Forum:Contradicting Rulings On Wiki?

There seems to be a contradiction involving the following cards: Skill Drain, Exiled Force, and Forbidden Chalice.

The contradiction is that it says when you use Forbidden Chalice on Exiled Force, it can still activate its effect and tribute itself, but then it CANNOT destroy a monster on the field since its effect activates on the field.

When you use Skill Drain, Exiled force can still activate its effect and tribute itself, and it CAN destroy a monster on the field since its effect activates in the graveyard.

So the contradictions are if it can destroy a monster and where exactly that destroying a monster effect activates. Gotta pick one, can't be both =P.

On a side note, I grew up learning that Exiled's effect happens in the graveyard and the tributing itself is a cost, therefore it should be able to go through Forbidden Chalice and Skill Drain. However, on the ruling page, I do see one of the sources for the Forbidden Chalice on Exiled Force comes from an official TCG Konami ruling, so yeah, I'm guessing someone put the wrong ruling up or maybe Konami judges are misruling? xD

-Masterzet (the ruler and user of skill drain decks)--now you see why this post is important and affects me xD Andy Nguyen (talk • contribs) 08:37, July 25, 2011 (UTC)