Forum:Decks for Free!

DECKS FOR FREE STATUS: ''' Open! '''

Please make sure to check the Archives or Deck Galleries FIRST, before requesting a deck. If the deck requested is already in the Archives/Deck Galleries, the request will be marked as Finished.

''' Please note, any deck that doesn't follow the guidelines below will be removed. '''

If your deck request was removed due to inactivity, feel free to re-request it.

If you have any questions regarding an archived deck, feel free to leave questions on the deckbuilder's talk page, or that of Brooklyn, if the deckbuilder has retired.

General Information
This page is dedicated to helping all duelists out there that need help with their decks. If you're a duelist that needs some help, we'll build you a deck. All you have to do is post here and tell us what kind of deck you want and how much money you're willing to spend getting the cards. If you already have a deck, if you post it in the Deck Template form, we'll revise it and give you our insight. We'll also make a side deck on request, but most likely you'll be directed to this list.

Example Requests

 * Ex1: Hi, could you make me a Butterspy deck? I have a money limit of $300. ~


 * Ex2: Hey, would you look at my Butterspy deck for me? ~

We'll make it a personal project and try to make sure that you're pleased with the final product. Each deckbuilder will only take one deck at a time and they will mark it by adding their part of their username to the header of that section and will let you know when they're done with a project by replacing their name with "Finished" on the request.

Please note that it's your job to collect the cards, our job is to create the perfect decklist for you.

Rules and Guidelines

 * 1) Please check the top of this page to see if Decks for Free! is "Open", if we are "Closed", then we will not accept requests.
 * 2) Make all requests in their own section and not directly beneath another person's request. Click here to start a new request.
 * 3) Have a direction for your deck (Examples: Dark World, Burn, Spellcaster, Bounce, etc.). Random strings of cards will not be helped. Remember that if you ask for a generic theme, such as Swarm or Chaos, you're leaving your deck up to the deckbuilder's preferences. If you don't want that, be more specific in what you want.
 * 4) Please don't post a request and ask for a Meta deck, you can find a decklist for almost any meta deck on most major Yu-Gi-Oh article sites, like TCGPlayer.com or Alter Reality Games. However, if you want to post a request for a meta deck, but want a unique twist to the deck to make it less meta, you may post that, just have something in mind when you do post.
 * 5) Give us at least 2-3 weeks notice if you plan to take a deck to a tournament, it is very difficult to make a deck for a tournament with only a few days of notice.
 * 6) Remember that we do build decks on a budget, but we can't make a great deck for under $20, the modern world doesn't work like that any more, so try to have a budget closer to $40 or $50.
 * 7) Do not ask for more than one deck at a time as others will have to wait longer for the deckbuilder to get to them. If you do post more than 1 request, we will close one of them, until the other one is finished, or just remove it. Also, don't post many requests back-to-back, as that creates more work as well.
 * 8) You may request a deckbuilder to help you, please note that it will only ensure that deckbuilder's help. It will not ensure the immediate help of that deckbuilder.
 * 9) This is a free service, but we are taking time out of our lives to help you. Be courteous and respectful to us, and please don't leave us waiting for you to answer a question.
 * 10) If we believe a duelist has abandoned their request, we'll place a notice on the request warning of it's removal within 24 hours unless some activity happens, but don't count on a notice, as a request can be removed without one.
 * 11) Decks that are not signed with 4 tildes (~) will not be helped, and the request may be removed without a notice.
 * 12) We reserve the ability to delete any and all requests for with or without a reason, including having an attitude toward a deckbuilder(s) on this wiki, abandonment, or failure to follow rules.
 * 13) Completed decks will be moved to the archive after a few days. Also, if you saw a deck on your post, but your post is now gone, check the most recent archive.
 * 14) We expect that you'll have access to and/or be able to buy cards from online retailers or hobby stores, we base all card prices on TCGPlayer or Google Shopping. We can, on request, verify prices on other sites. We will automatically chose the lowest card price for you.
 * 15) This page is not a page for people to post their opinions. Please, if you want to give your opinion on someone's deck, post it on the user's talk page.
 * 16) It is highly recommended that you browse the deck galleries or archives before requesting, you may find what you're looking for there before requesting our assistance. Also, please try to update the builds in the archives or galleries by yourself before asking us, you may ask us if you don't know how to update a deck, but it helps us if you do update an old deck by yourself.
 * 17) Please post all requests at the bottom of this forum, and not at the top of the Requests section, this is for archival purposes, and makes it easier on the staff.
 * 18) Please use proper spelling, grammar, and capitalization. Don't posts requests that have "I hav dek tht nds impvmt", it will be removed without further consideration. This also applies to the title of your request.
 * 19) Please make an account and log in before posting a request. Mere IP signatures will not be accepted, because it makes it more difficult for the deckbuilders to contact you. Making an account is simple and easy, just go to the top of the page and click on “Create an account”, then follow the simple instructions. Requests signed by with mere IP addresses will be given 24 hours to make an account.
 * 20) Remember to use a Template:Decklist for all requests, if you are posting your own deck. You can also post a Screen Shot of your deck from Dueling Network, if that's quicker. But a template is preferred.
 * 21) Please do not ask about the status of your request. When a deckbuilder has taken your request they will tell you that they have taken it, and you'll see a part of their username in the request title. Again, please don't ask about the status, but do at times comment on the deck, otherwise it may be removed because there is no activity from you or a deckbuilder.

ANY REQUEST THAT DOES NOT FOLLOW THESE RULES WILL BE GIVEN 24 HOURS TO COMPLY.

Contacts
''For more information or questions concerning this page, please visit the talk pages below. Do note that names higher up on the list are veteran members of Decks for Free!, and the most active members are listed.''

Archive Maintenance Notes
This section is for staff only. If you want to browse the archives, please look in the above section.

tag has been removed from Archive...

Deck Galleries
All the decks built on DFF, are in the galleries.
 * If you want a deck based around a monster, such as Yubel, look in the Monster Gallery.
 * If you want an Archetype, such as Gladiator Beasts, look in the Archetype Gallery.
 * If you want a deck based around a specific Type or Attribute, such as Beast or FIRE, look in the Attribute and Type Gallery.
 * If you want a deck based around a specific Theme, such as Chaos or Ritual, look in the Theme Gallery.

Deck Gallery Maintenance Notes
This section is for staff only. If you want to browse the deck galleries, please look in the above section.

= Requests =

Finished - Upgrading Gurren Lagann
Hi guys, it's me again. I was simply wondering if you kind fellows can help me by "upgrading" the Gurren Lagann deck I had requested years ago to the current banlist. It got hit last ban list, but I had quit before that so I didn't care. However, I would like to see this deck make a comeback. Here's the list I was given:

Anything you guys can do to keep the theme and make it competitive, if possible, would be nice. Thanks again guys! Aporia&#39;s Apprentice (talk • contribs) 05:52, February 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * Maybe you could ask User:Resk? She's the one that made it, and I remember, I was here at the time as well. -- Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  18:13, February 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * Playing Traditional Format, are we? Just to confirm; the following cards in this recipe are current banning - "Glow-Up Bulb", "Trishula", and "Trap Dustshoot". "Sangan" will also be banning in coming Format. To replacing them all: I will give you the following cards - "Unknown Synchron", replacing Bulb; "Mist Wurm", replacing Trishula; "Treacherous Trap Hole", replacing "Trap Dustshoot". And for "Sangan"; "Debris Dragon"? -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  18:30, February 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * It was made prior to Bulb being hit on the banlist, Just to verify, it was a deck to summon Halbeard cannon?
 * - Resk ( ✩ )( ☯ ) 22:22, February 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * I know, I just help updating the current/next banlist. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:03, February 24, 2013 (UTC)

Well, the deck didn't focus on summoning one monster. The deck simply summoned monsters that either looked like Gurren Lagann or it summoned monsters that had more powerful forms, kind of like how Gurren Laggan becomes bigger in the show. I liked how the deck functioned, in other words, I like how it would seem like I'm going to lose, but the deck came back and won. That's the exact theme I was going for. I hope that helps Aporia&#39;s Apprentice (talk • contribs) 13:26, February 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * We all know that - Resk's just talk about those are the cards for "T.G. Halbeard Cannon" strategy. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  13:54, February 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * I think Resk is doing this one, if she isn't would you like to try a T.G. Nordic deck? The Plant engine is mostly gone, Bulb was a major part of it. -- Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  04:12, March 7, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry for the late response. Yea a T.G. Nordic deck sounds good. Thanks guys. Aporia&#39;s Apprentice (talk • contribs) 05:57, March 18, 2013 (UTC)


 * K. Asked SM10 to type it up for me, as I'm really lazy and tired atm. -- Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  03:02, March 19, 2013 (UTC)

Here ya go. Synchro Maniac10 (talk • contribs) 15:13, March 19, 2013 (UTC)


 * In the best case scene with a semi-dismal hand, you'll want to summon Tanngnjostr after a T.G. Rush Rhino get's killed, that way you get to search out a T.G. Warwolf in the End Phase. During your turn, just flip up Tanngnjoster to get Guldfaxe of the Nordic Beasts and Special Summon Warwolf with it's own ability. That's your quick and preferred way to Thor. And of course you can do the traditional thing with Tanngrisnir as well. Usually, if Thor hits the table turn 2 or 3, your in a good position to win the game with his sheer ATK power. But the deck is quite flexible with it's game plan and has many different ways to win the game, and many different paths to Thor.


 * Also take note that this deck won't be as flexible as the "old Gurren Lagann" deck, as this decks plays to a slower pace because of the T.G. monsters, but it can rev up to light speed when the conditions are right. -- Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  00:59, March 20, 2013 (UTC)

Constellar
With the TCG release of the Constellar monsters coming fairly soon, I would like to request one. I've been looking at them but couldn't come up with a way to utilize them correctly. Hopefully one of you can come up with something, I was thinking of using Photon Thrasher and Fire Formation - Tenki to get an easy rank 4 Xyz out then trying to control the field from there. Thank you in advanced. Silentzombie (talk • contribs) 17:57, March 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * We most likely do not need to use Thrasher, as we have Constellar Pollux, Constellar Algiedi, and Constellar Kaus to make a strong Rank 5 or 4 play. -- Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  02:56, March 19, 2013 (UTC)


 * Its alright if Thrasher isn't used, I figured it would make a strong turn 1 play. Silentzombie (talk • contribs) 14:57, March 19, 2013 (UTC)


 * I might do this one over the weekend if that's cool with you. -- Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  22:17, March 19, 2013 (UTC)

Thats completely fine with me, I'm waiting for the TCG release of the pack anyways. Feel free to take your time on it. Silentzombie (talk • contribs) 00:25, March 20, 2013 (UTC)


 * Do you care how expensive the deck gets? Both Constellar Sombres and Constellar Omega are supposed to be in Lord of the Tachyon Galaxy, and I'm not too sure of their possible rarities. -- Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  14:03, March 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * I do not care how expensive the deck gets. Silentzombie (talk • contribs) 14:22, March 24, 2013 (UTC)

Finished - Valkyrian Bounzers?
I would like help with refining my Bounzer deck. With the release of Cosmo Blazer and Valkyrian Knight in it, I decided I could possibly use its effect to help facilitate the swarming of the level 6 Bounzers in this deck. My problem is, though, that I dunno how to do that; I've heard of a combo that some Warrior decks use that utilizes Divine Sword - Phoenix Blade and Return from the Different Dimension to swarm the field, and since Valkyrian Knight does something similar to Phoenix Blade, I thought I could use that as a template, but I can't find any examples of how the combo works. Can anyone help me out with this? I don't have that much of a budget restraint (though I would like anyone picking this up to consider it a "budget deck", if possible), but I do have some restrictions:


 * 1. All 3 Bounzers should be featured in the deck, if possible. You can use any amount of them, but each Bounzer should have at least one copy in this deck.
 * 2. The deck can be Swarm Beat (with Hammer Bounzer as the focus) or Xyz Swarm (with Photon Strike Bounzer as the focus), I don't really care either way. Whichever works best for this deck.
 * 3. I have three copies of Valkyrian Knight, and I'd like to use all three copies, if at all possible.
 * 4. I'd like to keep this as close to a pure Warrior deck as possible (duh, considering Valkyrian Knight's effect).

Other than that, go wild. I prefer NOT to have FredCat touch this deck, though, considering our vitriolic history, so anyone else I'd appreciate the help. Thanks. Vorpal Storm Pony (talk • contribs) 20:06, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

It's ok. FredCat, or any other non-staff member, shouldn't post on any request that isn't theirs without the permission of the DFF staff. (See Rule #15)

Maybe something like this? The Destiny HEROes work as an engine to speed through the deck and make easy Rank 6's and a few Rank 4's. Call works for more Summons but als to search 2 Bounzers with Phantom Bounzer by chaining it to MST for a +2. The 3rd Valkyrian Knight can be used if you wanna drop a Dododo or Hammer Bounzer, and dropping a Hammer would probably be the better choice. Blade Bounzer is really random and not very good, but I guess you can drop a Diamond Dude... Synchro Maniac10 (talk • contribs) 14:39, March 16, 2013 (UTC)


 * With all due respect... heck no. I'm sorry, but I refuse to play Destiny Heroes, either by themselves or in combination with another archetype. And, no offense, but I'd rather have more than just one Blade Bounzer in this deck. Don't ask why, I won't play a Bounzer deck unless all four Bounzer monsters are represented. Also, why is Double Lance in here? I see no point or purpose to him that Photon Thrasher can't already provide. Night Beam is too expensive, so that has to go (can be replaced with MST, I guess), and why only four Traps? Dire Wolf without any other Beasts? Seriously? No, I'm sorry, but this is not at all the deck I want. I don't mean to sound unreasonable, but... no, I'm sorry, but no. It doesn't even seem to resemble at all the fabled Phoenix Blade combo deck that I keep hearing about. Can you or someone else do this again, please? Vorpal Storm Pony (talk • contribs) 22:04, March 16, 2013 (UTC)


 * No offense, but this isn't exactly and easy request, especially now that you're more specific. Not to mention that you're coming off as a little rude, and I'm sorry if that wasn't your intent. And to be blunt, your request is asking for the impossible. The "Phoenix Blade combo" your talking about was a combo deck when Elemental HERO Stratos was released and could be used at 3. By the way, that deck DID use Destiny HEROes, but it's now gone completely because it used DMoC, 3 Dimension Fusion, a few Disk Commanders, triple Malicious, and triple Stratos...it just can't be done and definitely not consistently. The deck wouldn't work with Bounzers either; it's just not a workable idea. Think of asking for a deck like Goat Control, the idea is just too dead to salvage. I'll respect the problem with D-HEROes even if I don't understand, but I'll explain some card choices. Night Beam and the low trap count was to get the most use out of Diamond Dude. Double Lance is a 1-card Xyz, unlike Thrasher, and works better because of the mix of Level 4's and Level 6's. Diamond Dire Wolf is a last resort utility card that gets rid of a problem card in your way by giving up 2 Level 4's in a critical situation. All this being said, I have one more idea, and I'll try to get it up in a little bit. Synchro Maniac10 (talk • contribs) 00:56, March 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * Well, if that's how you feel, then hand it off to someone else who CAN make it work. Forgive me for being rude, but I don't buy any of your excuses; the combo is still being talked about on other sites, and is still listed on Valkyrian Knight's tips article as being viable, so obviously it IS still possible to make it work, even without the D-Hero crap. And how does it NOT work with Bounzers? Nearly every Bounzer deck I've researched online has the same idea - dump and revive the level 6 Bounzers for massive spammage, what you WANT with Valkyrian Knight/Phoenix Blade. No offense, but it sounds to me like you just don't want to touch this deck because of some hate against the Bounzers or something, and I'm just not going to have it. I'll look at this "one more idea" that you have, but if it's more of the same as above, then hand it off to someone else. Vorpal Storm Pony (talk • contribs) 01:15, March 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * I would like to know which sites you are talking about please, because I seem to be missing something, and that actually sounds interesting. Also, i'm not being mean, I'm just saying you're not really being reasonable. The Banish-to-bring-back-later combo isn't a good idea with the whole deck depending on just 1 Return from the Different Dimension; it REALLY needs Dimension Fusion(s). (And by the way, Valkyrian Knight's tips page says with Dimension Fusion in Traditional Format...) The problem with Bounzers is that there are only 3 members with little support for each other, and that their effects don't make them the most suitable for swarming, which means they are outclassed for that role. I will attempt the idea still, but the deck probably won't be too good, considering the missing key card, Dimension Fusion. I don't know what else to say, except that, being the most experienced deck builder here, just because I've been around a while and made a lot of weird decks, I really wouldn't say this strongly that this request is far-fetched if it wasn't. So I'll try my very best, but please don't be too disappointed if your deck idea falls short of your expectations when you test it. Synchro Maniac10 (talk • contribs) 04:06, March 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * Mostly this site and Pojo. I keep on hearing how the combo is still viable, and how Valkyrian Knight can be added to it to make it better, but no real specifics on WHAT the combo was, or can be now, that would make it viable. And how am I being unreasonable? I'm asking for a simple deck made in a simple way that I keep hearing is good, and you are the one who keeps saying "It's impossible, you're asking for something that can't be done, I have to alter the deck to make it nearly unrecognizable from what you want to make it work". I've played Bounzers before; I know what they're capable of, and I can tell you right now, that they ARE good at swarming, under the right conditions, and I believe that with the typical Bounzer techniques I've seen (dumping and reviving them), Valkyrian Knight and the Phoenix Blade combo sounds like the most viable way of doing just that. So again, if you feel so strongly that you can't do it, then I'd request you hand it off to someone who can. Vorpal Storm Pony (talk • contribs) 11:02, March 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * If I may, why not go around and ask on DN or DN's forums on how the combos done? Someone there is bound to know how it works, and they usually explain it. -- Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  15:59, March 17, 2013 (UTC)

I asked on NeoArkCradle, and all I got was redirects to Diamond Dude Turbo. Now I got a vague answer of the combo needing RotDD and a "recovery card" for modern builds. What kind of recovery cards can be used without breaking the flow of the deck? The other suggestion was using Junk Collector for the combo, but that's not available in the TCG, for some strange reason, so I'm at a loss, here. Vorpal Storm Pony (talk • contribs) 19:08, March 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * This is what I was trying to say...it's really difficult to do that, because the most reasonable choice is Mask of Darkness and that's kinda slow and mediocre at best. I'd say your best bet is just using Gold Sarcophagus to search RftDD and then set up to explode with it. That's about the best that can be done with that. You want me to try that? Synchro Maniac10 (talk • contribs) 00:57, March 18, 2013 (UTC)


 * If you want. if you can come up with a decent Warrior-centric way of milling and drawing consistently, I've heard Pharaoh's Treasure could work, but yeah, exploding with RftDD seems like the best way of doing this. Heck, if it's just THAT difficult to come up with a Phoenix Blade-type swarm strategy here, then tone it back and make it centered around exploiting Valkyrian Knight to reuse Phantom Bounzer or something. Vorpal Storm Pony (talk • contribs) 01:11, March 18, 2013 (UTC)

So, this is the best I got the whole idea to work that fits all your requests that the deck contains. The idea is to focus on making the most out of Phoenix Blade, since using it for a meager 300 ATK boost is impractical and not very useful. The main discard outlets for the Blade are Monk (who is a key card that searches out Valkyrian, Amrageddon to dump, Double Lance to Xyz and make the other 2 copies live, or Blade Bounzer himself), Phoenix Wing Wind Blast, an awesome trap right now, and Blade Bounzer himself. Gold Sarcophagus searches Return mostly, but can be dumped for Monk or used to grab another card after the first Sarcophagus. So, just banish and Xyz, then explode/swarm/Xyz a lot with your RftDD when your all set and get it in your hand. It's not the best thing ever, but how's that? Synchro Maniac10 (talk • contribs) 02:33, March 23, 2013 (UTC)


 * No, this won't work at all. I don't see any "exploding" in this deck, at all. I see no point in Double Lance, PWWB I also see no point in, the Knights seem too awkward in here (and why two Dust Knights and only one Armageddon Knight? I thought the main point was to exploit Phantom Bounzer?), just... no, this won't do at all. Clearly this deck is too much of a hassle for you guys to bother with, so let's just forget the whole idea. I'll just work with the deck I have and hope for the best. Vorpal Storm Pony (talk • contribs) 16:18, March 23, 2013 (UTC)


 * Just making sure you understand, the goal of the deck is to explode through Return by banishing cards w/ Phoenix Blade as you requested. PWWB is there so the Blade isn't just sitting in your hand, and using it for a 300 ATK boost isn't very useful, as I said. The Knights are really the only reliable way of getting your Bounzers to the grave, but only 1 Arma is needed since the only target is Phantom and it can be searched out w/ RotA and Monk when you need it. Also, Double Lance is a 1-card power play, which is always good when your trying to set up. Just wondering, did you even test the deck?...but if you are done with this, then I'll go ahead and mark this as finished. Synchro Maniac10 (talk • contribs) 20:31, March 23, 2013 (UTC)

Finished - New Deck, Please Help
I am looking for an extremely budget. Like, $25 extreme, deck of any kind that I can top 4 locals at, assuming there are 2 Machina players, 1 Fire Fist, 2 Mermail, and 1 Darkworld. Now, the chances are very low of me going up against Mermails and Machina. The only thing I really request of the deck is that it be consistant, and not be something I already have. I currently run Madolche, Reptillianne, Rock Stun, Toon, Chronomaly, and Fire Kings. Feel free to construct a deck that doesn't fit any archtype. If you absolutely want to know a few decks I want to build, so you can use them, I've wanted to try Great Moth, Archfiend, and Haze Beasts.

Zubzy (talk • contribs) 05:06, March 18, 2013 (UTC)

Out of the 3 decks you want to build Hazy Flames would best fit your price range. If somebody else doesn't take this I could get a budget Hazy Flame deck up probably by Wednesday, Friday the latest. Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 05:39, March 18, 2013 (UTC)


 * ~Hint: Make it Hazy Flame Fire Kings.~ And I can check the deck and make a few edits if need be. Synchro Maniac10 (talk • contribs) 01:25, March 19, 2013 (UTC)

1 Fire Formation - Tenki can replace a Rekindling if need be. Does this work for you? Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 16:56, March 19, 2013 (UTC)

I doubt I'd have a use for Fire Formation - Tenki anyway. And the price has jumped a bit. This will do fine! :) Thank you. Zubzy (talk • contribs) 03:43, March 20, 2013 (UTC)

Finished - Crazy Inzektor
What happened, why erased my request? I need an explanation Copperfield (talk • contribs) 04:00, March 19, 2013 (UTC)

Your request was removed due to lack of activity. Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 04:13, March 19, 2013 (UTC)

Well, at least you had said something earlier. The other time, I do not remember when, one of my requests was here for a month or more and nobody delete it Copperfield (talk • contribs) 04:44, March 19, 2013 (UTC)


 * Well with your Inzektor request Variable Form is not that great, like what Ace said it just helps get Dark Armed Dragon out easier. You can feel free to request it again if you want. Hastydemon2 (talk • contribs) 04:58, March 19, 2013 (UTC)


 * Well, given that you think that's boring, then mixed inzektor either with Dragunity, Machina/Gadget, quickdraw or Dark Word and that make destruction, swarm, synchrons and/or xyz like crazy. If synchros, that summon Quasar or Stardust family and other dragons; if xyz, that summon number 16, 17, 20, 39, gagagigo, pearl, and rank 3 djinn, and maybe heliopolis or megazord; if both, then the better of the previous list. I also have some six samurai and chaos dragon, but the previus list is what I have more complete. This must be interesting enough, right? Copperfield (talk • contribs) 19:01, March 19, 2013 (UTC)


 * Hmm...it's actually possible to mix the basic 7-9 card Inzektor engine into other decks, but the other decks must also have engines that run with a few cards, like the core of Dino-Rabbit. The only deck you even mentioned up there that could work is 3 Machina Fortress, 2 Gearframe, and 6 Gadget monsters. -- Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  22:20, March 19, 2013 (UTC)


 * Well, then a machina inzektor deck. Remember that I don't have Inzektor Sword - Zektkaliber, so make without it, and only 1 mantis... if it can summon megazord like my previus requests machina town the better, 1 Message in a Bottle can help that, right? well if not possible drop this part. Copperfield (talk • contribs) 00:02, March 20, 2013 (UTC)


 * Do you have Inzektor Ladybug? If you do, I can justify adding in a few Solar Wind Jammer, as it's a machine and a Level 5 monster. But forget about the Robo thing, it's just too inconsistent. -- Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  00:33, March 20, 2013 (UTC)


 * yes, I have 3. Why Solar Wind Jammer? Cyber Dragon is not better? Copperfield (talk • contribs) 00:48, March 20, 2013 (UTC)


 * Dragon is fine, but Solar Wind Jammer doesn't care if your opponent has monsters or not, its a tradeoff between utility and raw ATK power. If you wanted a Tiras, Keeper of Genesis or Number 12: Crimson Shadow Armor Ninja first turn, then Jammer would be better. However, it's your call and you can choose not to run any, as Centipede can give you another Inzektor to make your Rank 5 play next turn. -- Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  00:51, March 20, 2013 (UTC)


 * good point, keep it in, then I will play with Dragon meantime I get Solar Copperfield (talk • contribs) 01:11, March 20, 2013 (UTC)

I had to forgo the Gadget route in this, because it just ended up being too bloated of a monster line-up. Instead I wanted a leaner Machina engine to work with, and 4 other Machines that can be used to set up your Inzektor or Fortress plays. I added 2 Machina Cannon, but you can use Machina Force if you wish, it's main purpose is to act as a monster reborn for a yarded Fortress. As usual, I didn't test this deck, and you can test it out if you want. Although I may just run this myself, since it looks like a cool deck. -- Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  22:23, March 21, 2013 (UTC)


 * Certainly look like a cool deck. Because I don't have a Duality and Lance, I think I can use Allure of Darkness, Xyz Gift and Double Summon instead, that way I can event get a Shock Master first turn with Gearframe and dragonfly, also, with some crazy play I can go to Heliopolis... I like that. I'm going to test it right now. Thank Copperfield (talk • contribs) 01:00, March 22, 2013 (UTC)


 * I have test it a little, work fine, but the inzektor swarming if a little limited in middle to late game... Copperfield (talk • contribs) 22:27, March 22, 2013 (UTC)


 * I don't think there's much we can do about that, unless you want 3 Call of the Haunted, instead of 2. -- Dark Ace SP ( Talk )  00:43, March 23, 2013 (UTC)

Cyber Style
Hi, I requested a Cyber deck a while back but it was labeled as "inactive". I would like to request it again. Thanks.ChutneyFTW (talk • contribs) 23:03, March 20, 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I will make this one, just a few questions: 1) TCG/OCG/both? 2) traditional cyber fusion deck, or try with synchro/xyz stuff? Nephthy (talk • contribs) 15:21, March 22, 2013 (UTC)

Hi Nephthy. Glad you can make this for me. Here are the answers: 1) both 2) Can have synchroes/xyz as well. Once again, thanks. I really appreciate it. ChutneyFTW (talk • contribs) 01:21, March 24, 2013 (UTC)