Forum talk:Deck Contest 3: Main Characters


 * Runer5h shouldn't have put in Proof of Powerlessness and Burst Breath. Threatening Roar is better IMO. The Horror 'Speak if you dare 17:05, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

I prefer E-Dizzle's Deck because it brings E-Heroes to a competitive level also it's fairly original unlike most decks which run E-Heroes, since they're mostly anti-meta. --Trivi-AM 19:19, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Point goes to E-Dizzle. Unfortunately both Runer & Messenger made decent decks. I like the Dragon deck that Runer made, but it missed something that a Kaiba deck should never be without, and that is serious combinations with strategy cripples and deck destruction. Plus it focused on too many broad dragons, which wasn't the deal with Kaiba. Next is Messenger, and although it was mainly a Chazz deck, it just didn't have the flash that he had. I didn't see enough of the flashy and out there personality that Chazz had. E-Dizzle, point goes to you, because making a Jaden deck is relatively easy. Hell.. he even used Solemn Judgment in a previous episode. So match goes to E-Dizzle. This was fun, I'd like to enter in next time. xD --Overlordzorc 20:09, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

ghostmessenger, i believe ojama trio is limited, just a heads up.

I voted for runer5h, because he seems to have put the most thought into building his deck, and took the most time explaining it.

I'm glad to see this sort of contest. I find it a much better version! As former founder of WDC, I'd like to request you guys to start using that section instead of here so the space isn't wasted. As for comments, I find that although E-Dizzle has the most solid spell/trap lineup of the 3, the overwhelming variety/quantity of monsters doesn't do his s/ts justice (might I mention Prisma is semi-limited). Runer5h has the best monster lineup of the 3; his spells/traps are on the most part, generally well-rounded, however it would have been nice to see a full 3 Solemns, -1 Proof of Powerlessness, and at least a Heavy Storm or Giant Trunade instead of two Stamping Destructions. And for MotD's deck, I felt that it was thought out reasonably well; however, it concerns me that it is quite trap-heavy, not to mention a lack of defensive capability. With LV monsters, it is a big concern to be able to defend the stages in which you summon what you need--it takes steps, and these steps are often fragile. There is a need for 3 Solemns for this deck as well. Finally, all three should have a MST. Since I judge holistically after analyzing on a more specific scale, I vote for Runer5h. Again, I must stress the aforementioned comments are of my opinions, but please consider what I have said. Good job all of you! ::Chris427 10:32, 28 June 2009 (UTC)