Talk:Ancient Pixie Dragon

When?

 * When can you "destroy 1 card"? Once per turn? When it's activated?--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 20:59, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * Manga logic - I would say that this dragon has one time using. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  21:33, June 18, 2012 (UTC)

is it like once you activate the field spell card then you destroy 1 card on the field. --69.181.60.66 (talk) 00:29, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * Maybe that would be most like correct way to doing it - but we don't know what exact how she can doing that. -- i  F  r  e  d  C  a  t  00:30, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * The lore doesn't specify, but she uses its effect on Yu-Gi-Oh! 5D's - Ride 035. She activates a Field Spell, then destroy a card. So I guess "When a Field Spell card is activated..." is more appropriate.LegenaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 00:41, June 21, 2012 (UTC)

Merge or New Name?
So can we actually merge this card and the Ancient Fairy Dragon page. They have the same appearance, both are Synchro, LIGHT, LV7, 2100 3000 ATK DEF. The only difference is their effect, which we always have here in this wiki but we dont have separate article for every card that has different effect. We do not have separated pages for Call of the Haunted whos 1st anime effect was "revive a monster and make them Zombies". So why is this card having a separate page because of having manga effect? SharkTenjo 13:18, December 16, 2012 (UTC)


 * They're separate cards. "Fairy Dragon, Ancient" is confirmed for release in Premium Pack 15.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 13:20, December 16, 2012 (UTC)


 * Oh, and they have different Japanese names.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 13:20, December 16, 2012 (UTC)


 * Then if they are different, shouldn't we change the name of this card? It indeed makes confusion and not so long ago, its name was "Fairy Dragon, Ancient" which makes it different to "Ancient Fairy Dragon", any reason why it was changed? SharkTenjo 13:25, December 16, 2012 (UTC)


 * If I had to take a guess, I'd say this is the English manga name of the card.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 13:26, December 16, 2012 (UTC)


 * Any proof of that? If we don't then I say we revert it back to "Fairy Dragon, Ancient" SharkTenjo 13:33, December 16, 2012 (UTC)


 * Deltaneos gave his reasons in the edit history, something to do with the apposition of cards. I believe he was reffering to the argument on Yami's talk page. Neos01 (talk • contribs) 14:04, December 16, 2012 (UTC)


 * That's something different altogether. The name was originally changed from "Fairy Dragon, Ancient" to "Ancient Fairy Dragon (manga)" by Spectertvx, who said that it was the English name in his edit summary.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 14:07, December 16, 2012 (UTC)


 * Oh ok. Didn't notice that. Neos01 (talk • contribs) 14:09, December 16, 2012 (UTC)


 * We had a different name for this card. We changed it to this 'cause this is the official English name, from Viz's English version of volume 3, so we have to keep this name. When this card comes to the TCG, then it will probably be released with a different name, and then we can change it, and add this name as "|manganame". LegendaryAsariUgetsu (talk • contribs) 14:10, December 16, 2012 (UTC)


 * Can we actually have PROOF that it is named Ancient Fairy Drgaon on the English version of the manga? Like a scan of which it says that they are calling it Ancient Fairy Dragon? i thought this wikia NEEDS to show proof before doing any action -_- SharkTenjo 14:17, December 16, 2012 (UTC)


 * Do you want to buy the manga so you can have your own personal proof? Manga is LegendaryAsariUgetsu's 'department' and he is a trusted user. If he owns a copy of the manga and says that's the name, then that is the name. I've gotten confirmation from NeoArkCradle that that is the name, too, also from someone who owns the manga. The wiki isn't the one kicking up the fuss, you are.--YamiWheeler (talk • contribs) 14:19, December 16, 2012 (UTC)


 * I just want it to be fully confirmed as this wiki always says that it needs proof for posting information. We can't just be going around and changing names and information just because of 1 guy says so. Anyway if NeoArkCradle actually told you then why not post it? SharkTenjo 14:25, December 16, 2012 (UTC)