User talk:Falzar FZ

Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon
--Janjan123 (talk • contribs) 16:44, April 22, 2011 (UTC) sir how about red eyes darkness metal dragon? it is a normal summon monster right? can it be negated by cards such as thunder king rai-oh and frends? how about semi-nomi monsters?please help me.. thanks --Janjan123 (talk • contribs) 16:44, April 22, 2011 (UTC)janjan123

Red Nova Dragon
For your information, Red Nova Dragon cannot be negated as it's effect is considered to be static. Meaning it is in effect anywhere. I have already cleared this with over 5 official Konami judges. now, unless you can get an official statement from konami on that ruling. I must request that you stop assuming that my rulings are wrong. Its not true in the least.

FR Images
Since you warned me to not to create new topic, and this was my luck minute. I would admit a thank to you for cover up the flaw that the user and I cannot find the way. I already explained to him about how to create the file image in correct way and ever created my article to teach new users (who would be same to the one who tried his best to post the French version in) to know how do such way. So thank you. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  01:37, April 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Um, ok. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 01:51, April 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * And I just noticed that the link you posted in "Yuma's real parent" forum is deleted... I won'ered what happened to that? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:26, April 23, 2011 (UTC)

New F.A.Q. is up!
Just to let you know, Feline's F.A.Q. is now posting with "Summon" issue is covering. Just let me know if I am missing something there. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  02:59, April 24, 2011 (UTC)

Gravekeeper see the fireball in their land...
Just check this article out, I answered it but decided to let you correct me out. My judge experience is not on same level as your does. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  01:53, April 26, 2011 (UTC)

Arcarrruggh!
Look like I have finally catch up with that misunderstand of "Arcanite Magician" effect resolved. This article have already answered. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  18:27, April 26, 2011 (UTC)

Can Winged Dragon of Ra effects Can be chained together
When you tribute 3 monsters for "The Winged Dragon of Ra" and you normal summon it and pay life points until you have 100 left, can you chain its own effect with that say you can pay 1000 multiple times to destroy the opponent monsters while Winged Dragon of Ra ATK is increasing? —This unsigned comment was made by Zeek Asakura (talk • contribs) 04:37, 2011 April 27  

Feline's Ruling S - Synchron Explorer...
I would like to make sure if I place the comment correct about the ruling of "Synchron Explorer", Ruling List - S; Synchron Explorer -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  18:30, April 27, 2011 (UTC)

Wisel still have the Infinity...
If Granel and Skiel already changed into their own TCG name, so why not Wisel? I just noticed that ever after I fixed Wisel's Trivia page (only to add sub-line about "irony" part). -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  21:45, April 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * I see... but why not just do that now, since all other archetype, like Gusto, Jinzo, Dark Magician, etc. have been corrected ever before they were release into TCG....? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  10:58, April 28, 2011 (UTC)

Lost Sanctuary...
Did you realize that you're post wrong picture in that article? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  13:23, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

Boon of the Meklord Emperor...?
What the heck are you drink tonight, my friend? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:46, April 30, 2011 (UTC)


 * Honestly, no more cola for you tonight. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:58, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

Lyla and Final Attack Orders
For lyla the trap Final Attack Orders it doesn't work since you can't switch the position of your card. Look at the affect.

As long as this card remains face-up on the field, all face-up monsters on the field are changed to Attack Position and cannot change their Battle Position.

CANNOT change their battle position and Lyla's affect

You can change this card from face-up Attack Position to face-up Defense Position and destroy 1 Spell or Trap Card your opponent controls. If you activate this effect, this card's battle position cannot be changed until the end of your next turn, except with a card effect. During each of your End Phases, send the top 3 cards of your Deck to the Graveyard.

change the position BUT you can't now because final attack orders is on. At least thats what most people say.

christopherlin12™ (Talk)


 * You can ??? yessss then i can use it in my lightsworn XD —This unsigned comment was made by Christopherlin12 (talk • contribs) 02:33, 2011 April 30  

RE: Conditions again
Vanadis of the Nordic Ascendant should work the same with Quickdraw Synchron as they have the same condition ("Tuner Substitute Condition"). "Fusion Substitute Monsters" seems to work their own way even if their Condition is pretty similar with "Tuner Substitute Monsters"' Condition. ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 08:43, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

Image Copyright
I know it's a list but... due to fair image or something like that, I would just like to show you this - User:Wilimut/LDD-F -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  11:17, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Personal Use Images
Yeah, I misread it. I'll be uploading them somewhere else. Thanks for catching that.

TG Images
Why undo the pictures of TG?

christopherlin12™ (Talk)


 * They are official English picture, and they are real. So leave them alone, we cannot afford to have an annoy effort to revive anything you screw it up. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  14:16, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

Guess what?
$(KGrHqJ,!gwE160cou),BNvG0ro74g0 12.jpg Derr Hurr... -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:19, April 30, 2011 (UTC)


 * That link is long gone by now, so why need leave it clickable? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  13:55, May 1, 2011 (UTC)

About Lost Sanctuary
Zombie World has two different pages, each for the OCG & TCG (since it's OCG name was Undead World), while Warrior's Strike has only 1 page to cover both the OCG & TCG structure (the OCG name doesn't change at all). Lost Sanctuary's name doesn't change at all when it was imported to TCG, so why don't make it a single page instead of 2 pages like Zombie World & other Structure Decks that got a name change in TCG? -- Aeris Ventaile (talk • contribs) 03:33, May 1, 2011 (UTC)

En IMG
I am well-aware that you put in the English Image, but you forgot to put in TCG code... I added to latest two you just upload in. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  11:56, May 2, 2011 (UTC)

Template:OCG-TCG_card_image
Hi! I don't really get how this template works. I tried it on this file but it seems i made a mistake. Can i only use this template while uploading the image? Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 06:56, May 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * Maybe it's not prepared to be used with french cards lol --Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 07:04, May 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Perfect, thank you!! Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 07:06, May 3, 2011 (UTC)

Reflect the bad edits away...
I am sure you would need a steel helm to headbutt them away, harder? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:03, May 4, 2011 (UTC)

Are you a admin? Pls disable my account if you are one
Hi there. Are you an admin or something? If so,can you pls disable my acc? Thanks in advance.

YugiPharaoh (talk • contribs) 08:00, May 5, 2011 (UTC) Out

Request for adminship
Hi, I recently presented my request for adminship Here and, as a sysop yourself, I would love to get your point of view and I'm ready to answer any questions you might have. Thank you in advance --Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 08:50, May 7, 2011 (UTC)

-Broken Link
I am curious what happened to "Empty Jar FTK", it's dead or what? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  11:02, May 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * So you're saying that link was paste out of nowhere? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  11:07, May 7, 2011 (UTC)

Tualatin
That article need some block, as some unregistered user kept delete the details off there and here. It's getting on my last nervous as of now. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  11:44, May 7, 2011 (UTC)

Question
Hi Falzar and thank you for you support in my request for adminship. Before doing any mistake I just want to know the policies here about "Copyrighted" pictures. For example, I'm working on FET and I would love to be able to add all those Koreans cards but I want to be sure if the website name on each of them is tolerated here. Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 21:28, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

World Championship
What the heck is up with this page's constant vandalization? It is so hard also to determine what is real and what isn't. I would appreciate any help you could give. Irohanihoheto (talk • contribs) 19:45, May 9, 2011 (UTC)

New Images on the Wikia.

 * My apologies. The images I post onto the Wikia are edited in a program called "Gimp 2". Uploading a 2000 X 3000 pixel image from "Gimp 2" is necessary as uploading an image with less than a 2000 X 3000 pixel resolution will lose its clarity. --User:002517 (talk • contribs) 09:22, May 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * Thankyou for your advise. I only have the "Gimp 2" program in my computer and am unable to download the "Adobe Fireworks" or "Adobe Photoshop" programs. And again, my apologies from before. --User:002517 (talk • contribs) 09:52, May 10, 2011 (UTC)

H. Mirror...
Sorry if this sound offend, but when I see the card picture you upload, it look like a chopped card, just like "T.G. Christmas Angel" from a while ago... Thought I would just let you know... if you think it's not, just let me know and I will be understand of this. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  11:24, May 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * I know, as I was just to be sure if it's real card. I only referred to Christmas Angel since it was fake, fanmade card and compared that to this. But that's good news that it's real after all, like all other Anime Cards that have been show up on Anime for age. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  11:58, May 10, 2011 (UTC)

Sun and Moon Question
I wanted to clarify a ruling that you left on the forum about Inti and Quilla []. It is archived, but it does not seem to answer the question. So, to clarify, if Inti and Quilla are destroyed simultaneously, would Inti be revived immediately and Quilla next standby phase, or not? if you could put the clarification on the archived forum, that would be great. Thank you. Drakus1111 (talk • contribs) 14:56, May 10, 2011 (UTC)

Rulings
How should I go about changing the Rulings pages? Are Yu-Judges rulings the same as UDE rulings? Do Netrep rulings get an "out-of-date" template? Do I include "Previously Official Rulings"?

Ignition Effect Question Recycle
I could notice that, as that user didn't have a brain to use a define of "searching" the forum... But again, thanks for correct me once more. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  11:45, May 12, 2011 (UTC)

14 out of 14 Forums got Unsigned...
I understood your feeling for this one, so why not put in new way or ruling for Forum/Talk Page... like the article cannot be create/publish unless they put in a signature ( ~ )? It might reduce your "treacherous" headache... -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  11:59, May 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * Still, that box which show that is required to sign with tildes still will be ignoring either ways. I only suggest that it will work if Forum is strict up a little bit with tildes knowledge. If you still deny that, then it's fine. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  12:11, May 12, 2011 (UTC)

Check out my Talk Page...
I had taken the question from F.G.D. Talk Page into my own article, since couple of "De-Fusion" Forum were locking. I am not sure if I get the answer correct, so I would give you permission to take a look at it and answer it if you like. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  11:21, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

Japanese Cards
Indeed, I missed that line cuz I know that 1st edition doesn't exist for JP cards anyway. I wasn't too sure about it. Sorry for that. Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 11:44, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Rulings
In the OCG the the effect of "Spirit of the Six Samurai" can be applied if both it and its equip target are both going to be destroyed simultaneously.

About the TCG, Konami hasn't confirmed yet if those Rulings in the emails are still official. It is better to ask this question in the Judge Program Forum to be sure for the answer. Until then we have no better choice but to go with what the email says.

ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 12:46, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

Wisel still have the Infinity... Round 2
Look like I was right, as some user changed them to not have "infinity" symbol in his name anymore. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  18:35, May 15, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, I said that Wisel should have being renamed just like all other "True Warmen" blah. "Six Samurai" and "Legendary shit". If it approved to them, then it should approve to poor Anti-Synchro dude. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  01:54, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Historical Question
Why wasn't Solemn Judgment used before recent years?

EXVC Update Pack Picture...
And I am surprise that no-one noticed this before... -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:26, May 16, 2011 (UTC)


 * I mean by crotch/chest thing... it's updated on that pack picture. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  10:08, May 17, 2011 (UTC)


 * I am well-aware of that, but I am still talking on Pack Picture... That should be put up in the current Pack, like all other card with their lore updated, or ever image updated. If card can do that, why not pack? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  12:01, May 17, 2011 (UTC)


 * Oh freaking great, you're so hard to deal with sometimes... Ain't you want the children to see that Berserker have a head on his "crotch"? If not, then get it change. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  12:44, May 17, 2011 (UTC)


 * Maybe it's time for you to get your eye check... And I just had some conflict edits since you commented this. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  12:58, May 17, 2011 (UTC)


 * At least we don't have 4 more limbs to our body so we could do like 5 computers at once. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  13:21, May 17, 2011 (UTC)


 * There ya go again, made other mistake... Rapid Dragon is Normal Monster, not Effect. If it's an effect then why is it Yellow bordered? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  13:46, May 17, 2011 (UTC)


 * Are you quite sleepy? I already point out the mistake that his buddy got... his deck has 42 in Main Deck and 4 in Extra Deck, only two addition cards were Fortress Warrior and Threatening Roar. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  01:28, May 18, 2011 (UTC)

Am I doing it right?
Forum:Monster_Effects_and_Trap_Effects -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  12:39, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

File Moving
Is Moving Files an Administrator tool?

I can no longer see "empty" files in the Galleries. Is this a new template thing? I'd like to be able to upload them but it's really difficult without a button to upload (I miss Monaco) or with a "blank spot" to click on.

Leyvaten, LaDD and REDMD
Hey Falzar is this correct http://yugioh.wikia.com/index.php?title=Forum:Leyvaten,_LaDD_and_REDMD&t=20110521134631 Because I read the effect of both, and I dont think that Light and Darkness Dragon can be SS with the effect of Dragunity Arma Leyvaten by LaDD own effect. Could you please verify in set a ruling for this or I am correct in my apportacion for that ruling issue? ȜȠɎȨȴ.Ƿɔ.ɯɨʞɨ (talk • contribs) 20:12, May 21, 2011 (UTC)

Judge List M
Thanks for spot a mistake, I appreciated your swift power of eyes. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:33, May 25, 2011 (UTC)

Spirit of the Six Samurai's Ruling
Today we received the answer from Konami about the "Spirit of the Six Samurai VS simultaneous destruction" situation:

If an effect will simultaneously destroy "Spirit of the Six Samurai" and the "Six Samurai" monster it is equipped to, you will not be able to activate the effect of "Spirit of the Six Samurai" to save the equipped monster.

ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 06:38, May 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes the decided to contradict the OCG Ruling. ( I doubt if they knew how it worked in the OCG anyway! -_- )


 * They used the term "activate" to describe a Continuous Effect and this is wrong. They should have been more careful. We will still leave the Ruling exactly as it has been posted though.


 * ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 07:07, May 26, 2011 (UTC)

Delete Reborn Tengu vs. End of Anubis and tell YamiWheeler to leave me alone
I'm getting sick of arguing with YamiWheeler about Reborn Tengu. Please delete the Tengu vs. End of Anubis ruling thread, and tell him to leave me alone, please? Thanks. SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 15:36, May 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Lol, exactly. He's sick of "arguing" with me (more like, I've already trounced his arguments and now he's throwing a hissy fit) and is disguising it as a flame war. He began the mudslinging by calling me an idiot, and I returned fire, and now he can't handle that. Too bad. The main point is that he disagrees with my opinion and what I am saying, and that is not against the rules. This isn't the SynjoDeonecros Wiki and he is not a mod. I offered to delete his portion of the argument, and he is free to stop and move on, but wants to delete it all. He has no right to touch my posts and leaving it there doesn't affect him at all. He is being a baby who is throwing his toys out of his pram because he can't have his own way. Clearly, this needs to be dealt with.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 15:41, May 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes, by him stopping like the baby HE is; I've deleted the flame war several times in an attempt to stop it, but he has to get the last word in, so he keeps undoing it, despite my efforts to get him to stop. Deleting MY portion of the flame war wouldn't work, since there's still HIS part that remains, and that means HIS side of the argument would be the only one left for people to see. I'm sorry, but no; either the entire thing is up, or it's deleted, no one side goes away while the other gloats. And he started it by assuming that, because I stated that it didn't work in this PARTICULAR deck, and that I didn't like how it was more restrictive than I thought, that that automatically means my deck is crap and that I'm bashing on the card for being crap IN ITS ENTIRETY. He doesn't even want to hear that that's not what I meant, it's just his assumption that that's what I meant. And his last post to me was a simple "Tl:dr, get over it", in regards to my last response, AND he still undid the changes I made to the thread. HE is the one being the troll, not me. So please, delete the thread and tell him to leave me alone and stay away from my threads from now on. SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 15:46, May 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * There we go - the proof, he's admitted it himself. He's too prideful to just let it go. HE is the one who wants it deleted, I do not. So, naturally, you would delete his portion since he has the problem with it, but his pitiful pride means that he'll be crying to mommy if my counter-arguments are left in plain-view. This is a perfect example of someone who can't compromise and throwing their toys out of their pram. Also, I simply disagreed with what he said, which I am entitled to do. I said it in a frank, but uninsulting way, which I am also allowed to do. The so-called "flame war" started because he began to mudsling and now he can't handle it. SynjoDeonecros somehow feels that he is a user who deserves preferential treatment when he is just another random user.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 15:51, May 26, 2011 (UTC)

Admitted what? I WAS going to let it go, if you would just stop undoing the edits, but you HAVE to get your words in and make them the last ones, and as I said, deleting just MY side of the flame war only leaves YOUR comments as the one people read. No, that's not how it's going to go down. And you don't simply "disagree" with me; the very first thing he said on that thread was "Wonderfully narrow-minded view, there. It doesn't work in your very niche, very random deck, so it must have no use.". That is assumptive of him, to think I was even saying that it has no use, period, when all I said was that it has no use in THIS deck, and that I was getting annoyed at the restrictions that I keep seeing popping up with it. Does that mean that I say it's useless EVERYWHERE? No, but he assumed it was, and used that to start the flame war. I tried explaining it to him, but he wouldn't listen, and now he's refusing to let it go until he forces me to bow down to him and kiss his feet in recognition that his opinions are right and true and that I'm the worst duelist in the world. No, he's the one in the wrong, here, not me, and he needs to stop undoing the deletions if he actually wants to stop this. The fact that he refuses proves he's a bigger child about this than I am. SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 15:59, May 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Once again, tl;dr. Falzar, you can see the facts and you have a brief synopsis of what has gone on. Do what you will. I'm done arguing this BS with some nobody.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 16:01, May 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Then you wouldn't mind STOPPING with undoing the edits, instead of hovering over the thread like some vulture ready to swoop down and get your foot back into the door, like you've been doing for the past hour. SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 16:02, May 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Feel free to stop, yourself. I've already compromised. You want it exactly your way, being the crying baby that you are. This vulture is going nowhere. That's the last I'm saying on the matter to you.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 16:04, May 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Leaving YOUR side of the argument while MINE is deleted is NOT a compromise, it's you saying "My opinion is the only one that's right here". If you really ARE serious about stopping this, LEAVE THE DELETES ALONE AND LET THE FLAME WAR DISAPPEAR. SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 16:07, May 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Alright, here is what you guys are gonna do: You both breed deeply and leave the forum topic + the User Talk Pages. The best way to avoid arguing is just to give up and stop. I don't see the point of protecting the forum now. You're both grown guys and I'm sure you can both calm down. Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 16:09, May 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Dude, I'm perfectly calm. He's the one who is screaming and shouting, which I find hilarious. I simply have no intention of letting some user break the rules just because he's gonna cry until he gets his own way. He wants to delete my opinion because it disagrees with his, and is using a flame war as a guise to do so. It's the principle.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 16:11, May 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * It was a flame war. Just look at how he responded to me, in his first post; condensending and assumptive of what I was saying, as I already stated. If you want this to go away, the deletions I do has to stay, and YamiWHeeler has to leave me alone. That's all I ask. SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 16:15, May 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * That's called being frank. I didn't insult you. Niche and random are not insults, nor were they personal attacks until you began the mudslinging. I don't have to speak to you nicely just because you're too sensitive to take it. Get over it. You can't cry just because you don't like how people are speaking to you. I'm sure as hell not going to change myself just to make you feel better. Seriously, get over yourself.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 16:17, May 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * "Wonderfully narrow-minded view, there. It doesn't work in your very niche, very random deck, so it must have no use." You don't call THAT being insulting to me? You called me "narrow-minded" and in the context of that sentence, "niche" and "random" WERE insults to my deck. Face it, pal, you started the flame war, and it's you that needs to stop it and go away. SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 16:23, May 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * I'll stop when he does, which means he stops undoing my deletion of the flame war which started this. SynjoDeonecros (talk • contribs) 16:11, May 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Alright, then you're not grown up guys and I'll have to block the topic until your both cool down. And please, stop arguing on Falzar's Talk page, you have your own Talk Pages for that. Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 16:14, May 26, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Equips and destroyed monsters
Well, "Double Tool C&D" does not apply its effect if the equipped monster is destroyed in battle. This is because at the end of the Damage Step first the destroyed monster in battle is sent to the Graveyard and then "at the end of the Damage Step" effects activate. Since "Light Laser" and "Double Tool C&D" are such effects, they shouldn't activate their effects as they are not face-up on the field at that time.

The Japanese Wiki and WC11 seems to disagree about "Light Laser" though for some reason. The Japanese Wiki says that the effect of "Light Laser" activates before the equipped monster leaves the field. So it first banishes the opponent's monster and then the equipped monster is sent to the Graveyard. Which is wrong because the first thing that happens at the end of the Damage Step is to sent the destroyed monster(s) to the Graveyard.

So I say that the Jap Wiki and WC11 are just outdated/wrong and "Light Laser" do not banish the opponent's monster if the equipped monster is destroyed by battle. Much like "Double Tool C&D"!

ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 07:25, May 27, 2011 (UTC)

Can you restore my article?
Please can you restore my article about the Orichalcos Deck,the one that you deleted today. Can you restore it somewhere else or on my page?If yes send me the link also. SupercomputerGx —Preceding undated comment added 15:24, 2011 May 27  

The Article
Am I really doing it right this time? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  21:58, May 27, 2011 (UTC)

EN vs. NA
For sets following Soul of the Duelist, I think, there is no difference, but for sets preceding it (including Labyrinth of Nightmare), NA cards have the Set Number SET-999, whereas EN sets have the set number SET-EN999. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 08:38, May 28, 2011 (UTC)


 * The card images were uploaded to -EN and the gallery name was -NA, so should it be moved to Set Card Galleries:Labyrinth of Nightmare (TCG-EN-1E)‎?
 * Also, I've noticed a lot of duplicate files, where one is uploaded to the -NA name and the other to the -EN name, it's kinda redundant isn't it? and some redirects. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 08:45, May 28, 2011 (UTC)


 * You're going to hate me for saying this, but no, those cards all need renamed to use -NA instead, since they're of the North American print of the set (as I said above, this can be checked by looking at a card's set number; the North American print doesn't have the two-letter language code before the set card number). You can see an example with File:GeminiElfLON-EN-ScR.jpg (I've filled out a OCG-TCG card image tag on it).
 * Duplicates should be delinked and deleted (so should redirects, needless to say). Redundancy is especially bad with images. ;) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 07:12, May 30, 2011 (UTC)


 * But they aren't actually duplicates in many cases, they're just Unlimited/1st Edition versions or the European, International, Australian, or English versions.


 * If they're not duplicates, then they're not duplicates. ;) Those are all cases where the images need renamed. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 03:42, June 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * From LOB to SOD (not included), the galleries are such a mess. NA/EN is a big problem but we also have another problem: languages differents set names. You were talking about Labyrinth of Nightmare. LON in english, LDC in french. For Pharaoh's Servant; it's PSV in english, SDP in french, FSV in German, SDF in Italian etc. We really really need to take a decision soon about naming the images in those cases. Taking the english set name or the set name written on the card? Do we need to create a topic on the forum to discuss about it? Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 08:29, June 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Didn't you ask Deltaneos about it a few weeks back? I'd say, though, that a topic on the forums would be the best way to go. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 08:46, June 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes I did, but we just didn't conclude and we weren't able to find a solution at that time. Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 08:50, June 8, 2011 (UTC)

I've marked a bunch of images for name change (I'd change them if I could, but I can't).

T.G. Christmas Angel
Do you remember that chopped-up card of "Naturia Landoise" that we fought to get it rids of? I found her name - it's Marina Liteyears. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  10:29, May 28, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes, it's pretty sure she's dressed up for holiday. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  13:23, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

Coffeedude (name?)
I used that nickname as a pathetic joke for "Cheesedude's" obsess of having coffee some times ago. If you check his constribs, you will know why. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:14, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

Annoyance User
I explained to him nice and polite, as you asked. So I hope that would helps. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  14:23, May 29, 2011 (UTC)

Why did you delete all my pics?
Hey, I feel so annoyed by your actions.

I have no ideas why you delete all my upload pics for the Vjump 5 series.

This is a freedom platform, so plz keep the red tape minimum.

Apologize
i just wanna say i'm sorry for being rude, and in future i'll state my reasons for removing posting on here, that and i'm having a really bad day, you have my sincerest apologies. to make up for it, i suggest we have a duel? Muzzy86 (talk • contribs) 13:51, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

RE: W Nebula Meteorite vs. Solemn Warning/Oppression yet again
There are no changes to the Ruling. It is still posted on the Judge Program Forum. I fixed W Nebula Meteorite's Rulings! ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 21:17, May 31, 2011 (UTC)

Constant Lockouts
Hi Falzar FZ. In case you are unaware, Yu-Gi-Oh! Wikia has an IRC Chat that is frequently used to discuss the game and to play duels. The room is #wikia-yugioh at http://webchat.freenode.net if you are interested. However, when discussing and playing there, sometimes a card will come up that no one knows about. Not a problem. One of our users, Mr19, has created a Bot for us that looks at the Edit Page of Card Tables to see the card's text and statistics, and then formats it neatly in an eye-pleasing way. However, the Bot can no longer do this since you have locked out most card table articles to unregistered users. As it is impossible for the Bot to make an account, we can no longer make use of it. Please restore this feature to us. --Seaswimmer56 (talk • contribs) 03:29, June 2, 2011 (UTC)

File Disappearance
Someone said it was a Wikia glitch-is that true?


 * Yeah. Do you think this is a glitch? It's been over a week.

Protection setting
I'm not suggesting that you this differently, I'm just curious. What did you enter as the expiration when you protected Structure Deck 21: Devil's Gate? I notice that the set time is 20:11 UTC, which is 18:05 later than the time you set it on. 18 05 is also one way of writing June 18, the date it's set to expire. -- Deltaneos (talk) 02:18, June 5, 2011 (UTC)


 * 'Realised I made a mistake. June is the sixth month, not the fifth. >_> -- Deltaneos (talk) 12:22, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

Problem with signature
Hi, and the thing is when I edit a forum page, normally you would see that the last author was whoever edited it last, but when I edit a page, and click publish, the my user name doesn't show up, and it shows the previous author's user name. Ii this a problem, it has been going on for about a day or so. Also the edited page doesn't jump to the top of forum entries. I recently changed my signature so it would have the color. -- Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 20:00, June 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks. -- Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 00:48, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Revival Jam Effect?
Just to make sure, "Revival Jam's" effect cannot be restore by "Life Absorbing Machine" and prevented by "Des Wombat"? If so, then what is it called? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  19:39, June 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * Alright, it's just old text I had on my article, and I just noticed that yesterday night when I heard about the new release Structure Deck (Angel Deck, with Solemn Judgment in Common, yay!), read Marik's version and saw that. So thanks for point it out, I will go fixing it. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  09:24, June 9, 2011 (UTC)

Shapesnatch OTK
>.> A lot of people love this otk. It's easy, not too many needed cards, and if a deck is focused on it, it's not too situational. Plus, I put a lot of work into the page. You don't have to go an delete the whole thing! 04:30, June 9, 2011 (UTC)76.72.6.129 (talk) 04:30, June 9, 2011 (UTC) - A Shapesnatch OTK user


 * There are many others that require more cards, but not in the mood to argue.
 * Sure. That would be nice. Better than it not be here at all. Thanks.
 * 04:38, June 9, 2011 (UTC) - A Shapesnatch OTK user

RE: Remove from play → Banish
Ah alright then... So only Errata Article can have those changes? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  10:12, June 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * Alright... -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  10:15, June 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * Also, all "HERO" were renaming, and there are only one article that talked about them being changed. If that happening, so why not the other with exact words/quotes? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  10:18, June 9, 2011 (UTC)

Ryko's Effect Rulings
Alright, explain to me why I believed that Ryko can't affecting other Lightsworn - "Garoth, Lightsworn Warrior" - from be able to milling by his own effect ever if Garoth was controlling by opponent? It's somewhere in the Forum Discussion that I commented but not find it. It's like "Mark of the Rose" snatched Garoth then attacking Ryko with him, Ryko targeted "Mark of the Rose" and Garoth didn't get a chance to milling due to Ryko already gone. That's leading me to knowledge that Ryko's effect of Destruction and Milling is same time. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  11:34, June 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * Ah, that's a forum I was looking for. So let me get Ryko's point straight, Ryko target card and destroy it, then milling 3 cards afterward? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  19:42, June 9, 2011 (UTC)


 * The destruction effect is optional, and the milling happens afterward. However, since it is all one effect, Garoth will not return to your side of the field until Ryko's effect has finished resolving. James 'Shamus' Smith 08:33, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Class 1::Official
What is Class 1::Official, i have been looking all over wikia about this and nothing, and are there more classes, i'm an editor who has been gone for some time, mainly college and such, and would like to know about this, so i can make a table in my user pages of cards not released in OCG or TCG, and that are anime, manga, and Video game only, and excluding, Bandai, Early Duel Monsters,	Labyrinth Battle Game, Capsule Monster Chess,	Capsule Monsters Game, Dungeon Dice Monsters. please can you help, also the edit was to swap over the all and the TCG /OCG trap cards, because it was reversed compared to the other lists, also when are the tables going to be fixed, you can guess, anyway thanks for reading and i don't want to be some whiny ass, i really want to help and be apart of this again --LeafGreen Ranger (talk • contribs) 04:07, June 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you, you should make a class for all three Anime, Manga and Video Game. together, like Class 4 :) —This unsigned comment was made by LeafGreen Ranger   (talk • contribs)  04:20, 2011 June 10  


 * thanks for that info, i made a table maybe you can help me with the specfics on the page Anime, Manga or/and Video Game Only, anyway thats for all the help, and i hope i can help you out too —This unsigned comment was made by   LeafGreen Ranger  (talk • contribs)   04:54, 2011 June 11

ocg only page
can someone tell me why i can't veiw the ocg only page after i click the further results botton.--Huizman (talk • contribs) 05:09, June 10, 2011 (UTC)

Ojama Rainbow...
Can you please delete the card maker (Ojama Purple Image) from this site? Also this user tried to do wrong thing. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  11:44, June 10, 2011 (UTC)

New Ruling Round 2
Here's new addition topic in that article, if you know more cards that have similar to those monsters' "LOL, I refuse allow you to hit my girl next to me!" effect lore, please let me know, ok? Thanks -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  18:21, June 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * I heard one time that Hamon allowed opponent to attack directly, just like "The Legendary Fisherman"... or was that so wrong? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  11:48, June 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * I think you forgot "Command Knight", she has same effect as "Solar Flare Dragon"... only more general than Solar Flare Dragon did. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:21, June 11, 2011 (UTC)

RE: WC11 acting weird
Well, this question is kinda weird and only Konami can give us the sure answer. By the way if I had to guess I would say that "Garoth"'s control must return to the opponent in the middle of resolving "Ryko"'s effect, not after. So the opponent should be able to activate "Garoth"'s effect and mill 2 additional cards. But note that Konami may rule it otherwise as not all Continuous/Continuous-like Effects can be applied in the middle of resolving another effect. "Mark of the Rose" may be one of those!

I asked this question to the Judge Program Forum for an official answer. Lets hope that we will get it soon! ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 22:04, June 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * Like Atem have confirmed, the whole lore in Ryko's text is complete single box - therefore Garoth's revive is complete uninterrupted, as he cannot jump back to the field until Ryko's job is done and vanished as process of attacking. But yes, we should wait for official answer. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:58, June 11, 2011 (UTC)

No, nothing from Konami yet. It will may take long for Konami to respond, as Konami not often answers weird questions like this. We just got lucky with the Spirit of the Six Samurai Ruling that was answered almost immediately. Some people asked questions a few days after the forum's creation and they still wait for the answers.

By the way, thanks for the T.G. note!

ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 13:49, June 12, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, normally yea. The "Fusion Material Monsters" should forget that they were "Fusion Material Monsters", thus Fusion Recovery cannot be used. Back then Fusion Gate's Ruling was still official and we had to follow it. But now it's not so we should follow the correct way. ATEMVEGETA  (Talk) 14:40, June 12, 2011 (UTC)

Bloody Ceasefire Rulings Confusedness!
Look like someone need your help right away and it's about Ceasefire's requirement, since Set monster was in former official ruling (UDE) while Konami didn't say anything about requirement of Set. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:58, June 10, 2011 (UTC)

Fusion Recovery Question
There is already a Forum exist in the article itself; Fusion recovery without polymerization, so I am curious to know if it's still work if the fusion material has remove- er, banishing as well? I heard the rumor in this site somewhere... -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  21:40, June 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, I would just leave the current ruling that I just fixed on my "Fusion Recovery" article. If you care to check it out, then you are free to do so. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  09:11, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry
I am sorry, I didn't know what Cheesedude mean when he type cat. I thought it was something else. I could help you, re-added every archetype category. WinterNightmare (talk • WinterNightmare|contribs) 04:59, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

My Bad (6/14)
My bad dude, I worded my stuff incorerrectly. I didn't mean to say that Karakuri Strategist mdl 248 “Nishipachi” make a monster Face-down Attack Position but can make an already set card face-down... —This unsigned comment was made by June 15 Yang Kao  (talk • contribs)  03:57, 2011  

Deletion
Well since I always work with Special:PrefixIndex, I always find the files that I've uploaded when I come to work on a gallery. I still have hundreds and hundreds and thousand of french commons cards to scan and upload. I can't waste my time doing a whole set gallery if I'm going to upload only a couple of images from that set. I know it sounds weird but since the files are always well named, I always find them. Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 08:41, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Conditions
"Double Tributers" can be negated by Skill Drain etc; i got that info from Double Tributer. it says +/-"This is considered an Effect and can be negated through cards such as "Skill Drain""; because of that, it's not a "condition", but "continuous".--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 13:32, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * but don't they have to be face-up to use their effects?--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 13:39, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * it does say, "However, you can Tribute a face-down "Kaiser Sea Horse"" but I don't think that's applying to its effect. nevermind your rite. site: http://forum.tcgplayer.com/archive/index.php/t-206244.html?s=64dc26522ed6b2115d932ca0ff1e3398 under "D_DASHER" I never knew knew you can tribute it for its own effect.--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 13:59, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * I know "Arcana Force VI - The Lovers" 1st effect is trigger. I just never knew you can tribute set double tributer's for its own effect. that's all--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 14:43, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

RE:Formula Synchron vs. Solemn Judgment
Good idea. I just added the Contradict template.

And thanks! It's good to be back. :) --Deus Ex Machina ✉ 22:31, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Trigger effects in the Hand
Those monsters monsters that can Special Summon themselves from the hand by their Trigger Effect have been ruled that only one of those effects can exist in the same chain. "Infernity Archfiend" is just an exception. "Watapon" has no official Rulings so it should work the correct way (one per chain). ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 06:11, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Unofficial Rulings:Token Monsters
Well, I think we can do that yea! Lets move them there. ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 06:25, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

Newest Images/Else
On both the pages of Dark Magician and Red-Eyes B. Dragon you have replaced the original artworks with the newest ones. But don't you thing that this should also be done to the Blue-Eyes White Dragon page? Also how can I lock a page to prevent editing? I have seen some card information pages in which editing is forbidden. Last question? Is there the possibility of uploading a sound file and how?

Thank a lot,

--Billyno3000 (talk • contribs) 06:30, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

Dark Magician Girl
I don't know what country is the admin from, but in the Dark Magician Girl page the Greek name after the comma says "Σκοτεινό Γκομενάκι" which literally translates to "Dark Chick" (chick for hot girl not chick for chicken). In my opinion, it may be a nice joke, but I consider it to be highly inappropriate. if you can, please contact the admin to unlock the page so that we can erase this.

--Billyno3000 (talk • contribs) 07:17, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

One Article vs. Bunch Articles
So now feel better that I covered up the trouble that 1-Exodia Fan had not finishing? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  11:24, June 18, 2011 (UTC)


 * Maybe he's not aware of to moving them all at once, not just one article. So should either of us go and explain to him if he is going to do that in future? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  14:20, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Now I just realize him, I had some dark history with him about cross with his road for card discussions. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  14:29, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

User page
Hello, I'm starting to be a bit more frequent editing here, and would like some advice on building a personal page. I like the edit counter thing you've got! 08:16, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Anime image names.
I'm fairly sure that "-" should be removed. even if the image policy doesn't directly say so, it should be the intent to have consistency across mediums. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:34, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * I actually spoke to Dinoguy against this at Yu-Gi-Oh! talk:Image policy several months back. The page really need updating, it seems. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:39, June 21, 2011 (UTC)

Number 83: Galaxy Queen‎‎
Which Image Policy? It allows +/- "but JPEG/JPG is also accepted if PNG is not available."--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 12:59, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * You have to include the pack they came from like "PHSW-JP". How do you name an Image File for this then?--Wasn&#39;t (talk • contribs) 13:11, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

Forum Index page screwy
Hey Falzer, just thought I'd ask, but the Forum Index page is acting weird for me. I keep seeing the parameter boxes. -- Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 02:31, June 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't really know. I start getting this, and well.. I don't know what happened.

|
 * 1) ifeq: Forum:Index | Forum:Index
 * I think the number sign turned into a 1. I can't show you what I see, unless there is a way to screen capture on Firefox. -- Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 02:41, June 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't know the way to screen capture. -- Dark Ace SP™ (Talk) 02:43, June 23, 2011 (UTC)