User talk:BritishCynic

Rumours of my untimely demise have been greatly exaggerated. I now have a new Job, I will be back on when time allows.

''Also See: User talk:TwoTailedFox/Archive0001, 0002, 0003, 0004, 0005, 0006

Back from the Graveyard.
I am surprise that you have returning to your founder site. Welcome back, Founder! *bow* -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:44, June 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * Indeed, DeltaNeos, DinoMan1000 and few other activate Admins have keep this site in well shape while you were gone. ATEM is quite a perfection sniper when coming to Ruling conflict and post in the unofficial rulings. I respect them all. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:55, June 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * I would also like to welcome you back. I can't wait to see what your new contributions will be. Glittersword  Talk • Contributions 18:46, July 11, 2011 (UTC)

Buch 10 Promo
hi, do you remember where you took information about this set? because it seems to be the same as this one. i know that may be difficult to remember, but could it be this source?? /////||||||\\\\\ Jump Enemy (talk • contribs) 00:49, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

welp, as i said, i am impressed Thedarkdoor (talk • contribs) 00:28, June 6, 2011 (UTC)thedarkdoor

Two Things
Hmm...not really sure. I hadn't thought about it but I guess that's another thing I should do. Also, "appears to have" makes it sound as if it's not actually true-information on an encyclopedia should definitely be true unless otherwise stated.


 * You may be right but it still seems wrong.


 * I agree with BobaFett on this. It don't think it reads well when nearly every sentence n a character description starts with stuff like "it seems", "apparently" and "it appears". I haven't actually read the chapter/seen the episode, so I'm not positive about this particular example but for situations like this in general...
 * If Astral indeed acts scared around cats, I think it's fine to say that he is afraid of cats. We don't need to accommodate for the tiny chance of a plot twist that he was pretending or secretly afraid of something else, unless characters actually question his fear or it's otherwise hinted that he wasn't really afraid. Otherwise we may as well second guess everything about the series for things like a character could be dreaming, lying or secretly an impostor. If later episodes do indeed reveal that he wasn't actually afraid of cats, we can update the article and I don't think we're at fault for saying he was afraid previously, because it's what we were supposed to be believing while watching the show and weren't given any reason to doubt it.
 * I've seen many situations like this on another wiki; two characters turn out to the same person or characters said to be dead turn out to be alive. etc. The editors weren't at fault for saying the characters were separate people or saying the characters were dead, unless characters were shown to question either of these or there was in-show evidence that hinted they could be the same person or alive. -- Deltaneos (talk) 14:32, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

fix tuner list please
Hello. Is there any chance of recognising this list? http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Ask/-5B-5BMonster-20Type::Tuner-20Monster-7C-7CTuner-20Monsters-5D-5D/-3FJapanese-20Name/-3FCard-20Type/-3FAttribute/-3FLevel/-3FType/-3FATK/-3FDEF/-3FCard-20Number

and this please

http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Ask/-5B-5BClass-201::Official-5D-5D-20-5B-5BMonster-20Type::Tuner-20Monster-7C-7CTuner-20Monsters-5D-5D/-3FJapanese-20Name/-3FCard-20Type/-3FAttribute/-3FLevel/-3FType/-3FATK/-3FDEF/-3FCard-20Number

it's the list of all tuner monsters.

Thanks in advance.--Stereotypical Gamer (talk • contribs) 11:57, June 8, 2011 (UTC)

Re;Obelisk
I realize that. But if that's the case, it needs to be added using the vglore parameters for that game, not the anime lore parameter. They have nothing to do with one another. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:28, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Request here
I would like to let you check this Forum out... Thanks for take your time to realize the foolish. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:32, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

W Nebula Meteor
You do realize that Solemn Warning and Royal Oppression miss the timing on trying to negate W Nebula Meteor, right? Tea-Girl08  15:14, June 23, 2011 (EST)
 * I'm not concerned with the accuracy of the ruling, I'm concerned with the content of the website it came from. If it is indeed true that the external website cannot be accessed except by those, that will be looked into. The ruling should be flagged for further investigation into it's source, rather than summarily removed.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 19:18, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see. So I should be flagging instead of re-editing, my mistake. Then can you please tell me how to flag a ruling? Tea-Girl08  15:26, June 23, 2011 (EST)


 * Thank you, the template really helps.

Tea-Girl08  15:57, June 23, 2011 (EST)

Re: Ruby Text
Thanks for pointing that out to me--it makes typing out the kana above kanji so much easier/quicker. And sweet talk archives, you've really contributed a lot to the site. Bhigpx (talk • contribs) 19:16, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Robert ignored your words
That user just make it wrong each way. Should suspense him for like a week? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:12, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * I already have for 3 days for him to cool off. If he continues to misbehave after the ban expires, a week may well be the next step.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 20:13, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * As I sensed that coming, you know, I am a feline. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:14, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Redirects
Well, first of all, the redirects are already on the main page of the set. + I'll upload every french scans of that set tomorrow so I was planning to add everything after that (included every other languages sets and redirects). I'm not Superman haha. Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 21:10, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah yeah I got it, I really can't do it now but i'll do it tomorrow. It can be very long to add the set to every card in every language and then create the redirect for every language but yeah i'll do it . Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 21:17, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Card Rulings:W Nebula Meteorite
Hi TwoTailedFox! I'm sorry but I don't think that new template is a good idea for the Ruling pages. First the way it looks now it seems exactly the same with the template of UDE's unofficial Rulings, and I think this will cause a lot of confusion to people. Second the "This Card Ruling has been flagged by a user on the Yu-Gi-Oh! Wikia as unverified by Konami, incorrect, misleading, or otherwise false and/or lacking detail in it's explanation." sounds like anyone unfamiliar with the Rulings or not can add this template to any Ruling that he thinks it is incorrect, even if the Ruling is way to far from wrong.

What I want to say is that I don't think it's a good idea for anyone to add a Template on any Ruling they want, just because they think it is wrong or it should work otherwise, ect. It will cause a lot of mess!

Btw, from what I see, this template mostly can be used for the Judge Program Forum Rulings (as those are the only ones that cannot be viewed by anyone). What I suggest is to not add any Template to the Ruling Pages, leave the Rulings as they are, and if someone have doubts about a Ruling we can give him another visible source to check, or if there isn't any, we can give him a picture of the Judge Program Forum's threat of that Ruling (That's not problem for me to do)!

Also, about the "W Nebula Meteorite" Ruling, I can add it also in the OCG Rulings with an visible official source. So it don't think there will be anymore problems with it. If you only can remove the protection so I can add the OCG Ruling. Thanks!

ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 23:53, June 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Very well, lets allow people to add a template like that to the Rulings of the Judge Program Forum if they have doubts about them as they cannot see the source. But is a picture of the thread with the Ruling (PrintScreen) enough proof to confirm the Ruling's authenticity and remove the template? If so then no problem from my part! ATEMVEGETA  (Talk) 17:23, June 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * Err, what do you mean that must be by a Konami's employee? The answer of the ruling or the uploaded picture?


 * Also you mean that even with a picture of the ruling the template will still be on it until it appears on an official site?


 * ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 17:52, June 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * The difference with UDE's Rulings and Konami's Rulings is that UDE's Rulings are now unofficial. Normally we shouldn't keep them in the Card Rulings but since without them the people wouldn't know how the most of the cards work we decided to keep them but in the Previously Official Rulings category. Thus the reason why we created their template.


 * Also, in case that you don't know, the Judge Program Forum is also an official site of rulings (there is proof of that). So if the picture is enough proof for the ruling's authenticity, then this makes it that the ruling has been confirmed that exists in an official site. Thus no need for the template. No?


 * Just to let you know, Konami made the Judge Program Forum as a site for judges that can get official answers to their questions. The rulings it has are as much official as the ones that appear in Konami's Gameplay FAQ in the pdf files. Also those questions can only be answered by Konami's employees and not by the judges.


 * ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 18:22, June 24, 2011 (UTC)

Hmmm, I see! So the template is on until the Rulings in the Judge Program Forum become viewable by anyone. Well, then shouldn't be better if we add this template then to all Judge Program Forum's Rulings instead of waiting for a Wikia's user to add it? Also what if instead of a template we had a note saying that those Rulings are unverified blah blah? The note could be either at the end of the Rulings or in the header. Something like this. ATEMVEGETA (Talk) 08:00, June 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, it looks better now with the note. But that colored board looks somehow .....! Is it really necessary for the Rulings to be in a board, or it's the same with just only the template? Like this. I think it should be excellent that way! ATEMVEGETA  (Talk) 22:23, June 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * Nevermind then! I'll leave it as it is for now, at least until the Judge Program Forum become viewable for anyone or find another way to prove those Rulings' legality. Thanks! ATEMVEGETA  (Talk) 22:46, June 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * One more little thing! The bullet at the start of the (first) Rulings doesn't appear like Wikia's style bullet, as all the other Rulings have. I don't know what must be changed in the template. Can you fix it? Thanks! ATEMVEGETA  (Talk) 22:59, June 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * Great! Thanks for your help! ATEMVEGETA  (Talk) 00:09, June 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * One last thing! Can you remove the extra space that appears between the orange board and the OCG Rulings header? There should be only one space there. The other must be somewhere in the template! ATEMVEGETA  (Talk) 00:27, June 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * Excellent! Thanks again! ATEMVEGETA  (Talk) 18:03, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

You get a "Made of Win"
Good catch on episodes 77 and 78! Always heartening to see a fellow editor. Apparently, that fellow decided it'd be fun to have Joey play the Seal of Orichalcos in episode 75. Sounds like the factual equivalent of Whack-a-Mole, but oh well, c'est la vie. --Okamoto Takeo (talk • contribs) 18:52, June 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * It's a vandal using a Dynamic IP address. I think I've blocked him about 25 times by now. He keeps coming back. He's very persistent. If he edits in that a card appears in episode 75 when it doesn't, he also edit the card appearances page for that card and add it to the character's decklist. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:01, June 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * You can range block when the IPs are all numbered closely. In this case 166.137.128.0/20 blocks all IPs from 166.137.128.0 to 166.137.143.255. Instructions are in the first link. You have to be careful when using it. If you're not sure if you're doing it right, just let me know. -- Deltaneos (talk) 20:44, June 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * That's the problem. They are rarely numbered closely (though I'll look into rangeblocking if that comes up again). So it could be a bunch of people, but the pattern is consistent enough that I believe it's one person. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 20:56, June 25, 2011 (UTC)

Renaming?
Why did you rename the sets from WC11? Here, it's never been named with -VG. Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 17:43, June 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Do I really have to rename everything? The template at the bottom of every page shows that it's from the video game. It would be easier to just add a sentence at the top of every page saying "this set is from the ... Video Game. What do you think? Wilimut Talk Mail Paris, 20:31, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

Parameters
Why are you removing the "image" and "jpanimelore" parameters? Someone will add images eventually, so there's no reason to remove the parameter and III usually has the lores up within a few days. Just because there is nothing in them right now doesn't mean their won't be. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 18:31, June 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. Thanks. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 19:49, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

Irritated Article
" Cards " should be deleted already, it's still building by useless users (unregistered) that only copied out of "Card layout". -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  19:34, July 1, 2011 (UTC)


 * "Soaring Eagle Above the Searing Land" should be lock up and you should give the user a long hard talk because he just continued to screw up that article I just showed. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:49, July 1, 2011 (UTC)

Oh, jeez...

 * Every single GLD4 image I added needed to have "-LE" in front? I didn't even realize. I'll help changing the Card Gallery/Article pages later, but I can't rename the images themselves, and there's 45 odd left. ._.;--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 10:48, July 2, 2011 (UTC)

Monster Reborn
"Guardian Dreadscythe" was one of few monster cards that "Monster Reborn" had used on, though she required "Guardian Eatos" to dead on the field. Also "Blue-Eyes Shining Dragon", again, summoned via Yugi Muto/Yami Yugi in the movie - as it needed "Blue-Eyes Ultimate Dragon" to be sacrifice in order to Special Summon onto the field. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:10, July 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, my honour Founder, I would like to remind ya that "Guardian Dreadscythe's" Summon Condition is similar to "Black Luster Soldier - Envoy of the Beginning". If BLS - Envoy of the Beginning cannot be Special Summoned from Graveyard, therefore the former also cannot be Summoned from the Graveyard as well. It happening same with "Blue-Eyes Shining Dragon", but I don't want to shove up the bullshit up your bums - I just want to give you a prove that was the one the unregistered user tried to put up on the "Monster Reborn" article. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:24, July 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * So, you're telling me that BLS - Envoy and Shining Dragon are Semi-Nomi or was I just confused? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:36, July 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * Alright, therefore only "Blue-Eyes Shining Dragon" cannot be Special Summon except by Tribute Ultimate Dragon. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:47, July 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * Got it, Founder, so now I understand them apart. And I should put that up in my Judge Ruling to prevent the further confusedly. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:51, July 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * Black Luster Soldier - Envoy of the Beginning; Condition - also "Blue-Eyes Shining Dragon" is including in that article. So feel free check it out and you have my permission to mend it and make it more clearly for anyone to understand. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:56, July 3, 2011 (UTC)

RE: BLS
Well, sorry, I should forgot about that - I should including "Various Barrier Statues except for Heaven" instead. My bad. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:57, July 3, 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I was unaware they changed for everyone

Anime and manga appearances
Both commas and slashes work for separation, but Dinoguy decided that commas should be used for better readability while editing. He did after the parameter had been using slashes for quite a while, so there are many pages to be updated. Using slashes automatically places the page in Category:Anime and manga appearances transclusions to be updated. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:44, July 4, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah, you can smack me a good one for that. I'm going to run Dinobot through the category eventually, and then remove support for the slashes and extra unnamed parameters (the original style, before I figured out #arraymap), which will result in much simpler code in the templates. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 02:32, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Image policy (-)
Just in case you haven't noticed, the Image policy states that dashes (- – — － −) are to be removed from the monster name. (I think it's so that Template:OCG-TCG card image does not stuff up). -Falzar FZ- (talk page|useful stuff) 05:58, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Curse Report
Just to let you be information that someone post an insult in Forum:Help me?. Try look at the history for that stupidity user/unregistered IP user and let's see what you can do then. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  17:14, July 10, 2011 (UTC)

Butthead User
This new butthead user just won't to quit argue with me and about Formula Synchron's Anime Effect declare; with us said that F.S. can using effect to summon any Synchro Monster during opponent's turn while he declined it, said only that he had a power to draw a card once per turn. Can you making him eat his own dirt please? Thanks for leaning me your ears. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  21:29, July 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * TFF isn't back yet, as far as I know. As for the issue at hand, it looks to me that the lore in the anime artwork is shorter than it is in the OCG. So that user may be right. I don't know for sure though. Note that in his edit summary, he clarified that its "Shooting Star Dragon" that lets itself be Synchro Summoned during the opponent's turn. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:00, July 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * Then why did "Formula Synchron" had that line when I came around at this minute? -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:40, July 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * It's possible that quite simply, no one noticed the error before he did (again, not sure if it is an error or not). Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 22:49, July 22, 2011 (UTC)

New Idiot Spammer
Can you please smacking this user - - down for put up an unofficial source rulings on the Tuningware's Ruling Article, I revived up to three times and warned him twice (first time after his mistake). Turned out he didn't listen and just shove them back in. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  23:16, July 25, 2011 (UTC)

Blog Question
Just kind of "Wikia Question" rather than Yu-Gi-Oh one; I am curious why this Wikia lacked "Blog" article that all other I had been visiting do? I am not trolling or revolution against your decide of not including it, just to know why. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  16:44, July 30, 2011 (UTC)

Anoying Spamming user
I dint know who else to talk to this about, so i thought i'd tell you. This user http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/User:Charon_of_styx keeps arguing and spamming stuff everywhere that you can special summon cards from the graveyard like Red-Eyes Darkness Metal Dragon using it's summoning condition. He has become a nuisance on the chat. Could you please resolve the issue? Alboono (talk • contribs) 05:29, July 31, 2011 (UTC)

Move Conflict
Hey, Check it out! And no, it's not me who moved it. I tried to move it back, and it was locking. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:38, August 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * Oh never mind, it was someone who just moved it back in normal. So just crush the pointless redirect if possible. If you didn't get it, then my apologize for put up this silly message here. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  20:42, August 13, 2011 (UTC)

World Standard Championship?
I don't suppose you remember anything about this, do you? 「 ディノ 奴 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 03:34, September 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * *poke* 「 ディノ 奴 千？！ 」? · ☎ Dinoguy1000 03:37, October 20, 2011 (UTC)

Civilian Conversation
I am absolute understand that I should cease being that insane in that article you caught. I am just little tired of being overshadowed by them who repeat what I just mentioned. It's like they had no common sense to just absolute understand what I was saying and just leave it there. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:18, October 25, 2011 (UTC)


 * Acknowledge, founder. But I am not blame you or anyone; it's just my trait that I am suffering at the minute. I am actually blame myself for speak [sic] like that. -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  22:25, October 25, 2011 (UTC)

Found a vandal.
Right here. They've also registered as well, it seems. Already undid the vandalism, just thought I'd notify you so you can take action. I'dve delivered a warning myself, but I don't think it'd be particularly effective. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 14:11, November 20, 2011 (UTC)

Another couple of vandals
Right here.

Also, this user has been making edits that go against the manual of style, and has been warned and told to use the dub names when editing anime articles. I also asked that they read the manual of style before making any more edits; both warnings have gone unheeded. As such, I ask that you deal with this as you see fit. As for the edits, they have already been undone. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 20:57, November 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't think TTF is back yet. Also, Falzar offered to do a bot run to the fix the names, so it's really not that big of any issue. You don't need to inform every single admin about it. Cheesedude (talk • contribs) 01:58, November 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * It was a bout of irritation, I apologize. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 02:00, November 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Cheesedude just detailed exactly the reason I haven't responded. I'm not particularly enthusiastic on blocking IP addresses, because that can cause issues for legitimate users. It also appeared as if the issues highlighted were solved, thus requiring no intervention nor comment from me.

While I may seem away, I check my talk page whenever it's edited to check I don't miss anything important. This wasn't important.--TwoTailedFox (My Talk Page) 18:18, November 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Understood. Lord Grammaticus (talk • contribs) 18:20, November 23, 2011 (UTC)

Number 39: Utopia Replay
I'm not sure how to phrase this, but we technically do have a ruling on the replay scenario with Utopia, "After you’ve announced your attacking monster and the attack target monster during a Battle Step, the attack target might be removed from the field, or a new monster may be placed on the opponent’s side of the field before the Damage Step, due to a card’s effect. This causes a "Replay"...

And since Utopias effect makes him kill himself before the damage step, a replay does occur.

So I just thought I'd let someone know this and see if they can fix it (the ruling is in a green box) since the last time I fixed a ruling (they had the wrong monster typed in and all I did was type in the correct monster) a few people here complained at me for fixing it. So better safe then sorry I'd thought I'd let you know and see if you can do anything. Please and thank you and sorry if this isn't phrased accurately.

Tea-Girl08  4:03, December 28, 2011 (EST)

from ycm maker wikia
I know it is not appropriate to talk about it right here, but i have to try to contact you from here. Since you are an admin at that wikia, please appoint someone to become admin, so they have the right to clean the wikia, there are too much junk articles there. Bakurayuri (talk • contribs) 15:57, February 17, 2012 (UTC)

Hey can i be an admin plz?

Last Night ...
Hey its me ^^. Sorry 'bout last night, I got a little... Over-exerted... My apolgies.I'm not doing a Boris and being nice when I want to, I'm nice now because I feel I haven't been nice enough, so from now on, I will contribute more and try and make necessary edits wherever I can. And my final question, quite an obvious one, when will I be un-kicked ?????? Thats really bugging me, because the Beyblade wikians are really quite boring alot of the time. They keep trying to cyber-kill me, which I must admit IS NOT amusing in the slightest. Thanks for metaphorically listening, Hope to metaphorically see you soon ! A bit of love from the heart of -Charlie --SolitaryRageDemonCharlie (talk • contribs) 05:31, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

I tried once. I just gave up and burst into tears after that. I am sorry for what I've done. I have cooled down. I had a slight misunderstanding with your message, I didnt get the part where you sais something about having been lenient towards me for too long, or something along those lines. I have stuck to what I said, I have edited. --SolitaryRageDemonCharlie (talk • contribs) 22:06, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

Rescue Cat/Winged Dragon of Ra
I don't know that "Rescue Cat" can search out both form of "The Winged Dragon of Ra"... I mean the one you recently switch over to that... -- F  r  e  d  C  a  t  02:03, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

Will you unban me now?

Sorry....forgot to specify myself. Will you unban me now? Cd5464

I have never heard of such a ridiculous response in my life. Banning someone wont grant a change in behavior. Unbanning may provide different results with someone like me...consider it. I will be appreciated enough to try ceasing racial comments within the chat. Try it out. What do you have to lose? You can immediately ban me again if it happens.... Cd5464