User talk:TheScarecrow14

Dub changes
Cards that the dub changes too should be listed in the decklists, with a note saying it was a dub change. If they are removed, I can give you a 100% guarantee that an IP will add the cards back in without a note later on. That's why we keep them with notes. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 00:20, July 30, 2011 (UTC)


 * But surely there should be something to prevent this from happening because we all know that the dub adds them due to whatever reason the have for replacing rock cards within a deck with random cards such as Water Omotics and Exodia?

TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 11:40, July 30, 2011 (UTC)


 * Check the edit history of that article. Before I added the notes for the dub cards, they were simply sitting there as if they were really in his Deck. The only other option I can think of is listing dub changes in a line of prose near the Decklist. If you have any other ideas or want to discuss it, go ahead and make a forum post. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:34, July 30, 2011 (UTC)

Images
So I did say it before... removing the comment about the image policy the 2nd time means you understand what names you must use; you will not use a random name again or be barred from uploading, correct? -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 00:46, August 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * I know you said it before, I just didn't reply due to you being so rude about it. I did the wikia a favour by uploading the image, so simply saying can you rename it doesn't hurt.. TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 01:32, August 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * Neither time should be considered rood (feel free to ask others about it).
 * By not following the image policy, you're also hindering the time that mods can use to do their own contributions. And if everyone didn't bother with the image names, we would have a lot of clashes and random unused files everywhere. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 01:47, August 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * I understand that if that happened, then mods would spend a lot of time editing images, but you could have simply asked me to rename it, or replace the old one instead of threatening with an image ban. It isn't as if I uploaded the image with an incorrect name out of malice... TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 01:54, August 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * I asked you to follow the image policy twice; and what to do if the image under the correct name already exists once. The only time I mentioned a ban was after you ignored and removed the instructions twice, and that was a last resort to just get you to comment on why you removed it, and if you have acknowledged the image poicy. -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 02:03, August 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * Removed it before? I deleted the one you said about an hour ago, but I never saw that you posted one before that... and as I said, I read it before, but I deleted it because it was crass... TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 02:06, August 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * First time and Second time. Do I need to ask Dinoguy to see if they were considered rood? -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 02:12, August 27, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Question
Because they're unofficial Chinese scanlations. Rod (talk • contribs) 17:42, November 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * Can you please explain? TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 17:43, November 7, 2011 (UTC)

devack deck
Hey, scarecrow! If you are online right now, could you please put add devack's decks from tag force 6 today? I really want to play the tcg playable ones. Good luck and please respond back! Guardmaster (talk • contribs) 16:36, November 20, 2011 (UTC)

Can't
I added what I know from watching videos/playing on my friends PSP yesterday and dueling him, sorry. Also my friend only has his first deck. TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 19:03, November 20, 2011 (UTC)

Heart piece
Are you sure he beat two duelists? Each participants begins with one piece, which would mean Bronk defeated only one duelist. --15:29, November 28, 2011 (UTC)

Oh yeah

 * You're right. Il edit it. Totally forgot D:<. Thanks. TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 15:31, November 28, 2011 (UTC)

Shark
There actually is a page for Sharks. I'm not sure how much legitimacy there is to it, though. The same person who was (incorrectly) tagging those articles was the one who created it. --Golden Key (talk • contribs) 21:38, December 5, 2011 (UTC)


 * Just because there is a page for them, it doesn't mean that they're an archetype. Apart from having several WATER monsters with Shark in their name, there isn't anything else to them. In addition, the archetype box linked to Ryoga Kamishiro's page. Eitherway, I will remove them for now because in my opinion, they're not an archetype and several other "archetypes" have been removed for the same reason. TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 21:41, December 5, 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm also unsure as to whether or not it should be a page. It could be like Monarchs and Warrior. Let's ask an administrator who speaks Japanese. :)--Golden Key (talk • contribs) 21:56, December 5, 2011 (UTC)


 * Monarchs are similar and have a deck type thus a page for them is understandable. Personally I think the Warrior page should be deleted because there isn't support for monsters which have "Warrior" in their name. Eitherway, Shark's aren't big enough to be a contender to the Warrior page, and Monarchs work in a similar way. TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 22:10, December 5, 2011 (UTC)


 * I agree it shouldn't have a page yet. And "Monarchs" have no support either, Scarecrow. So if "Warriors" shouldn't be here, neither should Monarchs. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:20, December 5, 2011 (UTC)


 * I understand that, but I said in an earlier post that I understand that they have a page because they work in a similar manner. Most of the Warrior monsters belong to either their own archetype e.g. Magnet Warriors. I think calling them an archetype isn't correct, maybe calling them a 'series' or something along the lines of that because aren't archetypes defined by having specific support etc? TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 22:23, December 5, 2011 (UTC)


 * They are a series. We're still in the process of converting such articles to use that term. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 23:08, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

decklists
Hey Scarecrow, Here's a good japanese site for finding Tag Force 6 Decklists

Here's the address: 

By the way I'm going to help you put them in too. However, the site may still be in progress. Good luck! Guardmaster (talk • contribs) 19:56, December 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the link but... I can't read the site. Is there any way you could link me to the exact page which contains the decklists? Thanks. TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 21:28, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

Shark
There is an anonymous who claims that there was no Monster Reborn in Shark's hand in episode 34. Could you please provide a screenshot which shows otherwise? --109.92.8.162 (talk) 12:12, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

Decks to Focus on
Hey, Scarecrow. The site almost got all the 5d's character's decks (the only one not availible is Dark Signer Greiger). Could you focus on getting Greiger's Decks along with the video original characters? I'll put the available decks down. Thanks! Guardmaster (talk • contribs) 22:35, December 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * I said before, I can't read Japanese so I don't know how to navigate around the website which you gave me. TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 22:53, December 24, 2011 (UTC)

I mean to play the game to the get the decks. I'll put the others from the site down. Guardmaster (talk • contribs) 22:56, December 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't have the game. I usually get the information off of my friend who has the game, but he has yet to complete any of the Dark Signer's storylines so I put down what I know of the decks from when i've seen him duel them. TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 22:58, December 24, 2011 (UTC)

How did you get Roman's and Devack's decks then? Guardmaster (talk • contribs) 23:04, December 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * The Neo Ark Cradle forum. NeoArkadia posted a few of the character decks. TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 23:36, December 24, 2011 (UTC)

you want to set up a link to geisha world-- 22:01, December 28, 2011 (UTC)

Heartland Fairground Clown
Someone nominated an article you've created, Heartland Fairground Clown, for deletion. If you think it should be kept, can you please say why on the talk page. -- Deltaneos (talk) 18:26, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Misty
I was referring to the addition of those subheaders. That's precisely why they shouldn't be there - she used no other Decks. He had no Turbo Deck, so need need to use a "Ground" subheader. She only had a Deck as a Dark Signer, no need for that subheader either. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:32, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * The Dark Signer header was there to refer to the season because you said to put the season names rather than numbers. TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 03:34, January 1, 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes, but not if they only Duel in one arc. She only Dueled in that one arc. If you like, you could put "In the Dark Signer arc" at the beginning of the text. The problem is the subheaders. A Header shouldn't have only one subheader - and a subheader should not have only one sub-sub-header either. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:35, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * I still think putting the arc they use the deck in is useful for the viewers of the wikia, even if the duelist only duels in one arc as it allows them to identify which arc they are in easily. TheScarecrow14 (talk • contribs) 03:37, January 1, 2012 (UTC)


 * I would argue that it is just as easily identified in the prose, rather than a header. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 03:38, January 1, 2012 (UTC)