User talk:Golden Key/Archive 8

Gemini Article
It appeared that the one you posted in (List of Gemini Monsters) didn't have Anime/Manga (which is in OCG/TCG title), so should you take another check up? -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:20, August 26, 2012 (UTC)


 * Saw that conundrum, looks like the same issue of exclusion that's been happening to archetype navboxes in the past week or so. Hopefully Dinoguy can figure out something. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 00:45, August 26, 2012 (UTC)


 * Funny, I had asking Dino to get that code work... in formal way. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:52, August 26, 2012 (UTC)


 * What monster is supposed to be an anime/manga-only Gemini monster? -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 00:54, August 26, 2012 (UTC)


 * So if there are no appearance in that article, then why there are a title like that? It should removing till there is updating of the appearance. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:58, August 26, 2012 (UTC)

Cat Signal
Calm down Fred, name calling is beneath you. And why don't you just ask the admins to lock your talk page? Actually, since the bulk of the problems have been fixed, maybe you could end that protest already. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 17:23, August 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * He is a problem, he had no brains to read my Closed Note, nor think that I was against his argument. I only followed what Falzar was saying - I knew that he commented it wrong. It's that IP-Addressed User that have an issue. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:27, August 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * Great, look what he had done... He's ringing a bad ring. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:30, August 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * Well to be honest Fred, I partially side with him on this. While obviously I don't think you need to be banned, and you only reverted him once before he provided a reason why it wouldn't miss the timing, your language on his talk page was unnecessarily hostile. He obviously meant well, so you could have been nicer in explaining that you naturally assumed Falzar to be correct in the matter. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 17:34, August 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * Look at my history of Talk Page - that was what causing me into a bad mood. He should learn to watch his mouth (fingers in the case). -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:35, August 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * Check Falzar's Talk Page again, he (IP-Addressed User) spoke illness of me. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:40, August 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes, I'm keeping track, and again I agree with him. Your current way of protesting just makes it harder for others to converse with you, and I don't see it serving to further your cause anymore. You are free to restrict your talk page, but calling someone an asshole is never acceptable for such a minor violation and should never be done. You need to learn to not get so heated, and if you get a temporary block it is fully justified, again. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 17:45, August 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * That's why I respond here instead of over there. I am not dealing with that user anymore. He can have all the fun. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:46, August 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * User in question, here; I only spoke ill of him after he attacked me verbally about the changes and my trying to explain to him about the changes on his talk page. Honestly, I don't care what arbitrary rule he has about the talk page, it doesn't do me any good if I have a grievance with him directly and I can't talk to him directly about it to try and resolve it without conflict (and besides, how is it right that he restricts his talk page, not only to everyone NOT a mod or admin, but to them AND the founder, as well? Shouldn't they be able to override any rule he places on there, if they need to?). As for the changes, he keeps defaulting to Falzar, saying he was only following the guy's example, but Falzar wasn't the one who kept reverting it after I explained why it worked, nor did he insult me and challenged my explanation afterward. I'm sorry, but any way you slice it, it's FredCat's fault, not mine; any animosity I'm throwing his way is simply in response and defense to his scathing and uncalled-for comments toward me. 67.236.190.122 (talk) 17:48, August 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * I apologize for the treatment you've received and hope that it doesn't deter your from future helpful edits or making an account. In the future though, it is best to comment on a page's talk page for things like this. As I mentioned earlier, Fred only removed your tip from the page once, because you added it without explaining why anywhere. But it's fine now. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 18:05, August 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * Each User has their own Talk Page, which they can approving the rulings on it. I set my own rulings only for my own Talk Page - which any Admins are fine with. You're the one ignored it and violated it. It's like you're violated the Wikia's Rules. Nexus went as far as undoing one of your edits on my Talk page, which ordered you to reading the box. Admins respected my words in the box so they do what they should to do. So instead of "edit-warring" on the article, why not just simple go to that person (such as Falzar) or Discussion Article and respond your thought about what wrong with it. If you had done that, we wouldn't being in this situation, IP-Addressed User. So be caution when you're enter that kind of situation like that again in future, ok? -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  18:08, August 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * He wasn't the one I'm having the problem with, it's you. As I said, he wasn't the one who kept on reverting the article back after I made the changes, and it wasn't him who kept on insulting me when I tried to explain myself about the changes. Both of these issues were caused by YOU, not Falzar, which is why I went after you about it instead of him. And again, what is the point of locking down your talk page to EVERYONE, INCLUDING admins, mods, and the owner of the site? Shouldn't THEY be able to override it, if something needs to be discussed with you? Frankly, it just seems stupidly overkill of you and illegal to the rules of the site. The only reason that I'm seeing why you're doing these kinds of things is because you are a by-definition elitist who can't be bothered with anyone else but your own "superior" intellect when it comes to this game. As you mentioned to me before, you only listen to one mod on here, and no other people, which just goes to show how little you respect anyone else's positions on anything on here. Honestly, what do you expect me to do when I have a grievance with you that I want to try and settle without violence? Go straight to complaining to the higher-ups about how much of a jerk you're being, and potentially escalating the issue beyond all reason? As Golden Key stated, this was just a minor thing that, thanks to your stubbornness and personal dickery, got out of hand, when it really shouldn't have. The issue is settled with the article, so let's just drop it and move on and stay out of each other's way from now on, n'est-ce pas?


 * To Golden Key, I thought the comment was removed because he thought it was inaccurate, that Phantom Bounzer would miss the timing. I admit, I had to refresh myself on the whole "If vs. When" ruling for optional trigger effects, before I posted it, but to be perfectly honest, you'd think that they'd double-check my findings and the wording of the cards before they reverted it, instead of assuming it was so just because it was an optional trigger effect. Apparently, I'm not the only one who got tripped up over the "If vs. When" argument. 67.236.190.122 (talk) 18:23, August 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * If you think Falzar had do something that was oppose to what he was such to do, informing him your thought instead of edit-warring on that article. Edit-Warring on the article is actually more trouble than talk it out. I am listening to Falzar, ATEM, and ever Deltaneos because they are very respect users with less argument and anything. You're exact oppose to them and are an exact method used to making the world going to doom. Sure, blame me all you want - it's your brain that ain't work right at first place: Like other user said, anger at each other is not solving the problem. Advice for you, buddy; "Think before action." And think hard before snapped at me with my own advice, you heard? -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  21:23, August 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * Are you really going to insult me over this, especially since it's clear you aren't listening to what I'm saying? Falzar is NOT the guy I was going after with this, because he wasn't the one who started the edit war, nor was he the one who kept bashing me over it. THAT WAS ALL ON YOU, HENCE WHY I WENT AFTER YOU. Think of yourself as the elitist you are, infallible, flawless and pure, but even Golden Key knows you're full of it. Listen to yourself; I'm ready to put this to rest, because it HAS been put to rest, yet you are coming back at me full-force, like I raped your infant son or something, all over something so goddamn minor it shouldn't have even been an issue. I'm sorry, but I have no sympathy or respect for you, and I still maintain that, if this is how you treat people on a regular basis, especially if they piss you off for no reason whatsoever like I've apparently done, you need to be permanently banned, period. Now let's put an end to this before you make an even bigger fool of yourself, please. 67.236.190.122 (talk) 22:06, August 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * I aided Falzar, that's all. And you still anger at me? Really, cool down yourself and think again. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:07, August 27, 2012 (UTC)


 * Am *I* angry at you? Are you even listening to a single damn word I'm saying? I was willing to put this to bed, but you came back and slammed me for no reason other than YOU were still pissed and weren't ready to let it go. Honestly, who are you to tell me to back off when you, yourself, won't even listen to your own advice?


 * And you weren't aiding Falzar, you were trolling for the sake of trolling, plain and simple; Falzar didn't ask you to intervene, and he only reverted the article ONCE on his own; the rest were all on you. And even after I explained why the combo worked, YOU were the one who refused to believe it and attacked me for it, while Falzar, logically, stayed out of it for one reason or another. I'm sorry, but this is all on you; you were the one who started the edit war, you were the one who started the flame war, and now you are the one who refuses to stop. I'm calling for a ban on you to the mods, and I hope they listen and see what you've done, because I'm honestly getting sick of dealing with you everywhere I turn on this board. 67.236.190.122 (talk) 22:15, August 27, 2012 (UTC)

Photon Generation Unit
Alright, just let that user know about the reason of it being a member. Here, you can respond over there if you wanted, my good friend. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:35, August 28, 2012 (UTC)


 * I am baffled by the fact that you didn't know that. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 23:44, August 28, 2012 (UTC)


 * Agreed - I am still poorly with Japan language. So thank you for confirming it. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:49, August 28, 2012 (UTC)

FC Article Writer Group
BTW, could you please let me know on my talk page whenever you start the group, or forum topic or however you wish to start it? Thanks.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 23:44, August 29, 2012 (UTC)


 * Sure, Yami. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 23:59, August 29, 2012 (UTC)


 * It's up now if you wanna check it out.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 01:24, September 1, 2012 (UTC)


 * Another excellent article. I like the choice. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 02:04, September 1, 2012 (UTC)


 * You're too kind. Glad they're appreciated, though.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 02:19, September 1, 2012 (UTC)

Thund- er, hunder reverted
How is Thunder an archetype, when its an actual type?

No worry, I got them covered since Delta seemed alright with them included. Have a good time ^_^ -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  02:31, September 1, 2012 (UTC)

I took members out of the Hunder Archetype because i was under the impression that that it consisted of Mahunder, Pahunder, and Sishunder, along with cards that relate to their general play style. Not any monster that had the word "thunder" in its name. On a related note: how is Thunder an archetype, when its just a type? Bvalin (talk • contribs) 02:47, September 1, 2012 (UTC)

Fake Image
Ahoy there.

You uploaded an image of Gear Gigant X at File:GearGigantX-REDU-EN-ScR-1E.png. Erm... that's a fake image. And a pretty bad one to be honest. AEtherchild (Talk|Contribs) 01:14, September 2, 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I usually pay better attention. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 01:23, September 2, 2012 (UTC)

Translation
I don't think he understand what was going on with the links... it's like newborn baby that don't understand of being live. But I don't blame you for scolding on him. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:22, September 5, 2012 (UTC)


 * Fred, you're still here! I was afraid you'd left forever. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 00:33, September 5, 2012 (UTC)


 * Ain't leaf [sic], I reminded here to visit but my edit action is very less than before - like 1 out of thousand edits, I would be that post. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:37, September 5, 2012 (UTC)


 * I guess you can focus on some of the other wikias you go to. :) --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 00:44, September 5, 2012 (UTC)


 * Nope, this is only active Wikia I have as tab - other fours are unique tabs as well. I am more of focus on writing stories as we speak. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:49, September 5, 2012 (UTC)

Edit-Warring with Founder
Honestly, I am surprise of how buttheads Joey and Pato are when coming to the Featured Article. Again, like I had my talk with the IP-Addressed User up above (where Joey stopped me from continuing the argument); they honestly need to discussing their thought together before laying some punch on each other's face. Advice - Check the details, started the discussion, bringing in the agreement, synchronizing the details together and complete it with Manual of Writing (which Cheesy had done). If I was either of them, I just had done that sooner and not having some fighting. Let's hope there are no more edit-warring in the future. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:28, September 7, 2012 (UTC)


 * Yeah, things really escalated between those two. Come to think of it, I've still never interacted with TwoTailed. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 23:34, September 7, 2012 (UTC)


 * He's rarely to get around. When I first become member of this site; Deltaneos was the taking over till TwoTailedFox returned. So I think you're maybe get luck not being in his way that often. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:37, September 7, 2012 (UTC)


 * I pop in occasionally. I have some another Wikia project on the go at the moment, and some real-life projects, which sucks time away from me.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 23:40, September 7, 2012 (UTC)


 * Lucky, you have Delta watching this Wikia for you when you're not here. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:40, September 7, 2012 (UTC)