User talk:Dinoguy1000

About the (ruby) tag
Some browser (like Firefox with XHTML Ruby add-on installed) will show the Kanji and furigana overlapping each other when the text were placed on a single ruby tag like this one. To prevent it, additional &lt;ruby> tag is needed to show it properly. --Aeris Ventaile (talk • contribs) 04:11, December 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * Can you visit http://yugioh.wikia.com/index.php?title=Loki,_Lord_of_the_Aesir&oldid=1298295&useskin=monobook and post a screenshot of that? Firefox, of all browsers, should not be having this kind of trouble with Ruby text. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 04:18, December 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * After viewing the page using two different Ruby add-ons, seems it was entirely depends on how the engine render it. The XHTML Ruby Support add-on with Default settings render it correctly, but it also render some contents as if it were a Ruby text. While the second add-on, HTML Ruby show the text overlapping each other like in the screenshot. So should it be rendered with single tag or multiple tags for compatibility sake? --Aeris Ventaile (talk • contribs) 07:23, December 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * It sounds like both addons have bugs. What version(s) of Firefox are they recommended for, and what version are you using? And to be valid Ruby annotation, the whole text should be contained in one Ruby tag. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 15:55, December 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * After doing some research, the HTML5 Ruby spec only indicates using &lt;ruby/>, &lt;rp/>, and &lt;rt/> tags, and I have updated ruby accordingly. Can you look at and  and tell me if the kanji and furigana are still overlapping in Firefox with the plugins?
 * I've installed the latest versions (as available from Mozilla's addons site) of both plugins in my Firefox 3.6.12, and I'm seeing the same results as you've reported so far. I'm working on some CSS that will hopefully help, though. The overlapping problem is definitely an issue with HTML Ruby as opposed to our markup, though. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 02:54, December 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * Still the same result so far, also tested with Firefox 3.6.12 and default settings for both add-ons. Definitely a bug on the add-ons. --Aeris Ventaile (talk • contribs) 05:48, December 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't suppose you know much about CSS, do you? I'm wondering if HTML Ruby will behave better with the right CSS styles. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 16:37, December 2, 2010 (UTC)

Not sure which Kalin that is.
Sorry allow me to introduce my self, i'm elementalknight (Duelist: The Elemental Knight/Le Chevalier Elementaire). As far as my avatar goes, I'm not sure which Kalin it is. At 1st I thought that it might be Kalin Kessler, but it mite be Kallen your talkin about. Either way i thought it was kinda cool with the entire Team 5D's in it. --elementalknight (talk • contribs) 20:11, December 15, 2010 (UTC)

I see what you mean now, maybe Mr. Takahashi might have used Kallen's designs from Code Geass to design Aki Izayoi (Akiza Izinski).--elementalknight (talk • contribs) 22:35, December 16, 2010 (UTC)

This might be a stupid question but when does Code Geass come on? Just curious. --elementalknight (talk • contribs) 23:32, December 16, 2010 (UTC)

Yep in Florida. So wat Ghost In The Shell Stand Alone Complex the only anime they have on thats good any more or somethin?--elementalknight (talk • contribs) 03:32, December 17, 2010 (UTC)

Well i hope if they change the line up they keep GITS SAC and dont move it to another night, but if they do maybe about 10:30-ish.--elementalknight (talk • contribs) 20:24, December 17, 2010 (UTC)

Good point there, it wouldnt b the same if they take things off.--elementalknight (talk • contribs) 02:35, December 18, 2010 (UTC)

Question, i kno its been a while since i posted on ur talk page. Just curious, but do r u a member of the Code Geass wikia. I'm just askin because yesterday i stumbled across Code Geass on the YouTube link in the Close To You song page. And then after watching 2 or 3 episodes found it to be cool.--elementalknight (talk • contribs) 16:22, January 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * Nope, I've never even looked at it (that I can recall, at least) to be honest. Are you watching the original Japanese, or the English dub? (Johnny Yong Bosch voices Lelouch, so if you're a fan of Bleach, there'll be a "Holy shit, Ichigo?!" moment XD ) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 18:31, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

Archive Locked up?
I am about to moving the comments from my main Talk Page to Archive 7, but cannot find the "Edit" button on my Archive #. How can it happened? Should I have to renew the whole page? -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 20:15, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * It looks from Delt's talk page that you got it all sorted out; feel free to ask if you need more help though. =) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 23:44, December 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yea... I just don't like the change too much. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 23:47, December 21, 2010 (UTC)

Lowlife User
I honest like to ban this user; Matynayu because he just shove up yugiohcardmaker in some article that I just revived twice. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 01:14, December 23, 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't think they need blocked; they haven't continued their edits, and no one's talked to them at all yet. In addition, Deltaneos deleted the page, so if he thought it warranted a block, he would have done so. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 07:18, December 23, 2010 (UTC)

Archive failed
That user just rejected it out and revive it back to his version... Just felt unhappy that I just helped him went waste. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 01:33, December 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, it is his page... Ultimately, all you can do is offer advice; it's up to them whether to actually use it or not (and if so, how they use it). 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 02:12, December 24, 2010 (UTC)


 * He only make it worst... the shortcut sound easier to place in each archives if he is going to create... -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 04:20, December 24, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry to but in. If referring to me, I don't like creating "Templates", Archives, or any sub-accounts unless really needed because it's too much to handle, requires better topics for it, copies most people work styles, etc. Fredcat's and Dino, etc help to me wasn't waste. Besides I still don't know too much about yugioh.wikia; I use its command code to make adjustments like "<...>" +/- between word(s) What I do is...--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 21:26, December 26, 2010 (UTC).

Elements in Template:Six Attributes?
Can I or anyone put "Element" Archetype monsters in "Six Attribute" Template?; '''these are series of Light and Dark Monsters (3 each). Any Y?'''--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 18:08, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * "Element" are in "Six Attributes" Templates--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 18:53, December 24, 2010 (UTC).


 * Thanks for allowing me or anyone to add "Element" Archtype Monster in your "Template:Six Attributes‎‎" even though there not really Six Attribute Monsters since there only Light and Dark Attributes (3each)"--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 03:05, December 25, 2010 (UTC).


 * Once again, Six Attributes isn't "my" template; this is a wiki, and nothing (including user pages) strictly belongs to any one user. That being said, I would have to disagree with the addition of the Element monsters to the template - I have previously considered adding them, and it was previously discussed, but there isn't real evidence that they were intended as a Six Attribute archetype - they seem to be LIGHT and DARK monsters only to keep them from triggering their own or each others' effects. Therefore, I am opposed to their addition and will probably remove them (if more four-element card groups are tracked down, though, we could create a new Four Elements template for them, similar to the Six Attributes one). 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 06:04, December 25, 2010 (UTC)

Can I add Attribute Spirits Monsters and their "related form" to your "Template: Six Attributes"? Please answer. and Y--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 18:04, December 25, 2010 (UTC)?


 * Knowing now that Soul of Purity and Light is only tangentially related to the Attribute Spirits (at best), there is no longer any strong argument that the archetype is a Six Attributes archetype, as opposed to a Four Elements one. However, there are now three known Four Elements archetypes (the Elements, the Attribute Spirits, and the IOC group related to the Attribute Spirits), so there's a very good argument for creating a new Template:Four Elements. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 18:36, December 25, 2010 (UTC)


 * What's an "IOC group"--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 19:03, December 25, 2010 (UTC)?


 * The group of monsters in Invasion of Chaos related to the Attribute Spirits - Fenrir, Gigantes, Inferno, and Silpheed. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 19:16, December 25, 2010 (UTC)

Template:Six Attributes‎‎
I placed Equip Spell Cards and Field Spell Cards in one section because there both Magic Cards and Spell Speed 1--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 16:23, December 25, 2010 (UTC).


 * "None Yet" in Template: Six Attributes is gray I didn't want "(500 ATK▲/400 DEF▼)" and "(400 ATK▲/200 DEF▼)"to also be gray; that's Y I changed it to a different colour--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 17:47, December 25, 2010 (UTC)


 * Really the only thing the two spell groups have in common is that they're both spell groups, and they both modify monster ATK/DEF values. This isn't enough to say they're related, and besides, when they're grouped together, because of the ATK/DEF notes, the monster names no longer line up with the group names. As for the colors, both "None Yet" and "(500 ATK▲/400 DEF▼)"/"(400 ATK▲/200 DEF▼)" just serve as notes, so there's really not much of a reason other than aesthetics to distinguish them (and if we get into aesthetics, we'll be here forever - ask anyone on Wikipedia who was involved in the color discussions for wikipedia:Template:Ambox or wikipedia:Template:Navbox. If you really want colors for these tags, though, my talkpage isn't the place to ask for them; you should instead start a discussion on Template talk:Six Attributes. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 18:36, December 25, 2010 (UTC)

Suggestion
Suggestion: You should try to put "Template:Light and Dark" with "Template:Four Elements" as one "Template" since 4+2=6, and to save time and pressure--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 20:54, December 25, 2010 (UTC)


 * Would these same Elements go to your "Template: Light and Dark" group also--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 21:30, December 25, 2010 (UTC)?

Will you make "Four Attribute Monsters" section like U did with "Six Attribute Monsters"? so anyone can write about them--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 22:34, December 25, 2010 (UTC).


 * I've replied to both of the above questions on Template talk:Six Attributes. You don't have to keep asking questions in both places; I get emails whenever Six Attributes or its talk page is modified, so all you have to do is post there and I will see and respond. ;) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 00:12, December 26, 2010 (UTC)

Protection of highly vandalised pages
Would you consider protecting this page - for some reason it's got a lot of automated spam for a page - and as it's an old topic that's no longer been discussed, there'd be no harm in it -- Random Time  23:31, December 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * Indefinitely semiprotected. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 23:36, December 27, 2010 (UTC)


 * For what it's worth, that page was reported earlier. -- Deltaneos (talk) 23:40, December 27, 2010 (UTC)

Polite Comment
You told me about that, and I didn't remember about it till Deltaneos posted the link that show me how it causing. So now I do remember the reason what you meaning. He just took it wrong way. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 21:25, December 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I wouldn't worry too much about it if I were you. The internet is not the place for people who so easily take offense, and if he doesn't change his attitude, he'll quickly find elsewhere that responses like that only tend to aggravate the situation. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 21:47, December 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * Agreed... I just revert his bad mouth off recently. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 21:50, December 28, 2010 (UTC)

Template issue
Thanks for fixing Template:Cyber. Can you create another section on the template for cards that are in the "Cyber" archetype, but not in one of the three sub-archetypes? I asked Delt about it, and he didn't respond. I hate to be pest, so I thought I'd ask you instead. Templates are not my cup of tea. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:14, December 29, 2010 (UTC)


 * According to, , and , there are no cards belonging or related to the "Cyber" archetype without being in one of the more specific subarchetypes. I don't think it's possible to query according to part of an archetype name, which is what would be required for this. If you know of other subarchetypes we could try, though, that would work. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 02:19, December 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * That would because I haven't added them as being part of the archetype to any of the card pages yet. I wanted to have the template working first, but it appears adding them to the card pages needs to happen first. Since it seems quite likely that we'll be going with singular archetype page names, I'm going to wait until that goes through to add everything.Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 04:17, December 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * All right. Once that happens, you should be able to just add  to the template to pick the rest of the pages up. ;) 「 ダイノ ガイ  千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 07:06, December 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * Alright then, great. Thanks again. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 17:22, December 30, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for taking care of the Hidden Arsenal 3 Gallery page
I was communicating with FredCat100 about it and couldn't quite get him to understand where I was coming from. I had it all waiting in a preview page to change. but do not have the access required to fix the linkages of the (Perfectly good) files with their proper filenames (MOVE command). My way would have been messier out of necessity. Glittersword 21:22, December 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * No problem. In the future, when you notice card images with incorrect names, you can add TCG-OCG card image (with necessary parameters filled in) to the image, which will automatically mark it as needing renamed and provide a link for admins to perform the rename. =)
 * Also, would you mind considering adding a link to (at least) your user talk page in your signature? If you would like help styling it, I can help you out. Cheers! 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 21:33, December 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the offer, I would like help with that. Maybe something like FredCat100's but with a little less abbreviation. Glittersword 22:55, December 30, 2010 (UTC)


 * Here's a few samples based on FredCat's sig, but without any font resizing, and with different fonts:


 * Glittersword Talk • Contributions (Arial)
 * Glittersword Talk • Contributions (Courier)
 * Glittersword Talk • Contributions (cursive)
 * Glittersword Talk • Contributions (fantasy)
 * Glittersword Talk • Contributions (Georgia)
 * Glittersword Talk • Contributions (monospace)
 * Glittersword Talk • Contributions (script)
 * Glittersword Talk • Contributions (serif)
 * Glittersword Talk • Contributions (times)
 * There are a lot of other possible looks you can achieve just by experimenting with different fonts. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 23:29, December 30, 2010 (UTC)

Thoughts on Template:Set
As always, I appreciate thoughts of others, so feel free to post any thoughts or suggestions you may have on the set system. -- as 208.124.86.54 (talk) 22:41, December 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Generally speaking, I really need to think through these things better before implementing them.
 * A set-name-based system would be more robust than a set-abbreviation-based one, since historically, set abbreviations do not necessarily have a one-to-one mapping with set names.
 * This may be a problem if there are any cases where two unrelated sets with the same name are covered on the same page, but in those cases, the page should be split anyways.
 * Are there any cases where the same abbreviation, with the same lang code, refers to two different sets? The only one I'm aware of is EP1-EN, which refers to both the Exclusive Pack (EP1-EN001 through EP1-EN008) and Yu-Gi-Oh!: The Movie Kids WB Promo (EP1-EN000).
 * Language/region (lang) should be expanded to specify set lang and output lang. Set lang should still be specified in the template (sub)name; output lang should be passed in as a parameter and default to (Worldwide) English. This could be used in pairs to link to a set via its English name, but with the link piped to display the set name in some other language.
 * When SMW coverage of set details improves, set can be changed to fetch actual set names/abbreviations via SMW instead of having it hardcoded. This means the information is all pulled from the same place, making updates easier (however, it also means any templates relying on set will probably break whenever SMW breaks/is disabled (though this may not be such a problem, since it should typically get used in templates that already rely heavily on SMW)).


 * There may also be cases where the link target should differ from the set name (especially when disambiguating set names); the template must be able to account for that. And how to handle cases where the template doesn't get enough info to be able to unambiguously return a single set? (perhaps error text, or maybe just give back the least-ambiguous set name possible with the given info...) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 03:06, January 2, 2011 (UTC)

Question
What is "Metal Dragon" real Attribute?--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 18:42, January 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * Wind - it's right on the card. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 18:44, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

Weekly Jump dates
I think, but would need someone to confirm, that the cover date for issues of Weekly Shōnen Jump is four weeks after their actual release date. Do you know if this is true? And would it be safe to say that it holds true for all issues (at least since it started to serialise Yu-Gi-Oh!)? -- Deltaneos (talk) 00:50, January 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * Personally, I have no idea. On Wikipedia, we faced a similar problem over a year ago and decided that generally, cover dates are preferred over release dates, since cover dates are usually trivially confirmable (just look at the cover), unless the release date can be explicitly sourced (and even then, the cover date should be given as well).
 * On a related matter, I've been assuming that when the WJMP promos appear on issue covers, it means the card is actually in that issue - do you know if this is correct? 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 00:55, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, do you have any comment about the filenames I've been using? I could see a strong argument for expanding "WSJ" to "Weekly Shōnen Jump", and it may make a certain amount of sense to otherwise tweak the filenames... 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 00:57, January 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * When it comes to comparing release dates, the actual one would be more useful than the cover one. Since there's only three magazines to keep track of, if we can confirm that it only takes a consistent simple subtraction for each, we shouldn't have the same problem as Wikipedia. Of course, it is still worth while noting the cover one. Maybe I should add a cover date parameter to.
 * The filenames are fine. I don't have preference over abbreviating the name or not. Although, if using the long one we should probably use "o" instead of "ō". Same with the article name. In Yu-Gi-Oh! macrons tend to get left out in English romanisations (Yūgi Mutō → Yugi Muto). And the American Shonen Jump doesn't use the macron. -- Deltaneos (talk) 18:07, January 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * You mean, comparing between different languages, or different magazines? And while we certainly don't have the variety of magazines Wikipedia must contend with, we *do* have more than three. I am currently aware of Weekly Shōnen Jump (Japan), V Jump (Japan), Shonen Jump (U.S./Canada), and Banzai! (Germany), and there are undoubtedly other magazines we could create articles for (mostly versions of Shonen Jump in other countries). That being said, if we can confirm that a given magazine's release date is constant versus its cover date, we should certainly use that (for instance, the American Shonen Jump always goes on sale the first Tuesday of the month before its cover date (although subscribers often get their issue 2-3 weeks before that)).
 * Macron-less English publication is actually a somewhat more general trend for Viz - they aren't afraid of using macrons in names (for instance, when he was first introduced in Shonen Jump, Gaara's name was written as "Gāra"), but they generally seem to prefer not using them. Even so, WSJ is "above" YGO, and the stylistic decisions made for YGO shouldn't necessarily dictate our handling of WSJ and other such topics. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 18:51, January 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * Comparing to anything other than issues of the same magazine. e.g. the cover date for the V Jump issue that Ride 16 was first printed in is January 2011. The tankōban it's reprinted in was released December 29 2010. A timeline based on cover dates will list the reprint as coming before the original print.
 * I didn't think cover dates for any others would come up too much. But there's also the Swedish Shonen Jump. It and Banzai have four promos between them. I think Yu-Gi-Oh! has also been serialised in Comics House and Comic Champ. -- Deltaneos (talk) 19:55, January 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * I wouldn't be surprised if we could find release dates for at least a few issues from official sources, if we look around some. We'd be able to use these to extrapolate as necessary (though we should note such extrapolations, and source them whenever possible). Comparing cover dates to reprints seems like a good metric for establishing the latest possible time an issue could have been released, but it still leaves us a certain amount of ambiguity.
 * I think if we allow for cover dates for these, even if we ourselves don't go looking for them, they'll get filled in by others over time. It certainly doesn't hurt anything to support them, at least. ;) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 21:17, January 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * Oh, I forgot to answer your question about the promotional cards... I don't recall seeing any visual proof, but it makes logical sense. -- Deltaneos (talk) 02:15, January 5, 2011 (UTC)


 * It is a pretty safe conclusion, at least... I don't suppose we have anyone about who could confirm or debunk this (and if it's not correct, tell us what it really means)? 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 02:36, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

Thank you...
for linking to the manual of style on FredCat's talk page. I didn't even know that a MoS had been created for this wiki. Now I see a few things I've been formatting incorrectly. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 05:41, January 5, 2011 (UTC)


 * No problem. =) It's not really your fault; the MoS isn't advertised nearly enough. ;) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 06:19, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

Me as Admin?
Thanks for fixing my tongue. I am just surprise that he picked me out of random. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 04:33, January 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * No problem. As far as you being an admin, I think you'd be excellent admin material; you just have to work on your temper some (though you've certainly come a long way since I first met you during the whole GrouchMan fiasco). ;) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 04:39, January 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * I am current working on it, as of my family that I will move in soon...er. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 04:48, January 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your respond. I know that's unfortunate for me to not be able to become Admin myself. But it would be very long time before I will be able to becoming an Admin after July this year. So I am not regret it if I have being turn down by that. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 20:37, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

Red Nova Dragon vs. Enemy Controller
Sorry if I sound little hasty, but after -dest- said yes that I can resolved Red Nova Dragon's effect ever if the target is removed via Enemy Controller in same Battle Phase, my opponent continued to argue that Red Nova Dragon won't work anymore. This section have explained his answer. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 21:37, January 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * I am definitely *not* an expert on rulings, but as far as I can tell, Red Nova's effect should resolve regardless of whether it's still in your control when its effect is supposed to resolve (since removing Red Nova from play is not a cost). I'm not as sure about whether Red Nova's effect removes it from play at this time, even if it's no longer in your control.
 * This gets really deep into the inner workings of chains, something I've never really had a good grasp of. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 21:53, January 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your grate answer. -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 21:57, January 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * He said that Red Nova's effect work just like Monster Reborn when try to summon the "stolen" monster (which was being target and removed from play by D.D. Crow). -- F  red  C  at  Ta.P. • F.P. • J.R. • W.S. • Th.P. • S.C. 22:16, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

hi
hi, question.

Do you duel?

Crimson88 (talk • contribs) 06:19, January 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but no, at this point I'm only a collector. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 17:02, January 10, 2011 (UTC)

Archrelated
Based on what is in a lot of other card articles, I would say that the regular counterparts to the Toons should be related. There are plenty of things listed in archrelated that make much less sense than that. "Ojama Yellow" is categorized as being related to "Mokey Mokey (series) because the both appear in the artwork of "The League of Uniform Nomenclature", for example. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:56, January 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm not convinced myself. The only real argument I could see being made for Ojama Yellow/the Ojamas being related to the Mokey Mokeys is that both are low-level, low-power monster series with high-power members. In reality, Ojama Yellow and Mokey Mokey could have been replaced with any other Level 1 or 2 monsters on TLoUN's artwork for similar effect. BEWD and BETD are only tied together by virtue of the latter being a toon version of the former, which means (to me, of course) that Toon Dragon would be related to the Blue-Eyes archetype (as it is), rather than BEWD being related to the Toon archetype (a very tenuous connection, at best). On Wikipedia, this (comparing BEWD/BETD to Ojama/Mokey Mokey) would just be a variant of OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 01:09, January 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * I realize that. I believe it was User:Missign0 who added most of the card-art based archrelations to the card pages. That being said, I do feel some of them are valid, such as "Kozaky" being related to the Gagagigo (series) and "Inpachis", since those are covered in a lot of images. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:22, January 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah, there's a decently stronger argument in that case. Really, it just shows that this stuff should be handled with at least a modicum of thought, rather than "HURR THESE APPEARED TOGETHER ONCE ON THIS TOTALLY-UNRELATED-TO-EITHER-OF-THEM CARD SO THEY MUST BE RELATED". The card trivia pages should be used for incidental overlap/relations between cards, as opposed to adding the cards themselves to archetypes that they otherwise have absolutely nothing in common with. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 01:28, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * The card trivia pages do tend to be used that way, it just gets added to the main article too, which I would agree is ridiculous. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:30, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

Fake Vector
Inciclopedia have syled their Monobook to look like Vector. (CSS, JS). It's not exactly the same, but close. 'Might be of interest to you. -- Deltaneos (talk) 20:34, January 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * That does look interesting. I may well adapt it for myself (if I do, I'll look into applying it for myself globally on Wikia). With any luck, it won't end up being a permanent thing. =D 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 23:02, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

So...
...apparently Judai used the same card enough times that the template couldn't handle it. Taking guess from looking at the Template:Yu-Gi-Oh! GX anime appearances page, I'll assume that the template can't show more than 50 appearances currently. I honestly think the templates should be adjusted to show 150+ appearances, as if I ever get around to putting the template in "Polymerization", it's not even going to cover half of it. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:17, January 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * Counting, it seems that there are currently 58 episodes of GX that Clayman is listed as appearing in. The template *should* just ignore any extra parameters, but I don't know if that's what actually happened or not, since SMW has apparently been disabled again (at least, that's what the third box on my user page claims =D ). That really is some *bad* breakage, though, isn't it? We're probably going to have to move this functionality straight into CardTable2 itself so that we can trivially provide a backup when SMW goes down like this. In any case, I've updated Elemental Hero Clayman so that it'll properly display any number of GX anime appearances (you can use either slashes (/) or commas now, in addition to the up to 50 unnamed parameters, but you can't mix styles). 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 00:52, January 13, 2011 (UTC)