User talk:BritishCynic

''Also See: User talk:TwoTailedFox/Archive0001, 0002, 0003, 0004, 0005, 0006

Back from the Graveyard.
I am surprise that you have returning to your founder site. Welcome back, Founder! *bow* -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:44, June 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * Indeed, DeltaNeos, DinoMan1000 and few other activate Admins have keep this site in well shape while you were gone. ATEM is quite a perfection sniper when coming to Ruling conflict and post in the unofficial rulings. I respect them all. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:55, June 2, 2011 (UTC)

Buch 10 Promo
hi, do you remember where you took information about this set? because it seems to be the same as this one. i know that may be difficult to remember, but could it be this source?? /////||||||\\\\\ Jump Enemy (talk • contribs) 00:49, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

welp, as i said, i am impressed Thedarkdoor (talk • contribs) 00:28, June 6, 2011 (UTC)thedarkdoor

Two Things
Hmm...not really sure. I hadn't thought about it but I guess that's another thing I should do. Also, "appears to have" makes it sound as if it's not actually true-information on an encyclopedia should definitely be true unless otherwise stated.


 * You may be right but it still seems wrong.


 * I agree with BobaFett on this. It don't think it reads well when nearly every sentence n a character description starts with stuff like "it seems", "apparently" and "it appears". I haven't actually read the chapter/seen the episode, so I'm not positive about this particular example but for situations like this in general...
 * If Astral indeed acts scared around cats, I think it's fine to say that he is afraid of cats. We don't need to accommodate for the tiny chance of a plot twist that he was pretending or secretly afraid of something else, unless characters actually question his fear or it's otherwise hinted that he wasn't really afraid. Otherwise we may as well second guess everything about the series for things like a character could be dreaming, lying or secretly an impostor. If later episodes do indeed reveal that he wasn't actually afraid of cats, we can update the article and I don't think we're at fault for saying he was afraid previously, because it's what we were supposed to be believing while watching the show and weren't given any reason to doubt it.
 * I've seen many situations like this on another wiki; two characters turn out to the same person or characters said to be dead turn out to be alive. etc. The editors weren't at fault for saying the characters were separate people or saying the characters were dead, unless characters were shown to question either of these or there was in-show evidence that hinted they could be the same person or alive. -- Deltaneos (talk) 14:32, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

fix tuner list please
Hello. Is there any chance of recognising this list? http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Ask/-5B-5BMonster-20Type::Tuner-20Monster-7C-7CTuner-20Monsters-5D-5D/-3FJapanese-20Name/-3FCard-20Type/-3FAttribute/-3FLevel/-3FType/-3FATK/-3FDEF/-3FCard-20Number

and this please

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Ask/-5B-5BClass-201::Official-5D-5D-20-5B-5BMonster-20Type::Tuner-20Monster-7C-7CTuner-20Monsters-5D-5D/-3FJapanese-20Name/-3FCard-20Type/-3FAttribute/-3FLevel/-3FType/-3FATK/-3FDEF/-3FCard-20Number

it's the list of all tuner monsters.

Thanks in advance.--Stereotypical Gamer (talk • contribs) 11:57, June 8, 2011 (UTC)

Re;Obelisk
I realize that. But if that's the case, it needs to be added using the vglore parameters for that game, not the anime lore parameter. They have nothing to do with one another. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:28, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Request here
I would like to let you check this Forum out... Thanks for take your time to realize the foolish. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:32, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

W Nebula Meteor
You do realize that Solemn Warning and Royal Oppression miss the timing on trying to negate W Nebula Meteor, right? Tea-Girl08  15:14, June 23, 2011 (EST)
 * I'm not concerned with the accuracy of the ruling, I'm concerned with the content of the website it came from. If it is indeed true that the external website cannot be accessed except by those, that will be looked into. The ruling should be flagged for further investigation into it's source, rather than summarily removed.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 19:18, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see. So I should be flagging instead of re-editing, my mistake. Then can you please tell me how to flag a ruling? Tea-Girl08  15:26, June 23, 2011 (EST)


 * Thank you, the template really helps.

Tea-Girl08  15:57, June 23, 2011 (EST)

Re: Ruby Text
Thanks for pointing that out to me--it makes typing out the kana above kanji so much easier/quicker. And sweet talk archives, you've really contributed a lot to the site. Bhigpx (talk • contribs) 19:16, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Robert ignored your words
That user just make it wrong each way. Should suspense him for like a week? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:12, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * I already have for 3 days for him to cool off. If he continues to misbehave after the ban expires, a week may well be the next step.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 20:13, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * As I sensed that coming, you know, I am a feline. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:14, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Redirects
Well, first of all, the redirects are already on the main page of the set. + I'll upload every french scans of that set tomorrow so I was planning to add everything after that (included every other languages sets and redirects). I'm not Superman haha. Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 21:10, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah yeah I got it, I really can't do it now but i'll do it tomorrow. It can be very long to add the set to every card in every language and then create the redirect for every language but yeah i'll do it . Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 21:17, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Card Rulings:W Nebula Meteorite
Hi TwoTailedFox! I'm sorry but I don't think that new template is a good idea for the Ruling pages. First the way it looks now it seems exactly the same with the template of UDE's unofficial Rulings, and I think this will cause a lot of confusion to people. Second the "This Card Ruling has been flagged by a user on the Yu-Gi-Oh! Wikia as unverified by Konami, incorrect, misleading, or otherwise false and/or lacking detail in it's explanation." sounds like anyone unfamiliar with the Rulings or not can add this template to any Ruling that he thinks it is incorrect, even if the Ruling is way to far from wrong.

What I want to say is that I don't think it's a good idea for anyone to add a Template on any Ruling they want, just because they think it is wrong or it should work otherwise, ect. It will cause a lot of mess!

Btw, from what I see, this template mostly can be used for the Judge Program Forum Rulings (as those are the only ones that cannot be viewed by anyone). What I suggest is to not add any Template to the Ruling Pages, leave the Rulings as they are, and if someone have doubts about a Ruling we can give him another visible source to check, or if there isn't any, we can give him a picture of the Judge Program Forum's threat of that Ruling (That's not problem for me to do)!

Also, about the "W Nebula Meteorite" Ruling, I can add it also in the OCG Rulings with an visible official source. So it don't think there will be anymore problems with it. If you only can remove the protection so I can add the OCG Ruling. Thanks!

ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 23:53, June 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Very well, lets allow people to add a template like that to the Rulings of the Judge Program Forum if they have doubts about them as they cannot see the source. But is a picture of the thread with the Ruling (PrintScreen) enough proof to confirm the Ruling's authenticity and remove the template? If so then no problem from my part! ATEMVEGETA  (Talk) 17:23, June 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * Err, what do you mean that must be by a Konami's employee? The answer of the ruling or the uploaded picture?


 * Also you mean that even with a picture of the ruling the template will still be on it until it appears on an official site?


 * ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 17:52, June 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * The difference with UDE's Rulings and Konami's Rulings is that UDE's Rulings are now unofficial. Normally we shouldn't keep them in the Card Rulings but since without them the people wouldn't know how the most of the cards work we decided to keep them but in the Previously Official Rulings category. Thus the reason why we created their template.


 * Also, in case that you don't know, the Judge Program Forum is also an official site of rulings (there is proof of that). So if the picture is enough proof for the ruling's authenticity, then this makes it that the ruling has been confirmed that exists in an official site. Thus no need for the template. No?


 * Just to let you know, Konami made the Judge Program Forum as a site for judges that can get official answers to their questions. The rulings it has are as much official as the ones that appear in Konami's Gameplay FAQ in the pdf files. Also those questions can only be answered by Konami's employees and not by the judges.


 * ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 18:22, June 24, 2011 (UTC)

Hmmm, I see! So the template is on until the Rulings in the Judge Program Forum become viewable by anyone. Well, then shouldn't be better if we add this template then to all Judge Program Forum's Rulings instead of waiting for a Wikia's user to add it? Also what if instead of a template we had a note saying that those Rulings are unverified blah blah? The note could be either at the end of the Rulings or in the header. Something like this. ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 08:00, June 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, it looks better now with the note. But that colored board looks somehow .....! Is it really necessary for the Rulings to be in a board, or it's the same with just only the template? Like this. I think it should be excellent that way! ATEMVEGETA  (Talk) 22:23, June 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * Nevermind then! I'll leave it as it is for now, at least until the Judge Program Forum become viewable for anyone or find another way to prove those Rulings' legality. Thanks! ATEMVEGETA  (Talk) 22:46, June 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * One more little thing! The bullet at the start of the (first) Rulings doesn't appear like Wikia's style bullet, as all the other Rulings have. I don't know what must be changed in the template. Can you fix it? Thanks! ATEMVEGETA  (Talk) 22:59, June 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Great! Thanks for your help! ATEMVEGETA  (Talk) 00:09, June 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * One last thing! Can you remove the extra space that appears between the orange board and the OCG Rulings header? There should be only one space there. The other must be somewhere in the template! ATEMVEGETA  (Talk) 00:27, June 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * Excellent! Thanks again! ATEMVEGETA  (Talk) 18:03, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

You get a "Made of Win"
Good catch on episodes 77 and 78! Always heartening to see a fellow editor. Apparently, that fellow decided it'd be fun to have Joey play the Seal of Orichalcos in episode 75. Sounds like the factual equivalent of Whack-a-Mole, but oh well, c'est la vie. --Okamoto Takeo (talk • contribs) 18:52, June 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * It's a vandal using a Dynamic IP address. I think I've blocked him about 25 times by now. He keeps coming back. He's very persistent. If he edits in that a card appears in episode 75 when it doesn't, he also edit the card appearances page for that card and add it to the character's decklist. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:01, June 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * You can range block when the IPs are all numbered closely. In this case 166.137.128.0/20 blocks all IPs from 166.137.128.0 to 166.137.143.255. Instructions are in the first link. You have to be careful when using it. If you're not sure if you're doing it right, just let me know. -- Deltaneos (talk) 20:44, June 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * That's the problem. They are rarely numbered closely (though I'll look into rangeblocking if that comes up again). So it could be a bunch of people, but the pattern is consistent enough that I believe it's one person. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 20:56, June 25, 2011 (UTC)

Renaming?
Why did you rename the sets from WC11? Here, it's never been named with -VG. Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 17:43, June 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Do I really have to rename everything? The template at the bottom of every page shows that it's from the video game. It would be easier to just add a sentence at the top of every page saying "this set is from the ... Video Game. What do you think? Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 20:31, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

Parameters
Why are you removing the "image" and "jpanimelore" parameters? Someone will add images eventually, so there's no reason to remove the parameter and III usually has the lores up within a few days. Just because there is nothing in them right now doesn't mean their won't be. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:31, June 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. Thanks. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:49, June 27, 2011 (UTC)