Forum:Dark Ruler Ha Des Judge Ruling? (2012)

Okay, I am getting really aggravated with my friend. He is a Level 2 Judge and says stupid things about cards that have been around for years all the time. He knows that I never pay close attention to all the different tournaments around the world and every time he tells me that I am using a card incorrectly he just says that there was a Judge Ruling in one of those tournaments. Now he has told me something quite strange and like usual he says the same three things:
 * Where did you hear that Ruling? Yugioh Wikia is always wrong and never trust them.
 * UDE Rulings are all wrong and they have no impact on how to use the card at all. Regardless if the Ruling has not been confirmed or refuted by another Konami Ruling.
 * OCG Rulings have no impact on TCG and should not be followed even if there is no Ruling agreeing or disagreeing in the TCG.

Now, here is the thing that he said: "Dark Ruler Ha Des" does not have any form of Lingering Effect on monsters destroyed by battle. This means that there is no negation of the effects of "Plaguespreader Zombie", "Spore", "Necro Gardna", "Treeborn Frog", ...

Then he goes on to say that there was a Judge Ruling in both the Major California and Pennsylvania. Has anyone heard of these Rulings? Does anyone know of a place where these "Judge Rulings" are published? -- LordGeovanni - ( Talk To Me ) *Kupo* 02:44, June 5, 2012 (UTC)