Talk:Spatial Dragon

No Deletion
I think this is legit. I don't see any problem. It should stay. Anyone else agree? --Rocket.knight.777 (talk • contribs) 03:00, December 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * I consider this on the weaker spectrum as far as series go. There's a theme, but I don't see it as strong enough to warrant an actual page. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 03:26, December 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * This shouldnt be considered a series at all. Even Princesses (Curran and Ebon) are more of a series then this, and they no longer have a page. These guys are just fancy dragons that Mizael uses to summon Tachyon. They hardly have any similarities at all. NMBRHNTR64 (talk • contribs) 04:07, December 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * Really? They all focus on Level 8 swarming, in a sense. Sure the Gimmick Puppets do too, but still....--Rocket.knight.777 (talk • contribs) 05:16, December 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * So what? Yeah, they have similar effects. A LOT of Decks uses cards with similar effects. They have no indication of being related to each other, ergo, not an archetype. If they had "the Spacial Dragon" or something like that in their names, then yeah, make a page. This is not one of those cases. NMBRHNTR64 (talk • contribs) 05:41, December 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * a) Learn how to spell, it's "Spatial". b) Series don't need to be ties together by names. Look at the Sparrow Family. --Rocket.knight.777 (talk • contribs) 05:46, December 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * I agree with Rocket.Knight.777. And let me justify something; You go along with adding cards to the Knight and Sphere archetypes just because those words are in certain card names, despite the fact that they serve no purpose towards those archetypes. You are also okay with other archetypes that thrive on irrelevancies such as the Gem Dragons and Treasure Cards despite those having similarities by coincidence. It's outright hypocrisy if you think that the Spatial Dragons shouldn't be a thing, and yet those two "archetypes" get away with it. To Hell with that. Either let them be a thing like those two, or get rid of the two because they fit the same context as this situation right here. FAYAL (talk • contribs) 05:54, December 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * Rocket.knight, Don't make snide comments like that, they are unnecessary. Yeah, the Sparrow Family had their own TV show in the anime. Plus, look at effects of D.D. Jet Iron, Beast-Warrior Puma, and Ironhammer the Giant. Their effects were made to play off each other, even naming specific members in their effects. These "Spatial Dragons" and not quite the same.

P.S. Spacial and Spatial are synonyms. Calling them "Spacial Dragons" is just a plausible as "Spatial Dragons". NMBRHNTR64 (talk • contribs) 05:58, December 24, 2013 (UTC)