi-Oh! wiki! Thank you for your edit to the Burn! page.

If you need help, you can consult these pages:
 * Help:Contents
 * Manual of style
 * Chat policy

If you would like to make a suggestion or ask for assistance, feel free start a topic at the forums or contact an administrator.

Japanese names
Don't make up Japanese names for articles which have no official name. Unlike Zuzu's bracelet, none of the other bracelets received a name in the anime or a magazine. --  The Talk Goblin 20:35, November 26, 2015 (UTC)

Reversions
The reason why I reverted a large amount of your edits before this is because Cheesedude specified who exactly the opponents were. You took those specifications out. This is because the characters Dueled only a small amount of members of each faction, not the faction as a whole. ChaosGallade (talk • contribs) 09:19, January 18, 2016 (UTC)

"Unofficial members"
There's no such thing as an "unofficial Lancer." Neither Zuzu nor Sora have any of the benefits of being a Lancer without actually being named a Lancer. Lancers' benefits: modified Duel Disks with the ability to produce "Solid Vision with Mass" without the help of an ARC system, with the custom Action Field "Cross Over"; the card "Dimension Mover"; and custom Pendulum Monsters made for their use. At best, they're just allies to the Lancers' cause. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 21:36, January 26, 2016 (UTC)


 * While the section probably still shouldn't be re-added, it came about because the Executive Council decided to count Zuzu's win in the first round as one for the Lancers and Declan himself called her equal in skill to the Lancers. Does that warrant Trivia, maybe? Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 22:04, January 26, 2016 (UTC)


 * I think UK's rationale is fine here. As for the Council, that's a fair point, but who becomes a Lancer has nothing to do with the Council. Reiji is the one making these decisions, what the Council thinks is entirely irrelevant If you can find a way to integrate that point as trivia without simply adding it in a trivia section of its own, I have no objections. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:47, January 27, 2016 (UTC)

Summoning Methods: Lancers
Reinforcing what UK and Cheesedude have said; get on the talk page and start discussing reasonably. Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 00:06, May 6, 2016 (UTC)


 * Talk page. Now. You didn't even give him a reason this time. Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 03:25, September 17, 2016 (UTC)

Images
The infobox image is right-aligned. Images go right-left-right-left-etc except in very, very specific circumstances. Do not revert again. You need to stop reverting people (regardless of who they are) without providing an explanation as to why. If you have a specific argument as to WHY we should do something a certain way, you need to make that clear in edit summaries. Thanks, Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 09:08, May 24, 2016 (UTC)

Character biographies
When you're writing character biographies, please keep the tenses consistent. Past tense is highly preferred. ChaosGallade (talk • contribs) 15:24, May 30, 2016 (UTC)

Manual of Style
Follow the Yu-Gi-Oh!:Manual of style more carefully, please. More specifically, follow the quotation marks section of the link. ChaosGallade (talk • contribs) 05:27, May 31, 2016 (UTC)

My bad ChaosGallade, sometimes I can't word the summaries so I be trying the best I could to get it right. DragonEmeperor (talk • contribs) 06:20, May 31, 2016 (UTC)

Talk Before Undo
If you have an issue with my edits on the Lancers article, take it up on the talk page first before you go undoing them. Otherwise, it'll end up blocked again. --Jackpo21 (talk • contribs) 03:23, July 5, 2016 (UTC)


 * The same can be said about a lot of things on this wikia, like the trivia or the dimension each Lancer came from. The summoning methods are a plot point to Arc-V and I don't appreciate you deleting them every chance you get. On another note, you never really argued your case about it until the page got blocked. --Jackpo21 (talk • contribs) 03:56, July 5, 2016 (UTC)


 * Which no one bothered to follow up on, leading to Cheesedude forgetting about the block until I reminded him. --Jackpo21 (talk • contribs) 23:45, July 5, 2016 (UTC)


 * Then maybe you can stop undoing my edits and talk it over in the talk page for once. --Jackpo21 (talk • contribs) 01:45, July 6, 2016 (UTC)


 * That's not for you to decide yourself. --Jackpo21 (talk • contribs) 02:40, July 6, 2016 (UTC)


 * Well I hope your happy. The Lancers article was blocked again. --Jackpo21 (talk • contribs) 05:13, July 6, 2016 (UTC)

Manual of style
If you've been the one editing the ARC-V character articles, I suggest you follow the Yu-Gi-Oh!:Manual of style more carefully. For instance, it's not right to do this: "monster name's" effect. It's better to do this: The effect of "monster name". ChaosGallade (talk • contribs) 07:12, July 18, 2016 (UTC)


 * Seconding what Chaos said. English isn't an easy language, and I do appreciate that you add the information, but it is getting a little tiresome to clean up the grammar afterwards. Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 03:08, August 3, 2016 (UTC)


 * Just another request for you to fix your grammar. Also, we're putting Episode 125 in the Heartland City arc; we don't split arcs in the middle of Duels and Episode 126 is where the story begins to change. Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 05:43, October 10, 2016 (UTC)

Template capitalization
Please don't change the capitalization of template names when editing, as you did in this edit with anime. It makes literally no difference for the wiki software, and only clutters up the diff. Thanks! 「 ディノ 奴 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 05:05, September 28, 2016 (UTC)

Questions about the Awakened Page
Couple of things about the awakened page, 1. Sorry about the edit, did not know about the that they have made the 6th arc. 2. Would Yuto changing body count as awakened? 3. Reference 19 should be with episode 125 right, not 126?

Bdun4 (talk • contribs) 05:13, October 3, 2016 (UTC)

Changes?
Hey why did you undo all the changes i madeYugosynchropaladin (talk • contribs) 19:51, October 6, 2016 (UTC)yugosynchropaladin

Let's just wait for the episodes to air, the spoilers are making a mess on the pages. DragonEmeperor (talk • contribs) 23:48, October 6, 2016 (UTC)

Duplicate files
DragonEmeperor, you uploaded two files exactly similar to two already existing files, but with a different (and better) name. If you want files to have another name, you just have to tag them with Rename, if they are in the same format of the ones you would upload (PNG, in this particular case). Do not re-upload them under a different name. Further more, if they are re-uploaded by you with a different format (JPG that you upload as PNG), at least tag the stray ones with Delete, please. Becasita Pendulum (talk • contribs) 22:01, October 10, 2016 (UTC)

My bad. DragonEmeperor (talk • contribs) 00:47, October 11, 2016 (UTC)


 * Again, if you re-upload a JPG image as PNG, please tag the JPG one with . And since anime images don't follow any naming policy, if you could pass the new path, it would be great. E.g.,.
 * We really don't want to have copyrighted content floating around meaninglessly. Becasita Pendulum (talk • contribs) 11:27, October 31, 2016 (UTC)

Celina and Lulu
That image that you put on their pages with them cornering Yuya doesn't really feature them. May I suggest the shot with them both in it while the "Parasite Fusioners" cower in fear? It's fine to leave it on the Duel Academy page though. Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 05:25, October 13, 2016 (UTC)

Undoing
I noticed you undoing edits without giving an explanation of said undoing. Please give your reasoning for undoing things in the future; edits summaries are there for a reason. ChaosGallade (talk • contribs) 20:05, October 16, 2016 (UTC)
 * Second warning on the above. In addition, you also removed the summary of the latest ARC-V episode when there was clearly nothing wrong with it. Please explain yourself. ChaosGallade (talk • contribs) 07:53, October 17, 2016 (UTC)
 * The summary was already put back and I decided to just fix it a little instead.DragonEmeperor (talk • contribs) 09:52, October 17, 2016 (UTC)

You did it again for Yusho's page and started a mini edit war with User:Lol-ionel!. Do NOT do that, please. Do not remove material before you replace it; do it at the same time, after all it's what I do when I clean up your mess. And if you had a problem with Loli's grammar, you are the LAST person to gripe about that. Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 06:06, October 24, 2016 (UTC)


 * It's important that we give reasons when we undo edits. We need to be considerate that:
 * It's disheartening for someone to have their work rejected without explanation.
 * If your reverts are indeed correct, the other person needs to know what was wrong, so they don't just redo their edit.
 * If people are in disagreement over the content of a page, they need to give their reasons, in order for some resolution to be made.
 * I think that you have good intentions behind your undos and you're genuinely working to improve the pages, so I'd rather it not come to this. But you've made at least 15 unexplained reverts since your third prompt above. If you continue to undo without making an effort to add an explanation, you will be temporarily blocked from editing. -- Deltaneos (talk) 19:59, October 29, 2016 (UTC)


 * Just to voice that I also support this, because, DragonEmeperor, I've been keeping an eye on you for several months now; before the messages above, you only reverted with an explanation twice (as far as my records go, at least (not 100% accurate)). I always tried to avoid saying something regarding it, because, just like Deltaneos, I also think you don't have bad intentions. However, everytime you click on "undo", a notification saying "If you are undoing an edit that is not vandalism, explain the reason in the edit summary rather than using only the default message." appears and you never (bar a couple of times) respected it. So I'd also like to leave the note here that I want you to start making use of the edit summary, at least when you revert other people's edits. Thank you. Becasita Pendulum (talk • contribs) 20:08, October 29, 2016 (UTC)


 * And again, on the Duel Academy (ARC-V) page. Get to the talk page there and discuss with User:Superlogan7437 instead of undoing his edits without telling him why. Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 03:36, October 31, 2016 (UTC)


 * Good. Thank you. Make sure that you keep it up please. Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 04:12, October 31, 2016 (UTC)


 * You've made at least thirteen unexplained reverts in the past two weeks. You have been temporarily blocked from editing. -- Deltaneos (talk) 12:19, January 1, 2017 (UTC)

Mental State breaks
someone did not read episode 127 summary (Declan interrupts and relays his view of the story, that Leo was so immersed in his incomprehensible research that Henrietta's mental state started to break) (Clayton Carmine 23:55, October 16, 2016 (UTC))

Pages with no links
I suppose you went through all of those pages adding just one link to remove them from pages with no links, correct? You see, the point is not to remove them from there; the point is to clean them. And they still need that clean-up as much as they needed when they didn't have a link. The difference now is that they can't be easily (if at all) tracked. Becasita Pendulum (talk • contribs) 09:37, October 19, 2016 (UTC)

I honestly did try to do all of them, but it got tiring so yeah I did it the lazy way.DragonEmeperor (talk • contribs) 00:08, October 20, 2016 (UTC)

I'm looking forward to see more from the deck of leo and the awakening of zarc Yamamoto genryusei (talk • contribs) 22:30, October 30, 2016 (UTC)

please stop
BASTA!!! (means stop in Italy) (Lionel Head (talk • contribs) 17:39, November 7, 2016 (UTC))


 * Lol-ionel, your edits didn't have any source to back them up. No, we don't assume stuff. If an official source says Zarc will be voiced by A and Ray by B, then we add it here. Else, we don't. Becasita Pendulum (talk • contribs) 17:41, November 7, 2016 (UTC) —Last edited at 17:42, November 27, 2016 (UTC). Reason: Fix typo.

More undoing
Could you explain why you reverted this, please? Sure, I can see it doesn't have the best grammar, but some tweaks could put this into place. Why did you revert? And again, no explanation given. DragonEmeperor, this is not to be repeated. Becasita Pendulum (talk • contribs) 17:42, November 27, 2016 (UTC)
 * Some of the info was in the wrong section and was half done. 0123456789 The Great wasn't even trying to finish the relationships, that's why I reverted it so somebody could try to clean it up. DragonEmeperor 20:01, November 27, 2016 (UTC)


 * If it was in the wrong section, it means it would have to be moved to the correct section (or the section name being adapted (depending on the case)). If it was half-done, now it's zero-done. At least before, it had something that wasn't erroneous (if it was erroneous, that erroneous part should have been removed; the erroneous part only). Please don't do this again. People try to help; they may not have the time to build the prettiest of the texts, but they try to add some info. If it's not complete, you or anyone else can complete it; don't remove it entirely. Becasita Pendulum (talk • contribs) 20:12, November 27, 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I was wondering why you took down the pictures I added for Zuzu's page. That goes for every other picture I've posted as well. If you are going to take down something someone else posted you should at least give the person a heads up on why and tell him how he can fix whatever mistake he made. And what is this about edit summaries? Are they really necessary? Because I don't understand exactly what I should be typing?

Sign, AJ1989 Denofa 08:55, December 31, 2016 (UTC)


 * There are a few problems with how you add pictures, but DragonEmeperor here hasn't mentioned this in his edit summaries like we've asked him to in the past. When placing images, they are generally arranged with one on the left, then one on the right, rinse and repeat; they generally aren't placed in the middle of paragraphs but at the top; blank sections aren't added for space (use clear sections if you have to; you should find some examples on certain ARC-V character pages), and sometimes there's too many images for the space. All of which are easily fixed with more than just undoing it. Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 20:33, December 31, 2016 (UTC)

WHAT THE HECK PAL!? Why did you erase all the info I added for Leo Akaba and undo the separation I put down for the death list page? It makes it easier for others to see the difference between the manga & anime! As I said before, give someone a heads up before you undo their hard work! I hate to repeat what my mom says, but that's just common courtesy. Who do you think you are, do you even work for wiki or are you just a user like me? Denofa 06:28, January 1, 2017 (UTC)


 * Calm down mate. Goodness only knows why he did that; he's always been a bit too friendly with that undo button. He's been asked to give edit summaries before, and if you go to his user page you'll see that he's just an ordinary user.Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 06:38, January 1, 2017 (UTC)


 * Leo's info was a mess and jumbled all up with different events so I'll fix it later. And the deaths aren't hard to tell the difference. DragonEmeperor (talk • contribs) 07:38, January 1, 2017 (UTC)

Template
It's been agreed to be removed in favour of hardlinks. Sanokal K-T (talk • contribs) 23:27, January 8, 2017 (UTC)

Bot edits
Stop your edits. When the edits have been made by a bot, that usually means they shouldn't be reverted. At least ask the account why they made those edits? And wait for their response, please. --UltimateKuriboh (talk • contribs) 23:28, January 8, 2017 (UTC)

Sanokal just told me, but I want to know when did the discussion happened for the template. DragonEmeperor (talk • contribs) 23:30, January 8, 2017 (UTC)


 * Forum:Template:Anime_and_Template:Manga_usage. A month and half with no objections. Regardless, read the discussion. Using a template to replace a basic wiki function like a pipe link is pointless. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:38, January 8, 2017 (UTC)